Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0008, written 8 Jan 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 8 Jan 2026 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0008 |
| Deceased | Drew Greaves-Pimblett |
| Coroner | Anita Bhardwaj |
| Coroner area | Sefton, St Helens and Knowsley |
| Category | Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 NHS England 2 Chief Coroner 1 CORONER I am Anita BHARDWAJ, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Sefton, St. Helens and Knowsley 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 25 March 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Drew John GREAVES- PIMBLETT aged 26. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 08 January 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Drew Drew John Greaves-Pimblett died as a result of: 1a Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) b. Epilepsy Natural Causes 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Drew John Greaves-Pimblett was a 26 year old gentleman who had a medical history of epilepsy. On 22 March 2025, Drew was found unresponsive on the floor of the bathroom of his home address. At 14:11 hours a call was made to the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS), the information provided to the call handler was that Drew was found on the floor unresponsive and not breathing. The call was assessed as a category 1 emergency and an ambulance was allocated at 14:12 hours. As a result of the on-going conversation and confirmation of the fact he was not breathing, at 14:15 hours it was established Drew was epileptic, cold to touch and his finger nails, lips and face were grey. It was also proving difficult for him to be turned over onto his back so he remained on his front. As a result of this information, in accordance with the NWAS pathway, the call handler deemed Drew had not ‘just died’ and so resuscitation would not be effective. At 14:16 hours the ambulance was stood down and the police notified. At 14.43 hours the police attended and one officer noted Drew was still warm to the touch and so CPR was commenced. The other officer present observed Drew’s lips were blue/purple and swollen and his chest was quite stiff making CPR difficult. NWAS were contacted again, and an ambulance arrived at 14:44 hours and Drew was pronounced deceased at 14:46 hours on the same day. A review of the first call made to NWAS revealed the call handler should not have down- graded the call and should not have stood the ambulance down until further probing Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 questions were asked. There were no questions asked to establish how cold Drew was (‘stone cold’ or otherwise), how it was established he was not breathing, whether anyone else was available to help turn Drew onto his back and how stiff Drew was to establish whether rigor mortis had set in. It is impossible to know whether, after the probing questions were asked, the call hander would have reached the same conclusion or whether CPR would have been advised. The absence of the probing questions being a missed opportunity. It would be pure speculation to reach a conclusion that had CPR been carried out it would be a different outcome for Drew. NWAS found the appropriate standard of the call had not been achieved. In all the circumstances it is more likely that not Drew died of natural causes. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) Though a telephone triage is always challenging and subjective, there appears to be a gap in the national pathways for call handlers. Consideration as to further guidance and assistance to call handlers on probing questioning for fundamental aspects such as breathing and where and how to best assess how cold the body is. If someone is not breathing to ask how they know and/or techniques such as head to the chest, where to take a pulse etc. for the call handler to make a more informed decision as to whether someone is breathing and if CPR is required. When a call is made to NWAS, often it is by someone not thinking straight and so specific questions on breathing and general presentation may be of assistance in assessing the call. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by March 05, 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 1. North West Ambulance Service 2. 3. (spouse – next of kin) (brother-in-law – point of contact for family) I have also sent it to who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 08/01/2026 Anita BHARDWAJ Senior Coroner for Sefton, St. Helens and Knowsley Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Anita Bhardwaj
Senior Coroner for Sefton,
St. Helens and Knowsley
Town Hall Bootle
Oriel Road
Bootle
Liverpool
L20 7AE
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
3 March 2026
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Drew John Greaves-
Pimblett who died on 22nd March 2025.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 8th
January 2026 concerning the death of Drew John Greaves-Pimblett on 22nd March
2025. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would
like to express my deep condolences to Drew’s family and loved ones. NHS England
is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Drew’s care
have been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raised concerns that there is a gap in national pathways for call handlers.
You asked for consideration to be given to further guidance and assistance for call
handlers on probing questioning for fundamental aspects such as for breathing and
general presentation (e.g. how best to assess how cold a body is and where to take a
pulse), so that call handlers can make more informed decisions as to whether
someone is breathing and if CPR is required.
Regional Response
NHS England’s Regional North West Team have liaised with the North West
Ambulance Service (NWAS) regarding your Report. They have advised that when
Drew was found not breathing and unresponsive, a 999 call was made to NWAS. The
caller stated he was blue, had swollen lips, was very cold and not breathing. The call
was initially categorised as a Category 1, the highest level of ambulance response,
but was then downgraded to a Category 4 following responses to further questions
asked (note that one of the outcomes on NHS Pathways for a person who is clearly
deceased is a Category 4 response, and where death is not expected this can be
onward referred to the police). The police were notified of the unexpected death,
attended within 30 minutes and stated that Drew was blue and unresponsive but was
slightly warm, and therefore they started CPR – the police documented that pressing
Drew’s chest was very difficult. NWAS were called again and arrived within 2 minutes
of the police officer arriving at the scene.
