Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0392, written 3 Sep 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 3 Sep 2014 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2014-0392 |
| Deceased | Yohannes Kidane |
| Coroner | Louise Hunt |
| Coroner area | Birmingham & Solihull |
| Category | State Custody related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health trust 2. Director of Birmingham Prison CORONER lam Louise Hunt, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of Birmingham and Solihull CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 15 January 2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Yohannes Kidane. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 3 September 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was the deceased died from 1a. Asphyxia due to 1b. Low level suspension/compression of the neck and the jury recorded a conclusion of suicide. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Kidane was remanded into custody on 10/12/13 at Birmingham Prison. On 11/12/13 he tried to electrocute himself with a kettle cable and was placed on an ACCT. He was assessed on 12/12/13 and admitted to ward 2 of the healthcare department. On 18/12/13 he smashed his TV and made superficial cuts to his arms and abdomen. On the evening of 19/12/13 he lay on the floor between the window and the bed. He could not be seen from the cell hatch. At 22.53 he was found with a noose around his neck attached via his back to his ankle. This mechanism had been used to self-asphyxiate. CPR was provided but he was declared dead in his cell at 23.20 by paramedics. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1)The healthcare department has 2 wards with 15 patients on each ward. The evidence presented at the inquest confirmed that at night the healthcare wards are staffed by 1 nurse per ward and 1 prison officer who is shared between both wards. Evidence confirmed there were a number of prisoners on ward 2 who required ACCT observation plus other prisoners requiring attention. At the time only 1 nurse was present as the Prison officer was on the other ward. lam concerned the wards have insufficient staff at night to provide for all the healthcare and other needs of prisoners. (2) | am concerned that the ability to undertake effective ACCT observations is compromised by the lack of sufficient staff. (3) When I asked how staff took breaks at night | was told staff did not take breaks during the night. | am concerned about the impact this would have on the care and wellbeing of prisoners and on the staff. Staff must need to take comfort breaks throughout the night which would add an additional burden on the already stretched staffing levels. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should.be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 29 October 2014. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons Mr Kidane’s family, | have also sent it to the Prison and Probations Ombudsman’s office who may find it useful or of interest. 1 am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 3 September 2014 c [ i
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Birmingham and Solihull [iN/ZE9 Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust Chair & Chief Executive's Office Unit 1, B1 50 Summer Hill Road Ladywood Birmingham B1 3RB Tel: Fax: RECEIVED | 94 oct 20th 24 October 2014 Mrs Louise Hunt Senior Coroner Coroner's Court 50 Newton Street Birmingham B4 6NE Dear Mrs Hunt | am writing further to your letter of 3 September 2014 addressed jointly to the Trust and HMP Birmingham pursuant to Regulation 28 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. Thank you for informing me of your concerns following the inquest into the death of Yohannes Kidane. | appreciate receiving your independent views on this matter. In your letter of 3 September 2014, you raised the following concerns: 1. There are insufficient staff present on the wards at night to provide for all the healthcare and other needs of the prisoners. At night the healthcare wards are staffed by 1 nurse per ward and 1 prison officer who is shared between both wards. Each ward holds a maximum of 15 patients. Evidence confirmed there were a number of prisoners on Ward 2 who required ACCT observation plus other prisoners requiring attention. At the time only 1 nurse was present on Ward 2 as the Prison officer was on Ward 1. 2. The ability to undertake effective ACCT observations is compromised by the lack of sufficient staff. 