Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0315, written 18 Jun 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 18 Jun 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0315 |
| Deceased | Edward Cassin |
| Coroner | Sean Cummings |
| Coroner area | Milton Keynes |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 Milton Keynes University Hospital 2 Central North West London NHS Foundation Trust 1 CORONER I am Sean CUMMINGS, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Milton Keynes 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 29 June 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Edward Joseph CASSIN aged 66. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 13 February 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Narrative conclusion Eddie Cassin was a delightful elderly male with learning difficulties who was prone to silent aspiration. Although cleared for discharge home he was developing an aspiration pneumonia on the 24th June 2023 which went unrecognised. He had hypoglycaemic episodes which were not managed according to trust guidelines. He was fed jelly which was expressly contraindicated. Food and medication was left in his mouth, some of which he aspirated. This was not recognised and exacerbated the already developing aspiration pneumonia. Had he been treated for the developing aspiration pneumonia he would likely not have died at the time he did. His death was contributed to by neglect. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Edward Joseph Cassin was an elderly man with complex medical needs and learning difficulties. He had a known dysphagia which caused him silent aspiration. He had been investigated by the Speech and Language Therapist (SALT) team and his diet was prescribed by the Dietetic Service. He had frequent chest infections/pneumonia's as a result. He was in the Milton Keynes University Hospital pending discharge to a new care home. On the 24th June 2023 he was generally out of sorts, not eating his lunch which he normally did with enthusiasm likely due to another developing aspiration infection. His diabetes had been difficult to manage and there were several alterations to his insulin regime. On the 24th June 2023 he had a hypoglycaemic episode requiring treatment. The Hospital guidelines were not followed. Because of his dysphagia he was on a modified diet and required supervision when eating to mitigate aspiration risk. Jelly was specifically and repeatedly highlighted as a food he should not be given. Despite this there was evidence of repeated administration of jelly through his stay including on the 24th June. This was a food that was specifically excluded by the Dietetic Service. Their advice was not followed. He was not properly supervised and he aspirated. The expert evidence which I accepted, was that had his developing aspiration infection been recognised and treated, he would have survived. It was made worse by the aspiration following his hypoglycaemic attack. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) The Speech and Language Therapists (SALT) and Dietetic Service had well developed, comprehensive guidelines for investigating and managing patients prone to aspiration. Those guidelines were disseminated through the wards at Milton Keynes University Hospital and nursing and other staff were appraised of them or at least, should have been. I was disturbed to discover though that there was a lack of understanding of some of those policies and procedures some 22 months or so after the death. The SALT and Dietetic services are provided by the Central and North West London NHS Trust into the Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. It appeared to me that both Trusts were working to a degree in a siloed manner and that closer co-operation and sharing of clinical responsibility would benefit patients in a similar position in the future. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by August 12, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons The family of Mr Cassin I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 18/06/2025 Sean CUMMINGS Assistant Coroner for Milton Keynes Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Executive Office 31 July 2025 Sean Cummings HM Assistant Coroner for Milton KeynesHM Coroner’s Office Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ Dear Mr Cummings, Re: Regulation 28: Report to prevent future deaths Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 18 June 2025 following the inquest into the death of Edward Joseph Cassin. The inquest concluded on 13 February 2025. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) deeply regrets the death of Mr Cassin and we would very much like to extend our condolences to his family. I am writing to provide the Trust’s response to the concerns that you raised in your report. Matters of Concern A lack of understanding by nursing and other staff of some of the policies and 1. procedures that the Speech and Language Therapists (SALT) and Dietetic Service had developed and disseminated for investigating and managing patients prone to aspiration. Provision of the SALT and Dietetic services by the Central and North West London 2. NHS Trust into the Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (MKUH) involved both Trusts working to a degree in a siloed manner and that closer co-operation and sharing of clinical responsibility would benefit patients in a similar position in the future. We would like to respectfully clarify that the Dietetic Service is provided by MKUH and therefore our response refers only to the SALT Service. With regard to the criticism of siloed working arrangements, we have been in discussions with MKUH and have concluded that we can improve the service for patients if this is run fully by MKUH. Arrangements have been made with MKUH to transfer the service to them on the 22 October. We believe this change will support more integrated and responsive care, with a single provider responsible for coordinating all relevant services within the hospital. CNWL is working closely with MKUH to ensure a smooth and safe transition of care. Speech and Language Therapists (SALT) policies and procedures The SALT Team continue to provide regular training and support to hospital staff on safe swallowing to enhance their knowledge and understanding. This training has been reviewed to ensure that it provides relevant information to staff about how to identify which patients require a referral to the SALT Team, how to make these referrals and how to ensure that Trust Headquarters, 350 Euston Road, London NW1 3AX Telephone: 020 3214 5700 www.cnwl.nhs.uk safe swallowing recommendations are followed. The training has been enhanced by the inclusion of practical elements such as staff being required to prepare drinks and snacks that would be in line with the recommendations for a particular patient. Staff feedback on the training indicates that these changes have been received positively. In addition to this, the Speech and Language Therapy team are actively working with MKUH on a quality improvement initiative focused on enhancing the care of patients with dysphagia. This has included updating the leaflets describing the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation (IDDSI) levels and in particular providing more specific information about the types of food allowed, as well as making the yellow bedside signs that provide patient-specific swallowing recommendations clearer. Co-operation and sharing of clinical responsibility The SALT Team continue to assess patients on the wards at MKUH and work closely with their hospital colleagues as part of this. A new, electronic, referral process to the SALT team has been implemented to ensure that referrals are standardised and can be triaged effectively. In the event of a clinical incident immediate feedback is provided to the ward staff. Any incidents are recorded by CNWL staff on the CNWL Datix incident reporting system, they are sent to MKUH within 1 working day and entered into the hospital RADAR (incident reporting) system for timely review by MKUH. Thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention. I hope that the content of this letter provides sufficient assurance that CNWL takes the concerns raised seriously and has taken action following the death of Mr Cassin. CNWL has accepted the points raised and continues to work to improve the service we provide. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me Yours sincerely, Chief Executive
