Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0438, written 19 Sep 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 19 Sep 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0438 |
| Deceased | Lauren Bridges |
| Coroner | Andrew Bridgman |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Mental Health related deaths |
| Organisation named | Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Steve Barclay, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Department of
Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0EU.
2.
B97 9PT
1
CORONER
, Chief Executive, NHS England, PO Box 16738, Redditch
I am Andrew Bridgman, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 01.03.22 an investigation commenced into the death of Lauren Elizabeth Bridges
who died on 26.02.22, aged 20 years.
The inquest concluded on 01.09.23.
The medical cause of death was
1a) Hypoxic brain injury
1b) Cardiac arrest
1c) Hanging injury
The conclusion of the jury was
Lauren Elizabeth Bridges ended her life by ligature. This was misadventure with Lauren
not intending to commit suicide.
Missed opportunities for moving Lauren closer to home with acute and PICU beds
available during significant periods between July 2021 and February 2022 at St. Ann's,
Seaview and Haven wards, contributed to increased incidents and her death.
The prolonged stay in a PICU placement in Priory Cheadle led to iatrogenic
deterioration. This was prolonged by a delayed discharge. There was inadequate
communication about Lauren from Dorset Healthcare NHS Trust to relevant parties, and
there was insufficient communication about Lauren from Priory Cheadle to relevant
parties.
Dorset Healthcare NHS Trust did not recognise the exceptional circumstances of the
effects on Lauren being in an out-of-area placement over 260 miles away from home.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Lauren lived in Bournemouth. From March 2020 Lauren had been an in-patient,
detained under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983. In January 21 Lauren was
admitted to a Rehabilitation Unit, at The Priory, Dorking, as an Out-of Area patient. This
placement was commissioned by Dorset CCG (as it was then – now Dorset ICB).
Dorking is just over 100 miles from Bournemouth.
In about mid-June 2021 Lauren’s mental health deteriorated and it was determined on
01.07.21 that Lauren needed to be transferred to a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit to
keep her safe. On 23.07.21 Lauren was transferred to Pankhurst Ward PICU, The
1
Priory, Cheadle. Again, Lauren was an Out-of-Area patient at a distance, now, of some
260 miles from home. This placement was commissioned by Dorset Healthcare NHS
Trust.
Lauren was ready for step-down from the PICU by 02.09.21. The plan being to seek an
acute bed, at or closer to home, while a suitable Rehabilitation Unit was found.
Lauren remained in the PICU, at The Priory, Cheadle for the next 5 months, until her
death on 26.02.22 following a ligaturing incident on 24.02.22. Over that time Lauren’s
mental health deteriorated, with an increasing number of incidents of self-harm. A major
factor in Lauren’s deterioration was the distance from her home and family.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
Matter One
This is the second inquest I have heard where the delayed discharge/repatriation of an
Out-of-Area patient from an independent provider’s hospital has been a contributory
factor in that patient’s death. Lauren was 20 years of age. The other inquest involved a
15 years old patient - 115 miles from home.
Both of these cases illustrate,
a) Underfunding for local mental health beds.
b) An over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds.
The Government set itself a target to eliminate inappropriate (which I infer would include
delayed discharge) Out-of-Area in-patient placements in mental health services for
adults by 2020-21.
Matter Two
The
Healthcare NHS Trust, The Priory and relevant parties.
inadequate and
identified
jury
insufficient communication between Dorset
I heard evidence that Dorset Healthcare NHS Trust have appointed a designated Care
Co-ordinator for its Out-of-Area patients. Having a single point of contact will alleviate
some of the communication issues identified.
I heard evidence from The Priory as to some of the challenges it faces when dealing
with the NHS commissioning bodies, be they Hospital Trusts or Integrated Care Boards.
The Priory is just one of the several independent providers of mental health care.
1. The Priory deals with 42 NHS separate commissioning bodies.
2. There are multiple software programmes for record keeping for these organisations,
which makes transfer and sharing of clinical information cumbersome and difficult,
as direct sharing is not possible.
3. These bodies have varying processes and requests for communication.
4. There is no national standard process for referrals into the independent sector nor
for discharge/repatriation to the ‘home team’.
With regard to delayed discharge/repatriation of an Out-of-Area patient I heard evidence
that The Priory have devised a protocol/standing operating procedure in respect of
delayed discharge, which should reduce the risks of a patient being left miles from home
at all and in any event reduce the time taken to repatriate. However, it relies on the
‘home team’s’ engagement in the process. In brief, the protocol is as follows,
1. Once it has been determined that a patient
is ready for discharge/step-
down/repatriation BUT no bed/placement is available that is a delayed discharge
and the protocol is triggered.
In week one The Priory MDT hold a professionals meeting to explore reasons for
2.
