Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Neil Yates

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0593, written 4 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report4 Nov 2024
Reference2024-0593
DeceasedNeil Yates
CoronerAnita Bhardwaj
Coroner areaLiverpool and the Wirral
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Community health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1 NHS England & NHS Improvement (PFDs)
2 The Chief Coroner

1

CORONER

I am Anita BHARDWAJ, Area Coroner for the coroner area of Liverpool and Wirral

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 31 January 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Neil Michael YATES
aged 53. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 01 November 2024. The
conclusion of the inquest was that Neil died of a Drug Related Death. The cause of death
being:

1a Mixed Drug Toxicity, Bronchopneumonia

Official

II. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cirrhosis

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Neil Michael Yates was a 53 year old gentleman who had a number of co-morbidities,
including long QT syndrome. Neil also had a history of being a habitual heroin user. Whilst
in the community Neil was prescribed MST (morphine sulphate tablets) instead of liquid
morphine due to the risk of liquid morphine on his long QT syndrome. This was prescribed
by a voluntary sector organisation specialising in substance misuse and criminal justice
intervention projects in England and Wales. On being remanded into custody the GP records
were reviewed by the prison GP, this medication change did not appear on his records and
so liquid morphine was prescribed to him. This change did not cause or contribute to his
death, however, during the inquest evidence was heard that when organisations, other than
GPs, prescribe medications to individuals it takes a number of weeks before the
information is sent to the GP surgery for it to be placed on the GP summary for that
individual; thus posing a risk that further medication is prescribed to the patient without
knowledge of what has already been prescibed.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
(brief summary of matters of concern)

The delay of information relating to what has been prescribed to an individual being sent to
the GP surgery by voluntary and NHS organisations.

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or
your organisation) have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by December 30, 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION

8

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:

1.
2. HMP Altcourse (Practice Plus Group)
3. Newton-le-Willows Community Hospital (GP)

(sister)

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or
of interest.

Official

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of
interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

Dated: 04/11/2024

Anita BHARDWAJ
Area Coroner for
Liverpool and Wirral

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Nhse (PDF)
Ms Anita Bhardwaj 
Area Coroner  
Liverpool and the Wirral Coroner’s Service 
Gerard Majella Courthouse 
Boundary Street  
Liverpool  
L5 2QD 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

9 January 2025 

Dear Coroner, 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Neil Michael Yates who 
died on 25 April 2023  

Thank  you  for  your  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths  (hereafter  “Report”)  dated  4 
November  2024  concerning  the  death  of  Neil  Michael  Yates  on  25  April  2023.  In 
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to 
express my deep condolences to Neil’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen 
to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Neil’s care have 
been listened to and reflected upon.   

Your Report raises concerns over delays to prescribing information for patients being 
sent to GP surgeries by voluntary and NHS organisations.  

There is a National Care Records Service (NCRS), also referred to as the Summary 
Care Record (SCR), which is often used by care providers as a source of information 
for a patient’s current medication. The medications displayed on this record are driven 
by the patient’s GP record as opposed to other sources. This means that there remains 
a  need  for  medications  supplied  from  sources  other  than  the  patient’s  GP  to  be 
recorded on the GP record before the information can then be made available on the 
National Care Records Service.  

The limitation of medication information within patient clinical records is a known one, 
and a series of initiatives and work are being undertaken to address this across NHS 
England, local systems and IT vendors. These include the following: 

•  A core set of fully “interoperable medicine standards” (IMS) have been defined 

and tested by early adopters and are available to IT system suppliers.   

•  An Information Standards Notice (ISN) for Trusts is supporting wider adoption 
of  IMS  which  have  been  incorporated  into  national  digital  medicines 
programmes.  

•  National adoption of IMS to underpin the transfer of medication information at 

the time of hospital admission and discharge is underway.  

•  The first NHS Trust has used the IMS as part of the local shared care record.  

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 •  GP IT suppliers are now required to deliver the requirements set out in the IMS 

by June 2025.  

•  The GP Connect interface, where prescription only medication supplies made 
from  specific  settings  (e.g.  community  pharmacies)  without  being  prescribed 
directly by the GP, can now be electronically recorded into the GP record by 
the supplying professional. 

•  Guidance on consolidated patient medication records has been published by 
the  Faculty  of  Clinical  Informatics,  as  follows:  professional-consolidated-
medication-record-rendering-guidance-v20-sep-23.pdf  

•  The Professional Record Standards Body (PRSB) have updated their 

discharge summary standards:  
https://theprsb.org/standards/edischargesummary/ 

•  Work  is  currently  underway  to  update  the  medicines  specification  of  the 
Transfer  of  Care  initiative,  i.e.  the  mechanism  to  send  information  from 
secondary care to primary care.  

•  NHS England have worked with local Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) to support 
the development of “local shared care records.” This provides the opportunity 
for local systems to present medication information across multiple providers.  
•  This programme of work is seen as a priority by NHS England, and timelines 
are currently being reviewed but implementation must be managed in line with 
the differing levels of digital maturity within ICBs. 

The  full  national  adoption  and  implementation  of  these  pieces  of  work  would  allow 
permitted clinicians to have an up-to-date record available along with medicines supply 
information to aid safe clinical decision making.  

Work is underway on all these projects, but adoption is required by multiple vendors 
which makes it difficult to give a specific completion end date. These projects will likely 
be rolled out over the coming two to five years.   

Regarding prison screening processes specifically, the reception screening process 
for those arriving at prison asks the patient about their current medicines, in line with 
the  National  Institute  for  Health  and  Care  Excellence  (NICE)  guideline  NG57: 
Recommendations | Physical health of people in prison | Guidance | NICE. This is the 
basis  by  which  the  current  medicines  are  initially  recorded  and  reviewed.  A  patient 
receiving  treatment  in  the  community  under  the  Substance  Misuse  Service  (SMS) 
would be referred to the prison’s SMS team for review and a care plan.  

It should be noted that morphine sulphate tablets (MST) are not used for substance 
misuse treatment but are used as an opioid for pain.  

I  would  also  like  to  provide  further  assurances  on  the  national  NHS  England  work 
taking  place around  the  Reports  to  Prevent Future  Deaths.  All  reports  received  are 
discussed  by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical 
Directors,  and  other  clinical  and  quality  colleagues  from  across  the  regions.  This 

 
 
 
 
 
 ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Neil, 
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay 
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.   

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.  

Yours sincerely,  

National Medical Director

Related reports

Other reports by Anita Bhardwaj

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.