Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0508, written 13 Oct 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 13 Oct 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0508 |
| Deceased | Jamie Funnell |
| Coroner | Rachel Redman |
| Coroner area | East Sussex |
| Category | State Custody related deaths · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 Practice Plus Group 1 CORONER I am Rachel REDMAN, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of East Sussex Coroners Service 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 19 December 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Jamie Stuart FUNNELL aged 44. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 30 September 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Narrative Conclusion: Jamie Stuart Funnell's death was due to the effects of drug and alcohol withdrawal that was exacerbated by a series of omissions by healthcare and prison staff. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Jamie Stuart Funnell was detained at HMP Lewes, 1 Brighton Road, Lewes - arriving on Friday 15th December 2023 where he resided until his death at 17:16 hours on 16th December 2023. During his detention at HMP Lewes, Jamie was withdrawing from alcohol and drugs on a specialist wing, then known as K-wing. His care at HMP Lewes presented missed opportunities for detoxification identification and management, essential protocol-driven care and potentially life saving medication prescriptions and reviews. From the evidence given, the jury found multiple instances of insufficient multi-disciplinary care, inconsistent monitoring, multiple deferrals of responsibility and a definite failure in communication. HMP Lewes has displayed cases of institutional apathy that allowed a vulnerable adult to fall through its care protocols. The key points the jury saw as possibly causative in Jamie's death were as follows: - When Jamie was admitted to HMP Lewes, healthcare staff omitted to correctly identify and record vital assessments to determine the stage and nature of his withdrawal; meaning the appropriate regime was never put in place. - Conflicting accounts regarding Jamie's symptoms during his stay at HMP Lewes demonstrate a clear failure to correctly record, keep, observe and communicate when caring for a vulnerable adult. - Finally there was no instinctive initiation of CPR at the first opportunity. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) 1.The Standard Operating Procedure for Assessment and Management of Alcohol Dependence expired in March 2024. I heard evidence that it will be replaced by an updated Policy on 9.10.25. I asked for a copy of the draft Policy to determine whether issuing a PFD could be avoided when hearing evidence about PFD matters but was advised by the PPG’s legal representative that this was not possible, without a reason why being offered. I consider that action should be taken to prevent a failure to update before their expiry all PPG’s Standard Operating Procedures including this one which the Clinical Reviewer found to be potentially unclear. His findings were published on 19.4.24, a month after the Standard Operating Procedure had expired, and yet it continues to remain out of date, almost 18 months later. PPG could have reasonably expected it would be subject to scrutiny in this inquest and update it accordingly and in a timely manner. Their failure to do so indicates a cavalier attitude to reviewing and updating important Policies and action should be taken to address this. 2. I heard evidence describing the care given to Jamie Funnell after his collapse as chaotic, with faulty equipment and incorrect CPR technique. The Ambulance crews witnessed the healthcare members carrying out CPR before taking over. After Jamie’s death was confirmed, a crew member raised concerns with the Duty Governor about the CPR attempts she had witnessed. I have heard evidence that although 32 eligible healthcare staff have now completed life support training, I have not heard any evidence regarding the level of this training and remain concerned, especially in light of the unsatisfactory response by PPG in its Action Plan for the PPO Report dated September 2024 that adequate training of staff and monitoring of equipment to prevent faults in its operation have been undertaken to prevent a fatality occurring in similar circumstances. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by December 8, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons Family of Jamie Funnell Ministry of Justice (Government Legal Department) Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 13/10/2025 Rachel REDMAN Assistant Coroner for East Sussex Coroners Service Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Practice Plus Group
Building 1330,
Arlington Business Park,
Theale,
Reading,
RG7 4SA
practiceplusgroup.com
Ms Rachel Redman
H.M. Assistant Coroner for East Sussex Coroner’s Service
27 November 2025
Dear Madam,
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths Report – Jamie Funnell
I write in response to your Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued to Practice
Plus Group ("PPG") on 13 October 2025 following the inquest touching upon the death of Jamie
Funnell at HMP Lewes. Practice Plus Group would like to express its sincere condolences to
Jamie’s family and friends.
This response addresses the matters of concern as it relates to Practice Plus Group.
