Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0432, written 20 Aug 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 20 Aug 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0432 |
| Deceased | Charles Stonley |
| Coroner | Anita Bhardwaj |
| Coroner area | Liverpool and Wirral |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 NHS England Improvement (PFDs) 2 Deputy Director of Patient Safety NHS England 3 National Director FOR Mental Health 4 Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) 1 CORONER I am Anita BHARDWAJ, Area Coroner for the coroner area of Liverpool and Wirral 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 17 March 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Charles Andrew STONLEY aged 50. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 19 August 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Official Narrative Conclusion: Self ligatured whilst suffering from a psychotic episode 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Charles Andrew Stonley was a 50 year old gentleman who had a medical history of severe depression with psychotic features (diagnosed in 2018) for which he was on medication. In September 2023 Charles had been detained under section 2 of the Mental Health Act. On 12 March 2025 Charles attended Arrowe Park Hospital at 8.51pm with suicidal ideations, he was tearful, psychotic and paranoid. There were no mental health rooms available in the Emergency Department due to them being occupied by other patients and so Charles was put in a cubicle near to the nursing bay (cubicle 7). This was more exposed to the busy Emergency Department and so potentially more detrimental than if he had been in a quiet room specifically for patients suffering a mental health crisis. The plan being if Charles wanted to leave the Department, a capacity assessment would be carried out and if he then left Department the missing person alert process would be instigated with the police. Charles was assessed and agreed to an informal admission to a mental health unit. Charles was awaiting a bed to be made available and remained in the Emergency Department in the cubicle. On the morning of 13 March 2025 at 2am he was suffering with increased agitation and displaying psychotic symptoms; at 2.25am a capacity assessment was carried out where he was deemed to lack capacity; at 3.30am and at 4.22am he left the hospital but was returned on both occasions and he attempted to leave on several occasions thereafter; at 7am he was calm and administered medication. A short time after 8am Charles again left the department stating he was going to take his own life. Merseyside Police were contacted by staff at Arrowe Park Hospital to report Charles had been pursued by security officers into the woods. A short time later Charles was found deceased hanging in a wooded area, near to Arrowe Brook Lodge, near to a public car park off Arrowe Brook Road. He was hanging by an electrical cable hooked over a broken Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 branch. The toxicological analysis revealed nothing of significance and the post mortem found Charles died by hanging. Throughout this period there were no legal powers to forcefully detain Charles within the emergency department. It is more likely than not that if a mental health bed had been available within a reasonable time, namely a few hours, the outcome for Charles would have been different and prevented him from leaving the Emergency Department and carrying out the act of self harm he subsequently did. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 1. The legal powers and resources available for mental health patients in the Emergency Department of Hospitals is limited and as such detrimental to those attending Accident and Emergency Departments when suffering from a mental health crisis. 2. The severe shortage and availablity of beds in mental health facilities resulting in vulnerable patients being left in the Emergency Department for days increasing the risk of self harm and death. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. Official 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by October 15, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 1. The Family of Charles Andrew Stonley 2. Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Trust (WUTH) 3. Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Trust (CWP) I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. They may send a copy of this report to any person who they believe may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 20/08/2025 Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 Anita BHARDWAJ Area Coroner for Liverpool and Wirral Official Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Health Services Safety Investigations Body Lytchett House 13 Freeland Park Wareham Road Poole Dorset BH16 6FA Sent via email to: 27 August 2025 Mrs. Anita Bhardwaj Area Coroner for Liverpool and Wirral Dear Mrs. Bhardwaj Regulation 28 report response from HSSIB: Mr. Charles Andrew Stonley Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to respond to your regulation 28 report regarding the death of Mr. Stonley. We were very sorry to learn about the circumstances surrounding his death. We note that no specific matters of concern were highlighted for HSSIB to respond to in your report. Instead, we have attempted to take account of all the various concerns raised in the report in providing our response. Your report highlighted concerns about Mr. Stonley’s death in relation to: • The legal powers and resources available for mental health patients in the Emergency Department of Hospitals suffering from a mental health crisis. • Vulnerable patients being left in the Emergency Department for days increasing the risk of self-harm and death. HSSIB came into operation on 1 October 2023. We are a fully independent arm’s length body of the Department of Health and Social Care. We investigate patient safety concerns across the NHS in England and in independent healthcare settings where safety learning could also help to improve NHS care. We do not replace any existing investigation processes available within healthcare. Our job is to understand why patients may have been harmed or be at risk of harm and our investigations take a system perspective and aim to reduce the likelihood of patient safety incidents from happening. We share learning and support patient safety improvements across the whole healthcare system in England. During our series of investigations into Mental health inpatient settings we heard concerns about the care of people in mental health crisis which may benefit from a HSSIB investigation. We carried out a range of work to help further understand these concerns, including conversations with stakeholders, reviewing available data sets, and analysing existing literature. We