Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0139, written 5 May 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 5 May 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0139 |
| Deceased | Richard Ormond |
| Coroner | David Reid |
| Coroner area | Worcestershire |
| Category | State Custody related deaths · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
##DW<<ALLTRIM(cSignedBy)>> ##DW<<ALLTRIM(cSignedByTitle)>> for ##DW<<ALLTRIM(cJurisdiction)>> REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1) The Governor, HMP Long Lartin, South Littleton, Worcs. 2) Head of Healthcare at HMP Long Lartin, Practice Plus Group. 1 CORONER am David Donald William REID, HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 23/01/2019 | commenced an investigation into the death of Richard James Ormond. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest hearing on 29th April 2021. The conclusion of the inquest was that Mr. Ormond’s death was drug-related. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On 11.1.19 Mr. Ormond, who had a history of substance misuse whilst in prison, was found in his cell at HMP Long Lartin in a drug-related cardiac arrest. He was transferred to Worcestershire Royal Hospital, where he was declared deceased later that day. A post-mortem examination revealed the following cause of death: 1a synthetic cannabinoid toxicity. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 1) During the course of the inquest I heard evidence that: (a) Pursuant to an agreement between HM Prison Service and West Midlands Ambulance Service (WMAS ): (i) When a Code Blue or Code Red emergency is phoned through to WMAS by a prison, and no answer can be given by the prison control room to the questions “is the patient conscious?” and “is the patient breathing?”, then without further information a Category 2 response will be generated ( i.e. average attendance time of c.18 minutes i} (ii) Should further information be relayed to WMAS by the prison control room that the patient is either in cardiac arrest or peri-arrest, or not breathing, or fitting, or choking, or that CPR is being administered, WMAS will upgrade the response to Category 1 ( i.e. average attendance time of 7 minutes ). (b) In Mr. Ormond’s case: (i) It was immediately apparent to prison officers who found Mr. Ormond in his cell that ##DW<<corAddress>> Tel ##DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>> he was unresponsive and required CPR. When healthcare staff responded to the Code Blue call which went out over the radio, and attended the cell a short time later, they found those officers already giving Mr. Ormond CPR; (ii) The prison control room initially informed WMAS that this was a Code Blue emergency, but were unable to say whether Mr. Ormond was conscious or breathing. The call was therefore given Category 2 status; (iii) There was then a delay of at least 9 minutes before the prison control room provided WMAS with information that Mr. Ormond was not breathing and was requiring CPR, at which point WMAS upgraded the response to Category 1; (iv) In a Safer Custody Learning Bulletin issued in December 2016 to all prison staff, entitled “The Importance of Immediate Emergency Response”, the instruction was given to “Ensure that information on the condition of the patient is passed to the control room as soon as possible so that the ambulance service can be updated.” (v) The 9 minute delay referred to at (iii) above occurred despite the prison officers and healthcare staff who first attended the scene having radios, and therefore being in a position to the control room the information that Mr. Ormond was not breathing and required CPR. 2) The failure to provide WMAS with critical information about Mr. Ormond’s condition, which would have resulted in the call being given the highest category of emergency response, did not appear to have been recognized by either HM Prison Service or Practice Plus Group until this inquest hearing. In the circumstances, there is concern that members of the prison and healthcare staff at HMP Long may still not recognize the need to update WMAS with critical information about a patient’s condition in similar circumstances. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 30" June 2021. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and i Mr. Ormond’s next of kin ). | have also sent it to the following who may find it useful or of interest: 1) HM Chief Inspector of Prisons; 2) Prisons and Probation Ombudsman; 3) Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody; | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. ##DW<<corAddress>> Tel ##DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>> 05/05/2021 Signature Ved David Donald William Reid HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire ##DW<<corAddress>> Tel ##4DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>>
