Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Kayleigh Melhuish

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0672, written 4 Dec 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report4 Dec 2024
Reference2024-0672
DeceasedKayleigh Melhuish
CoronerMaria Voisin
Coroner areaAvon
CategoryState Custody related deaths · Suicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published3

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

M. E. Voisin
His Majesty’s Senior Coroner
Area of Avon

4" December 2024 REF:

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS ~]

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

HMP Eastwood Park

Healthcare ~ Practice Plus Group

Mental Healthcare — Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership Trust
Ministry of Justice

1 CORONER

lam M. E. Voisin HM Senior Coroner for Avon

2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

http://www. legislation gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/S/paragraph/7

http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made

3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 19" July 2022 | commenced an investigation into the death of Kayleigh Ann MELHUISH. The
investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 17‘ October 2024. The conclusion of the inquest
was Suspension by a ligature contributed to by neglect

4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Kay arrived at HMP Eastwood Park on 15th June 2022. It was her first time in prison and she had a history
of autism, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and a personality disorder.

She arrived with a suicide and self-harm warning form having been completed as she had tried to
ns Staff started a suicide and self-harm monitoring process
referred to as an ACCT.

Initially Kay was placed on the prison induction wing, subsequently she was moved to Residential Unit 3.
During her time at the prison she continued to self-harm, she banged her head, she punched herself, she
made scratches and cuts to herself, she made ligatures and was found with them on two occasions. She
found it difficult to cope with the noisy environment and prison regime.

On 21st June a neurodiversity specialist met her and created a communications support plan for her. This
set out the difficulties she had with noise, smells, food, and physical contact, it suggested ways for
people to understand and interact with her.

On 4th July Kay cut her arms in the morning, a nurse cleaned her wounds and Kay handed to her a
ligature that she had made.

ie Coroner's Court, Old Weston Road, Flax Bourton, BS48 1UL

At around 6.30pm Kay could not be found and after a search she was located hiding under a table in the

association room. She refused to go back to her cell. She was restrained and carried back to her cell by
officers.

At 7.26pm 3 officers went into her cell and found her hanging, she was cut down and cardio-pulmonary
resuscitation is commenced.

Paramedics arrive and she is then taken to Southmead Hospital.

Kay died on 7th July 2022.

During her numerous ACCT case reviews her care plan with support action was never completed.

After the control and restraint constant observations were not considered.

There was little understanding by the prison staff of Kay's neurodiversity.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory
duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. -

1. To HMP Eastwood Park and The Ministry of Justice - training issues in relation to the
following areas for new and existing staff:

a. Neurodiversity, | am told 75% of women in prison have mental health or
neurodiverse issues, this training is not mandatory;

b. ACCT, there was little understanding of the requirement to complete or review
the care plan and support actions at every ACCT review not just the planned
reviews;

c. Little or no understanding of when constant supervision can be used and how
is it used;

2. Healthcare (AWP and PPG): training issues arose in relation to, when attending ACCT
reviews that they check the care plan with support actions part of the document is
reviewed and if necessary updated; it was suggested that consideration could be made
to making changes to the system-one database to check this step has been taken.

3. To HMP Eastwood: the ligature point in Residential Unit 3 where the privacy screen
meets the wall.

e@ Coroner's Court, Old Weston Road, Flax Bourton, BS48 1UL

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
tn my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take
such action.
7 YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 28'"
January 2025. |, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8 COPIES and PUBLICATION
| have sent a copy of my report to the chief coroner and to the following interested persons
a Kayleigh’s family
b HMP Eastwood Park
¢ Healthcare — Practice Plus Group
d Mental Healthcare — Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership Trust
e Ministry of Justice
lam also under a duty to send the chief coroner a copy of your response.
The chief coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the chief coroner. |
9
Aignature
M. E. Voisin
HM Senior Coroner for Avon

ourt, eston Road, Flax Bourton, BS48 1UL

Responses

3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership Trust (PDF)
Ms Maria Voisin
HM Senior Coroner for Avon
Coroner’s Court
Old Weston Road
Flax Bourton
Bristol
BS48 1UL

Avon and Wiltshire
Mental Health Partnership Trust
Bath NHS House
Combe Park
Bath
BA1 3QE

              By email only:   27 January 2025

Inquest into the death of Kayleigh Ann MELHUISH
Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths

Dear Ms Voisin,

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 4th December 2024 concerning the tragic
death of Kayleigh Ann Melhuish who died on the 7th July 2022.

I would like to begin by offering my sincere condolences on behalf of the Trust to the family
and friends of Ms Melhuish.

In your report you highlighted your concerns in relation to:

ACCT reviews – Training re: Review/Update of Care Plan & support actions.

The Trust has reviewed our involvement and input into the ACCT process, and revised the
Local Operating Procedure for ACCT attendance (attached). This was discussed and signed
off at the service level Quality and Standards meeting on 22nd January 2025.

