Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0198, written 21 May 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 21 May 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0198 |
| Deceased | Barbara Patterson |
| Coroner | Carly Henley |
| Coroner area | North Northumberland |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Organisation named | North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 2. Department of Health 3. Care Quality Commission 1 | CORONER | am Carly Elizabeth Henley, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of North Northumberland. 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 9.1.15 | commenced an investigation into the death of Barbara Patterson aged 67 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 18.5.15. The conclusion of the inquest was the following narrative conclusion: “On the balance of probabilities Barbara Patterson died on 2.1.15 at Wansbeck General Hospital of a cerebral stroke suffered on 1.1.15, which resulted in an unwitnessed low level fall from a stair lift in her home. Her death was probably accelerated by a lack of timely administration of CPR due to the late arrival of an ambulance and the lack of appropriate medical advice for the family in the intervening period." 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Barbara Patterson suffered a large cerebral stroke whilst at home on 1.1.15. This caused her to fall a short distance from a stair lift in her home, (an unwitnessed fall). __|_Her-husband-was-at-home,-heard.the-fall.and.summonsed_help.from their daughter who_|_ lived a short distance away. She immediately called 999. The ambulance took 15 minutes to arrive and in the intervening period the family were not given appropriate medical advice by the call handler. The lack of CPR in the intervening period is likely to have accelerated Mrs Patterson's death. She died at Wansbeck Hospital on 2.1.15. _|___| The-cerebral-stroke.was-an-unsurvivable-event.but.she.may_have lived fora few.more |. days or even weeks had CPR been administered. 5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed-matters-giving rise-to-concern-In—|— my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. a The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — 1. The failure by the Call Handler to give timely advice in respect of CPR. 2. During the inquest evidence was given that the Pathways system, a computerised system piloted in the North East and since rolled out for use by 6 other Healthcare Trusts nationally, has a fault in that it does not advise non clinical call handlers to issue CPR advice unless a patient has stopped breathing. This fails to recognise the need for CPR in cases of Aganol (heavy/noisy breathing which is insufficient to sustain life). This fault was pointed out to Pathways by the Clinical Section Manager for North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust.prior to the latest update being installed in early 2014 (Update 9). Pathways refused to amend the system. That fault remains in place to date. 3. The failure by the ambulance dispatcher to dispatch an ambulance closer to the deceased's location 4. The target time for the arrival of the ambulance was 8 minutes, this was breached. The ambulance did not arrive for 15 minutes. 5. During the inquest evidence was given that there is a national shortage of paramedics, which is particularly acute in the North East. 6. During the inquest evidence was given that ambulance availability is being jeopardised by crews being delayed at hospital when handing patients over to Accident and Emergency staff. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your organisation has the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 14.7.15. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: Barbara Patterson’s husband and daughter. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. [DATE] QI < .) 7 [SIGNED BY CORONER]
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Care Quality Commission Care Quality Commission Citygate Gallowgate Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4PA Telephone:03000 616161 information.access@cqc.org.uk www.cqc.org.uk Mr T Brown HM Senior Coroner North Northumberland 17 Church Street Berwick upon Tweed TD15 1EE 3 July 2015 Dear Mr Brown Re: Inquest into the death of Barbara Patterson. We were sorry to read about the death of Ms Patterson and the circumstances in which she died. Thank you for your report and the requirement for us to review what actions should be taken. Please treat this letter as the formal response of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to your report dated 21 May 2015. In your report and pursuant to the requirements under paragraph 7, schedule 5 of the Coroners Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, you require the CQC to provide details of any action that has been taken or which is proposed to be taken in response to the concerns highlighted in your report, or an explanation as to why no action is proposed if appropriate. Background Before the death of Barbara Patterson we carried out unannounced visits to North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (NEAS) which involved visits to four ambulance stations and the emergency contro! centre on 4, 5, 6, 7 and 13 February 2014. Following that inspection we identified areas of non compliance against the following regulations detailed in the Health and Social Care Act (2008): e Regulation 10 (1)(b)(2)(b)(i) Assessing and monitoring the quality of service provision; e Regulation 13 Management of Medicines; e Regulation 23(1)(a) Supporting Workers; e Regulation 21(a)(i) Requirements relating to workers; Following submission of the final report we instructed NEAS to submit an action plan. The Action Plan was duly presented to CQC by NEAS within the required timescale and, recognising that the Service required a reasonable period of time to implement the proposed measures, regular meetings were scheduled and conducted between CQC and NEAS, to monitor the progress of their implementation. This process was undergoing at the time of Mrs Patterson’s death. Matters of Concern 1. The failure of the call handler to give out timely advice in respect of CPR. The CQC intend to carry out a planned comprehensive inspection of North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) as part of its ongoing inspection process. During this inspection we will investigate to what extent and degree call handlers are supported by systems and procedures already in place. We will also require NEAS to furnish oral and written evidence to demonstrate that they understand their role and responsibilities in relation to call handlers and that they provide regular monitoring to ensure that the system is functioning at an appropriate tevel. 