agreed that we would progress work toward a HSSIB investigation. During this period, we also received a further PFD report in relation to Ms. Tracy Ostler, which has helped us to understand areas of concern we have identified about the crisis pathway. On 26 August, we approved two new HSSIB investigations into mental health crisis care. These investigations will help to address key areas of concern highlighted in your report. These investigations are: Mental Health Crisis: Care of patients in emergency departments This investigation is intending to: • Explore the knowledge, skills, and resources available to emergency departments to care for patients in mental health crisis, including access to information held by other services. • Explore how the physical environment in emergency departments impacts on the care provided to patients in mental health crisis. • Explore staff decision making about when to admit or discharge patients who have presented in mental health crisis. This will include consideration of the impact of protected characteristics and health inequalities in this area of care. The investigation will launch in October 2025 with a final report anticipated to be available in Summer 2026. Mental Health Crisis: Ambulance service response via NHS 111 and 999 This investigation is intending to: • Explore how ambulance services triage and prioritise calls about patients in mental health crisis. • Explore ambulance crew education, training, and assessment of a patient’s capacity when in mental health crisis. • Explore ambulance crew decision making on when to convey a patient in mental health crisis to hospital, including access to relevant clinical advice and access to information held by other services. This will include consideration of the impact of protected characteristics and health inequalities in this area of care. This investigation will launch in Spring 2026, following completion of substantive work on the first report, and is anticipated to be available in Spring 2027. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for sharing your report with us. The investigations we have now launched will help to address the issues you have identified at a national level. Yours sincerely, Chief Executive Officer
Anita Bhardwaj
HM Area Coroner
Liverpool and the Wirral Coroner’s Service
Gerard Majella Courthouse,
Boundary Street,
Liverpool
L5 2QD
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
13th October 2025
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Charles Andrew Stonley
who died on 13 March 2025.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 20
August 2025 concerning the death of Charles Andrew Stonley on 13 March 2025. In
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to
express my deep condolences to Charles’ family and loved ones. NHS England is
keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Charles’ care
have been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raised concerns around the limited legal powers and resources available
for mental health patients attending the Emergency Department (ED), and the
detrimental impact this has on those attending whilst suffering from a mental health
crisis, as well as the shortage of beds in mental health facilities.
NHS England recognises the concern that there is a lack of clarity about what legal
powers are available to health professionals to forcefully detain someone in an ED
who is awaiting assessment or admission. In recent debates of the Mental Health Bill,
the Department of Health and Social Care committed to engage with stakeholders to
understand how the current legal framework is applied in this setting and identify
solutions to the problems raised. They will also provide further guidance on the existing
legal framework, including the handover process from police to healthcare, in the next
revision of the Mental Health Act Code of Practice.
NHS England is also taking steps to address the current operational pressures driving
these issues. The NHS operational planning guidance for this year tasks local health
systems to improve patient flow through mental health crisis pathways and to reduce
waits of more than 12 hours in EDs. In 2025/26, the NHS is also investing £75 million
in capital funding to reduce mental health out-of-area placements, which pose an
increased suicide risk and lead to longer stays away from the patients’ support
networks.
At a local level, NHS Cheshire and Merseyside Integrated Care Board (ICB) is working
with system partners to improve system flow for mental health inpatient beds. This is
focusing on reducing the length of stay and the number of patients who are clinically
ready for discharge (CRFD). By reducing CRFD patients, capacity will be created to
enable people to access a mental health inpatient bed in a timelier manner.
The ICB is also working with system partners on improved crisis response services,
to mitigate the need for people to attend an ED for a mental health intervention. This
includes providing access to crisis lines and crisis cafes.
The ICB's providers are also working with them to improve the management of people
who do present to an ED with an apparent mental health need, with a focus on
enhanced training and triage and reducing or eliminating 12 hour waits. To enhance
this work, the next Director of Nursing meeting in October 2025 will focus on
agreement of key actions that maintain the safety of patients attending EDs with
mental health needs. It is intended that this will allow the development of essential
actions for safety, effectively a ‘red lines’ tool kit for Mental Health Safety in EDs, and
reporting of any breaches to these required actions. A red lines tool kit is a guidance
document co-created by the system Directors of Nursing/Chief Nurses to agree the
range of acceptable adjustments that can be made during escalating pressures and
what are the hard stop ‘red lines’ that should not be crossed for risk of compromising
patient safety. If any of these lines are crossed during period of exceptional service
pressure an incident is raised to support a patient safety response to understand the
causes and consider areas of improvement to prevent reoccurrence.
Harm reviews are routinely conducted by the ICB’s mental health providers for 12 hour
waits in EDs and for CRFD patients and the learning applied to service delivery. The
ICB is also developing additional physical capacity in or near to EDs for people who
are in mental health crisis, creating a safe and more appropriate location for them to
receive their initial assessment and intervention by a mental health professional.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of
Charles, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps
us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
NHS England
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.