Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0207, written 30 Apr 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 30 Apr 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0207 |
| Deceased | Louise Rosendale |
| Coroner | Alison Mutch |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1) Flixton Road Medical Centre 2) Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board 1 CORONER I am Alison Mutch , senior coroner, for the coroner area of Manchester South 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 1st October 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Louise Danielle ROSENDALE. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 17th March 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was accidental death. The medical cause of death was 1a) Multiple drug toxicity and Pneumonia. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Louise Danielle Rosendale was prescribed long term opiates for pain following previous surgery. On 24th September 2024 she was found unresponsive at . A post- mortem found she had died from a combination of multiple drug toxicity and pneumonia. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – THE INQUEST HEARD EVIDENCE THAT Louise Rosendale had been prescribed opiates for many years despite the risks associated with long term opiate prescribing. The evidence before the inquest was that there had been very limited attempts to review the long term prescribing of opiates to her. The inquest was told that she had been identified as a patient on a long term opiate prescription in 2022. The next action had been a pharmacy review in July 2024.There was no evidence of long term detailed planning or oversight of these patients within the practice 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 25th June 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: Father of Mrs Rosendale on behalf of the family who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. They may send a copy of this report to any person who they believe may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Alison Mutch HM Senior Coroner 30.04.2025
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Tel 0161 748 2021
Email: flixtonroad.mc@nhs.net
132 Flixton Road
Urmston
Manchester
M41 5BG
Private & Confidential
Ms Alison Mutch
HM Senior Coroner
Coroner’s Court
1 Mount Tabor Street
Stockport
SK1 3AG
28 May 2025
Dear Ms Mutch,
Response to Regulation 28 Report into the death of Louise Danielle Rosendale
Thank you for your letter and for sharing with us the findings from the recent inquest, along with the matters
of concern outlined in the Regulation 28 Report.
We would like to begin by expressing our sincere condolences to the family and loved ones of Ms
Rosendale. We recognise that this has been an extremely difficult and distressing time, and we are deeply
sorry for their loss. As a practice, we fully acknowledge the emotional impact that events such as these can
have on those affected.
We welcome the opportunity to reflect on the circumstances of this case and to respond constructively.
We have carefully considered the issues raised in the Prevention of Future Deaths report, particularly
those relating to the prescribing and administration of opiates.
As part of our commitment to learning and improvement, we have undertaken a review of our current
practices and will provide additional education and guidance to our staff to reinforce safe prescribing,
monitoring, and administration of these medications. We are making changes which are relevant to
addressing the concerns.
Background
1. Regulation 28 Report into the death of Louise Danielle Rosendale
A1
Tel 0161 748 2021
Email: flixtonroad.mc@nhs.net
132 Flixton Road
Urmston
Manchester
M41 5BG
Our Response
To each of the matters of concern are provided as follows: -
Concern - Prescribed Opiates
The inquest heard that Ms Louise Rosendale had been prescribed opiates for many years despite the risks
associated with long term opiate prescribing. The evidence before the inquest was that there had been
very limited attempts to review the long-term prescribing of opiates to her.
Response to Concern
Ms Rosendale (our patient) had passed away, the review by the coroner noted that there was historic high
use of opioids. Ms Rosendale was taking 120mg of Morphine via tablet form and taking oramorph also.
Ms Rosendale had been taking historically high doses of opioids before becoming a patient at Flixton Road
Medical Centre, due to symptoms of severe abdominal pain and had seen general surgeons and
gastroenterologist who confirmed the high dose opioid use to control Ms Rosendale’s pain.
Ms Rosendale was taking 120mg of oral morphine through tablets and liquid morphine when required. Ms
Rosendale’s patient history stated there were several admissions to casualty with severe pain.
Ms Rosendale transferred to Flixton Road Medical Centre in December 2019 following the closure of her
previous GP practice, along with the doctors who had been caring for her. She continued to be seen
regularly for general health reviews throughout 2020. In May 2021, she had a medication review with her
regular GP, which included management of her mental health condition and medications prescribed by the
mental health team.