2. Deficiencies in Pathways System As recognised in your report, the Pathways system is a National Programme, piloted in the North East, which has been introduced in other areas of the country. We have written to NEAS to instruct them to submit evidence of how they are mitigating the tisk within the Pathways system and also how they are working with Pathways to improve the system. 3. Failure of ambulance dispatcher to dispatch an ambulance closer to the deceased’s location This issue will be included as part of our planned comprehensive inspection and investigated to ascertain whether procedures presently in place by NEAS relating to the dispatch of ambulances is appropriate and what, if any, improvements can be made to the current system. Additionally, we will be meeting with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss how they are managing the process of dispatching ambulances. 4. Target time for arrival of ambulance in 8 minutes was breached. This issue will be included as part of our planned comprehensive inspection and investigated to ascertain whether procedures presently in place relating to dispatch of ambulances is appropriate and what, if any, improvements can be made to the current system. We have written to NEAS fo instruct them to submit evidence of their current position around breaches of arrival times of their ambulances together with providing evidence of how they are mitigating the risk for of reducing the missed target times of ambulance arrivals. 5. National shortage of paramedics, which is particularly acute in the North East We will be meeting with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss and monitor how they are managing their delivery of the service, what is their current position of staffing levels and identified vacant posts and their current recruitment position. 6. Delay at handover of patients to A & E staff which jeopardises availability of ambulance staff We will be meeting with NEAS in September 2015 to discuss how they are managing the handover process to A & E services and how they are working collaboratively with all providers and stakeholders to ensure a smooth and timely handover process. In addition, this issue will be reviewed as part of our planned full comprehensive inspection of North East Ambulance Service (NEAS). We greatly appreciate the information you have provided us in your report and please do not hesitate to contact me with any further questions you may have. With best wishes. Yours sincerely Head 5 = Inspections — North East
4. From the Lord Prior of Brampton AS Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for NHS Productivity (Lords) A Department Coa. of Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall Ms C. Henley London Assistant Coroner SW 1A 2NS 17 Church Street re: Berwick-upon-Tweed TD15 1EE 20 JUL 2015 DL He Hes, Thank you for your letter of 21 May 2015 following the inquest into the death of Barbara Patterson. I was very sorry to hear of Mrs Patterson’s death and wish to extend my sincere condolences to her family. You raise several concerns which relate to the level of ambulance service which was provided to Mrs Patterson: . Failure by call handler to give timely advice in respect of CPR. . The Pathways system piloted in the North East has a fault in that it does not advise non clinical call handlers to issue CPR advice unless a patient has stopped breathing. Although this fault was pointed out to Pathways by NEAS NHS Trust manager before the latest update of the system (early 2014), Pathways refused to amend the system. The fault remains in place. . Failure by ambulance dispatcher to dispatch ambulance closer to deceased’s location. ° Target time for arrival was 8 minutes but the ambulance took 15 minutes to arrive. ° National shortage of paramedics particularly in the North East ° Ambulance availability is jeopardised by crews being delayed at hospital when handing patients over to A&E staff. The most immediate concern is about the lack of timely advice provided to Mrs Patterson’s family by the ambulance call handler. I understand you have been told the handler was following the protocol and procedures from the NHS pathways call handler system (Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS). Although Mrs Patterson would not have survived the stroke, you were told the system did not advise that CPR should be applied on this occasion, because the patient had not stopped breathing. You consider this is a fault in the system that needs to be remedied. NHS Pathways has provided a response to your concerns (attached) which includes an overview of the CDSS system, how it is implemented, reviewed and updated and the amendments that are made to supporting information on breathing assessment. Noisy breathing is already identified as a major airway compromise that requires an emergency response and appropriate CPR advice. NHS Pathways believes the call-handler might have failed to pick up the cues which should have led to this advice being given. The target for an emergency ambulance response is that 75% of all Red 1 calls — the most serious, life-threatening category - receive a response within eight minutes. While ambulance services will always attempt to provide a response as soon as possible in life-threatening situations, the target recognises that it is unfortunately not always physically possible for ambulance services to respond to all Red 1 calls within eight minutes. The North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) is currently facing unprecedented demand. NEAS has made progress in recruiting to vacancies, reducing its paramedic shortfall to 21% at the end of April 2015, and will continue to recruit more paramedics. I understand that NEAS has separately provided you with its response to the issues you raised. To improve services nationally, NHS England’s National Medical Director, Professor Sir Bruce Keogh, undertook a review of urgent and emergency care in 2013. This aims to change the way services are provided, including shifting care outside of the hospital setting where clinically appropriate, thereby avoiding unnecessary journeys and admissions to hospital. The review proposes transforming the urgent and emergency care system _by: ° providing better support for people to self-care; ° helping people with urgent care needs to