Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

James Boland

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0599, written 5 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report5 Nov 2024
Reference2024-0599
DeceasedJames Boland
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaManchester South
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:   

The Home Secretary 

1  CORONER 

I am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester  

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 20th June 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of James 
Patrick BOLAND .The investigation concluded on the 17th October 2024 and the 
conclusion was one of narrative: Died from the complications of 
pyelonephritis probably contributed to by the complications of chronic 
ketamine use. The medical cause of death was  1a) Sepsis 1b) Acute 
Pyelonephritis on a background of Chronic Ketamine use 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On 19th June 2024 James Patrick Boland known as Jamie was a chronic user 
of ketamine. He had developed significant urological issues as a consequence 
from the ketamine use. He was found unresponsive at his home address 

. A post mortem examination was undertaken. He was found to 

have a non-fatal level of ketamine in his system, but to have died from sepsis 
caused by acute pyelonephritis, a complication of long term use of ketamine. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  
The inquest heard evidence that previously Mr Boland had used cocaine a class 
A drug but, had switched to ketamine a class B drug on the basis that he 
perceived it to be less harmful. His perception that it was less harmful was 
based on the fact it is designated as a class B rather than Class A drug.  
The evidence before the inquest was that Ketamine is a deeply harmful 
substance when used outside the purposes for which it is licenced for 
prescribing by clinicians and that users such as Mr Boland are unable to give it 
up despite knowing how dangerous it is to their health. Maintaining its 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 classification as a Class B drug was likely to encourage others to start to use it 
or continue to use it under the false impression it is “safer”. 
The evidence at the inquest was that Ketamine use causes huge long term life 
changing health problems. In Mr Boland’s case it had caused long term 
urological damage and liver damage. It was the damage to his urological system 
caused by Ketamine that led to his death. 
The inquest was told that there is a significant increase in the illicit use of 
Ketamine and that this has led to clinicians seeing a rise in potentially fatal 
health problems linked to its use. The extent of these risks rarely understood by 
users until the damage has been done to their health. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
have the power to take such action.  

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 31st December 2024 . I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is 
proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons namely 
may find it useful or of interest. 

 on behalf of the family , who 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of 
your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Alison Mutch 

HM Senior Coroner 

05/11/2024 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from The Home Office (PDF)
Minister of State for Policing, Fire 
and Crime Prevention 
2 Marsham Street 
London SW1P 4DF 
www.gov.uk/home-office 

Alison Mutch 
Senior Coroner 
HM Coroner's Office  
Manchester South 

By email c/o 

DECS Reference: 
Your Reference:  

23 December 2024 

INQUEST INTO THE DEATH OF JAMES PATRICK BOLAND: REGULATION 28 
REPORT 

Dear Ms Mutch, 

Thank you for your Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report of 5 November to 
the Home Secretary about the death of Mr James Patrick Boland, which was linked to 
chronic ketamine use.  You suggest that further action should be taken to prevent future 
deaths from ketamine.  I am replying as the Minister of State for Policing, Fire and Crime 
Prevention. 

Firstly, any death related to drugs is a tragedy, and I was very sorry to read about the 
circumstances of Mr Boland’s death. 

The inquest found that Mr Boland had switched from using cocaine, which is controlled 
under Class A of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (“the 1971 Act”), to ketamine, a Class B 
under the 1971 Act, because he thought that the classification of ketamine meant that it 
was less harmful.  You are concerned that maintaining ketamine’s classification is likely to 
encourage others to start or continue to use the drug, under the false impression that it is 
safer than drugs controlled under Class A.  

Ketamine is controlled as a Class B drug under the 1971 Act.  The maximum penalty for 
supply and production is up to 14 years in prison, an unlimited fine or both.  The 
maximum penalty for possession is up to 5 years in prison, an unlimited fine or both.  
These controls are intended to discourage the use of drugs and contribute, along with 
other measures, to restrict misuse. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ministers are subject to a statutory duty to consider advice provided by the Advisory 
Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), an independent scientific advisory body, before 
making changes to drugs legislation.  Ketamine was moved from Class C to Class B 
under the 1971 Act in 2014, in accordance with advice provided by the ACMD.  Their 
recommendation was based on evidence of ketamine’s potential for harm at that time.  
The ACMD stated that “although there is limited evidence of ketamine misuse causing 
social harm, evidence of physical harm (mainly chronic bladder toxicity but also an 
increase in acute toxicity) has increased”.  This report is available at the following link: 
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7ce1bbed915d7c849adce3/ACMD_keta
mine_report_dec13.pdf. 

I recognise growing concern about the harms of ketamine.  I intend to commission the 
ACMD to conduct an updated harms assessment of ketamine as part of the forthcoming 
three-year work programme commission cycle.   

Thank you again for your letter and bringing this matter to my attention. 

Yours sincerely, 

Minister of State for Policing, Fire and Crime Prevention

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.