Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0297, written 27 Sep 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 27 Sep 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0297 |
| Deceased | Liam Lyes-Watson |
| Coroner | John Ellery |
| Coroner area | Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Chief Executive Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Trust Headquarters St. George's Hospital Corporation Street Stafford ST16 3SR CORONER I am Mr John Penhale Ellery, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of Shropshire, Telford & Wrekin. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 1st November 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Liam Joseph LYES-WATSON, 26. The inquest concluded with evidence being heard on the 19th of July 2022 with subsequent reasons in writing following a review of body worn video footage. The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide. The medical cause of death was Ia) Fatal Opioid Toxicity 1 2 3 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the 26th October 2021 Liam was found deceased in , Shrewsbury, Shropshire. There were no suspicious circumstances and no evidence of third party involvement in his death. The inquest heard that Liam had been struggling with his mental health in the weeks preceding his death. He and his mother, and subsequently his step-father, contacted the Access Team on the 20th & 25th October 2021. Following the second telephone call by Liam’s step-father the call handler said that without Liam’s consent they could not take action and if the situation was acute they should ring emergency services as they had previously done on the 20th October 2021. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows; (1) Four areas of concern are; a. The call handler on the second occasion was not trained and needed to take professional advice from a colleague which colleague did not then speak directly with the caller. b. The apparent blanket response that they could not discuss the case with the caller yet they could take information from him. c. With that information more should have been done. d. Consideration should be given whether incoming calls to the Access Team should be recorded. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 22nd November 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons; – mother of deceased I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 6 7 8 9 Mr John Penhale Ellery Senior Coroner Shropshire, Telford & Wrekin 27th September 2022
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Trust Headquarters
St George’s Hospital
Corporation Street
Stafford
ST16 3SR
18th November 2022
Mr J Ellery
Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Shropshire, Telford & Wrekin
Dear Mr Ellery,
RE:
Liam Joseph Lyes-Watson (deceased)
Report to Prevent Future Deaths
Thank you for your letter dated 27th September 2022, reporting a matter to us, in accordance with
Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
May I take this opportunity to reassure you that following Mr Lyes-Watson’s death, we undertook
a thorough investigation into the care delivered by the Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust.
MATTER OF CONCERN:
The four areas of concern were:
a. The call handler on the second occasion was not trained and needed to take professional
advice from a colleague which colleague did not then speak directly with the caller.
b. The apparent blanket response that they could not discuss the case with the caller yet they
could take information from him.
c. With that information more should have been done.
d. Consideration should be given whether incoming calls to the Access Team should be
recorded.
Following discussions within the mental health services in the Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin Care
Group and with corporate services, I am now in a position to respond to the specific concerns raised
during the course of the inquest.
a. The call handler on the second occasion was not trained and needed to take professional
advice from a colleague which colleague did not then speak directly with the caller.
Together we are making life
better for our communities
Response:
The Call Handler has discussed in supervision meetings with the Quality Lead of the Access Team on
a monthly basis since the Serious Incident. All concerns regarding their working practice have been
addressed. These meetings also ensure all Mandatory Training is up to date and learning needs have
been addressed. These meetings have led to the following further training:
• The Call Handler has attended a Stress and Resilience course to help them understand how
to manage their own emotional responses to difficult calls received during their work.
• The Call Handler has attended the course provided by Zero Suicide Alliance.
• The Call Handler is due to attend the Shropshire Council’s Joint Training in Suicide
Prevention Awareness along with a cohort of her peers on 28th Nov 2022.
We have reviewed the training needs for all call handlers. All new call handlers will only shadow
trained colleagues until they have completed their training and then will be supervised whilst taking
calls until assessed as competent by the Quality Lead.
We have reviewed the suicide prevention awareness training for call handlers and the decision has
been made that all call handlers will have received the training below by the end of November 2022
https://www.zerosuicidealliance.com/training. A record of who has received this training will be
held by the team manager and compliance monitored through supervision. In addition to this
training, it has been agreed by the service manager that the training offered by Shropshire Council’s
Joint Training in Suicide Prevention Awareness Suicide prevention | Shropshire Council is
undertaken by all call handlers in the Access Team on a yearly basis and that this is built into their
mandatory training for recording purposes on their electronic staff record.
The aide memoire for call handlers is also included at Annex A.
We have addressed the fact that the shift coordinator did not then speak to Mr Heaton is our
response at C.
b. The apparent blanket response that they could not discuss the case with the caller, yet they
could take information from him.
Response:
We have shared MPFT’s Guide to Carers Confidentiality with all the staff in the Access Team. This
reinforces the message to our staff that a confidentiality breach only occurs when new, person
identifiable, information is given to a third party and does not exclude gathering information from
carers and providing them with support and advice. This message has been reinforced in team
meetings in October 2022.
