Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0598, written 26 Nov 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 26 Nov 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0598 |
| Deceased | Celia Phillips |
| Coroner | Ana Samuel |
| Coroner area | Birmingham and Solihull |
| Category | Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Inspire You Care Ltd CORONER I am Ana Samuel Assistant Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 20 May 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Celia Marion PHILLIPS. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest . The conclusion of the inquest was; Died from natural causes contributed to by a malfunctioning ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The deceased had a complex medical history including normal pressure hydrocephalus, for which a Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt was inserted in October 2023 and revised in February 2024. In January 2025 she was hospitalised with discharge to a rehabilitation unit, following which she was discharged home with carers visiting four times a day due to her being bed bound. On the 27th April 2025, following a period of deterioration, the deceased was admitted to the Queen Elizbeth Hospital in Birmingham suffering from a probable chest infection, acute kidney injury and dehydration. CT imaging revealed a fractured shunt and increased ventricular volume following which a visual examination undertaken by the neurosurgical team discovered that the shunt had eroded through the skin and was visible, with some 6cm of tubing protruding. The erosion and protrusion had not been noted prior to this examination, either prior to her admission to hospital by family or carers or by hospital staff who saw her earlier on 27th April. Despite treatment the deceased continued to deteriorate and died on ward 513 on the 1st May 2025 at 12.03. Whilst the shunt malfunction and resultant protrusion did not directly cause her death it contributed to her neurological decline predisposing the deceased to infection and dehydration. The protruding shunt had been hidden by the deceased's hair and was not obviously visible. Based on information from the Deceased’s treating clinicians the medical cause of death was determined to be: 1a Multiple Organ Failure 1b Sepsis of Unknown Origin 1c 1d II Malfunctioning Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunt (For Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus), Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes, Frailty CORONER’S CONCERNS 1 2 3 4 5 During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. The deceased was bed bound. 2. On the 12th March the deceased's GP documented that she had pressure sores and stressed the importance of frequent repositioning, noting that she had carers who attended four times a day. 3. In both written, oral and documentary evidence provided by the carers there was no indication that repositioning had been undertaken; that there was any understanding of the need for repositioning to mitigate against the development of pressure sores; or that there had been training on pressure scores, skin assessment or re-positioning. 4. Whilst not causative of or contributory to death when admitted to hospital on the 27th April 2025 it was noted that the deceased had a DTI and a grade 1 pressure sore. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 21 January 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, , CQC , I have also sent it to the Medical Examiner, ICB, NHS England, who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 26 November 2025 Signature: 6 7 8 9 Ana Samuel Assistant Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Investigation Report: Celia Marion Phillips Date: 15th January 2026 Introduction This document provides Inspire You Care Ltd.'s formal response to the Coroner’s report. Following receipt of the report, we undertook an immediate and thorough internal investigation to understand the concerns raised in the care provided to Celia Phillips. This report details our findings, and the comprehensive actions we are taking to prevent any recurrence of these concerns raised. We accept the coroner's findings and express our profound condolences and apologies to the family of Celia Phillips. Below are the concerns that were raised and have been investigated. Thereafter actions will be set out by Inspire You Care Ltd. 1. Celia Phillips was bed bound. / On the 12th March 2025 the deceased's GP documented that she had pressure sores and stressed the importance of frequent repositioning, noting that she had carers who attended four times a day. 2. In both written, oral and documentary evidence provided by the carers there was no indication that repositioning had been undertaken; that there was any understanding of the need for repositioning to mitigate against the development of pressure sores; or that there had been training on pressure scores, skin assessment or re-positioning. 3. Whilst not causative of or contributory to death when admitted to hospital on the 27th April 2025 it was noted that the deceased had a DTI and a grade 1 pressure sore. What measures have been taken to reduce risk in future and internal investigation Inspire You Care Ltd - Management team opened an investigation upon receiving these concerns, this included meeting and speaking with the core staffing team that worked with CP in her last two weeks of receiving care. The below report outlines the summary findings of the investigation, staff responses, agreed actions, and learning outcomes. 