The attending NWAS clinician completed an assessment and confirmed that Drew had
passed away. He stated when asked that Drew was very cold.
NWAS audited the call after the event and did find that there had been some deviation
and the need for more probing before the downgrade, which resulted in the ambulance
being stood down, with feedback given at the time to the NWAS call handler on this.
NHS England was not a party to the inquest, but has been informed that the Coroner
accepted all of the evidence and concluded that it was more likely than not that Drew
had been deceased for some time before NWAS’s arrival.
National Position
Background
NHS Ambulance Services are required to process 999 calls through an approved
triage system. There are currently two long established systems approved in England
for primary 999 triage; NHS Pathways and the Medical Priority Dispatch System
(MPDS). The systems are used to prioritise 999 calls received into Ambulance
Services’ Emergency Operations Centres (EOCs). The North West Ambulance
Service (NWAS) uses the NHS Pathways system.
The primary purpose of triage is to quickly identify priority symptoms (e.g.
unconsciousness, difficulty breathing, chest pain) and to assign an appropriate
response priority. The outcome (disposition) reached based on the information
provided by the caller is mapped to one of the five national categories (Categories 1 –
5) set out within the NHS Constitution and Ambulance Service 999 contracts. The
development of triage question sets and instructions lies within the remit of the triage
system provider.
NHS Pathways Background
NHS Pathways is the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) used for remote
clinical assessment (triage) in urgent and emergency care. In use since 2005, it
underpins all NHS 111 services and more than half of England’s 999 telephony
services. It is also used for self-service triage via NHS 111 online and at the front door
of Emergency Departments.
The product is owned by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and is
manufactured and managed by the Transformation Directorate of NHS England. The
tool also supports enhanced clinical assessments via modules such as the NHS
Pathways Clinical Consultation Support (PaCCS) system.
The safety of NHS Pathways triage outcomes - known as "dispositions" - is overseen
by the National Clinical Assurance Group (NCAG), an independent intercollegiate
body hosted by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC). Alongside this
independent oversight, NHS Pathways aligns its clinical content and assessment
protocols with up-to-date national clinical guidance, including from NICE (the National
Institute for Health and Care Excellence), the UK Resuscitation Council and the UK
Sepsis Trust, amongst others.
The system supports over 2.5 million triage assessments each month across
telephone, digital, and face-to-face settings.
NHS Pathways follows a structured clinical hierarchy. Serious and potentially life-
threatening symptoms are assessed first to ensure rapid escalation - such as
dispatching an ambulance or involving a clinician. The assessment then progresses
through to less urgent symptoms, identifying the most appropriate level of care.
Principles of Health Advisor Training
In telephone settings (calls made to NHS 111 or 999), assessments are conducted by
trained non-clinical health advisors. These advisors complete a
specially
comprehensive, structured mandatory training programme to ensure they can use the
NHS Pathways algorithm safely and effectively, and they are always supported by
clinicians, as a condition of the NHS Pathways licence, which NHS 111 and 999
providers must enter into in order to use the system. If a case is complex or unclear,
health advisors are required to escalate to clinical colleagues. The NHS Pathways
licence states that clinical supervision and escalation support must be available 24/7,
and immediately accessible to health advisors during live calls. This clinical availability
is a core system control.
Following the initial core role preparation training, health advisors and clinicians are
required to update their training every 12 weeks. They are also able to access a
comprehensive library of additional training courses and educational resources such
as ‘Hot Topics’, case studies and e-learning packages.
NHS Pathways Assessment of Consciousness and Breathing
Based on the information provided regarding this particular case, in respect of the NHS
Pathways triage system we can confirm the following:
•
•
them
If a cardiac arrest is not suspected at the onset of the call, the system seeks to
quickly establish whether there is an immediate threat to life. If the patient is not
fitting or choking, supporting information is provided to the health advisor to
assist
is conscious or not.
Unconsciousness is classed as when the individual cannot be woken or is
difficult to wake up.
If the patient is confirmed to be unconscious, the next question presented seeks
to establish whether a normal breathing pattern is present.
to establish whether
the patient
• Health advisors can use the supporting information provided to advise the caller
to check whether the chest is rising and falling regularly and/or whether regular
breaths can be heard or felt coming from the nose of mouth. If there is doubt,
they are prompted to ask the caller to ‘look, listen and feel’ for breathing.
If the patient is not breathing normally, the supporting information advises that
there may be no or very little attempt being made by the individual to breathe.
They are advised that there may be occasional gasps or breaths with possible
long pauses in between. The supporting information also advises here that the
•
•
skin may appear grey or blue, and where to check for this on the body, and
where to check when skin tones may be darker.