Ms Rosendale was reviewed in the gastroenterology clinic in March 2022, where a continued diagnosis of
pancreatitis was made. Despite ongoing severe pain, no changes were made to her opioid medication. At
this time, she was also under haematology for chronic anaemia and cardiology for arrhythmias; all involved
specialists were aware of her medications and raised no concerns.
In June 2022, a GP medication review confirmed the continuation of high-dose opioid treatment as per
gastroenterology advice. Ms Rosendale reported that only by taking oral morphine sulfate (120mg daily)
and Oramorph as needed, did she gain some relief. The risks of high-dose opioid use were discussed.
In September 2022, the Primary Care Network pharmacist switched her medication to Zomorph. A follow-
up review in October 2022 resulted in no further changes. That same month, she attended Wythenshawe
Hospital with severe abdominal pain. A CT scan showed no acute changes, and she was treated with
additional opioids. A referral to gastroenterology was made.
A2
Tel 0161 748 2021
Email: flixtonroad.mc@nhs.net
132 Flixton Road
Urmston
Manchester
M41 5BG
In March 2023, the medicines management team reviewed her prescription after she reported a lost bottle
of Oramorph, later confirmed to have been mistakenly discarded by her father.
She was seen in August 2023 for ENT concerns and diagnosed with a deviated septum. Blood tests showed
no abnormalities. In September 2023, she attended her annual health check with the nurse.
In November 2023, Ms Rosendale sustained a fractured clavicle after a fall and received treatment. She
was reviewed by a GP in March 2024 for concerns about low B12, and blood tests were ordered.
In July 2024, the practice pharmacist conducted a medication review. Ms Rosendale later reported
misplacing some Zomorph; the amount was calculated and replaced. A follow-up consultation reinforced
the importance of adhering to the prescribed dose. Ms Rosendale stated her father assisted with her
medication. She was advised not to take additional opioids beyond the prescription.
She was offered a face-to-face appointment on 18 September 2024, but did not respond. On 20
September, she contacted the surgery regarding ankle swelling and was seen the same day.
Flixton Road Medical Practice was notified of Ms Rosendale’s death on the 25th of September 24. The
cause of death was respiratory infection, but the pathologist noted the high levels of opioids in the patient
postmortem results. There was also codeine which was not prescribed by the practice and the combination
of both medications added to the respiratory depression.
As part of the practice’s commitment to continuous learning and patient safety, a comprehensive review of
opioid prescribing was undertaken. This included a revision of the opioid prescribing policy in line with
current clinical guidelines, alongside the introduction of mandatory training for all prescribers to support
safer opioid use. An audit of high-risk prescribing was completed to identify areas for improvement and
ensure appropriate monitoring. Electronic safety alerts within the prescribing system were optimised to
support clinical decision-making at the point of care. Structured medication reviews were reinforced as a
routine part of ongoing care, particularly for patients on long-term or high-dose opioids. In addition, a
standardised communication protocol was developed to ensure consistent, clear, and timely
documentation and coordination between clinical teams involved in patient care. These actions aim to
strengthen prescribing safety, enhance patient outcomes, and support a culture of continuous quality
improvement.
To ensure that the learning from this case is fully embedded across our practice, we have developed an
action plan to address the concerns raised, which is enclosed with this response. Key elements of our
learning dissemination include publication on our internal learning platform (TeamNet), briefing sessions
with the clinical team, and structured reflection during team meetings.
A3
Tel 0161 748 2021
Email: flixtonroad.mc@nhs.net
132 Flixton Road
Urmston
Manchester
M41 5BG
On reflection, several areas have been identified where care could have been improved. Earlier
identification of risks associated with long-term high-dose opioid use may have prompted more timely
interventions. Greater patient involvement in decision-making could have supported shared understanding
and safer management plans. There was limited external input from specialist services in reviewing
ongoing opioid prescribing, and an absence of a formal monitoring framework meant that risk mitigation
strategies were not consistently applied. Resource constraints also impacted the ability to implement more
proactive, structured reviews. Opportunities were missed for more proactive monitoring of opioid use,
supported by a clear and structured communication protocol across the clinical team. Additionally, ongoing
training in opioid safety and polypharmacy was not embedded consistently across the team. Structured
medication reviews should have been undertaken more frequently and in a multidisciplinary context.
