Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Richard Fitzgerald

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0369, written 10 Jul 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Jul 2024
Reference2024-0369
DeceasedRichard Fitzgerald
CoronerNadia Persaud
Coroner areaEast London
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

MISS  N PERSAUD
HER  MAJESTY'S  CORONER

EAST TONDON

Walthamstow  Coroner's Court, Queens  Road  Walthamstow,  E17  8QP
Telepho  ne O2O 8496 5000  Ema il coroners@wa  ltha mforest.gov.  uk

REGULATION  28: REPORTTO  PREVENT  FUTURE  DEATHS  (1)

Ref:23586673

REGUTATION  28 REPORT TO  PREVENT  FUTURE  DEATHS

THIS REPORT  IS BEING SENT  TO:

 CEO of Serencroft, 

t

CORONER

I am Nadia Persaud, Area  Coroner  for the coroner  area of East London

2

CORONER'S tEGAt  POWERS

I make  this report under paragraph  7, Schedule  5, of the Coroners  and  Justice Act 2009
and Regulations  28 and  29 of the Coroners  (lnvestigations)  Regulations  2013.
htto://www.leeislation.eov. u k/ukpea/2009/2Slsched  ule/5/pa raera  ph/7
http://www.  leeislation.eov.uk/u ksi/2013/1629/pa  rtl7/made

3

INVESTIGATION  and INQUEST

On 3 July 20231commenced  an investigation  into the death of Richard Michael
Fitzgerald  (aged  71 years).  The investigation  concluded  at the end  of the inquest on
the 2 July 2o24.The  conclusion  of the inquest was a narrat¡ve conclus¡on:

Richard  Fitzgerald  died  as a result of choking, whilst  o resídent  in a nursing  home.  His
death  was contributed  to by the absence of a fult and robust core plan to minimise the
known risk

I

 4

CIRCUMSTANCES  OF THE  DEATH

Richard  Fitzgerald  suffered from Alzheimer's Dementia. He was admitted  to Gable
Court Care  Home  in October 2022.ln  March  2023 he suffered  a choking  episode  and
required  admission  to hospital. Following his discharge  from  hospital, he underwent  a
speech and  language therapy  (SALT)  assessment. This assessment confirmed  no organic
swallow  issue,  but Mr Fitzgerald  was at risk of choking  due to him overfilling  his mouth
and  due to him eating  too quickly.  A care plan was directed  by the sALT team to
minimise  his risk of choking.  The nutritional  care  plan  in Gable Court  was  updated to
include the sALT recommendations.  staff  in the care  Home  were aware  of Mr
Fitzgerald  sometimes eating  food  outside of mealtimes; food that was not safely
prepared for him.  There  is no evidence  that this  risk was brought to the attention of
the sALT team. This risk of accessing  food not safely  prepared for him, was not
assessed  or managed  by the care  home  staff. ln addition,  due to his dementia,  Mr
Fitzgerald  did not always allow the close supervision  that  had been  directed  by the
SALT team. On the morning of the 24 June 2023, Mr Fitzgerald  had  his breakfast in his
bedroom.  This  was supervised  by a senior carer.  After  finishing  his breakfast,  the senior
carer  was with another  patient  when she heard  a wheezing  sound.  she found Mr
Fitzgerald  having  difficulty  in breathing  and she pressed the emergency  alarm at 0916.
It is most likely that Mr Fitzgerald  had accessed  uncut  food  from  the breakfast  trolley.
Members of the housekeeping  staff  immediately  attended  and attempted measures to
clear the food blockage  (backslaps and abdominal thrusts).  After pressing the
emergency buzzer a second time, more staff  members  attended.  Abdominal  thrusts
were attempted by male  care staff. The ambulance  was called  at O9I7.  During  the call
to the ambulance  service,  Mr Fitzgerald  was having  increased  difficulty in breathing.
Very  shortly  before the first paramedic's  arrival,  Mr Fitzgerald  stopped  breathing  and
had a very low oxygen  saturation.  The  first paramedic  arrived at his side bV 0923/092a.
Mr Fitzgerald  was found  to be in cardiac  arrest.  The care  home  staff were  not providing
any resuscitative measures  when the paramedic  arrived. The emergency policy in place
required  the care  home staff to commence basic  life support.  This  was  not done.  There
is however  no evidence,  on the balance  of probabilities,  that this would  have
prevented  Mr Fitzgerald's  death. The paramedic  team were  able to remove  the food
blockage  from the airway and they  carried out advanced  life support.  They were able to
achieve  a return of spontaneous circulation  and they transferred Mr Fitzgerald to King
George  Hospital.  Sadl¡  the return of spontaneous circulation  was not maintained.
Resuscitation  cont¡nued,  but sadly,  Mr Fitzgerald  had  suffered  a catastrophic  hypoxic
braín