get the right advice in the right place, first time; ° providing highly responsive urgent care services outside of hospital so people no longer choose to queue in A&E; ° ensuring that those people with more serious or life threatening emergency care needs receive treatment in centres with the right facilities and expertise in order to maximise chances of survival and a good recovery; and ° connecting all urgent and emergency care services together so the overall system becomes more than just the sum of its parts. Department of Health Some of the proposed changes are already underway, affecting NHS 111, community pharmacy and developing the ambulance service as a mobile treatment service rather than solely a transportation service. Hospital handovers, the process whereby the hospital takes over responsibility for the patient from the ambulance service, should occur within 15 minutes of the ambulance’s arrival at the A&E department. The ambulance crew cannot leave the patient to attend further calls until the hospital has formally assumed responsibility. There is no single cause for handover delays and local factors often contribute. Patient handover therefore needs to be as efficient as possible both to achieve the best possible outcome for the patient and to free ambulance resource. Some ambulance services and A&E departments have introduced Hospital Liaison Officers to act as a single point of contact between services. Other work aims to improve the discharge process and patient flow. This includes reducing delays for patients moving between NHS and social care organisations so more beds become free. NHS England is preparing guidance for Urgent and Emergency Care Networks designed to improve patient flow within the urgent and emergency care system. Work will continue to increase the number of Physician Associate training programmes across England in order to meet the workforce needs of acute, community and primary care providers. HEE will also ensure that paramedic training provides an additional 16% growth - 1,900 additional paramedics — in the current workforce over the next five years. The skills and abilities of paramedics and the wider workforce also need to be utilised more fully. This will help ambulances to become mobile treatment services, rather than transport services, so that more patients can be treated at scene, where clinically appropriate. We are extending paramedic training to enable them to better assess, prescribe for and manage patients with chronic illnesses. They need to work more closely with GPs and community teams. In support of this, NHS England plans to publish guidance to help ambulance services develop these new ways of working. I hope that you find this reply helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the circumstances of Mrs Patterson’s death to my attention. DAVID PRIOR
North East Ambuiance Service nm Tr Our ref: HMG/906 Ambulance Headquarters Your ref: AB/CEH/JT/15/11 Berea Mouse The Waterfront 23 June 2015 Geldcrest Way Newburn Riverside Strictly Private and Confidential Newcastle upon Tyne Ms Carly Elizabeth Henley NE15 8NY Assistant Coroner for North Northumberland H.M. Coroner's Office Tel: 0191 430 2000 17 Church Street Fax: 0191 430 2086 Berwick upon Tweed - Northumberland TD15 1EE By Email: - Dear Madam, Re: Ms Barbara Patterson (deceased) | write with regards to the Regulation 28 Report dated 21 May 2015, which raised a number of concerns in connection with the inquest touching upon the death of Ms Barbara Patterson on 02 January 2015 at Wansbeck General Hospital. Those concerns raised within the Regulation 28 Report are shown below; 1. The failure by the Call Handler to give timely advice in respect of CPR. 2. During the inquest evidence was given that the Pathways system, a computerised system piloted in the North East and since rolled out for use by 6 other Healthcare Trusts nationally, has a fault in that it does not advise non clinical call handlers to issue CPR advice unless a patient has stopped breathing. This fails to recognise the need for CPR in cases of Aganol (heavy/noisy breathing which is insufficient to sustain life). This fault was pointed out to Pathways by the Clinical Section Manager for North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust. Prior to the latest update being installed in early 20 14 (Update 9). Pathways refused to amend the system. That fault remains in place to date. 3. The failure by the ambulance dispatcher to dispatch an ambulance closer to the deceased’s location. 4. The target time for the arrival of the ambulance was 8 minutes, this was breached. .The ambulance did not arrive for 15 minutes. The North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust is registered, and therefore licensed to provide services, by the Care Quality Commission (Provider ID: RX601). For more information visit www.cac.org.uk 5. During the inquest evidence was given that there is a nelioneal shortage of paramedics, which is particularly acute in the North East. 6. During the inquest evidence was given that ambulance availability is being jeopardised by crews being delayed at hospital when handing patients over to Accident and Emergency staff. | have attached the Trust's resporise to each issue, which you requested by 14 July 2015. As such, the Trust's response repeats the evidence which was given at the Inquest, based on your comments that you were satisfied with and grateful for the efforts which the Trust had taken with respect to its investigation and production of management evidence. | understand that you were mindful at the Inquest that much of the information to be included in the Trust's response had already been shared by the Trust in its evidence disclosed prior to, and considered at, the Inquest. Finally, | think it is worth highlighting that the national operational standard for ambulance trusts, as defined within the NHS contract, is for 75% of Red 1 (patients in respiratory or cardiac arrest) and Red 2 (all other life threatening emergencies) incidents to be responded to within 8 minutes. This standard is measured Trust performance as an ambulance provider as opposed to performance with an individual Clinical Commissioning Group, i.e. Northumberland. Yours faithfully, ) ‘ ITY ek a YO new Levon Yvonne Ormston Chief Executive The North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust is registered, and therefore licensed to provide services, by the Care Quality Commission (Provider ID: RX601). For more information visit www.cqc.org.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.