3. The fact that staff do not take breaks during the night and the impact that this would have on them and on the care and wellbeing of prisoners. Staff must need to take comfort breaks throughout the night which would add an additional burden on the already stretched staffing levels. In order to respond to the concerns that you have raised, the Trust has liaised with Birmingham Community Healthcare Trust (who provide physical healthcare on Ward 1 of the healthcare centre) and G4S who provide healthcare prison officers in the Chair: Sue Davis, CBE Chief Executive: John Short PALS Patient Advice and Liaison Service Customer Care Mon-Fri, 8am — 8pm Tel: 0800 953 0045 Text: 07985 883 509 += Email: pals@bsmhft.nhs.uk | Website: www.bsmhft.nhs.uk impreving mental health wellbeing healthcare centre. The Trust has also forwarded a copy of your letter to the Commissioner responsible for funding healthcare services within the prison. Overview of the Healthcare Centre and night staffing As you will be aware, the healthcare centre at HMP Birmingham has two, fifteen bedded wards. Ward 1 provides physical health needs for prisoners and deals with a range of clinical activity from self-harm to wounds that prisons receive through assaults, to more serious physical health problems that require inpatient care. When prisoners are transferred out to general hospitals, on return to the prison there is a process in place where prisoners will be placed on Ward 1 for a period of observation ‘prior to returning to their normal location. Ward 1 also has a high dependency cell “where prisoners with more serious health problems, for example terminal illness, can be cared for until the point where they may need to be transferred out of the prison for hospice care. / Ward 2 provides a service for prisoners with mental health problems and again ranges from prisoners who can have a period of admission to the ward for assessment and treatment and be returned back to normal location, through to prisoners who have severe and enduring mental health problems who will also require assessment but may need to be transferred out to a medium secure hospital for treatment pursuant to the Mental Health Act. Both wards have the same establishment of staff providing clinical care. During the day there are two qualified nursing staff on each ward and two healthcare prison officers. During the night shift the establishment of staff reduces down to one nurse on each ward and one healthcare prison officer who is shared between both wards. Although two prison officers are allocated to ward 2 often based on the acuity on the ward, there will often be three healthcare prison officers allocated during the day; however, this is not a permanent feature as part of the establishment. In addition to the Healthcare Centre, there is also an emergency response registered general nurse based in main prison building as well as a night IDTS (Integrated Drug Treatment Service) nurse. Both of these nurses need to be escorted to and from an incident by a prison officer. Duties that night staff undertake for both wards The duties that night staff undertake on Ward 1 and Ward 2 are split between clinical and non-clinical roles. Nursing staff duties — Ward 1 Nursing staff provide clinical input, for example, on Ward 1 nursing staff will administer medication for the night shift. Nursing staff will be required to complete PER forms for prisoners who are going out for hospital appointments the following morning. Nursing staff also order medication, are involved in ACCT observations, provide clinical updates for all fifteen patients on the ward and respond should an emergency admission be required. Nursing staff duties — Ward 2 On Ward 2 the nursing staff will be required to administer evening medication, complete PER forms for prisoners who are going out on a hospital escort, provide summaries for. patients on the ward, order medication, respond if an admission is required during the evening due to an emergency. When prisoners are due to be transferred out nursing staff will be required to print off System One notes. At night the Ward 2 nurse can sometimes be called to the CSU to provide an algorithm if a prisoner has been placed in the CSU during the night. Ward 2 nursing staff also carry out observations under the ACCT process. Heaithcare prison officer duties For both wards, healthcare prison officers can respond to cell bells where a patient may require assistance; be it hot water for a drink, general enquiries or to report any medical complaints they may have. Healthcare prison officers can complete the ACCT observations and support nursing staff with their clinical duties. Review of staffing levels As | have mentioned above, the Trust has liaised with Birmingham Community Healthcare Trust and G4S regarding night staffing levels. In principle, there is agreement that extra help during the night would assist both nursing staff and the healthcare prison officer in their duties. For Ward 1 and 2, should a medical emergency occur during the night there is an emergency response nurse within the prison who can respond and assist as required. , ; Birmingham Community Healthcare Trust have reviewed their skill mix for ward 4 which has resulted in a change to the skill mix whereby the current funding for unqualified staff will now be converted into qualified nurses. This will allow for an additional primary care nurse to be present during the night shift. | understand that recruitment for these extra posts will commence shortly, however recruitment for prison nurses is historically challenging. It is envisaged that that nurse would assist the emergency response night nurse as well as providing cover on Ward 1 so that the Ward 1 can have their break. An additional nurse would also mean that the