ssed

on the 26 June 2023

.He

Geo

Ho

at

5

CORONER'S  CONCERNS

During  the course  of the inquest the evidence revealed  matters  giving rise to concern.
ln my opinion  there is a risk that future  deaths  could  occur unless  action  is taken.  ln the
circumstances  it is my statutory duty to report  to you.

The  MATTERS  OF CONCERN  are as follows

t.  The care Home staff were aware  that the  SALT care plan  could not be

consistently followed in terms  of close supervision, but dld not discuss  this with
the  SALT team to ensure  that a contingency care  plan could be put into place.
?  Thp riçk nf t\4r Fitzgcrald  picking  up unoofc food  wog l<nown  to ltaff, but was
lan.

risk assessment  and  risk ma

into the

not

2

 t'

3. The emergency protocol  for choking  was not followed by the staff  in
attendance  on 24 June 2023  (íncluding  qualified  nursing  staff).

4. The Care Home's  investigation  lacked thoroughness and professional curiosity

6

ACTION  SHOULD  BE TAKEN

ln my opinion  action should be taken to prevent future  deaths  and I believe  you
IAND/OR your organisat¡on] have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR  RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond  to this  report  within  56 days  of the date of this  report,
namely by 4 September 2024.1, the coroner,  may extend the period.

Your  response  must contain details of action taken or proposed  to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain  why  no action  is proposed.

8

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent  a copy  of my  report  to the Chief Coroner  and to the family  of Richard
Fitzgerald,  the Care  Quality Commission,  London  Borough  of Redbridge  (Safeguarding
team),  and the local  Director of Public  Health  who  may find it useful  or of interest.

I am  also under a dutyto  send a copy ofyour  response to the ChiefCoroner  and  all
interested  persons  who  in my opinion  should receive  it.

I may also send a copy of your  response to any other person  who I believe may find it
useful  or of interest.

The Chief Coroner may  publish  either  or both  in a complete  or redacted or summary
form.  He may send  a copy of this  report  to any person  who he believes  may find it
useful  or of interest.

You may  make  representations  to me, the coroner, at the time of your response,  about
the release or the publication  of your  response.

q

LO lulv2024

?*\-'- Ms G N Persaud

a
J

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Serencroft (PDF)
MISS N PERSAUD 
HIS MAJESTY'S CORONER 
East London Walthamstow Coroner's Court, 
Queens Road  
Walthamstow, E17 8QP 

30th July 2024.  

Dear Ms Persaud,  

RESPONSE TO REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

This  is  Gable  Court’s  response  to  your  report  made  under  paragraph  7,  Schedule  5,  of  the 
Coroners  and  Justice  Act  2009  and  Regulations  28  and  29  of  the  Coroners  (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013, dated 10 July 2024, following the tragic death of Richard Fitzgerald on 26th June 
2023.  

Thank you for your conduct of the inquest and for your identification of a number of matters of 
concern, which are set out in the Report.  

Richards tragic death has had a profound effect on the whole team and our deepest condolences 
go out to Richard’s family.  

Richard had resided at Gable Court for eight months and during his initial placement, when he 
was able to communicate his needs, he expressed that he was very happy with his placement at 
Gable Court. He had formed many positive relations with his fellow residents, also many staff 
had a very positive relationship with Richard, and they were extremely fond of Richard. Sadly, his 
condition deteriorated, and it became more difficult for Richard to express his needs effectively 
and  it  became  more  and  more  challenging  for  him.  Richard  remains  very  much  deep  in  our 
thoughts.  

As an organisation we will strive in every way to prevent this from happening again.  

Action Gable Court took immediately following the incident.  

1.  Further First aid including Basic life support training has been delivered in house to all 

staff. 

2.  Further Dysphasia, Dysphagia and IDDIS training has been delivered in house to all staff. 
(Since the incident, Gable  court staff have had several  training sessions on Dysphasia 
and IDDIS to ensure all staff understand signs and symptoms and know when to escalate 
any concerns promptly, and to ensure all staff are equipped with the full knowledge and 
are competent as well a confident in an emergency situation.  

