Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0042, written 29 Jan 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 29 Jan 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0042 |
| Deceased | Terence Briney |
| Coroner | Alison Mutch |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Stockport NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Greater Manchester Integrated Care 1 CORONER I am, Alison Mutch, HM Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 21st March 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Terence Briney. The investigation concluded on the 8th December 2023 and the conclusion was one of Natural Causes. The medical cause of death was 1a) Acute respiratory event on the background of an aspiration 1b) Frailty II) Myocardial Infarction, Ischaemic Heart disease and Aortic Stenosis 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Terence Briney's health began to deteriorate significantly from July 2022. His appetite reduced, he had increasing lethargy and developed tremors. He began to lose weight. No investigations were carried out until he was referred to gastroenterology on the cancer pathway. He was very frail by the time of the referral. The tests indicated his oesophagus was not functioning effectively but there was no clear cause. He was admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital on 15th March 2023 after the GP examined him and was concerned about how frail he was. On admission no clear reversible cause was identified. He was put on Nil by Mouth due to his poor oesophageal functionality. He presented a high risk of aspiration. On the balance of probabilities, the deterioration in his oesophageal function was due to an undiagnosed neurological condition. On 17th March he suffered an acute respiratory event due to aspirating on his saliva. He died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 17th March as a consequence. 1 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – The inquest heard evidence that symptoms raised by Mr Briney and his family were attributed to old age rather than a possible neurological disease. The evidence before the inquest was that there were situations where clinicians would attribute a deterioration to the aging process rather than consider the whole picture and investigate if there was a treatable condition. This presented a risk that treatable conditions in the elderly could be missed. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 25th March 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely 1) on behalf of the Family and; 2) Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 2 9 Alison Mutch HM Senior Coroner 29.01.2024 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
4th Floor, Stopford House
Piccadilly
Stockport
SK1 3XE
Date: 2nd April 2024
Private & Confidential
Ms Alison Mutch
H M Senior Coroner
1 Mount Tabor Street
Stockport
SK1 3XE
Dear Ms Mutch
Inquest into the death of Mr Terence Briney - Date of Death 17 March 2023
I refer to the Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued following the inquest
into the death of the above named. I am sorry to learn of the circumstances of Mr Briney’s
death and offer my sincere condolences to his family.
You seek assurance in response to the following cause for concern:-
The inquest heard evidence that symptoms raised by Mr Briney and his family
were attributed to old age rather than a possible neurological disease. The
evidence before the inquest was that there were situations where clinicians
would attribute deterioration to the ageing process rather than consider the
whole picture and investigate if there was a treatable condition. This presented
a risk that treatable conditions in the elderly could be missed.
In order to address this concern we have liaised with Mr Briney’s GP and Stockport NHS
Foundation Trust (Stepping Hill Hospital).
Mr Briney attended A&E at Stepping Hill Hospital on 19th May 2022 following a fall down a
full flight of stairs backwards. He underwent a CT scan of his cervical spine which showed no
evidence of acute cervical injury. He also had a CT head which showed no haemorrhages, no
space-occupying lesions, and no obstructive hydrocephalic changes. There were generalised
involutional changes noted which were put down to chronic small vessel disease. A soft tissue
swelling was noted and a right occipital skin discontinuity which was commented on as being
a likely post-traumatic laceration. The CT head summary showed ‘no evidence of intercranial
haemorrhage or recent territorial infarct’
He initially had his wound sutured in A&E and was due to be discharged but experienced a
vasovagal episode on return from the toilet following this, and therefore went on to have an
ECG, blood tests and a chest x-ray and was referred to the medical team. He was then
admitted under the medical team from 19th May 2022 until 25th May 2022 and the reason for
admission on the discharge letter is ‘fall with head injury’. His Amlodipine and Diltiazem
medications were stopped due to low blood pressure during this admission.
Mr Briney’s family believe that Mr Briney health deteriorated following this significant fall in
May 2022.
On review of notes, there was no report or documentation of lethargy or tremors when the
gentleman presented at the practice or when his family contacted the practice. It was not
until Dr Hudson visited the Mr Briney on 15th March 2023 where she noted forearm
fasciculations which the family reported had been present for 12 months. This however
had not been noted in any previous interactions between Mr Briney and the practice.
Mr Briney’s weight loss was first noted in a consultation on the 27th July, when he reported
that he had been eating less. It was not discussed again until a consultation on 3rd of
February 2023.
visited Mr Briney at home on the 15th March at the gentleman’s wife’s request.
His family were very concerned about ongoing weight loss and general deterioration.
discussed the results of the CT scan with the family which did not show any cancer
and that he had a follow-up arranged with
at Stepping Hill in April. They reported
that the previous year he had walked three to four miles but now had very poor mobility
within the home. He had a 17kg weight loss. He had difficulty swallowing solids. He had
slurred speech. He felt tired all the time and very weak. He had urinary incontinence.