healthcare prison officer on duty could move upstairs to assist the Ward 2 nurse if they are busy. Regarding Ward 2, as mentioned above, an IDTS nurse is also present within the main prison building during the night. The Trust anticipates that that nurse could undertake part of their administrative duties on Ward 2 in order that the Ward 2 is able to take their break and vice versa. Where the IDTS nurse is occupied, it is also anticipated that a member of primary care staff could assist on Ward 2 whilst the Ward 2 nurse takes their break. While this would mean that an RGN would be covering the break of an RMN, in reality the RMN would be able to return to an immediate mental health emergency as they would still be taking their break within the healthcare centre. In this way, we consider that we are able to allay your concern regarding staff not being able to take their breaks. | am disappointed to report that we asked our Commissioner to attend two meetings regarding funding of an extra staff member for Ward 2. They declined to attend these meetings on the basis that the “PFD” report was not directly addressed to them and therefore did not require them to respond to it. We have been unable to make progress on this point within the time allowed by the Regulations to provide a response, We will continue to pursue this matter with them. We have met with G4S and representatives from the National Offenders Management Service as the evidence at the inquest identified that a significant part of the duties during the night are non-clinical, for example responding to cell bells, general enquiries and undertaking ACCT observations. | understand that they will be providing a separate response to you. | would like to thank you for raising your concerns about the need for an extra staff member in the healthcare centre at night. | hope that this response demonstrates to you that | have taken those concerns seriously and have attempted to solve them as much as | can within the means available to this organisation. | would invite you to consider specifically addressing a letter to our Commissioners for healthcare provision within the prison to facilitate the process of future discussions. Yours sincerely John Short Chief Executive
Ministry of Equality, Rights and Decency Group
National Offender Management Service
J U ST | C E “4th Floor, 70 Petty France,
National Offender Lontion SW1H 9EX
Management Service t: 0300 049 7051
Mrs Louise: Hunt
Senior. Coroner
Birmingham and Solihull Area
50 Newton Street
Birmingham
B4 6NE
4 November 2014
Dear Mrs Hunt
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 3 September 2014 addressed to Michael
Spurr, Chief Executive of the National.Offender Management Service (NOMS), concerning
the recent inquest into the death of Yohannes Kidane lon the 19 December 2013 at HMP
Birmingham. . Your letter has been passed: to the Equ lity, Rights and Decency Group in
NOMS as we have policy responsibility for sulcide. prevention and self harm management
and.for sharing learning from deaths in custody, | haye consulted with the.Controller at
HMP Birmingham in formulating this response.
You, have raised three: matters of concern. | am awate that the first of which concerns
matters for Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust who will be
responding separately. | will therefore address the second and third in turn.
The night. staffing level for HMP. Birmingham was reviewed when responsibility for its
Operation was transferred to G4S, and NOMS is satisfled that it is acceptable. G4S has
chosen to deploy a Prison Custody Officer {PCO) to patro] the healthcare centre at night, and
this is beyond the public sector benchmark which would require the use. an Operational
Support Grade (OSG) for this purpose. This allows extr flexibility, as a PCO Is trained and
authorised to perform additional duties, such as to unlock cell doors if required,
Each evening the PCO on night duty recelves a handovet from the PCO who has completed
the day shift, and decides on the basis of the operatiohial needs identified where best. to
locate themselves for that shift. At night the PCO and twb nurses have access to both wards.
In-an emergency they use the alarm to summon assistande and the Night Orderly Officer and
incident response PCOs-from elsewhere in the prison respond and attend.
Staff breaks at night
The Night Orderly Officer arranges cover for breaks with the staff on duty at the beginning of
each night shift. if there is.a particularly high number of prisoners subject to Assessment,
Care in. Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) process in one location, the Night Orderly Officer may
choose.to locate an additional member of staff in that afea. This is not common practice as
night staffing levels are assessed as sufficient, but it is-a option that can be used. If there
are prisoners located in the Healthchre Centre who are the subject of continuous supervision
additional staff will be provided. :
| hope this provides you with assurance that the matters of concern you have identified have
been fully addressed.
Yours sincerely
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.