1. Celia Phillips was bed bound. / On the 12th March 2025 the deceased's GP documented that she had pressure sores and stressed the importance of frequent repositioning, noting that she had carers who attended four times a day. Concern Raised The concern raised was that Celia was bed bound; this is a part of her care plan and the subsequent care that she would require. Investigation – Fact Find: − Carers informed the management team that they were aware Celia was bed bound as they read her care plan. Carers said they had the appropriate skills/training to support her whilst she was in bed. This includes the importance of repositioning her at an appropriate interval when they attended their care calls. They also understood that if there were any concerns around Celia skin then this should be immediately informed to the district nurses. − When staff were asked that it was not reported in the daily logs that Celia was repositioned, staff admitted that this was their failing part due to poor record keeping and not mentioning this important information in the daily notes. Findings: − There is some evidence of staff not understanding their role of caring for Celia whilst in bed as when asked to document how they cared for Celia they did not mention key information. − Staff do agree that they failed to include important information in their daily logs which could now be seen as they did not reposition Celia accordingly. Agreed Actions: − Team managers will meet with all staff individually in their supervision and discuss the importance of detailed and accurate daily recording. − Staff will undergo refresher training on Record Keeping and Communication. − Staff will also undertake further training in Wound Prevention. − These trainings will be completed within a four-week (19th January 2026 – 15th February 2026) timeframe and then care coordinators will carry out competency spot checks on the staff members. − Management team will also look into working with digital recording provider (Access Group) and set up options of skin check / repositioning for clients where needed as a check in item on the daily recording element. 2. In both written, oral and documentary evidence provided by the carers there was no indication that repositioning had been undertaken; that there was any understanding of the need for repositioning to mitigate against the development of pressure sores; or that there had been training on pressure scores, skin assessment or re-positioning. Concern Raised: In both written, oral and documentary evidence provided by the carers there was no indication that repositioning had been undertaken; that there was any understanding of the need for repositioning to mitigate against the development of pressure sores; or that there had been training on pressure scores, skin assessment or re-positioning. Staff Response: − Staff stated that as mentioned before they did reposition Celia at all four daily visits as this would have to take place due to them having to complete personal care tasks for Celia at each visit. − Staff were asked in the investigation if they understood the importance of repositioning and all the staff responded in the affirmative that yes, they understand with the primary concern being the development of pressure sores if repositioning does not take place. − Staff accepted that their record keeping had been poor and due to this it may appear that repositioning did not take place. Staff said in their written evidence also they detailed the care that Celia received but again they failed to be accurately detailed to also include information around repositioning Celia. Findings: − Staff response clearly shows that they do understand the importance of repositioning service users who are bed bound as this will then reduce the likelihood of pressure sores developing. − Staff agree with their failing on not being detailed enough when making their daily records and when giving their written evidence for care provided to Celia. Agreed Actions: − Staff have been informed through the investigation that they must go through a refresher training programme around record keeping / communication training alongside also completing a training module in wound prevention. − These trainings will be completed within a four-week (19th January 2026 – 15th February 2026) timeframe and then care coordinators will carry out competency spot checks on the staff members. 3. Whilst not causative of or contributory to death when admitted to hospital on the 27th April 2025 it was noted that the deceased had a DTI and a grade 1 pressure sore. Concern Raised: Whilst not causative of or contributory to death when admitted to hospital on the 27th April 2025 it was noted that the deceased had a DTI and a grade 1 pressure sore. Staff Response: − Staff stated that they mentioned the pressure sore to the family of Celia and also reported to the management team who subsequently reported this to the district nurse team. − Staff said they understand the importance of pressure sores and that they must be attended too and reported to the appropriate professionals. Findings: − Staff did understand the importance of pressure sores and that they must be reported to the appropriate professionals. − Staff through their written evidence did not mention repositioning Celia, which could make pressure sores worse. Agreed Actions: − Staff have been informed through the investigation that they must go through a refresher training programme around record keeping / communication training alongside also completing a training module in wound prevention. − These trainings will be completed within a four-week (19th January 2026 – 15th February 2026) timeframe and then care coordinators will carry out competency spot checks on the staff members Conclusion The concerns raised by the coroners report and, while concerning, have provided an opportunity to reflect on our practices and identify areas for learning and growth. By addressing these concerns with transparency, and a commitment to improvement, we can ensure that all our service users receive the highest standard of care. This investigation reaffirms our dedication to safeguarding the well-being of those we serve and upholding the values of trust, respect, and professionalism that define Inspire You Care Ltd. Prepared by Position: Nominated Individual Date: 15th January 2026
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Ana Samuel, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.