To ensure adherence with this procedure, the Quality and Standards meeting will monitor
completion  of  ACCT  training  and  refreshers  through  an  audit  schedule,  which  will  also
include  monitoring  improvements  in  standards  across  record  keeping  in  ACCT  and
SystmOne.

Chair

Trust Headquarters
Bath NHS House, Newbridge Hill, Bath BA1 3QE

Chief Executive

 
 A Quality Improvement Plan has been developed to support this and is attached.

I hope this letter and attachments provide assurance that the Trust takes learning very
seriously and that we have taken action to address the concerns you raised.

I would be happy to meet with you and discuss our work to improve patient safety in more
detail, or provide further information and assurance should that be helpful.

Yours sincerely

Executive Director of Nursing & Quality
Response from Hmpps (PDF)
Director General of Operations
HM Prison and Probation Service
8th Floor Ministry of Justice
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Email: 

17 July 2025 

Maria Voisin  
Senior Coroner for Avon  
Old Weston Road 
Flax Bourton, 
Bristol, BS48 1UL 

Dear Ms Voisin, 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS –  
KAYLEIGH MELHUISH 

Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 4 December 2024 following the inquest into the 
death of Kayleigh Melhuish at HMP Eastwood Park on 7 July 2022. I am responding on 
behalf of both HMP Eastwood Park and the Ministry of Justice. I am very sorry for the delay 
in responding to your report which was the result of an administrative oversight. 

I know that you will share a copy of this response with Ms Melhuish’s family, and I would 
firstly like to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and 
the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority. 

Your report raises concerns regarding: the prevalence of neurodiversity within the population 
and a lack of related training for staff; inadequacies in understanding amongst staff of 
Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) processes, including when to use 
constant supervision, and the existence of a ligature point in one of the residential units at the 
prison.  

As you heard in evidence at the inquest, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is 
undertaking significant work to understand and raise awareness amongst staff of 
neurodiversity issues and the impact that they can have in the custodial environment. In 
recognition of the importance of such issues, staff undergoing initial training receive training 
on diversity and inclusion, personality difficulties and neurodiverse conditions including 
autism are discussed and consideration is given to how staff can support prisoners with these 
needs. This training covers issues such as how best to conduct searches of individuals and 
how to manage disciplinary processes that may impact negatively on those with neurodiverse 
conditions. For existing staff, the online learning platform to which all staff have access 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 contains training modules relating to neurodiversity including Neurodiversity-Autism/ADHD 
and Neurodiversity-Learning Disabilities and Challenges.  

We have recruited Neurodiversity Support Managers (NSMs) across the prison estate to 
ensure that support for neurodiverse prisoners is consistent across all education, skills and 
work opportunities as well as the wider prison. One of the main responsibilities of the NSMs 
is to provide training and support for other prison staff to help them better understand and 
support those with neurodivergent needs within the prison. The NSMs are also responsible 
for implementing a whole prison approach to supporting neurodivergent needs with improved 
processes. This can include ensuring that all information and forms are available and/or 
designed with suitable adaptations, and that reasonable adjustments are made for prisoners 
with a disability so that they are not unfairly disadvantaged and can access all parts of prison 
life.  We have also developed a ‘National Neurodiversity Training Toolkit’ that is available for 
all frontline staff within prison and probation, developed by and with neurodivergent staff, in 
cooperation with HMPPS and Ministry of Justice staff networks.  

Eastwood Park has employed a Speech and Language therapist and a Neurodiversity 
Strategic Lead to work alongside the local NSM. The NSM delivers an introduction on 
neurodiversity to all new staff during their training period. This session includes highlighting 
common characteristics of neurodiverse people and best practices when working with them 
and provides staff with the opportunity to ask any questions they may have to deepen their 
understanding. 

Turning to your second concern, I agree that it is essential that ACCT procedures are 
understood by staff, and in particular that ACCT case co-ordinators are aware of the 
importance of reviewing actions at case reviews and are confident in knowing the 
circumstances in which constant supervision would be appropriate.  

These issues are covered in the case review training that is provided to ACCT case 
coordinators, and a case review refresher course is also available for staff to attend. A new 
quality assurance process for ACCT has also been developed and provides an opportunity 
for managers to offer feedback to case co-ordinators to enhance their performance. 

At Eastwood Park the standard of ACCT case management is monitored through the quality 
assurance process. Any concerns identified are raised directly with the case coordinators and 
support sessions are provided for staff. Where concerns continue, these are escalated to line 
managers. The prison is also facilitating forums for case coordinators to allow further 
discussion about the ACCT process and supplementary information is shared with staff 
through the safety Microsoft Teams channel.  

