Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0593, written 4 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 4 Nov 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0593 |
| Deceased | Neil Yates |
| Coroner | Anita Bhardwaj |
| Coroner area | Liverpool and the Wirral |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 NHS England & NHS Improvement (PFDs) 2 The Chief Coroner 1 CORONER I am Anita BHARDWAJ, Area Coroner for the coroner area of Liverpool and Wirral 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 31 January 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Neil Michael YATES aged 53. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 01 November 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was that Neil died of a Drug Related Death. The cause of death being: 1a Mixed Drug Toxicity, Bronchopneumonia Official II. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cirrhosis 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Neil Michael Yates was a 53 year old gentleman who had a number of co-morbidities, including long QT syndrome. Neil also had a history of being a habitual heroin user. Whilst in the community Neil was prescribed MST (morphine sulphate tablets) instead of liquid morphine due to the risk of liquid morphine on his long QT syndrome. This was prescribed by a voluntary sector organisation specialising in substance misuse and criminal justice intervention projects in England and Wales. On being remanded into custody the GP records were reviewed by the prison GP, this medication change did not appear on his records and so liquid morphine was prescribed to him. This change did not cause or contribute to his death, however, during the inquest evidence was heard that when organisations, other than GPs, prescribe medications to individuals it takes a number of weeks before the information is sent to the GP surgery for it to be placed on the GP summary for that individual; thus posing a risk that further medication is prescribed to the patient without knowledge of what has already been prescibed. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) The delay of information relating to what has been prescribed to an individual being sent to the GP surgery by voluntary and NHS organisations. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by December 30, 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 1. 2. HMP Altcourse (Practice Plus Group) 3. Newton-le-Willows Community Hospital (GP) (sister) I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. Official The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 04/11/2024 Anita BHARDWAJ Area Coroner for Liverpool and Wirral Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Ms Anita Bhardwaj
Area Coroner
Liverpool and the Wirral Coroner’s Service
Gerard Majella Courthouse
Boundary Street
Liverpool
L5 2QD
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
9 January 2025
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Neil Michael Yates who
died on 25 April 2023
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 4
November 2024 concerning the death of Neil Michael Yates on 25 April 2023. In
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to
express my deep condolences to Neil’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen
to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Neil’s care have
been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raises concerns over delays to prescribing information for patients being
sent to GP surgeries by voluntary and NHS organisations.
There is a National Care Records Service (NCRS), also referred to as the Summary
Care Record (SCR), which is often used by care providers as a source of information
for a patient’s current medication. The medications displayed on this record are driven
by the patient’s GP record as opposed to other sources. This means that there remains
a need for medications supplied from sources other than the patient’s GP to be
recorded on the GP record before the information can then be made available on the
National Care Records Service.
The limitation of medication information within patient clinical records is a known one,
and a series of initiatives and work are being undertaken to address this across NHS
England, local systems and IT vendors. These include the following:
• A core set of fully “interoperable medicine standards” (IMS) have been defined
and tested by early adopters and are available to IT system suppliers.
• An Information Standards Notice (ISN) for Trusts is supporting wider adoption
of IMS which have been incorporated into national digital medicines
programmes.
• National adoption of IMS to underpin the transfer of medication information at
the time of hospital admission and discharge is underway.
• The first NHS Trust has used the IMS as part of the local shared care record.
• GP IT suppliers are now required to deliver the requirements set out in the IMS
by June 2025.
• The GP Connect interface, where prescription only medication supplies made
from specific settings (e.g. community pharmacies) without being prescribed
directly by the GP, can now be electronically recorded into the GP record by
the supplying professional.
• Guidance on consolidated patient medication records has been published by
the Faculty of Clinical Informatics, as follows: professional-consolidated-
medication-record-rendering-guidance-v20-sep-23.pdf
• The Professional Record Standards Body (PRSB) have updated their
discharge summary standards:
https://theprsb.org/standards/edischargesummary/
• Work is currently underway to update the medicines specification of the
Transfer of Care initiative, i.e. the mechanism to send information from
secondary care to primary care.
• NHS England have worked with local Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) to support
the development of “local shared care records.” This provides the opportunity
for local systems to present medication information across multiple providers.
• This programme of work is seen as a priority by NHS England, and timelines
are currently being reviewed but implementation must be managed in line with
the differing levels of digital maturity within ICBs.
The full national adoption and implementation of these pieces of work would allow
permitted clinicians to have an up-to-date record available along with medicines supply
information to aid safe clinical decision making.
Work is underway on all these projects, but adoption is required by multiple vendors
which makes it difficult to give a specific completion end date. These projects will likely
be rolled out over the coming two to five years.
Regarding prison screening processes specifically, the reception screening process
for those arriving at prison asks the patient about their current medicines, in line with
the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline NG57:
Recommendations | Physical health of people in prison | Guidance | NICE. This is the
basis by which the current medicines are initially recorded and reviewed. A patient
receiving treatment in the community under the Substance Misuse Service (SMS)
would be referred to the prison’s SMS team for review and a care plan.
It should be noted that morphine sulphate tablets (MST) are not used for substance
misuse treatment but are used as an opioid for pain.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Neil,
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.