Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Tyler Ryan

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0395, written 17 Oct 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report17 Oct 2023
Reference2023-0395
DeceasedTyler Ryan
CoronerCarly Henley
Coroner areaNewcastle upon Tyne and North Tyneside
CategoryChild Death (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published3

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  NHS England 
2.  The Rt Honourable Steve Barclay MP, Secretary of State for 

Health and Social Care 

3.  The Royal College of Pathologists  
4.  The General Medical Council 

1  CORONER 

I am Carly Elizabeth Henley, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner areas of 
Newcastle upon Tyne and North Tyneside. 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 26th April 2022 the Senior Coroner opened an inquest into the death of 
Tyler Jay Ryan.  

On 17th October 2023 I resumed and concluded the inquest. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Tyler  Jay  Ryan  (born  02.09.2009)  died  at  the  Royal  Victoria  Infirmary, 
Newcastle upon Tyne on 12.02.2021 aged 11 years old. 

Tyler had been found in his bedroom at his home address in a collapsed state 
by his mother on the morning of 12th February 2021.  Police, Paramedics and 
the  Great  North  Air  Ambulance  Service  attended  at  the  home  address  and 
attempted to resuscitate him.  He remained asystole.  He was conveyed to the 
RVI,  Newcastle  by  Air  Ambulance.    Sadly,  his  death  was  pronounced  after 
prolonged attempts to resuscitate him. 

,  Consultant 
Post  Mortem  examination  was  carried  out  by 
Perinatal  and  Paediatric  Pathologist  at  the  RVI  on  17th  February  2021.    His 
report was filed on 20th December 2021, over 10 months later.  He concluded 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 that the death was due to 1a) Acute Anaphylactic Shock.  The family did not 
accept this conclusion on the basis that Tyler had no known medical history of 
allergies and no agent was identified to have triggered this reaction.  The family 
contended  that  there  must  have  been  an  undiagnosed  and  potentially 
hereditary underlying condition.  Tyler had four surviving siblings and the family 
were concerned that they too may be at risk of sudden fatal collapse. 

HM  Senior  Coroner  for  Newcastle  instructed 
, 
Consultant Paediatric Histopathologist to report as an independent expert.  Her 
report  is  dated  15th  August  2022.    In  her  opinion,  Tyler  died  of  Sudden 
Unexpected Death in Childhood.  She recommended that an analysis of Tyler’s 
tissue samples should be conducted to explore whether Tyler had an underlying 
genetic condition which may have caused an arrhythmia. 

Genetic testing, via molecular autopsy, subsequently confirmed that Tyler had 
two variants in the gene RYR2.  The scientific evidence strongly suggests that 
these variants are pathogenic and therefore expected to cause human disease.  
The RYR2 gene is known to be associated with a rare genetic condition, type 1 
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia “CPVT”.  This condition 
can  lead  to  the  development  of  a  potentially  dangerous  heart  rhythm 
disturbance  called  Ventricular  Tachycardia  “VT”,  usually  when  exercising  or 
under  conditions  of  stress  or  emotional  arousal.    VT  can  degenerate  to 
Ventricular Fibrillation “VF”.  VF is lethal if it is not corrected by defibrillation. 

CPVT is a cause of sudden death in children and young adults with a mortality 
rate of up to 50% by the age of 30 years old if left undiagnosed and untreated.  
It is possible that Tyler’s siblings may have inherited this condition.  

Having heard the evidence, I concluded that Tyler died of Sudden Unexpected 
Death in Childhood. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In 
the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

1. 

 and 

 each gave evidence that the 

delay in Paediatric Pathology reports is due to a chronic shortage in 

recruitment and retention of Paediatric Pathologists in the UK.  This 

shortage is systemic.  Currently only 50 out of 80 national vacancies 

for Paediatric Pathologists are filled.  Coronial and Forensic work is 

undertaken by these Pathologists on a private basis, in addition to 

their NHS work.  This provides insufficient time to carry out this work in 

a timely fashion.  There is an acute shortage of Subspeciality 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 Paediatric Pathologists, with just one Paediatric Orthopedic 

Pathologist undertaking Forensic and Coronial work in the UK.  

