Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021

Sameena Javed

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0430, written 23 Dec 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report23 Dec 2021
Reference2021-0430
DeceasedSameena Javed
CoronerCatherine McKenna
Coroner areaManchester North
CategoryCommunity health care
Organisation namedPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Dr

& Partners, Croft Shifa Health Centre,  Belfield Road,  ROCHDALE 

1 

CORONER 

I am Catherine McKenna, Area Coroner for the Coroner area of Manchester North 

2 

CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS 

I  make  this  report  under  paragraph  7,  Schedule  5,  of the  Coroner's  and  Justice  Act  2009  and 
Regulations 28 and  29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  1  June  2021  an  investigation  into  the  death  of  Sameena  Javed  was  commenced.  The 
investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 December 2021.  The conclusion was Natural 
Causes 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH 

Sameena Javed was  33  years old  when  she  presented  at the  Royal  Oldham  Hospital  on  27  May 
2021.  She  had  severe complications of anorexia nervosa,  malnutrition and heart failure.  She was 
found  to  have  COVID  19  pneumonitis  and  was  transferred  to the  Intensive  Care  Unit.  Despite 
treatment,  Mrs Javed deteriorated and died on  30 May 2021.  The medical cause of death was  1a) 
multi organ failure 1 b) Covid 19 pneumonitis 2) Dilated cardiomyopathy, severe malnutrition, chronic 
pancreatitis  and  chronic  hepatitis  B.  Mrs  Javed's  very  low level  of physiological  reserve  was  a 
contributory factor in her death. 

Mrs  Javed  had  been  referred  to  the  community  Eating  Disorder  Service  (EDS)  by  a  Liaison 
Consultant Psychiatrist in February 2020 who  had  assessed her when she was an  inpatient on the 
labour ward following a still-birth.  The EDS made a number of attempts to contact Mrs Javed but in 
April 2020 discharged her when she failed to respond to correspondence.  On 9 April 2020, the EDS 
sent a  letter to the  GP practice  in  which  it discharged  Mrs Javed  back to  the  care of the GP and 
recommended ongoing medical monitoring. The Court heard evidence that the discharge letter from 
EDS was filed  by administrative staff at the surgery without being seen by a GP and that had it been 
seen,  the  GP would  have  requested  blood  tests  and  kept 'an  eye' on  Mrs Javed's weight,  eating 
habits and nutrition. 

Whilst it was not possible to say, on the available evidence, whether Mrs Javed would have engaged 
with any efforts by the GP practice to monitor her weight and eating habits, it was an opportunity to 
provide care and foster engagement with health services that was missed. 

The  Court heard of a further incident when relevant paperwork sent to  the surgery was not placed 
before a GP.  An Out of Hours doctor had been called to see Mrs Javed at her home address on 6 
May 2021.  However, when the Out of Hours doctor arrived,  Mrs Javed had inexplicably denied him 
access  to  her  home.  The  Out  of  Hours  doctor  sent  an  email  to  the  GP  practice  detailing  the 
circumstances of the aborted visit.  This email was not placed before a GP and the Court heard that 
had it been, it would have resulted in the GP making telephone contact with Mrs Javed to inquire into 
her health and the reason why she had declined the visit. 

 s 

CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.  In my opinion 
In  the  circumstances  it  is  my 
there  is a  risk  that  future  deaths will  occur  unless  action  is  taken. 
statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:-

(1) The Court heard that incoming correspondence to the GP practice is dealt with by 

administrative staff who are responsible for deciding whether it should  be placed before a 
GP.  There is no written procedure or guidance in place at the GP Practice which guides 
administrative staff on which correspondence needs to be placed before the GP before it is 
filed within the patient records.  The concern is that there is no system in place to ensure 
that communication to the surgery which requires actions to be taken by the medical staff is 
brought to their attention. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my opinion  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent future  deaths  and  I believe  each  of you 
respectively have the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a  duty to respond to this report within  56  days of the date of this  report,  namely 21 
February 2022. 

I,  the Area  Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable 
for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action  is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following  Interested Persons namely:-

•  The family of the Deceased 
•  Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust 

I am  also under a duty to send the  Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary from.  He may 
send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.  You  may 
make  representations  to  me the  coroner at the  time  of your response,  about  the  release  or the 
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

/\,  ,,. 

, 

Date: 

23 December 2021

Related reports

Other reports by Catherine McKenna

See all →

More reports categorised “Community health care”

See all →

Track Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.