3.  The Swallowing policy has been reviewed and updated. This has been disseminated to all 
staff and has been discussed at team meetings and at the daily flash meeting regularly.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4.  Staff are briefed daily at handovers on the importance of any high-risk residents.  

5.  Grab files have been re-issued to all the units.  

6.  Choking risk assessments have been completed on admission and reviewed monthly for 
all  residents  living  at  Gable  Court,  as  well  as  when  instructed  to  do  so  by  external 
professionals or after incidents. 

7.  A new Clinical support manager has been appointed that is highly experienced to support 

the home manager.  

8.  The protocol for the safety of the food trolley has been reviewed. The trolley is not left 

unattended at any time unless it is in a locked room.  

Further improvements we made prior to the hearing on 1st July ’24 to mitigate future incidents:  

1.  A SALT register has been developed and shared with kitchen, including all IDDIS Levels.  
2.  An Escalation to signpost the management team and leadership team at Gable Court, in partic-
ular if they are experiencing challenges with any resident in providing safe care. This includes 
which professionals should be contacted and involved in the resident’s care review.  This also 
includes a risk management plan to support the home in minimising the risk of deterioration in 
the resident’s physical and mental wellbeing.  

3.  An extra member of staff has been allocated to the ground  floor; they  will be present during 

mealtimes to oversee the safety of high-risk residents.  

4.  Ensure that all care plans are being followed and monitoring this, ensuring that difficulties in 
following care plans due to Residents’ behaviours are fed back to external professionals so that 
these can be adapted to ensure the Residents are safe and their needs are being met. 

5.  A Clinical Lead/Unit Manager was appointed to oversee any clinical concerns in all units, care 

plans, risk assessments and to support staff with all clinical work aspects. 

6.  Care plans and risk assessments are now more robust and improved to meet individuals care 

needs. 

7.  Care plan training both online and face to face has taken place. 
8.  Gable court to keep the local authorities informed of any changes in resident’s care needs. 
9.  The Pre-admission assessment has been reviewed in ways that Gable court assess new resi-
dents to ensure that we can fully meet their care needs before admission, especially around 
challenging behaviour and appropriateness of the environment.  

Matter of concern 1  

The Care Home staff were aware that the SALT care plan could not be consistently followed in 
terms  of  close  supervision,  but  dld  not  discuss  this  with  the  SALT  team  to  ensure  that  a 
contingency care plan could be put into place. 

Further action that has been taken since the Inquest 

•  The  Senior  management  team,  alongside  a  specialist  Independent  Consultancy  team 
have reviewed every resident care needs, with swallowing difficulties. They have ensured 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 that  a  robust  risk  assessment  is  in  place,  that  specifically  captures  any  barriers  in 
providing the care that SALT have prescribed. This piece of work has been completed.  

•  Meetings  are  taking  place  with  the  whole  staff  team,  to  share  the  findings  from  the 
Inquest.  These  have  been  transparent  and  used  as  a  learning  opportunity  for  staff  to 
understand,  the  importance  of  escalating  concerns  back  to  the  practitioners  that 
prescribed  the  resident’s  care.  These  meetings  will  continue  over  the  next  couple  of 
weeks, until all staff have been shared lessons learnt. We anticipate that we should have 
met with all the staff by the end of July ’24.  

•  Clinical review meetings that take place are specifically capturing any difficulties staff are 
experiencing in delivering safe, effective care and these will be triggered for a re-referral 
to the relevant professionals. This is an on-going piece of work.  

On-going learning 

•  Clinical  review  meetings  will  take  place  every  2  weeks  that  will  identify  all  high-risk 
residents and pick up on any barriers in delivering safe/ effective care. If any concerns are 
noted these  will be escalated  to  the relevant professional team as well as  the funding 
authority.  

•  The home has a clinical support manager, and alongside the manager they will oversee 

all high- risk residents on-going care needs.  

•  The  Clinical  lead  /  or  home  manager  will  ensure  they  are  in  attendance  of  any  SALT 
assessments / reviews. If they are not available then it will always be a qualified nurse of 
senior carer that attends the review, to ensure any changes are flagged immediately to 
the SALT team.  

Matter of concern 2 

The risk of  Mr Fitzgerald picking up food  was known to  staff but was not incorporated into  the 
choking risk assessment and risk management plan.  

•  As mentioned above the SMT alongside an Independent Consultancy team have reviewed 

all the choking risk assessments, specifically capturing any associated risks.  

