Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0133, written 4 May 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 4 May 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0133 |
| Deceased | William Simons |
| Coroner | John Ellery |
| Coroner area | Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
1 2 3 4 5 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Chief Executive, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust CORONER I am Mr John Penhale Ellery, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of Shropshire, Telford & Wrekin. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 16th October 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of the late William Arthur John SIMONS, 93 years of age. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 20th and 27th day of April 2021. The conclusion of the inquest was that the deceased died following two falls the second of which was the more significant and preventable. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Simons was admitted to the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital by his GP on the 21st August 2020 where he stayed undergoing treatment. Before that treatment was completed there were two intervening events which caused or contributed to his death. The first was a fall on the 23rd August 2020 on Ward 22 F when he fell having been to the toilet. The nurse who escorted him waited outside but was called away to another patient. Mr Simons having finished left the toilet without using the call bell. He was found lying on the floor. It was later discovered he had fractured his hip and underwent surgery. On the 8th September 2020 then on Ward 22 T&O Mr Simons had a further fall when he was returned to his bed having been taken by wheelchair for a Doppler scan on his left leg. On returning Mr Simons to the ward no one was available and the porter assisted Mr Simons without a nurse. Mr Simons walked about 2 meters with his zimmer frame but lost his balance and fell back hitting the back of his head on the floor. Both falls contributed to his death with the second the more significant of the two. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) The Tele-tracking system a) It was not clear what the purpose was of a doctor expressing a preferred option of transport (i.e. by trolley/bed) if that doctor did not have sufficient information to make it. b) Whilst it became clear that that option was subject to review by the nursing staff on the ward it was not clear why a doctor would not either liaise with the nursing staff or expressly make it clear that the nursing staff should make that assessment and inform the porters accordingly. c) The system on the day led to confusion and a breakdown in communication with the patient being taken instead by wheelchair with his zimmer frame. 6 7 8 9 (2) Assistance. It was established that assisting a patient to move meant by a member of the nursing staff and not a porter. It should be clear what a porter is to do if no nursing staff is available. (3) Risk awareness. The porter did not know the patient’s level of risk of falls. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 29th June 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons, Lyons Davidson, solicitors for the family. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Mr John Penhale Ellery Senior Coroner Shropshire, Telford & Wrekin 4th May 2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Chief Executive’s Office Royal Shrewsbury Hospital Mytton Oak Road Shrewsbury SY3 8XQ Date 24 June 2021 Mr J P Ellery HM Senior Coroner Shropshire, Telford & Wrekin Area Shirehall Abbey Foregate Shrewsbury SY2 6ND Dear Mr Ellery, Thank you for your letter dated 4 May 2021 issued under Regulation 28: Report to prevent future deaths, in relation to the risks you identified through the Inquest touching the death of the late William Arthur John Simons. I write to provide assurance that we have taken steps to resolve the issues highlighted in your letter. 1. Teletracking a. It was not clear what the purpose was of a doctor expressing a preferred option of transport (i.e.by trolley/bed/chair) if that doctor did not have sufficient information to make it. b) Whilst it became clear that, that option was subject to review by the nursing staff on the ward it was not clear why a doctor would not either liaise with the nursing staff or expressly make it clear that the nursing staff should make that assessment and inform the Porters accordingly. c)The system on the day led to confusion and a breakdown in communication with the patient being taken instead by wheelchair with his zimmer frame. Actions Taken: The mode of transport to the department for the investigation for an inpatient is specified on the form by the doctor making the request. This should be done in discussion with the nursing staff. However, the patient’s condition may change from the time of the request to the investigation being undertaken and so a further assessment should be made by the registered nurse (RN) caring for the patient at the time of transfer of the patient. When Mr Simons was going for his investigation, it was appropriate for him to go in a wheelchair as he had been mobilising with the assistance of one member of staff and was comfortable sitting in a chair. However, there was no process in place for this assessment 1 or documentation of it. Following the Serious Incident investigation a process was put in place whereby a form was generated by Radiology for the Porters to take to the ward for sign off by the Registered Nurse prior to transfer and on return to the ward. This included: Patient Details Any Infection Prevention Control concerns Mode of transfer Whether patient required escort and if so if this is a Registered Nurse, Student or Healthcare Assistant. To be signed by the RN prior to transfer and on return Further actions taken since 4 May: A review of the form has taken place with all key staff, to ensure this is a dynamic risk assessment, and there is clear documentation for the RN caring for the patient prior to the patient being transferred to and from an investigation/procedure. A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Transporting Patients to and from Radiology has been put in place and this new process has been included in that (enclosed). Snapshot audits of forms have been carried out by the Trust’s Quality Matrons. Audit results will be discussed at ward managers meetings to highlight any areas of concern. The process, including roles and responsibilities, will be included in a new wider Hospital Transfer Policy. This has been drafted and is currently going through the Trust’s ratification process. 2. Assistance It was established that assisting a patient to move meant by a member of the nursing staff and not a Porter. It should be clear what a Porter is to do if no nursing staff are available. This was communicated as part of the SI and Porters DO NOT transfer patients from chair to wheelchair or bed without the assistance of a nurse when being transferred off or onto the ward. Action taken: As part of the response to the Regulation 28 this has been recommunicated across the Trust via: Trust wide safety alert (attached) A discussion at a Ward Manager’s meeting with the Director of Nursing on 12 May 2021 to ensure that a Nurse (either a Registered Nurse or a Healthcare Assistant) always assists the Porter with the transfer of the patient on their return to the ward from another department 2 A discussion with all Porters with the Head of Portering In addition a letter has been sent to each individual Porter outlining that the responsibility for the safe transfer of the patient from chair to wheelchair or from wheelchair to chair or bed, is the responsibility of the nursing staff caring for the patient. If a Nurse is not available the Porter should take the patient in the wheelchair to the ward desk and request Nurse assistance. 3. Risk Awareness. The Porter did not know the patient’s level of risk of falls. Action taken: Falls awareness training is currently being delivered by the Falls Practitioner to all Portering staff. This training includes making Porters aware of visual alerts that patients at risk of falls have in place, for example yellow wrist bands and icons both at their bed space and on the patient safety screens near the nurses’ station. The expectations around undertaking falls awareness training for Porters will be included in the Procedure for Managing Inpatient Falls. This training will now be delivered to Portering staff on induction and 3 yearly as part of statutory mandatory training for Porters. The training, in combination with a clear briefing from the Registered Nurse to the Porter transferring the patient, should ensure the Porter is aware of the individual risk for the patient being transferred. Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention. I hope you are assured that I have taken them seriously and investigated them appropriately. If I can provide any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above address. Yours sincerely Chief Executive 3
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.