Matters of Concern:
1. The Standard Operating Procedure for Assessment and Management of Alcohol
Dependence expired in March 2024. I heard evidence that it will be replaced by an
updated Policy on 9.10.25. I asked for a copy of the draft Policy to determine whether
issuing a PFD could be avoided when hearing evidence about PFD matters but was
advised by the PPG’s legal representative that this was not possible, without a reason
why being offered. I consider that action should be taken to prevent a failure to update
before their expiry all PPG’s Standard Operating Procedures including this one which
the Clinical Reviewer found to be potentially unclear. His findings were published on
19.4.24, a month after the Standard Operating Procedure had expired, and yet it
continues to remain out of date, almost 18 months later. PPG could have reasonably
expected it would be subject to scrutiny in this inquest and update it accordingly and in
Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Ltd. Registered in England No 10498997
Registered Office: Hawker House, 5-6 Napier Court, Napier Road, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8BW
a timely manner. Their failure to do so indicates a cavalier attitude to reviewing and
updating important Policies and action should be taken to address this.
2. I heard evidence describing the care given to Jamie Funnell after his collapse as chaotic,
with faulty equipment and incorrect CPR technique. The Ambulance crews witnessed
the healthcare members carrying out CPR before taking over. After Jamie’s death was
confirmed, a crew member raised concerns with the Duty Governor about the CPR
attempts she had witnessed. I have heard evidence that although 32 eligible healthcare
staff have now completed life support training, I have not heard any evidence regarding
the level of this training and remain concerned, especially in light of the unsatisfactory
response by PPG in its Action Plan for the PPO Report dated September 2024 that
adequate training of staff and monitoring of equipment to prevent faults in its operation
have been undertaken to prevent a fatality occurring in similar circumstances.
Standard Operating Procedure for Assessment and Management of Alcohol Dependence
Please find the enclosed clinical guidance document for ‘Assessment and Management of
Alcohol Dependence’. We can confirm that this was ratified at a Governance meeting on 9
October 2025.
The enclosed document has turned the previous SOP into clinical guidance, allowing for a best
practice benchmark and more patient centred care rather than the constraints of an SOP. The
guidance has now been changed to become more user friendly for staff and breaks the guidance
into smaller sections. It has also added a contents page to help staff navigate the guidance
documents more easily and makes reference to the SMS template hub, for capturing prescribing
interventions, monitoring requirements and monitoring results.
As well as the above, the guidance ensures clearer responsibilities regarding those patients that
require overnight monitoring. Previously, the policy indicated that increased face to face
monitoring through the night with the cell door open would need to be considered for high-risk
patients or those displaying signs of severe withdrawal. The new guidance document outlines
that if, based on a risk assessment of the individual, the prescriber deems that additional
monitoring through the night is required, they need to clearly outline the specific management
plan in the notes (e.g. what monitoring is required (CIWA-Ar), how often that should take place,
escalation plans and the indication for additional medication). The requirement to open the door
Page 2 of 6
for any additional assessments still stands. The requirement for a management plan ensures
that measures to protect the welfare of the patient are documented so that all staff are clear
about the expectations, allowing for greater continuity of care.
The revised operating procedure acknowledges that since moving towards integrated care
pathways, the EDiC (Early Days in Custody) team have a responsibility to consider whether the
minimum monitoring requirements (or additional monitoring requirements outlined by the
prescriber) are appropriate at their daily MDT (Multi-Disciplinary Team meeting). In addition, the
EDiC team is also required to consider whether any further action needs to be taken based on
recent assessments. This provides an additional 'safety net' for new patients entering the prison
to ensure the correct treatment regime is implemented without delay, a service which was not
available when Mr Funnell arrived at HMP Lewes.
An additional section is also included in respect of the location of patients and transfer. This
highlights that patients in alcohol withdrawal should be in a safe area of the prison and should
not be routinely transferred to another prison or attending court for the duration of their alcohol
detox.
A section on omitted doses is also included to highlight that diazepam for alcohol detox is a
critical medication and a single missed dose should be followed up with the patient. Pabrinex is
also no longer available and has been amended to generic vitamin B&C IM injections. We also
added in a link to the SPS (Specialist Pharmacy Service) guidelines around prescribing thiamine
in alcohol dependence.