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Director General Prisons HM Prison and Probation Service 8th Floor Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London SW1H 9AJ Email: 29 July 2021 David Donald William Reid Senior Coroner for Worcestershire Worcestershire Coroner Service The Civic Martins Way Stourport on Severn Worcestershire DY13 8UN Dear Mr Reid Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 15 May 2021 following the inquest into the death of Richard James Ormond at HMP Long Lartin on 11 January 2019. I am grateful to you for granting an extension to the statutory deadline for my response. I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr Ormond’s family and I would first like to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority. Following evidence heard at the inquest you have raised concerns in relation to the flow of information conveyed from staff at the scene of an incident to the prison’s Emergency Control Room (ECR), and subsequently to the ambulance service call centre to enable calls to be prioritised appropriately. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. After the inquest, the Governor of HMP Long Lartin undertook a review of all local policies, instructions and protocols relating to emergency incidents to ensure that they conveyed the importance of updating the ECR on a prisoner’s condition as soon as possible and passing this on to the responding ambulance service without delay. All local policies have now been updated and republished, and Governor’s notices have been issued to ensure that all staff are aware of the expectation that they should provide this information and keep in touch with the ECR during an emergency incident. In addition to this, a checklist has been created for staff working in the ECR which contains the vital information required by the ambulance service. The checklist includes immediate information, such as whether or not the prisoner is breathing and if CPR is being administered. There are also some follow up questions, to which staff working in the ECR can gather responses by maintaining contact and obtaining regular updates from staff at the scene. In June 2021 an instruction was given to all custodial managers (CMs) - the staff who carry out incident scene management duties - that they must communicate a concise and accurate report of the prisoner’s condition at the earliest opportunity as a priority action when responding to and managing an emergency incident. Notices to staff have been issued that have made CMs aware of the information required to be shared. In light of this case, and similar cases at other prisons, we have amended the relevant Prison Service Instruction (PSI 03/2013 Emergency Response Codes) to make the requirement to provide information to the control room clearer. The revised version will shortly be issued, alongside pocket cards, and posters for use in control rooms, reminding staff of the information that is required by ambulance services when receiving an emergency call. Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that this response provides assurance that the Governor has taken appropriate action locally, and that national policy has been amended to address the issue that you raised. Yours sincerely Director General for Prisons
Practice Plus Group Hawker House 5-6 Napier Court Napier Road Reading Berkshire RG1 8BW practiceplusgroup.com Mr D.D.W. Reid HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire Worcestershire Coroner’s Court The Civic Martins Way Stourport-on-Severn Worcestershire DY13 8UN 17 June 2021 Dear Mr Reid Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report, Richard James Ormond (Deceased) Thank you for your Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued to Practice Plus Group following the inquest touching upon the death of Richard James Ormond at HMP Long Lartin. Practice Plus Group would like to express its condolences to Mr Ormond’s family and friends. Below you will find each of the matters of concern addressed in turn: Matter of Concern 1. During the course of the inquest I heard evidence that: (a) Pursuant to an agreement between HM Prison Service and West Midlands Ambulance Service (WMAS ): (i) When a Code Blue or Code Red emergency is phoned through to WMAS by a prison, and no answer can be given by the prison control room to the questions "is the patient conscious?" and "is the patient breathing?", then without further information a Category 2 response will be generated (i.e. average attendance time of c.18 minutes); (ii) Should further information be relayed to WMAS by the prison control room that the patient is either in cardiac arrest or peri-arrest, or not breathing, or fitting, or Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Limited. Registered in England No 10498997 Registered Office: Hawker House, 5-6 Napier Court, Napier Road, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8BW choking, or that CPR is being administered, WMAS will upgrade the response to Category 1 (i.e. average attendance time of 7 minutes). (b) In Mr Ormond's case: (i) It was immediately apparent to prison officers who found Mr Ormond in his cell that he was unresponsive and required CPR. When healthcare staff responded to the Code Blue call which went out over the radio, and attended the cell a short time later, they found those officers already giving Mr Ormond CPR; (ii) (The prison control room initially informed WMAS that this