These findings have guided recent improvements aimed at enhancing clinical practice and ensuring safer
patient care.
A more robust process for prescribing high-dose opioids has now been introduced to ensure greater
clinical oversight and patient safety. This includes a clear prescribing protocol that outlines thresholds for
escalation, mandatory documentation of clinical rationale, and multidisciplinary involvement in decision-
making. All high-dose opioid prescriptions are now subject to regular structured medication reviews, with
clearly defined intervals and oversight by both GPs and clinical pharmacists. Electronic prescribing systems
have been updated to include enhanced safety alerts, specifically highlighting high opioid use, with a safety
message now embedded in our EMIS clinical system to prompt prescribers at key decision points.
Additionally, any new initiation or dose escalation of high-level opioids requires a documented risk-benefit
discussion with the patient, including exploration of alternative pain management strategies. This process
is supported by ongoing staff training in opioid safety and polypharmacy and monitored through regular
audits to ensure compliance and continuous improvement.
We have included the following documents for your consideration with our response.
Investigation Action Plan
1.
2. Regulation 28 – Response Final
3. Review of Opioids Treatment for non-Palliative Patients
4. Teamnet Page Opioids and Pain Management
5. Opioids Prescribing Protocol
6. SEA
7. Audit
A4
Tel 0161 748 2021
Email: flixtonroad.mc@nhs.net
132 Flixton Road
Urmston
Manchester
M41 5BG
In addition, we will share the key findings and learning points with our Primary Care Network (PCN)
colleagues and across other practices within the Trafford area to support wider system learning and
reinforce safe practice in the prescribing and management of opiates.
To ensure the effectiveness of the actions taken and to support continuous improvement, we will
implement follow-up audits to monitor compliance with revised protocols and safety measures related to
opiate prescribing. The audit results and learning will be reviewed at our practice meeting, where we will
strive to ensure all new processes are acknowledged and embedded by all the clinical team.
Thank you once again for providing the practice with the copy of the regulation 28 report for our attention
and remedial action.
Yours sincerely,
Partner
Flixton Road Medical Centre
A5
E: Date: 24 June 2025 Private & Confidential Ms Alison Mutch Senior Coroner for the area of Manchester South Coroner's Court 1 Mount Tabor Street Stockport SK1 3AG Sent by email to: Dear Ms. Mutch Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths - Louise Danielle Rosendale Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 30 April 2025 regarding the sad death of Louise Danielle Rosendale. On behalf of NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care (NHS GM), We would like to begin by offering our sincere condolences to Ms. Rosendale’s family for their loss. Thank you for highlighting your concerns during the inquest which concluded on the 17 March 2025. On behalf of NHS GM, we apologise that you have had to bring these matters of concern to our attention. We recognise it is very important to ensure we make the necessary improvements to the quality and safety of future services. During the inquest you identified the following cause for concern: Louise Rosendale had been prescribed opiates for many years despite the risks associated with long term opiate prescribing. The evidence before the inquest was that there had been very limited attempts to review the long-term prescribing of opiates to her. The inquest was told that she had been identified as a patient on a long-term opiate prescription in 2022. The next action had been a pharmacy review in July 2024. There was no evidence of long-term detailed planning or oversight of these patients within the practice. NHS GM has undertaken an investigation into the cause for concern. As the GP practice responsible for Ms. Rosendale’s care, Flixton Road Medical Centre has provided a comprehensive response, and I understand that their response has been shared directly with you. The practice has shared their response with NHS GM, and I have included this and the associated documentation at Appendix 1 to this letter. 