•  The Clinical support manager has met with the senior teams, including nurses, seniors’ 
carers and clinical lead clarifying the importance of capturing all the associated risks.  

•  We will meet with the whole team and share the findings from this report and go through 
the  risk  assessment  process,  highlighting  the 
importance  of  staff  raising,  and 
documenting all incidents and any concerns with residents. We will complete this by the 
end of July’ 24.  

On-going learning  

•  Clinical  review  meetings  will  take  place  every  2  weeks  that  will  identify  all  high-risk 
residents and if any risks are identified. The manager will then ensure, that they allocate 
the relevant staff member to update any risk assessments and that will be reviewed by 
the home manager.  

 
 
 
 •  The home manager will update her daily report to the RI and the Quality and Compliance 
Manager,  the  Quality  &  Compliance  Manager  will  then  audit  that  care  plan  and  risk 
assessment.  

Matter of concern 3  

The  emergency  protocol  for  choking  was  not  followed  by  staff  in  attendance  on  24  July  2023 
(including qualified nursing staff)  

•  Emergency response training , including First aid and Basic life support training has been 
delivered  to  all  staff,  specifically  focusing  on  choking  incidents.  This  training  also 
included –Basic life support this was delivered on 10th July ’24.  

•  We have made referrals to the NMC for both the qualified staff. One of those staff resigned 
from her position due to personal reasons. The other member of staff is on bank following 
their return from maternity leave and we are not currently using her on our bank. A further 
investigation is taking place and should be completed and concluded by mid - August.  

•  We have received a decision from NMC in regard to the two referrals that were submitted.  

•  Nurse  EO  they  have  concluded  that  there  are  Regulatory  concerns  that  they  will  be 
investigating  further  under  RC1:  “Failure  to  respond  appropriately  to  a  deteriorating 
patient – in that you neglected to provide the necessary care to Resident A when you knew 
he was deteriorating” 

•  Nurse  SA  they  have  considered  the  fitness  to  practise  concern  raised  and  they  have 

decided we won’t be investigating it further at this time. 

On going learning  

•  Regular workshops will take place to further embed all the learning from the training that 
has been delivered; this will include how to deal with practical situations. This will further 
empower staff and give them more confidence in dealing with emergency situations.  

•  Visible posters are available for staff throughout the building. 

•  Grab  files  that  include  how  to  deal  /  respond  in  certain  situations  will  be  regularly 

discussed / shared at team meetings.  

•  We  have liaised with our colleagues from SALT to seek their advice on the use of anti-
choking  devices.  If  they  feel  that  it  would  benefit  our  service,  then  we  will  source 
appropriate devices and arrange training on the use of these.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Matter of concern 4  

The Care Homes investigation lacked thoroughness and professional curiosity.  

• 

It was very  clear  from  receiving the  updated  bundle,  that  the situation on the day  was 
chaotic.  

•  The  senior  manager  that  led  on  the  investigation,  is  no  longer  in  post  she  left  in  late 

October ’23. 

•  The Home Manager is also no longer with the organisation 

•  We have appointed a Consultancy Care Company to support the team at Gable Court, 

whilst we appoint a suitable new Home Manger.  

On-going learning  

•  Following  any  significant  events,  the  investigation  will  be  allocated  to  at  least  two 
independent  investigators,  not  from  the  Care  Home  involved  in  the  incident.  This  has 
been implemented immediately.  

• 

If there are not two Senior Managers available from the group, consideration will be given 
to  outsource  the  investigation  to  an  independent  person  not  from  our  group.  This  has 
been implemented immediately.  

•  Once  a  thorough  investigation  has been  completed,  this  will be presented and  further 
scrutinised by at least two members of the Board of Directors, to satisfy themselves that 
a  thorough  and  robust  investigation  has  taken  place.  This  has  been  implemented 
immediately.  

•  Training  is  being  sourced  for  the  Senior  Management  team  on  preparing  for  Coroners 
inquests, this will further support them in being more thorough in their Investigation skills. 
This will be completed throughout September.  

Once again, we would like to take the opportunity to thank you for highlighting these matters of 
concern, and for giving us the opportunity to respond. We will continue to work with SALT and the 
Local Authority to make sure we have robust risk assessments and care plans in delivering safe 
effective care to vulnerable people with swallowing difficulties who are at risk of choking.  

Yours sincerely

Related reports

Other reports by Nadia Persaud

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.