Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Odessa Carey

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0150, written 12 May 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report12 May 2023
Reference2023-0150
DeceasedOdessa Carey
CoronerAndrew Hetherington
Coroner areaNorth Northumberland and South Northumberland
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANDREW HETHERINGTON 
H M Senior Coroner for North Northumberland and 
Acting  Senior Coroner for South Northumberland 

County Hall, Morpeth, Northumberland NE61 2EF 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT  IS BEING SENT TO: 

Chief  Executive  of  Cumbria,  Northumberland,  Tyne  and  Wear  NHS 
·Foundation Trust 

1  CORONER 

I am Andrew Hetherington, Senior Coroner for North Northumberland and  Acting 
Senior Coroner for South Northumberland. 

2 

CORONER'S LEGAL'POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph  7, schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 
2009  and  Regulations  28  and  29 of the  Coroners  (Investigations)  Regulations 
2013. 
http://legislation.gov .uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov .uk/uksi/201 3/1629/part/7 /made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 10 April 2019  HM  Senior Coroner Tony Brown commenced an Investigation 
into the death of Odessa Carey who was born on 20 May 1945 and who died 
within 
suspended  the investigation  under Schedule 1 of the CJA as he was informed 
on  15 April 2019 that an individual  had  been charged with a homicide offence of 
murder. 

 pn 8 April 2019.  He adjourned  and 

On 11  March 2020 the perpetrator was found to have comm itted Murder and 
sentenced under Section 38 Hospital Order with a Section 41  Restriction. 

I made the decision to resume the Inquest, as there was sufficient reason to do 
so as the perpetrator had  been  involved with mental health  services for an 
extensive period of time and was still  open  to services at the time of Odessa 
Carey's death. 

The conclusion  of the inquest was "Unlawfully killed". 

 
 
 The medical cause of death was  1 a Blunt force head injury. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Odessa  Carey was last seen  alive on  the evening of Thursday 4th April 2019 
, Ashington.  She was attacked by the 
within  her home address 
perpetrator.  On 7th  April 2019 the police  have attended 
and  found the body of the deceased  covered with bedding  sheets. The  body 
was without the head.  Police officers have then attended another address and 
following a systematic search of that property, the perpetrator was found and 
arrested  in connection with  the  murder of the deceased. 

, Ashington 

On 11  March 2020 the perpetrator was found to have committed Murder and 
sentenced  under Section 38  Hospital  Order with a Section 41  Restriction. 

I resumed the  Inquest  as  there was sufficient reason to  do so as the  perpetrator 
had  been involved with mental health  services for an extensive period of time 
and  was still  open  to services at the time of Odessa Carey's death. 

5  CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During the  course of the inquest evidence revealed matters giving  rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is  a risk that future deaths will  occur unless 'action 
is  taken.  In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are, as follows:  -

1.  Multi-agency Risk Assessment Conference ("MARAC") 

I heard  evidence of issues  of assault,  violence and  intimidation.  Further that the 
consent of the individual  reporting  the concerns is not always required  in order 
to complete a MARAC referral. 

Whilst  I recognise that the  extent of the issues could  have been diminished  out 
of fam ilia I ties or for other reasons,  I am  concerned that that staff did not explore 
the issues  to a greater extent with the  deceased,  the wider family and other 
agencies. 

2.  Assessment of substance misuse 

The service user had a history of substance misuse in  particular cannabis  and 
its impact on  mental health was recognised. 

Whilst  I acknowledge issues  regarding  service user consent and  compliance,  I 
am  concerned there was no referral to substance misuse services for advice or 
assessment and treatment whilst an inpatient  or in the  community. 

3. 

Inpatient discharge  30 May 2018 

 The discharge was not a coordinated  discharge in  line with the trust CPA policy. 
There was no discharge meeting,  no involvement with other agencies or family, 
the service user was still  mentally unwell,  having delusional  beliefs,  without 
supported  accommodation, vulnerable,  moving to a new locality and without 
familial support 

I am  concerned there was a lack of opportunity to involve the family  or other 
agencies in the discharge. 

I am  concerned that there was no direct contact or introduction to  the service 
user from the care coordinator whilst an inpatient or before discharge to 
establish  a relationship  and trust. 

4.  Discharge from the Community Treatment Team on 6 Au_gust 2018 

There was no pre-discharge  meeting in  line with  trust CPA Policy involving the 
family,  lead professionals,  other agencies  or a  Consultant Psychiatrist for future 
planning. 

A more assertive approach to engagement may have been appropriate. 

I am  concerned that following discharge from the Lowry ward to the community 
and  prior to discharge from the community treatment team, the deceased was 
seen  only four times in person  by individuals from the mental health team  and 
only once by the care coordinator. 

I am  concerned that more intense,  in  person  engagement was warranted and 
discharge from  the  Community Treatment Team was premature. 

I am  concerned that the service user was not seen  by a Consultant Psychiatrist 
at all  after 30 May 2018 despite  enquiring  about a further appointment. 

5.  Appointment of a Care Coordinator 

I heard  that in  line  with the trust CPA policy paragraph 12.1  "Consent must 
always be sought from a professional prior to them  being identified  as a Care 
Coordinator.  Under no circumstances must any professional be stated as Care 
Coordinator without negotiation  and agreement.  " 

I am  concerned that consent and  agreement was not obtained from  a care 
coordinator prior to being  identified for the role of care coordinator and concerns 
regarding  capacity were not considered. 

6.  FACE Risk assessment tool 

I am  concerned that there continues to be  an inconsistent  approach to the 
assessment of risk. Various methods are still  being  deployed  and there is  a 
possibility  of a disparity  in the  understanding  of the risk to the service user and 
others. 

7.  Record Keeping Documentation 

 I am  concerned that entries  in the  RiO  medical records were not made in  line 
with Trust guidance in  a timely, complete manner or at all. 

I am  concerned that evidence of clinical assessment, care planning  and the 
reasoning  behind  clinical decision  making were not recorded. 

8.  Contact with !RT and referral to  Community Treatment Team 

The service user contacted the service on a number of occasions and  sought 
self-referral to the Crisis team  on  19 September 2018 who assessed  her as 
requiring  a re-referral to the community team.  No referral was made. 

I am  concerned that there was a delay in the  referral to the Community 
Treatment Team  and there  is no audit system to ensure referrals are made and 
in a timely fashion. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my opinion  action  should  be taken to prevent future  deaths  and  I believe you 
have the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You  are  under a duty  to  respond  to this  report within  56  days of the  date  of this 
report,  namely by 
I,  the  coroner,  may  extend  the  period.  Your  response  must  contain -details  of 
action  taken  or  proposed  to  be  taken,  setting  out  the  timetable  for  action. 
Otherwise you must explain why no action is  proposed. 

8 

COPIES and  PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following  Interested 
Persons The family of Odessa Carey Deceased 
I am  also  under a duty to send  the Chief Coroner acopy of your response.  The 
Chief Coroner may publish  either or  both  in  a complete or  redacted  or summary 
form. He may send  a copy of this  report to  any person  who he  believes  may find 
it useful  or of interest.  You  may make representations  to  me, the  coroner,  at the 
time  of your response,  about the  release  or the  publication  of your response  by 
the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Date\').~  Signed: 
-i,,:~} 

/ 

. 

. 

-
,1  )(JJ'J  kt/~ r:.
)Ji~v•

t 

Andrew Hetheri  gton  HM  Senior Coroner  or North No  umberland and Acting 
Senior Coroner for South  Northumberland

Related reports

Other reports by Andrew Hetherington

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Andrew Hetherington

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Andrew Hetherington, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.