2.  The delay in Paediatric Pathology Reports results in the delayed 

detection of the need for genetic testing amongst surviving siblings of 

children who die of Sudden Death in Childhood.  Currently, it is not 

until the Pathologist provides a report that the need for genetic testing 

is identified.  Reports can take up to two years to be filed. 

3. 

 and 

 gave evidence that more 

widespread use of molecular autopsy would assist in detecting genetic 

abnormalities in children who have died suddenly, leading to greater 

opportunities to prevent future deaths within their families and in other 

families. 

4. 

, Consultant Clinical Geneticist gave evidence that 

Tyler is, to date, the only human in history to have been found to have 

these two RYR2 variants which is significant to his family and to the 

wider scientific community.  Greater use of molecular autopsy would 

save lives within families and in other families.  The detection of these 

variants is directly relevant to others and the prevention of future 

deaths. 

5. 

 gave evidence that the development of the use of 

molecular autopsy calls for a revision of the SUDIC Protocol also 

known as the Kennedy Protocol.  

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe 
your organisation has the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of 
this report, namely by 12th December 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons:  
Tyler’s family 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to 
me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the 
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

17.10.2023                                        C E HENLEY 

4

Responses

3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
From Maria Caulfield MP   
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for  
Mental Health and Women's Health Strategy 
Department of Health and Social Care 

39 Victoria Street  
London  
SW1H 0EU  

Carly Elizabeth Henley   
Assistant Coroner   
Newcastle upon Tyne and North Tyneside   
Coroner’s office 
Lower Ground Floor 
Block 1 
Civic Centre 
Barras Bridge 
Newcastle upon Tyne 
NE1 8QH 

13 May 2024  

Dear Miss Carly Elizabeth Henley,  

Thank  you  for  your  Regulation  28  report  to  prevent  future  deaths  dated  17th  October  2023 
about the death of Tyler Jay Ryan.  I am replying as Minister with responsibility for Minister for 
Mental Health and Women’s Health Strategy.       

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Tyler, and I offer 
my  sincere  condolences  to  their  family  and  loved  ones.  The  circumstances  your  report 
describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. 
Please accept my sincere apologies for the significant delay in responding to this matter.  

The report raises concerns over workforce capacity, genetic screening (particularly in relation 
to molecular autopsies), and issues surrounding sudden death in childhood, all of which are 
matters I take extremely seriously.   

In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with NHS England and 
will continue to discuss these important issues with NHS England counterparts.  

Workforce  

The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan LTWP) published by NHS England in June 2023 sets out 
the steps the NHS and its partners need to take to deliver an NHS workforce that meets the 
changing needs of the population over the next 15 years. The plan outlines the action needed 
to ensure we train and retain more staff, and reform medical education and training to put the 
NHS workforce on a sustainable footing for the future.   

Genetic screening   

NHS England (NHSE) has published guidance for inherited cardiac conditions which requires 
services  to  investigate  patients  with  previously  undiagnosed  cardiac  disease,  suggestive 

  
  
  
  
 
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 symptoms  or  from  families  with  sudden  unexplained  deaths.  Where  a  genetic  variation  is 
identified, cascade testing is offered to relatives based on risk.   

NHS England has undertaken a formal assessment and continues to review evidence for the 
potential merits of using genetic testing for certain heart conditions and heart disease through 
the National Genomic Test Directory. A robust and evidence-based process and policy is in 
place to ensure that genomic testing continues to be available for all patients for whom it would 
be of clinical benefit.    

Genomic testing in the NHS in England is delivered through a national genomic testing network 
of seven NHS Genomic Laboratory Hubs (GLHs). The NHS GLHs deliver the testing outlined 
in  the  National  Genomic Test  Directory  (the Test  Directory)  available  here:  NHS  England  » 
National  genomic  test  directory,  which  sets  out  the  eligibility  criteria  for  patients  to  access 
testing as well as the genomic targets to be tested and the method that should be used, and 
is  applicable  nationally  providing  a  standardised  approach.  The  Test  Directory  currently 
includes  357  rare  and  inherited  disease  clinical  indications  (covering  around  3200  rare 
diseases) and over 203 cancer clinical indications. The Test Directory is regularly updated to 
reflect the latest scientific and technological developments, including new clinical indications 
for rare disease, for example during the most recent update in October 2022, which included 
150 changes to the directory.   