2
3.
4.
delay and together with the ‘home team’ identify SMART actions.
If after 4 weeks there is limited progress The Priory MDT will request the ‘home
team’ ICB to arrange a Care & Treatment Review.
If there is, by then, no or little progress there should be discussions between the
Priory Head of NHS Partnerships and the ‘home team’ Commissioning Managers.
5. As a last resort: service of notice on the patient’s placement.
The protocol is heavily reliant on engagement from, and cooperation of, the numerous
NHS commissioning bodies. The protocol requires a low threshold for the escalation of
delays to the appropriate manager and/or commissioner at the ‘home service’.
There are over 60 independent providers for in-patient mental health services.
The initiative taken by The Priory is to be applauded but it is just one of many
independent providers for some 42 separate NHS commissioning bodies. There is a
clear danger that it will not be adopted by the other independent providers, indeed there
is no reason for them to be aware of its existence. In the premises, Out-of-Area
delayed discharge, and its detrimental effect on a patient’s mental health, will remain a
matter of concern.
to eliminating
While there remains a shortage of local NHS mental beds and the Government remains
committed
the
inappropriate Out-of-Area
development of protocols or standardised operating procedures to avoid delayed
discharge, or limit the length of delay, is a clearly a matter for the NHS rather than the
individual independent providers.
in-patient placements
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the
power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report.
The coroner may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons namely, who may find it useful or of interest.
1. Lauren’s family
2. The Priory
3. Dorset Healthcare NHS Trust
4. Dorset ICB
5. Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
Dated this 19th day of September 2023
3
Andrew Bridgman
HM Assistant Coroner
4
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
From Maria Caulfield MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Department of Health & Social Care 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 9 May 2024 Andrew Bridgman Assistant Coroner South Coroner's Office 1 Mount Tabor Street Stockport SK1 3AG Dear Mr Bridgman, Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 19 September 2023 about the death of Lauren Elizabeth Bridges. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for mental health and patient safety. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Lauren’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. Please accept my sincere apologies for the significant delay in responding to this matter. Your report raises concerns about delayed discharges from out of area placements in independent mental health inpatient settings. In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with NHS England and I understand that NHS England and Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust have each already carefully considered the matters of concern in your report and have provided you with comprehensive responses setting out the actions being taken to improve care quality and patient safety. The Department recognises that it is important that those who require inpatient care are treated as close to home as possible, which is why we publicly committed to eliminating all inappropriate acute out of area placements by 2020/21. Unfortunately, COVID-19-related pressures contributed to services missing that target. These pressures were caused by a number of factors, including bed closures due to the need for infection control; reduced community networks; staff absences; and higher levels of demand for NHS mental health services. However, I would like to assure you that that we remain committed to eliminating all inappropriate acute out of area placements for adults aged 18 and over. All systems that still have inappropriate out of area placements have been required to refresh their local plans to ensure these placements are eliminated everywhere as soon as reasonably possible. NHS England continues to work with the worst performing areas and support them to improve and we are working with NHS England to ensure that systems prioritise this, including a focus on discharge and flow. To support adult social care and discharges across the NHS, including from mental health inpatient settings, up to £2.8 billion was made available in 2023/24 and £4.7 billion in 2024/25, reducing bed occupancy. The Department has also worked with NHS England and other system partners to develop statutory guidance for discharge from all mental health inpatient settings, which was published in January 2024. This sets out how NHS bodies and local authorities can work together to support the discharge process, improving flow and ensuring the right support in the community. The guidance is available at: Hospital discharge and community support guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) More widely, through the NHS Long Term Plan, we have invested almost £1 billion extra in community mental health care for adults by March 2024, expanding community mental health services to reduce reliance on inpatient treatment, so that patients are supported to stay well in their communities. This major expansion in funding for community mental health services commenced in all areas in 2021/22 and has been key to managing pressures on beds. Turning to your concerns around an over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds, private companies have always played a role in the NHS and patients should expect a safe and good quality service regardless of whether their care is delivered by independent sector or public sector providers. As set out in NHS England’s response to your report, all integrated care boards have been tasked with developing 3-year plans to localise and realign inpatient mental health care, including care provided by the Independent Sector, as part of NHS England’s mental health, learning disability and autism inpatient quality transformation programme. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely, MARIA CAULFIELD
