Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0046, written 31 Jan 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 31 Jan 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0046 |
| Deceased | Shahzadi Khan |
| Coroner | Alison Mutch |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 1 CORONER I am, Alison Mutch, HM Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 15th February 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Shahzadi Khan. The investigation concluded on the 23rd November 2023 and the conclusion was one of Narrative: Suicide contributed to by a failure to effectively and appropriately manage her care in the community following discharge from hospital. The medical cause of death was 1a) Drug Toxicity. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On 29th December 2022, Shahzadi Khan was detained under section 2 of the Mental Health Act due to her mental state and the risks she presented. She was found to have had a manic episode with psychotic symptoms. Due to a lack of beds, she was placed in a privately-run mental health hospital in Norfolk. She remained there until her discharge to the family home on 26th January 2023. She was commenced on Olanzapine and Zopiclone for her mental health whilst an inpatient. Her diagnosis on discharge was mania with psychotic symptoms. She was to remain on olanzapine in the community. Her placement out of area contributed to disjointed and inadequate discharge planning to support her in the community and was exacerbated by poor communication between the team managing out of area placements and the local team. As a consequence, the aftercare planning did not take place in accordance with S117 Mental Health Act. This was exacerbated by a failure by all health professionals involved in her care within the mental health trust to recognise that she needed to be referred on to the Trafford Shared Care pathway. A referral would have ensured she received support and care for at least 12 weeks when she 1 returned to the community. There is no clear reason for this failure. She was seen by the Home-Based Treatment Team (HBTT) on 28th January and 2nd February, then discharged back to her GP. Within a week of that discharge from HBTT, which meant she had been left with no mental health support, she had deteriorated significantly. On 9th February her GP sent her to hospital for emergency assessment due to her presentation. She was discharged home to be seen by the Home- Based Treatment Team on 11th February. She was seen by that team on 11th, 12th, and 13th February. There was still no recognition of the fact that the Trafford policy was not being followed. She had indicated her lack of compliance with olanzapine, suicidal thoughts and her behaviour on 13th February was erratic. On 14th February 203 she took a fatal overdose of prescribed zopiclone at her home address. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. The inquest heard evidence that a shortage of mental health beds nationally meant that the situation that arose here of a placement out of area many miles from home was not unusual and that private beds were being used on a regular basis due to a shortage of NHS beds. The inquest heard that this meant that there were a number of consequences as a result all of such placements which could as in Ms Khan’s case impact on a patient and increase the risk they presented. In particular: A family could not easily stay in contact and visiting was almost impossible. This meant a patient felt more isolated and their family could not provide information effectively to the treating clinicians. Where a non-NHS bed was being used or an out of trust bed was being used notes were not easily shared as different electronic systems were used. Out of area trusts/private providers would not be familiar with local arrangements to support discharge and had to rely on local trust teams to put plans in place which could as in this case lead to less effective communication 2. There was evidence from her family that her deterioration was in part due to her going through the menopause and that had there been better awareness of this as a factor in mental health deterioration for some women and better support in place, interventions could have taken place at an earlier stage and been 2 more effective. 3. The inquest heard that due to its size the mental health trust covers a number of areas. Each area has its own systems and pathways. Lack of understanding of these pathways by coordinating teams meant that patients were not being moved onto the correct pathway for care. The inquest heard that this was compounded by a lack of awareness by the Trafford HBTT of the local pathway for a patient such as Ms Khan and the need for a clear discharge plan to be in place that was understood by all those involved in a patient’s care including her family and mental health care workers. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 25th March 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely 1) Mrs Khan on behalf of the Family; 2) Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and; 3) Southern Hill Hospital, who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Alison Mutch HM Senior Coroner 29.01.2024 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