Seven  NHS  Genomic  Medicine  Service  (GMS)  Alliances  also  play  an  important  role  in 
supporting  the  strategic  systematic  embedding  of  genomic  medicine  in  end-to-end  clinical 
pathways  and  clinical  specialities,  as  well  as  raising  awareness  among  clinicians  and  the 
public  of  the  genomic  testing  available  through  the  NHS.  The  NHS  GMS  Alliances  are 
supporting several national and local transformation projects, including a national project with 
the  NHS  Inherited  Cardiac  Conditions  services,  British  Heart  Foundation  and  the  country’s 
coroners,  who carry  out inquests  into sudden  and unexplained deaths. The  project  will  test 
DNA of people who died suddenly and unexpectedly at a young age from a cardiac arrest. 
Their surviving family can then also be offered genetic testing to see if they carry the same 
gene changes.   

Sudden death in childhood   

Research is on-going in many of the causes of Sudden Cardiac Death. There is an opportunity 
now  with  the  implementation  of  Genomic  Laboratory  Hubs  across  England  to  explore  the 
systematic introduction of post-mortem genetic testing.  

In 2020 NHS England and the British Heart foundation launched the NHS-Coronial-Sudden 
Unexpected Death pilot, including the causes of SAD across 7 sites to develop the pathways 
necessary to ensure equitable access to a genomics driven clinical programme.   

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.   

Best Wishes,   

MARIA CAULFIELD
Response from General Medical Council (PDF)
8 December 2023 

Miss C E Henley 
Assistant Coroner 
Newcastle Upon Tyne and North Tyneside 

Dear Miss Henley 

Preventing future death report (Tyler Ryan), coroner case reference: 

We share your concern about the shortage of paediatric pathologists. We recognise the significance 
of this issue in light of the tragic circumstances of Tyler Jay Ryan’s untimely death, and especially the 
concerns of his family.  

You have asked us to set out the actions we will take to address the concern you have raised, or to 
explain why we do not propose to take action.    

GMC’s role 

The GMC, as the statutory regulator for the medical profession, does not have a direct role in the 
recruitment or retention of doctors across any specialty in the UK. This is exclusively a matter for the 
NHS in each of the four UK countries. Similarly, although we have responsibility for the oversight of 
postgraduate medical training, we have no role in determining how many doctors are trained in any 
specialty or subspecialty. These numbers are set by each of the UK governments in conjunction with 
the NHS in each of the countries. We’re not therefore in a position to take specific action to secure 
numbers of doctor in this speciality, or in any others. 

However, we do have responsibility for the registration processes through which suitably qualified 
doctors obtain the legal right to practise in the UK, or (in the case of specialist registration) 
demonstrate that they have completed specialist training across all recognised specialties. How 
effective we are at managing those processes clearly does have a direct bearing on the how readily 
the UK workforce can attract and absorb the doctors required to meet ever-increasing and more 
complex service needs. We’re committed, as a matter of priority, to making our registration 
pathways as flexible and accessible as we can for all those doctors who meet the required standards 
to join and remain in the UK medical workforce.  

Specialist registration 

Particularly relevant here, perhaps, is the work we’re doing to make specialist registration more 
accessible to those who are suitably qualified, but who have not completed an approved training 
course in the UK. We have long sought, and have now obtained, a change to our legislation to make 
it less prescriptive about the evidence requirements to support an application for specialist 

The GMC is a charity registered in 
England and Wales (1089278) 
and Scotland (SC037750) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 recognition. Our further ambition is to develop and implement a number of new pathways to the 
specialist register. In doing so, we’ll aim to widen access to potential applicants by offering a range of 
options and mechanisms through which they can demonstrate they have the required knowledge, 
skills and experience to practise at consultant level in the NHS.   

Doctors trained outside the UK 

We particularly value the contribution that overseas-trained doctors make to the UK medical 
workforce, and we registered over 14,000 international medical graduates last year. Our own recent 
research – published in The state of medical education and practice workforce report 2023 – clearly 
shows the crucial part they play, and are likely to continue playing, in ensuring a sustainable 
workforce in UK healthcare.  