Andrew Bridgman Assistant Coroner South Manchester area Corporate Office Sentinel House Nuffield Industrial Estate 4-6 Nuffield Road Poole, Dorset BH17 0RB Dear Mr Bridgman, Re Regulation 28 Report following the inquest touching on the death of Lauren Bridges We acknowledge receipt of the Regulation 28 Report issued to Dorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust following the inquest touching on the death of Lauren Bridges. The report, dated 19th September 2023, was received by Dorset HealthCare on 24th November 2023, following contact with your office. Our thoughts are with Lauren’s family following their loss and we are truly sorry for the circumstances in which Lauren died. After Lauren died, we undertook a review of the care and support offered and we have made changes to the way in which we support our patients who are receiving care out of area. In respect of the specific regulation 28 matters of concern notified to the Trust, I will respond to these in turn: a) The omission to update the Hospital Overview timeously and correctly. In respect of the Hospital Overview document, we have made a number of changes and improvements to ensure that this is updated in a timely and correct way. The changes we have made are detailed below: 1. The Trust has undertaken a comprehensive review to ensure that all patients who are receiving acute care funded by the Trust in Out of Area beds are accurately identified as such on our clinical system. 2. We have enhanced the daily Hospital Overview situation report which is accurate at the point it is sent, with the purpose of providing a summary at the start of the working day across the organisation to key colleagues including senior clinicians and managers. The information contained in the daily Hospital Overview template is updated manually by the night practitioners from data contained in the clinical system. It is then checked by both the Out of Area Co-Ordinator and the Clinical Site Managers, who are clinicians who are overseeing bed flow decisions, to ensure that the information contained in this document is correct for that point in time. The Hospital Overview is then emailed to key colleagues to provide a summary of the bed state every 24 hours. 3. In addition, the Trust has also added a specific section to the daily Hospital Overview template showing patients who are in out of area beds who require repatriation to a local bed. This ensures that Clinical Site Managers are taking these patients into account when making daily decisions on bed allocations. 4. We have also made improvements to our automated reporting. We have updated the electronic admission form template that is embedded in the patient record system so that when a patient requires admission, we capture more robust information, which is then also reportable in a bed state automated report. This automated report provides additional information in respect of patients in excess of the Hospital Overview document, for example a list of names and length of stay for every patient admitted to hospital, to an out of area bed, and those awaiting admission. This more detailed information is used by clinicians directly involved in bed flow and inpatient care to support their daily work. b) It can be inferred from the absence of any documentation regarding discussions about Lauren’s repatriation to an available bed that no such discussion took place. In respect of this matter of concern, I have focused our response on actions we have taken to improve the oversight, routine review, and documentation in respect of admission and / or repatriation decisions including for patients whose inpatient care is provided out of area: 1. The Trust has implemented a new Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Enabling Purposeful Admissions. This clearly sets out the required process, roles and responsibilities of key staff and the required recording in respect of inpatient flow decisions. This SOP has been communicated to staff and included on our staff intranet. 2. We have reviewed our daily clinical meeting that takes place in respect of bed flow and set out requirements in the meeting's terms of reference, including standard items for discussion and recording standards. These terms of reference are included within the Enabling Purposeful Admissions SOP. 3. As referred to during the inquest, we have appointed a dedicated Out of Area Coordinator post, which is a clinical post. We have also written and implemented a SOP for the ‘Use of Out of Area Acute and Psychiatric Intensive Care (PICU) Mental Health Inpatient beds: Therapeutic inpatient care and proactive discharge planning’. The SOP includes standards to be met in respect of regular contact and recording of that contact with patients who are out of area, and their families / carers, as well as with clinicians working in out of area providers overseeing that care. 4. Clinical Site Managers now use a live Microsoft Teams channel for communicating updates between them on requirements around bed flow, which is linked to patient electronic records. This replaces previous paper handover records and ensures that there is documentation of bed flow discussions and decisions, for example, if there are moves of patients between wards in order to create bed capacity in a specific ward to facilitate an admission, that this is 2 appropriately communicated between Clinical Site Managers. This supports better handover between Clinical Site Managers coming onto a shift, so they can understand the status of pending admissions and decisions taken in the previous shift. In addition, discussions regarding individual patients are also recorded in the patient's own electronic patient record (known as RiO) to ensure a complete up to date record for each individual patient. 5. A regular audit takes place every month involving reviewing the records of all patients receiving their care out of area against the standards set out within the SOP. This audit is undertaken by our Nursing and Quality Directorate and will remain ongoing. Audit standards include evidence of OOA coordinator input, date of last input, that the patient has an allocated Care Coordinator, date of last input from them, date of last contact with patient and family, date of Care Programme Approach meeting, date of last clinician attendance at a multi- disciplinary team review, and whether there is a discharge / repatriation plan. I can confirm that all of the actions detailed have been completed and ongoing assurance where required is monitored via the monthly audit. We hope we have provided assurances that Dorset HealthCare has addressed the areas identified in the Regulation 28 Report and that we have taken the matter extremely seriously. The DHC Board are sighted on the significance of the Regulation 28 Report. We will continue to report our progress to both our Board and NHS Dorset Integrated Care Board so there is clear visibility of the service improvements being made. We are now confident that the circumstances for Lauren would not be repeated, which we hope will bring some comfort to Lauren’s family. We are also keen to reiterate our sorrow for the circumstances in which Lauren sadly died. Yours sincerely Chief Executive 3
Andrew Bridgman
Manchester South Coroner’s Court
1 Mount Tabor Street
Stockport
SK1 3AG
Dear Coroner,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
9 November 2023
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Lauren Elizabeth Bridges
who died on 26 February 2022.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 19
September 2023 concerning the death of Lauren Elizabeth Bridges on 26 February
2022. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would
like to express my deep condolences to Lauren’s family and loved ones. NHS England
are keen to assure the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Lauren’s
care have been listened to and reflected upon.