From Minister Caulfield MP Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Mental Health and Women's Health Strategy 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 18 April 2024 Alison Mutch HM Senior Coroner for the coroner area of South Manchester Area Coroner Dear Ms Mutch Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 29 January 2024 about the death of Shahzadi Khan. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for Mental Health and Womens Strategy. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Ms Khan’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are very concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. Please also accept my sincere apologies for the delay in responding to this matter. The report raises the concerns about: - how a how a shortage of mental health beds nationally can lead to patients being placed far from home, impacting their care and increasing risks. Key issues include families not being able to stay in contact or visit. Difficulties in communication and sharing information between patients, families, and clinicians, especially when non- NHS or out-of-trust beds were used. Additionally, out-of-area trusts and private providers lacked familiarity with local discharge support arrangements, resulting in less effective communication and coordination. - The inquest heard that due to its size the mental health trust covers a number of areas. Each area has its own systems and pathways. Lack of understanding of these pathways by coordinating teams meant that patients were not being moved onto the correct pathway for care. The inquest heard that this was compounded by a lack of awareness by the Trafford HBTT of the local pathway for a patient such as Ms Khan and the need for a clear discharge plan to be in place that was understood by all those involved in a patient’s care including her family and mental health care workers. - There was evidence from Ms Khan’s family that her deterioration was in part due to her going through the menopause and that had there been better awareness of this as a factor in mental health deterioration for some women and better support in place, interventions could have taken place at an earlier stage and been more effective. In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with NHS England and the Care Quality Commission. To improve the issue of out of area placements, and to support adult social care and discharge, up to £2.8 billion has been made available in 2023/24 and £4.7 billion in 2024/25. This can be used to support discharge from mental health inpatient settings, reducing bed occupancy and OAPs. The Department has been working with NHS England and other 1 partners to develop statutory guidance for discharge from all mental health inpatient settings. This was published on 26 January 2024, setting out how NHS bodies and local authorities can work together to support the discharge process, improving flow and ensuring the right support in the community. Private companies have always played a role in the NHS, and patients should expect a safe and good quality service regardless of whether their care is delivered by independent sector or public sector providers. All providers, whether independent or NHS, must register with the Care Quality Commission and follow a set of fundamental standards of safety and quality below which care should never fall. We have also made specific enquiries at local level. Up until September 2022 Greater Manchester had very low numbers of reportable out of area placements. They then experienced a gradual increase. The management of contracted independent sector provision and out of area placements is managed by the North-West Bed Bureau. Following the increase in reportable out of area placements the capacity within the North-West Bed Bureau was strengthened. Practitioners were allocated to specific providers which enabled them to develop better relationships- within this was included in person visits to better understand the settings they were placing patients in. There were always strong processes in place for patients placed within Greater Manchester but in a different local authority to the one in which they resided. These processes and policies have been reviewed and strengthened to ensure the same rigor and oversight is in place for those patients who are placed outside of Greater Manchester. There is a weekly meeting at NHSGM ICB level (Multi Agency Discharge Event) about out of area placements ensuring that as an ICB, they have real grip and control. There is also a trajectory of improvement in place with their NHS Trusts to reduce the number of out of area placements To raise awareness of menopause for healthcare staff including the effect of menopause on mental health, funding has been given to Mind in Greater Manchester (this is a partnership of five local Minds working together to ensure people experience better mental health and to support people with their mental health to live well and feel valued in their communities and at work). The funding will: • Enable local Minds to provide free training to Small and Medium Enterprises (SME’s), that have less than 250 employees and may not have the funding to access such training, to raise awareness of menopause to both managers and colleagues • Fund free mindfulness and relaxation for menopause courses. These courses support individuals in learning mindfulness and meditation to give them greater capacity to manage the emotional and physical impacts of menopause and to improve their mental health. • Delivery of free, culturally appropriate and specific menopause awareness sessions in different communities across Greater Manchester delivering in a range of multicultural languages and providing in-depth understanding of symptoms and what help is accessible Greater Manchester has also provided a free access to menopause resource for anyone working in health and care in the city region. It is hoped that this course will help form part of a wider cultural change that leads to better support for people going through the menopause, whilst also helping individuals understand the challenges and how to get the right help. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Best Wishes, MARIA CAULFIELD
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.