In recent years we’ve invested in additional facilities and people to offer a record number of places 
in both parts of the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) test, which is the means by 
which many international medical graduates can demonstrate their knowledge and skills for 
registration purposes. In 2022 over 14,000 doctors sat PLAB 1 and over 13,500 doctors sat PLAB 2, 
which were significant increases compared to previous years. The number of places this year is 
around 23,000 for PLAB 1 and and 16,000 places for PLAB 2 respectively. 

Beyond that, we also have number of programmes underway aimed at streamlining our registration 
processes. I recognise that none of this amounts to assurance about specific vacancies being filled. 
But I hope it shows our ongoing commitment to providing effective channels into the UK medical 
workforce.  

UK medical graduates 

With regard to UK medical students and graduates, there may be some work to do – perhaps by the 
medical schools, the NHS and the Royal College of Pathologists – in promoting careers in pathology 
and related sub-specialities. The data we have collected shows that there has been an increase of 
29% of trainees in pathology programmes between 2018 and 2022. This appears quite encouraging 
and suggests that the broad field at least is of interest to junior doctors.  

I hope this is helpful, and I will of course be happy to provide any further information or clarifications 
you may need.  

Yours sincerely 

Director 
Registration and Revalidation 

gmc-uk.org                                                                                                                                                                                                   2
Response from NHS England (PDF)
Carly Elizabeth Henley 
Assistant Coroner 
Newcastle upon Tyne and North Tyneside 
Lord Mayor’s Suite 
Civic Centre 
Barras Bridge 
Newcastle upon Tyne  
NE1 8QH 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

19 December 2023 

Dear Coroner, 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Tyler Jay Ryan who died 
on 12 February 2021.  

Thank  you  for  your  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths  (hereafter  “Report”)  dated  17 
October  2023  concerning  the  death  of  Tyler  Jay  Ryan  on  12  February  2021.  In 
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to 
express  my  deep  condolences  to  Tyler’s  family  and  loved  ones.  NHS  England  are 
keen to assure the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Tyler’s care 
have been listened to and reflected upon.  

I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to your Report, and I apologise for 
any  anguish  this  delay  may  have  caused  to  Tyler’s  family  or  friends.  I  realise  that 
responses to Coroner Reports can form part of the important process of family and 
friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones and appreciate 
this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them. 

In your Report you raise a concern over the shortage of Paediatric Pathologists and 
the  delays  that  this  can  cause  to  Paediatric  Pathology  reports.  The  shortage  of 
paediatric and perinatal pathologists and the impact it has on services has been of 
concern  for  some  time.  This  issue  has  been  the  subject  of  a  great  deal  of activity 
relating  to  attracting  pathologists  into  higher  specialist  training  in  this  area  with  the 
implementation  of  recruitment  incentives  (one-off  payments  of  £20,000)  as  well  as 
supporting  learning  via  e-learning  resources.  Work  is  also  ongoing  with  NHS 
England’s  Children  and  Young  People’s  Team,  the  Pathology  Team  and  the 
Workforce Training and Education Directorate, as well as professional bodies such as 
the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) and the Institute of Biomedical Science 
(IBMS)  to  develop  a  curriculum  for  placental  pathology  reporting  for  biomedical 
scientist  advance  practice  to  supplement  the  stretched  workforce.  There  isn’t  a 
timeline for this at the moment but we are happy to update the coroner once further 
progress has been made.  

Guidance on autopsy in children is issued by the RCPath and will cover the need for 
genetic analysis where indicated. I note that you have also issued your Report to the 

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 RCPath and they would be the appropriate organisation to provide comment on your 
concerns touching on molecular autopsy.  

In your Report you also reference the Kennedy Guidance and the need for a revision 
of  the  Sudden  Unexpected  Death  In  Children  (SUDIC)  protocol.  The  guidance  was 
published in November 2016 and was developed by the RCPath in collaboration with 
the  Royal  College  of  Paediatrics  and  Child  Health  (RCPCH).  NHS  England  will  be 
raising the issue of the revision with the Royal Colleges and the relevant government 
departments.  

I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking 
place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed 
by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical  Directors,  and 
other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key 
learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both 
a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends 
that may require further review and action.  

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information. 

Yours sincerely, 

National Medical Director

Related reports

Other reports by Carly Henley

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Child Death (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.