Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021

Robert Walaszkowski

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0325, written 27 Sep 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Sep 2021
Reference2021-0325
DeceasedRobert Walaszkowski
CoronerNadia Persaud
Coroner areaEast London
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards) · Mental Health related deaths
Organisation namedBarking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

MISS N PERSAUD 
HER MAJESTY’S CORONER 

EAST LONDON 

Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.

 Chief Executive Officer, Patient Transport UK Ltd, Unit 3,

Summit Centre, Summit Road, Potters Bar, EN6 3QW

1 

CORONER 

I am Nadia Persaud area coroner for the coroner area of East London 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 4th December 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mr Robert 
Walaszkowski, age 35 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 
22nd September 2021. The conclusion reached by the jury was a narrative conclusion: 

The original head and neck injury was the primary trigger that led to a series of events 
which ultimately caused Robert’s death.  Robert’s neck was not cleared by paramedics 
nor A&E staff and this failure to identify his injury meant it was left unsupported.  This led 
to further injury to the spinal cord and vertebral artery during the course of his care 
which ultimately lead to a hypoxic brain injury which contributed to his death.  His death 
was contributed to by neglect. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

1 

 
 
 Robert Walaszkowski sustained a head injury and cervical spine damage whilst he was 
a detained mental health patient at Goodmayes Hospital.  The injury occurred on the 
19th October 2019 after he was seen to run towards a locked door.  It is likely that he 
collided with the door. Robert was taken to A&E.  Whilst in A&E, Robert was given three 
doses of 4mg of lorazepam.  This exceeded the Trust’s guidelines.  He did not undergo 
a cervical spine CT scan and he did not receive a full medical assessment before his 
discharge.     

In the early hours of the 20th October, Robert was discharged from Queens Hospital in a 
very poor state of physical health.  His neck was not supported and he was transported 
in an unsuitable vehicle back to Goodmayes Hospital.  On arrival at Goodmayes 
Hospital, Robert was found unresponsive on the floor of the vehicle.  He was in 
respiratory arrest.  Paramedics transferred him back to Queens Hospital where he was 
diagnosed with catastrophic injuries to his cervical spine, right vertebral artery and 
hypoxic brain injury.  He passed away from these injuries on 15th November 2019 at 
Queens Hospital. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:  

By virtue of his detention under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act, a secure transport 
vehicle was booked to transfer Robert back to Goodmayes Hospital.  Robert was in an 
extremely poor state of physical health.  He was unable to weight bear, unable to sit up 
on a wheelchair and unable to hold his head upright.  Robert was placed onto the floor 
in the caged section of the vehicle.  Robert’s partner and the healthcare support worker 
accompanying him, raised concerns about the suitability of the vehicle.  There were no 
seatbelts or means of securing Robert into the vehicle.  On his arrival to Goodmayes 
Hospital, following a fifteen to twenty-minute journey, he was found unresponsive and in 
respiratory arrest.  The independent expert stated that Robert’s airway was unlikely to 
have been protected in the position in which he was transferred and this is likely to have 
contributed to the respiratory arrest. 
The inquest heard evidence that this was not a one-off occurrence, but that there is a 
practice whereby detained mental health patients are placed on the floor of secure vans. 

It is of concern that: 

(i)  There was no review by Patient Transport UK Ltd into the service provided to 

Robert in the early hours of 20 October 2019. 

(ii)  The apparently trained transport staff did not re-consider the appropriateness of 

the vehicle when they observed Robert’s very low level of consciousness 
and his inability to walk; sit unaided and hold his head upright. 

(iii)  The staff placed Robert, in this concerning condition, on the floor of the vehicle 

without any seat belt or other mechanism to keep him safe and secure. 

(iv)  Placing mental health patients on the floor of the caged area, seems to be an 

accepted practice by Patient Transport UK Ltd. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the 
power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 namely by 25d November 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons the family of Robert Walaszkowski, the LAS, the A&E Consultant, North East 
London Foundation Trust and Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS 
Trust. I have also sent it to the CQC and the local Director of Public Health who may find 
it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and to all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.   

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it 
useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest.  

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

30 September 2021                

3

Related reports

Other reports by Nadia Persaud

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.