If the patient is not breathing or not breathing sufficiently, this results in a
Category 1 ambulance outcome, on the basis that a cardiac arrest is likely. This
was the outcome reached in this case based on the information provided.
• Once it has been established that the scene is safe, the NHS Pathways system
seeks to establish whether the caller is within easy reach of the patient. If no
specific scenarios where specialist instructions are required (such as hanging,
drowning, choking etc) are present, information on how to give basic life support
(BLS), and whether a defibrillator can be located, presents itself for the health
advisor.
The only reasons that a health advisor should advise BLS to cease are if the
ambulance crew arrive and take over, if the patient regains consciousness, or if the
person performing BLS is for some reason unable to continue.
NHS Pathways does not ask the caller to try to ascertain if there is a pulse present.
For the ordinary lay person, the identification of a pulse can prove challenging, thus
potentially wasting valuable time in terms of dispatching an ambulance. All pathways
relating to instructional information regarding resuscitation have been approved and
ratified by Resuscitation Council UK.
Also, of relevance to this particular case, in terms of additional training regarding the
assessment of consciousness and breathing, health advisors utilising NHS Pathways
who have completed the core training are provided with ‘CPR Toolkit Training’. This
encompasses what is called the ‘No, No, Go’ approach where, if the patient is not
conscious or not breathing (either normally or at all), health advisors are trained to
proceed immediately to the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as
presented by the system. This additional training seeks to ensure that health advisors
are supported to proceed quickly to the required life supporting advice.
The CPR Toolkit training explains that evidence from multiple studies indicates that
performing CPR on a patient who is not in cardiac arrest is unlikely to cause harm.
Health advisors are therefore trained that, where there is any uncertainty regarding
whether a patient’s breathing is normal, or if the patient is not breathing at all, they
should initiate telephone-guided CPR.
NHS Pathways Management of Expected or Unexpected Death
A ‘triage not possible’ route exists within the NHS Pathways system for the
management of an expected or unexpected death. From the limited information
provided regarding this case, it is not possible to comment on whether or not the health
advisor should have selected the option for ‘discovery of a stone cold or stiff dead
body’.
Even if the health advisor in this case had thought that Drew was already deceased
and this route was selected, the option of ‘Sudden Unexpected Death’ would have
likely been chosen. This route follows the consciousness/breathing assessment as
described above, whereby BLS instructions are presented as the system in this
scenario assumes that CPR should be performed as the exact moment of cardiac
arrest is not known.
NHS Pathways Additional Health Advisor Support
Almost every question in the NHS Pathways triage system has ‘supporting
information’, shown under the question text, enabling the health advisor to ask probing
questions. This supports health advisors to ensure the caller’s responses match the
answer selection. ‘Probing’ is extensively trained in the health advisors’ mandatory
training, and the facility is a fundamental aspect of the NHS Pathways system and
how it differs from fixed-script based systems. The supporting information provided to
support the identification of an immediate threat to life is extensive as, in
circumstances whereby a patient may not be conscious or breathing, this is recognised
as an exceptionally stressful situation for all involved including the health advisor.
The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS)
In addition to the NHS Pathways response detailed above and whilst this falls outside
of NHS England’s direct remit, for completeness, NHS England has discussed the
concerns in your Report with the provider of the MPDS triage system. The MPDS is a
long-established triage system launched in 1979, published by the Priority Dispatch
Corporation (PDC), and its ongoing development is supported by the International
Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED).
PDC has advised that:
• Upon the report of a patient found on the floor ‘unresponsive and not breathing’,
with no other indication of trauma or cause of injury, the 999 call handler will
utilise the MPDS instructions to provide CPR advice to the caller.
•
• CPR advice will not be discontinued until a responder is at scene to take over,
unless there is definite evidence that the patient is no longer in cardiac arrest.
In the event that a caller provides additional information that indicates a patient
may be beyond help, the call handler will continue to provide CPR instructions
unless a specific set of individual ambulance service Medical Director approved
identifiers are mentioned, which include the patient being cold and stiff in a
warm environment, or if the patient’s condition is incompatible with life.
If any of the identifiers are confirmed, the MPDS will direct the call handler to
ask an additional safety question to confirm the detail and ensure the caller is
clear that the patient cannot be resuscitated. Only in this instance would the
call handler cease advice and clear the line. This obvious death information is
only addressed if volunteered by the caller.
•
• Where a patient is unconscious and not breathing, CPR advice will be delivered
and no other interruption to the guidance for the caller will occur.
Should the Coroner require any further information relevant to the MPDS, we would
advise that you contact PDC directly.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Drew,
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
NHS England
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Anita Bhardwaj, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.