In respect of embedding this guidance at HMP Lewes and other PPG sites across the country,
we have taken a number of steps. Following the ratification of the guidance this has been added
to the PPG intranet for all staff to be able to access. A Green Alert (a notification to staff relating
to clinical updates) was sent to all Heads of Healthcare on 17 November 2025 to notify them of
the updated guidance and a webinar about it and the changes took place on 20 November 2025.
At HMP Lewes specifically the guidance was shared with the senior leadership team on 13
November 2025 to share with their staff through the weekly team meetings. In addition, the
guidance was shared via the weekly staff bulletin sent to all staff on 14 November 2025. A
clinical training session with all staff has been arranged for the week commencing 1 December
Page 3 of 6
2025 to share the updated guidance and focus on the key principles. Furthermore, the service
ran a refresher training session for all staff on 6 November 2025 on the CIWA scoring tool and
its use in managing those detoxing from alcohol.
Emergency Response
The service at HMP Lewes has placed significant focus on emergency response and recognise
the importance of having the right equipment available, competent staff to manage these
complex situations and robust governance processes in place to ensure quality of care.
At HMP Lewes, all of our substantive and bank nursing staff, GP staff and health care assistants
receive annual Immediate Life Support training which is accredited with the Resuscitation
Council UK. Agency staff receive annual training through their employing agency and are not
able to work at Practice Plus Group sites without having an in-date certificate of completion.
Current compliance figures for Immediate Life Support training are 96% which is monitored
monthly so that timely courses can be booked to ensure staff remain up to date.
Following successful recruitment, the service now has minimal requirement for temporary
agency staff which means that the team is more cohesive and consistent, enabling better
working relationships which are key when dealing with emergency situations.
We recognise that attending to emergency situations can be challenging in a prison environment
and therefore to address this we introduced a number of training initiatives in July 2025 which
includes:
• All staff “back to basics” training covering emergency bags, where bags are located
across the site, what is in each of the emergency bags, and the importance of bag check
audits.
• All staff scenario-based emergency response training. This training involves the team
walking through an emergency response - what happened, what the immediate
response was, what worked well, what didn’t work well, and any learning taken from the
incident. The purpose of this training is to provide staff with a “real life” scenario to build
confidence across the whole team to lead an emergency response if needed.
The above training sessions are scheduled to occur quarterly and currently include healthcare
staff only but we plan to include our HMPPS colleagues to enable learning as a wider team.
Page 4 of 6
Emergency bag equipment is checked every 2 weeks by the team to ensure that they contain
the correct equipment, that the equipment works and that emergency drugs are in date. After
each check, the bags are resealed and the seals are checked daily on site to ensure they remain
intact. The emergency bag check process is audited monthly as per the Practice Plus Group
annual audit schedule and in line with the Emergency Response Policy for Healthcare
Professionals within Health in Justice sites (ratified January 2024 and due for review March
2026). In addition to the regular bag checks, we have also implemented bimonthly dip tests of
the emergency response bags to provide further reassurance.
We recognise that the emergency response on 16th December 2023 fell short of the standards
we expect of our healthcare team. Sadly, whilst any concerns raised are unlikely to have
changed the outcome in this case, PPG has taken significant steps to address the concerns
raised during the Inquest. Armed with the training described above, the healthcare team's ability
to respond in a timely and appropriate manner to a patient in cardio-pulmonary arrest were put
to the test in a similar emergency in October 2025. We are pleased to confirm that the same
governor who gave evidence at the inquest described the healthcare response in October 2025
as “exemplary”. She specially commended the two emergency response nurses who were first
on scene and who undoubtedly saved the individual's life.
I am confident that with these measures in place, supported by the new guidance document,
the staff at HMP Lewes will continue to provide the safe, effective and high quality care that we
expect from any of our Practice Plus Group sites.
I hope that the above response provides assurance that Practice Plus Group are committed to
providing a high-quality healthcare service at HMP Lewes, and its other sites, and trust this
response addresses the concerns you had.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director, Health in Justice Practice Plus Group
Page 5 of 6
Page 6 of 6
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.