We are also developing new guidance for carers which contains a range of resources to provide
support to carers in the form of a fact sheet which will include:
Information on how to support their family member to make a safety plan
• Contact details of local organisations who can provide further support
•
• How to support the person they are concerned about to have “hope”
•
• How to seek help in an emergency
Links to approved internet resources such as the Mental Health Foundation
c. With that information more should have been done.
Response:
2
We have further reviewed our actions in relation to the period immediately prior to Liam’s tragic
death, these include:
• The Call Handler is due to attend the Shropshire Council’s Joint Training in Suicide
Prevention Awareness along with a cohort of her peers on 28th November 2022.
• To allow for shift patterns the remaining Call Handlers on Access Team will undertake this
training on 11th January 2023.
• The Call Handlers have been provided with MPFT’s newly published Guide to Carers
Confidentiality and are awaiting the Triangle of Care Training that all staff on the Access and
Crisis Teams will be undertaking to enhance their skills when communicating with family
members in contact with their teams.
• We have reinforced to all call handlers that concerns raised by family members are of high
significance and must be referred to the shift co-ordinator. We have stressed the
importance to all shift co-ordinators that, where family are expressing concerns, they must
speak to them to clinically formulate the changes in behaviours.
• We have reviewed this case with shift co-ordinators and agreed that Liam should have been
referred to the Crisis Team for them to make the decision about further action.
• We recognise that the shift co-ordinator should have spoken to Mr Heaton and listened to
his and Liam’s mother’s concerns. We apologise for this omission and learning from this
missed opportunity has been shared with the Team to ensure all attempts are made to re-
engage service users who disengage.
d. Consideration should be given whether incoming calls to the Access Team should be
recorded.
The Trust and the investigator apologise for mistakenly stating that the calls to the Access Team
are not recorded. All calls are recorded and are kept for audit and quality assurance and kept by
the company who provides the service for 30 days. The Trust has requested that the company
examine whether they can access the recording in question and will be reviewing whether calls
can be kept for a longer period of time.
It is not stated on the call that the calls are recorded for training and audit purposes which is a
matter that we have rectified. In future it has been agreed that when an unexpected death is
reported that the relevant call will be retrieved immediately and reviewed as a part of the
investigation process.
Our Health Informatics Service has confirmed that we are unable to retrieve the specific calls in
relation to this case due the exceeding the period of storage for such recordings. Calls recorded are
erased automatically after 30 days and are not able to be retrieved. We have changed our process
and following the notification of a serious incident within 30 days of contact with MPFT, the Access
Team Manager will retrieve the calls related to the case and secure them in preparation for any
subsequent investigation.
3
I hope this response helps to address your concerns. However, if you require any further information
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive Officer
4
Annex A
Call Handlers Aide Memoire – Self referral
To be used to gather relevant information when patients call to self-refer.
•
Find patient on RiO. IF THEY ARE ALREADY OPEN TO A PATHWAY, AND ARE CALLING
DURING THEIR WORKING HOURS, PROVIDE THE NUMBER FOR THEIR PATHWAY AND
ADVISE THEM TO CALL THE PATHWAY DIRECTLY (END CALL).
• Check demographics of caller and update contact details as required. Take tel. number
caller is calling from. Check caller’s current location. Are they with anyone?
MENTAL HEALTH CONCERNS
• Ask the caller to explain in their own words why they are calling Access and what are
their current Mental Health issues? How do they feel this is affecting them?
• Are they currently receiving / or have previously received support from any other
Mental Health services? (i.e. counselling /IAPT/ Social Services etc.).
• Establish risks:
RISKS
• Have they ever Deliberately Self Harmed? If yes, when was the last time? How do they harm
themselves?
If actively self-harming at the time of call then to go to Shift Co, or if OOH to relevant Crisis
Team and consider calling Emergency Services (follow the UK Triage Tool)
• Are they having any thoughts to harm others?
• Are they having any suicidal thoughts? YES/N0 if Yes is there a plan? If Yes, is the plan
imminent?
(If Yes, call to go to Shift Co, if OOH’s this must be discussed with the relevant Crisis Team).
Place caller on hold and ensure unvalidated progress note is inputted on RiO. Speak with
Access shift co. who will advise how to proceed.
Plan:
Document next steps clearly in progress notes i.e. Referral opened to Access. Tracker sheet
to Shift Co (document full name of Shift Co). Or Tracker sheet updated and passed to Shift
Co etc.
If OOH, discuss with / advice sought from CRHT Shift Co and include any advice given and
steps to be taken either by Access or Client.
5
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.