4 August 2025 Dear Dr Cummings, REF: Regulation 28 – Report to Prevent Future Deaths Thank you for your letter dated 18 June 2025, outlining the details of the Regulation 28 Report concerning the death of Edward Joseph Cassin, who sadly passed away while under the care of Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere condolences to Mr Cassin’s family. We recognise the profound loss they have suffered, and we are truly sorry. I hope this response provides assurance that we are taking meaningful and sustained action to prevent such a tragedy from occurring again. The findings regarding the failings in Mr Cassin’s nursing care do not reflect the standard of care I expect from our nursing staff. The deficiencies identified in the management of diabetes and dysphagia are unacceptable, and we have taken steps to ensure these are not repeated. The Regulation 28 Report outlines the following specific actions required by the Trust to prevent future deaths: • All staff working with individuals with dysphagia must be knowledgeable about the relevant • policies and procedures, particularly regarding aspiration prevention. Improved collaboration between clinical teams, Speech and Language Therapists (SALT), and Dietetics. Prior to and following the conclusion of the inquest, the Trust has implemented a number of measures to ensure appropriate processes are in place for the care of patients with dysphagia. I believe these actions fulfil the requirements set out in the Regulation 28 Report and, most importantly, will ensure that patients with dysphagia receive safe, appropriate care from well-informed and trained staff. Management and Care of Patients with Dysphagia The Trust is currently running a Quality Improvement Programme (QIP) focused on dysphagia management. This initiative includes collaboration between staff from both MKUH and CNWL, working together to strengthen existing practices. The QIP has a project charter that outlines the challenges faced by the SALT and MKUH teams. The problem statement is as follows: “We are seeing a high trend in incidents where patients are choking on food or fluids. Swallow assessments are delayed, or advice is not being adequately followed, resulting in adverse incidents including aspiration pneumonia and a patient death.” The project has three primary goals: 1. Improve the quality of SALT referrals. 2. Provide clear guidance to staff to enhance awareness and management of dysphagia prior to referral. 3. Establish clear service-level agreements and contracts. Actions Taken Completed: • Established a multi-professional group to develop a dysphagia resource pack for wards and departments. • Redesigned and distributed the ‘thickened fluids’ poster in collaboration with SALT, now displayed in all inpatient clinical areas. • Ensured all staff are familiar with the poster and understand how to identify and prepare • appropriate diets. Introduced a new electronic SALT referral process, co-designed with CNWL, to standardise referral information and improve prioritisation. In Progress: • Development of an eating, drinking, and swallowing support kit (available Autumn 2025). • Engagement of a person with dysphagia to support the QIP and training development. The Cassin family has been invited to contribute their experience to this work. • Review of current nutritional and dysphagia training (due September 2025). • Refinement of the audit programme to include compliance with special diets (due September 2025). • Trial of a QR code system to inform catering of patient preferences (September 2025). • Ongoing quality and safety walkabouts focusing on dysphagia management, involving a multidisciplinary team. All wards are expected to be visited by October 2025. Planned: • Development of a dedicated dysphagia policy (due August 2025). • • Design of a referral process for the Emergency Department to access SALT services (due Implementation of patient surveys and audits to assess project impact (due September 2025). • September 2025). Introduction of practical training on special diet textures and preparation (commencing Autumn 2025). Following the inquest, the Chief Nurse issued a ‘call to action’ email to all clinical ward leaders, reminding them of their responsibilities regarding diet and fluid management and the importance of staff training. This coincided with the release of the updated ‘thickened fluids’ posters. The Trust is also investing in new bedside communication whiteboards, designed with input from SALT and Dietetics. These boards will highlight individual patient needs, including dietary requirements, and are expected to be in place by December 2025. Training and Education The Trust is delivering a Fundamentals of Care training programme for all clinical staff. Each month, a different topic is covered through 7-minute learning sessions and ward-based discussions. Topics include: • Oral hygiene • Nutrition and hydration • Recognition of the deteriorating patient • Medicines safety • Individualised personal care The nutrition and hydration module reinforces the importance of special diets and the preparation of thickened fluids. All healthcare support workers are also required to complete the Care Certificate, which includes training on diet and nutrition. Improved Collaboration with SALT Since the inquest, the Trust has worked closely with the SALT team to address the challenges of delivering care across organisational boundaries. The QIP has identified issues such as access to patient records across different systems, and efforts are underway to resolve these. In April 2025, CNWL served notice regarding the provision of inpatient SALT services. On 9 July 2025, CNWL began a consultation process with SALT staff to transition the service in- house at MKUH. While change can be disruptive, we believe this move will improve efficiency and ultimately enhance patient care. I trust this response provides the necessary assurance that MKUH has acknowledged and acted upon the failings identified in the Regulation 28 Report concerning Mr Cassin’s death. On a personal note, as the new Chief Nurse, I was deeply saddened by Mr Cassin’s passing. I am fully committed to ensuring that incidents of this nature are not repeated, through the actions outlined above and by fostering a culture of continuous learning and improvement. Yours sincerely, Chief Nurse Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.