was a Code Blue emergency, but were unable to say whether Mr Ormond was conscious or breathing. The call was therefore given Category 2 status; (iii) There was then a delay of at least 9 minutes before the prison control room provided WMAS with information that Mr. Ormond was not breathing and was requiring CPR, at which point WMAS upgraded the response to Category 1; (iv) In a Safer Custody Learning Bulletin issued in December 2016 to all prison staff, entitled "The Importance of Immediate Emergency Response", the instruction was given to "Ensure that information on the condition of the patient is passed to the control room as soon as possible so that the ambulance service can be updated." (v) The 9 minute delay referred to at (iii) above occurred despite the prison officers and healthcare staff who first attended the scene having radios, and therefore being in a position to the control room the information that Mr Ormond was not breathing and required CPR. Response: We understand that a process was put in place at HMP Long Lartin, which had been agreed between the West Midlands Ambulance Service (WMAS) and HMP Long Lartin. This had been circulated to prison staff in a Safer Custody Bulletin in 2016, prior to the implementation of the new ambulance response categories and before Practice Plus Group held the contract for healthcare provision at Long Lartin. Unfortunately Practice Plus were not made aware of this agreement and it has not been revisited with WMAS since the original process was agreed. We have contacted WMAS to jointly review the process and we will: • work together to understand the information they require in order to despatch an ambulance appropriate to the patient’s needs • use this information to write a new process to call for ambulances in a manner that is appropriate to the patient’s needs. Page 2 of 4 • provide prison staff with guidance to enable them to provide the relevant information to the ambulance despatch team. Matter of Concern 2. The failure to provide WMAS with critical information about Mr Ormond’s condition, which would have resulted in the call being given the highest category of emergency response did not appear to have been recognised by either HM Prison Service or Practice Plus Group until this inquest hearing. In the circumstances, there is concern that members of the prison and healthcare staff at HMP Long Lartin may still not recognise the need to update WMAS with critical information about a patient’s condition in similar circumstances. Response: Practice Plus Group has a robust process (our Purple Alert system) for sharing important patient safety information across all prison sites within which we provide healthcare services. We can confirm that in April 2021, as soon as we became aware of this issue, a Purple Alert was disseminated across all sites to request that immediate action be taken to ensure that systems are in place to escalate deteriorating patients, particularly those who require CPR, to enable an appropriate ambulance response time. Following the receipt of a Purple Alert, sites will inform their staff of the information via daily handover or ‘buzz’ meetings, clinical supervision and training events (including emergency scenario training), to ensure all staff are aware of the detail. They will also liaise with the prison if actions need to be taken by HMIP. All sites are required to provide a description of the actions taken in response to the purple alert. At HMP Long Lartin the purple alert was shared via a buzz meeting and the daily handover on 4th and 5th May. Staff were also emailed via a global alert on 7th May. This was further reiterated as a mop up on 19th May. In addition, Practice Plus Group have become aware that ambulance response arrangements to secure establishments vary between regions, and therefore have initiated conversations with several Ambulance Trusts that serve our sites to seek wider collaboration and solutions to this issue across the country. An initial meeting was held with WMAS in March 2021 to review arrangements for calling ambulances in prisons; further meetings are planned. Any outcomes will be shared nationally in order to share learning across all our sites. Furthermore, our Resuscitation Council-accredited immediate life support (ILS) trainers have been asked to include the importance of upgrading calls to category one where CPR is in progress in their ILS training materials for Practice Plus Group staff and this has been in place since 13th May 2021. Page 3 of 4 Practice Plus Group is committed to providing a high quality healthcare service at HMP Long Lartin and to patient safety across all our sites. We are deeply sorry that Mr Ormond died while receiving care from our service and we will ensure that the lessons learnt are not just implemented at HMP Long Lartin but across Practice Plus Group’s services. We trust that the above responses provide the information that you require but please do not hesitate to contact me if Practice Plus Group can be of any further assistance. Yours sincerely National Medical Director, Health in Justice Practice Plus Group Page 4 of 4
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.