In the light of your comments the local procedures in relation to constant supervision at 
Eastwood Park will be reviewed. The Governor expects to complete this work within a month 
and any changes will be communicated through staff briefings. Additionally at a national level 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 the Safety Group is currently undertaking work to develop further guidance for prisons on 
constant supervision, which is planned for completion by the end of March 2026. 

You identified the existence of a ligature point on Residential Unit 3 at the prison.  Whilst we 
aim to minimise the presence of ligature points, including by ensuring that all new and 
refurbished accommodation meets ligature resistant standards, we are not able to remove all 
such points across the estate.  At Eastwood Park, four ligature resistant cells, spread across 
three residential units, have been installed for use for prisoners who have been identified as 
being at risk of suicide by ligature and are expected to come into use shortly. The prison will 
continue to support prisoners at risk of suicide by ligature with other measures through the 
ACCT case management system and the case review team would decide on actions such as 
whether to remove items that can be used to ligature or constant supervision where 
appropriate to manage the risk. 

Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention and I trust that this response 
provides assurance that we are addressing them.  

Yours sincerely, 

Director General of Operations
Response from Practice Plus Group (PDF)
Practice Plus Group 
Building 1330, 
Arlington Business Park, 
Theale, 
Reading, 
RG7 4SA 

practiceplusgroup.com 

M Voisin 
HM Senior Coroner for Avon 
Coroner’s Court 
Old Weston Road 
Flax Bourton 
Bristol 
BS48 1UL 

By email only: 

10.1.2025 

Dear Madam, 

Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths Report – Kayleigh Ann Melhuish 

I write in response to your Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued to Practice 

Plus Group on 4 December 2024 following the inquest touching upon the death of  Kayleigh Ann 

Melhuish  at  HMP  Eastwood  Park.  Practice  Plus  Group  would  like  to  express  its  sincere 
condolences to Kayleigh’s family and friends. 

This response addresses the matters of concern in so far as they relate  to Practice Plus Group 

only. 

Matter  of  Concern  2:  Healthcare  (AWP  and  PPG):  training  issues  arose  in  relation  to,  when 

attending ACCT reviews that they check the care plan with support actions part of the document is 

reviewed and if necessary updated; it was suggested that consideration could be made to making 

changes to the system-one database to check this step has been taken. 

Response: We have carefully considered the potential for implementing changes to SystmOne to 

include a tick-box to confirm the review of the care plan and support actions. Unfortunately, Practice 
Plus Group’s ability to makes changes to SystmOne is limited and this would require action by TPP 

who own and operate the software. We have forwarded a copy of the Prevention of Future Deaths 

Report to TPP for their awareness. 

However, it is important to note that whilst a tick-box could serve as a prompt, it does not provide 

a mechanism for reporting or ensuring that meaningful reviews and updates are conducted.  

To address this matter effectively, we remain committed to maintaining robust oversight through 

regular audits of ACCT reviews. These audits will ensure that  care plans and associated support 

actions are being reviewed and updated appropriately.   

Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Ltd. Registered in England No 10498997 
Registered Office: Hawker House, 5-6 Napier Court, Napier Road, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8BW 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Additionally,  we  will  continue  to  collaborate  closely  with  the  prison  to  ensure  all  relevant  staff 

complete updated ACCT training. This will reinforce the importance of thorough and consistent care 
plan  reviews  as  part  of  the  ACCT  process.  As  at  today’s  date,  78%  of  all  clinical  staff  have 

completed  ACCT  training  and  we  continue  to  work  with  the  prison  to  ensure  access  to  regular 

ACCT training sessions.   

Practice Plus Group conduct regular audits of the ACCT process, in October and November 2024 

Healthcare attended  100%  of  all  ACCT  reviews and  this  is  documented  on  SystmOne. We  will 

continue to monitor this process.  

It is important to note that at the time of  Kayleigh’s incarceration Practice Plus Group was not a 

provider of healthcare services at HMP Eastwood Park. Of note, following the last inspection by 

HM Inspectorate of Prisons and the CQC in October 2022, there were very few recommendations 

for healthcare at the time. Practice Plus Group actioned all recommendations, having only taken 

over the contract a few days prior, and have a continuous Quality Improvement Plan in place. 

I  hope  that  the above  response  provides  assurance  that  Practice  Plus  Group are  committed  to 

providing  a  high-quality  healthcare  service  at  HMP  Eastwood  Park  and  trust  this  response 

addresses the concerns you had. 

We would like to end our response by taking the opportunity of inviting you to visit the healthcare 

team at HMP Eastwood Park should you wish to discuss and review first-hand the enhancements 

set out in this letter.   

Yours sincerely, 

Associate Medical Director, Health in Justice Practice Plus Group 
E: 

Page 2 of 2

Related reports

Other reports by Maria Voisin

See all →

More reports categorised “State Custody related deaths”

See all →

Track State Custody related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.