On examination
found him to be very frail with slurred speech, his blood pressure
was slightly low at 101/69, his pulse was 79 bpm regular which is normal, and his
observed fasciculations (twitching
temperature was normal at 36.1 degrees.
muscles) in the muscles of his left forearm as he was at rest.
decided to admit him acutely under the medical team and wondered whether he
referred him
may have a neurological condition such as motor neurone disease.
to the same-day emergency care unit at Stepping Hill and advised he should go in via A&E
and his wife agreed to arrange for an ambulance to take him there.
Mr Briney was admitted to Stockport NHS Foundation Trust (Stepping Hill Hospital) on 15
March 2023 following referral by his GP due to a rapid deterioration for the last month; a
past medical history was noted as follows:-
• Hypertension
• High lipid level
• Previous history of angina
• Moderate AS
• Recent diagnosis of dysphagia and weight loss of around 14 kg
• Barium swallow 23.2.23: moderate, silent penetration of the airway is seen during
swallowing. Marked dysmotility of the oesophagus is noted
had been cutting up her husband’s food) following episodes of choking.
Discussion with family highlighted a 12-month history of weight loss with significant muscle
waste over the last 6 months. They also raised concern in regard to Mr Briney’s swallow
(
Regarding the deterioration in mobility if was noted that Mr Briney had attended an evening
at the theatre in January 2023 but was now housebound. The family also reported slurred
speech and difficulty in understanding what Mr Briney was saying along with fluctuating levels
of confusion.
On arrival to the Emergency Department, Mr Briney’s observations were stable. His NEWS
score was 0 in the ambulance but on arrival scored 1 due to confusion. On examination
there was nothing significant apart from the fact that he was dry and looked dehydrated.
His neurology examination appeared normal but there was significant muscle waste. Bloods
did not raise any concerns for infection.
At this stage there was no clear indication of what had caused the deterioration but the
following considerations were noted:-
- Neurological pathway or rapid onset of dementia
- Significant frailty
- Confusion query cause, possibly in the context of rapid onset dementia
At this point further investigations were ordered to be performed including ECG, IV fluid,
referral to gastroenterology due to marked oesophageal disability. A SALT review was also
requested to evaluate Mr Briney’s swallow and a neurology review for clarification of cause
of the deterioration.
The following morning it was noted on consultant review that Mr Briney’s GCS score had
deteriorated and was now 12/15. The working diagnostic was probable vascular dementia.
Further investigations were ordered including a CT head and PR examination (which was
normal). In view of the pattern of cognitive decline syphilis serology was also requested.
An urgent CT scan was performed and reviewed that day revealing isodense extra -axial
collections overlying both cerebral convexities (right more than left). The findings were
suggestive of chronic subdural haematoma or subdural hydroma. There was no associated
mass-effect. It was advised for neurosurgical team referral.
Advice from the neurological team following review of the CT scan was as follows:-
(1) Bilateral isodence subdural collection - Minimal midline shift
(2) PS3 deterioration (query whether this was new). This referred to baseline of
independence and was documented: Confined to bed/chair more than 50% of waking
hours
Neurological impression was that it was unlikely that presenting symptoms were unrelated
to CT head findings.
The following plan was agreed:-
(1) No need for neurological intervention
(2) Admit locally
(3) Neuro observations
(4) Investigate other causes for deterioration in mobility - if slurred speech is new to rule
out stroke
(5) If Mr Binney deteriorates to re-scan and re-discuss
(6) Clear C Spine
Neurological consultant input was agreement that the chronic subdural collection was unlikely
to be related to presenting symptoms. No neurological intervention indicated but a plan to
re-scan within 2-4 weeks in the event that Mr Briney did not return to his baseline.
Later that night (early hours of 17 March 2023 Mr Briney was reviewed by the on-call doctor
due to a sudden deterioration of his saturation. Sats had dropped to 80% with Mr Brinney
already on 15L O2 which had not been required previously. Suction was attempted but there
was no improvement.
Arterial blood gas revealed further deterioration indicating mixed metabolic and respiratory
acidosis with very low pH (7.130) and high CO2 (13.95) and high lactate (3.0).
This was considered to be in keeping with an acute respiratory event, likely from aspiration
of own saliva which had been the main concern at the point of admission.
Shortly after this Mr Briney was reviewed further by the on-call Registrar who noted a drop
in GCS and hypoxia.
At this stage the Registrar was concerned that this was potentially an NSTEMI, noting the
ECG to have revealed a ST depression on the arterial lead. The plan was for treatment for
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS); there also remained concern re the findings from the CT
scan. Mr Briney was prescribed Fondaparinux and aspirin as treatment for ACS.
At 08:30 on 17 March 2023 Mr Briney was reviewed again and further deterioration was
noted. Family was contacted and made aware of the significant deterioration and that it was
likely that Mr Briney was entering the dying stage.
, Consultant, reviewed Mr Briney at 09:23 and whilst he was writing his notes, Mr
Briney was noted to have sadly passed away.
In light of the Prevention of Future Deaths Report, the GP Partners reviewed Mr Briney’s case
and discussed if and what could have been done differently. They analysed all of the
interactions between Mr Briney and the practice from the point of his discharge from Stepping
Hill Hospital on 25 May 2022 (this admission had been due to a fall down a flight of stairs).