In your Report you raised concerns over underfunding of local mental health beds and
the mental health impact of Out of Area (OAP) placements and an over-reliance by
the NHS on independent providers. You also raised the issue of inadequate and
insufficient communication between the Trust, independent provider and other
relevant parties, the challenges that can be posed by having separate NHS
commissioning bodies, and the need for protocols/standardised operating procedures
to avoid delayed discharge from OAPs/Psychiatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs).
The NHS remains committed to eliminating the practice of adult acute Out of Area
Placements. All Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) were asked to work towards
eliminating the practice in NHS England’s 2023/24 Priorities and Operational Planning
Guidance. An ICB is a statutory NHS organisation which is responsible for developing
a plan for meeting the health needs of the population, managing the NHS budget, and
arranging for the provision of health services within a given geographical area. They
replace clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), taking on the NHS planning functions
previously held by CCGs, as well as absorbing some planning roles from NHS
England.
While good progress was being made ahead of the Covid-19 pandemic in eliminating
the practice of OAPs, the subsequent increase in prevalence of mental health
problems against the backdrop of an existing treatment gap has made this even more
difficult.
Further, while the level of NHS investment in mental health services is higher than
ever before and investment targets are being met nationally, pressures on both
community and inpatient services remain very high.
In July 2023 NHS England published renewed guidance to support the commissioning
and delivery of timely access to high quality therapeutic inpatient care, close to home
and in the least restrictive setting possible. Key to this are the principles of: timely and
purposeful admissions that are local, timely discharge, joined-up care and continuous
improvement.
To implement this, all ICBs have been tasked with developing 3-year plans to localise
and realign inpatient mental health care, including care provided by the Independent
Sector, as part of the mental health, learning disability and autism inpatient quality
transformation programme launched in 2022. Health and Care systems across
England are currently being supported to operationalise the guidance via 3-year plans
with direct support from regional and national teams. The transformation programme
is underpinned by a £36 million investment.
NHS England recognises the critical importance of strong commissioner oversight and
joint working in inpatient mental health care, and as such has made it a requirement
that these 3-year plans be co-produced – including with patients, families and their
carers.
We are also currently engaging on how the roles and responsibilities for
commissioning and assuring the quality of mental health, learning disabilities and
autism inpatient care across the NHS and the independent sector can be
strengthened, with a view to embed learnings and best practice in National Quality
Board policy and governance frameworks from 2024 onwards.
My regional colleagues in charge of quality of care in the South West have also
engaged with Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust (‘the Trust’) on the
matters raised in your Report. The Trust have acknowledged that there were missed
opportunities in Lauren’s care, and I understand have written to Lauren’s family
separately to express their regret. They have also provided NHS England with
assurances that actions have been taken to address the identified learnings. These
actions have included:
• Reviewing all standard operating procedures
•
Improving the way we engage and communicate with providers and families
• Better care co-ordination and involvement of local teams to address our
patient’s clinical needs and plans for repatriation.
•
Improved data and oversight including regular auditing of care arrangements.
• Appointment of an out of area co-ordinator and a programme of quality
assurance of providers used by the Trust.
The Trust advises that the work is resulting in improvements and a reduction in the
time patients are receiving care outside of area, where there is no clinical need. They
have also secured planning permission to rebuild some of their mental health inpatient
facilities and increase the availability of PICU for adults and younger people. Subject
to business cases and plans being agreed, they hope to have new facilities in 2026.
In the shorter term they have also taken the opportunity of using winter monies to
create a discharge and flow team for mental health and have recently appointed a
Consultant Psychiatrist to provide clinical leadership to this team.
The Trust now has a formal arrangement with Marchwood Priority in Southampton, for
those occasions where an OAP may still be required based on clinical need and due
to capacity. Marchwood Priory is geographically one of the closest providers to Dorset,
which hopefully improves the chances of families being able to visit and maintain
contact.
I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking
place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed
by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and
other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key
learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both
a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends
that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.