4th Floor, Piccadilly Place, Manchester M1 3BN Tel: 0161 6257791 www.gmintegratedcare.org.uk A6 NHS GM (Trafford locality) Medicines Optimisation team have reviewed your report and the cause for concern and have provided information on the expectation of care for patients prescribed opioids, work underway in the locality to reduce harm from opioids and plans for improvements in the future. GP practice expectation regarding review of patients prescribed opioids. Since October 2020, there has been a requirement, as part of the PCN Direct Enhanced Service (DES) contract, for GP practices to proactively identify and prioritise for structured medication review (SMR) patients using one or more potentially addictive medications from the following groups: opioids; gabapentinoids; benzodiazepines; and z-drugs. However, the PCN DES also states that the number of SMRs that a PCN is required to offer will be determined and limited by their clinical pharmacist capacity. Work undertaken in the NHS GM Trafford Locality The Trafford locality Medicines Optimisation Team have undertaken several actions with the aim of reducing harm from opioids. One of the pharmacists in the team leads on opioid risk reduction and pain management, collaborating with colleagues to share good practice and implement strategies for opioid risk reduction. This includes: • Taking part, along with a pharmacy technician from the Trafford team, in the Medicines Safety Improvement Programme (MedSIP) breakthrough series collaborative which aims to implement a whole system approach to high-risk opioid prescribing. This has resulted in sharing of good practice and closer working with other secondary and primary care colleagues across Greater Manchester. • Representing the Trafford Locality at the Greater Manchester Pain Collaborative which brings together stakeholders to identify and develop solutions to the challenges of prescribing pain medicines across Greater Manchester. • Attending the local hospital trust’s Opioid Safety Group to facilitate primary and secondary care colleagues working together to reduce the harm from opioids. One of the current areas of work for this group is the implementation of the GM Communication Standards for Opioids at Discharge. • Attendance at trust-led case-based discussions regarding opioid prescribing to gain a better understanding of the challenges faced in secondary care and how these impact on primary care • Working with colleagues from Manchester University to investigate and implement use of the new Safety Medication (SMASH) dashboard indicator which identifies patients prescribed opioids within 30 days of discharge from hospital. The aim of the indicator is to facilitate identification and review of patients to prevent harm from long term opioid use. • Collaboration with a colleague from another locality to produce a communication for primary care to highlight the risks from opioids used in chronic pain, encourage review of these patients and signpost to resources available on the Greater Manchester Pain Management Resources Hub. • Discussion at regular meetings held with PCN clinical pharmacists to highlight the need to identify and prioritise patients prescribed opioids for structured medication reviews and ensuring they are aware of resources available to facilitate review, including the Greater Manchester Pain Management Resources Hub. 4th Floor, Piccadilly Place, Manchester M1 3BN Tel: 0161 6257791 www.gmintegratedcare.org.uk A7 • Attendance at the Regional CD Local Intelligence Network meetings to ensure awareness of and learning from issues/incidents in other areas and share good practice. As well as continuing with the work detailed above, the following actions are planned in Trafford locality this year: • Work with GP practices to increase use of the safety medication (SMASH) dashboard, including the new opioid indicator. • Review by a pharmacy technician and pharmacist from the team of patients flagged by the SMASH opioid indicator and identify improvements that can be made to primary care review processes as well as feeding back, via the trust Opioid Safety Group, potential improvements to secondary care processes. • Work with colleagues in other GM localities to produce and implement standards for primary care review of patients discharged on opioids. • Provide data to GP Practices regarding their opioid prescribing, including high dose opioids, and • ensure they are aware of resources available to facilitate review of patients. Increase awareness, and ensure information is readily accessible to GP practice clinicians, regarding local services available to support the review of patients on opioids, including pain clinic referral pathways and non-pharmacological support for pain management. • Collaborate with colleagues from other GM localities and secondary care pain clinics to explore the potential for multidisciplinary team review of complex patients on high dose opioids in primary care. NHS GM works in partnership across all locality Medicines Management teams and all learning is shared through the ICB for GM wide system learning. I hope that this responses assures you that NHS GM has responded to your report and will take positive steps to share learning. If you have any questions about this responses, please contact me. Best wishes 4th Floor, Piccadilly Place, Manchester M1 3BN Tel: 0161 6257791 www.gmintegratedcare.org.uk A8
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.