They highlighted the consultation on the 3rd February 2023.
Mr Briney attended to see
his fall in May 2022 and his subsequent decline as outlined below.
with his wife and daughter. There were concerns following
▪ Weakness in hands
▪ Ongoing dizzy spells and falls
▪ Reduced appetite
▪ Weight loss
▪ Choking on food
▪ Nausea when eating
▪ Confusion
▪ Reduced mobility
At this point his wife was having to fully care for him.
His weight was documented at 57kg, and it was arranged for him to have further bloods and
referrals to the dietician/falls team/frailty team. His daughter was advised to contact Adult
Social Services for further support.
discussed with a colleague (not named in the notes) regarding his choking, weight
loss and nausea and the possibility of a gastroscopy was discussed.
During this consultation
and agreed to make referrals to:
- Dietician
- Falls Team
- Frailty Team
- Upper GI Suspected Cancer Pathway under the two week wait rule.
- Daughter was contacting Adult Social Care and Social Services for support in arranging
an attendance allowance.
-
These referrals were processed and sent on the 6th February.
The consensus amongst the GP Partners was that the two week wait referral along with the
other referrals to local services were appropriate. These were appropriate referrals given Mr
Briney’s symptoms, which were suggestive of a possible upper GI cancer.
Given the comments in the Regulation 28 Report: ‘The inquest heard evidence that
symptoms raised by Mr Briney and his family were attributed to old age rather than a possible
neurological disease’, the GPs discussed whether they would have considered a referral to
neurology at this stage. However, on reflection Mr Briney’s symptoms were in keeping with
a possible upper GI cancer and it was deemed clinically appropriate to exclude cancer first
before investigating other referral options.
Whilst it was discussed that perhaps a neurological referral could have been made following
the consultation on the 3rd of February, until this point and in the absence of any focal
neurological symptoms or specific neurological symptoms such as fasciculation being
previously reported to his GP it was always more likely that his symptoms were due to a more
prevalent/common pathology, e.g. upper GI cancer as a cause of swallowing problems with
weight loss, choking and nausea in an older adult, postural hypotension leading to falls and
progressive frailty following falls leading to further functional deterioration in an older patient.
If a neurological referral had been done on 3rd February 2023, it is difficult to be certain if he
would have received an appointment by 15th March 2023 given current waiting times of many
months, even for urgent referrals.
If he did see a neurologist and had received a neurological diagnosis, Mr Briney and his family
could have received information and support. However, it is uncertain whether a referral and
diagnosis would have changed the outcome in terms of his prognosis.
The GPs also reflected that here at Cheadle Hulme medical group we operate a
principal/personal list and as a practice we strive for continuity of care. It is not always
possible and on reflection perhaps if Mr Briney had seen the same clinician on every occasion
post his fall in the May 2022 before Dr Hudson visited him at home, it is possible his decline
may have been more noticeable.
Since July 2023 we have moved to a total triage model and all medical requests are triaged
by a GP who will determine the next course of action thus ensuring continuity care more
successfully.
During the reflection process, it was also discussed that although Mr Briney and his family
did respond to text messages from the practice, that there could be more consideration to
the age of patients who we engage with via text message. Whilst it is common practice for
the GPs to discuss with the patients that they are going to send them a text, we should
always ensure that they are able and happy to receive and respond using this method of
communication.
Having reflected and discussed Mr Briney’s presentation, all GPs are now more likely to
consider neurological causes for weight loss and swallowing difficulties in older people,
alongside the need to rule out cancer, which would always, realistically need to be done first.
This consideration to be documented in the notes to aid other clinicians who may see the
patient subsequently.
By coming together to review and discuss the circumstances surrounding Mr Briney’s case,
this has increased the likelihood of GPs considering the possibility of neurological conditions
in older people presenting with similar symptoms. It has also facilitated detailed discussion
and hence shared learning. However, the partners felt that they would not have acted
differently in this case given the symptoms and information available at the time.
From the review of this case, I am satisfied that both the GP Practice and the hospital team
did make effort to identify treatable causes for this gentleman’s presentation and that
appropriate investigations were ordered, and expert advice sought with a view to appropriate
treatment. It is acknowledged that the neurological referral could have been made following
the GP consultation on 3 February 2023 although it is unclear whether this would have led
to an appointment for this gentleman prior to his admission to hospital the following month.
The overall review of this case highlights that communication with the family was not always
as timely and I am disappointed to see that family were not contacted overnight on the night
of 16 – 17 March 2023 when the significant deterioration in this gentleman’s condition
occurred as this would have enabled the family to have more time with Mr Briney in the final
hours of his life. I appreciate that we cannot make this right but I would ask that my sincere
apologies are conveyed to Mr Briney’s family for the delay in contacting them at such an
important time.
I hope the above is helpful to you but if you do require any further information please contact
Yours sincerely
Deputy Chief Nurse (Quality and
Safety)
p.p. on behalf of
Interim Deputy Chief Executive
And Chief Nursing Officer
NHS GM Integrated Care
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.