Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0291, written 23 Jul 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 23 Jul 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0291 |
| Deceased | Doreen England |
| Coroner | Louise Hunt |
| Coroner area | Birmingham and Solihull |
| Category | Mental Health related deaths |
| Organisation named | Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 4. Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust 2. Right Honourable Jeremy Hunt MP - Secretary of State for Health 3. NHS England 1 | CORONER | am Louise Hunt, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of Birmingham and Solihull 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 9" October 2014.1 commenced an investigation into the death of Doreen England. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 21st July 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative: The deceased died from an infected grade 4 pressure sore which developed during her admission from 20/7/14. There was a gross failure to prepare and put a care plan in place to monitor and prevent pressure sore formation following a waterlow score of 17 indicating high risk on 20/7/14. There was an overall lack of knowledge on the ward of how pressure sores formed and how they could be prevented. Her death was contributed to by neglect. 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The deceased was an 81 year old lady who suffered from vascular dementia. Her family were unable to care for her at home due to deterioration in her condition. She was unsettled and screaming out. She was initially admitted to an EMI residential home who were unable to cater for her needs. She went to A&E at Good hope hospital on 19/07/14. They arranged a mental health assessment which resulted in her being admitted to Rosemary Suite at the Juniper Centre (part of Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust) on 20/7/14. On admission a waterlow score was undertaken which confirmed a result of 17 indicating she was at high risk of pressure sore formation. Despite this risk no care plan was prepared, and no care provided to prevent pressure sores occurring. On 23/7/14 blood test results revealed a raised white cell count and CRP indicating possible infection — these results were not followed up or repeated. On 24/7114 her sacrum was noted to be red. On 25/7/14 a further waterlow score was undertaken which showed a result of 19. A care plan was prepared including a 2 hourly turning chart but this was not commenced. By the evening on 27/7/14 her sacrum was described as having a very bad sore and a 2 hourly turning chart was put in place. From 28/7/14 she was nursed in bed to relieve pressure on her sacrum. On 29/7/14 she became systematically unwell and was prescribed antibiotics. Her condition deteriorated resulting in her admission to QEHB on 30/7/14 when a grade 3 pressure sore was diagnosed. Bu 08/08/14 she developed osteomyletis of the sacral bone and a chest infection. The sore was graded as 4 by 11/8/14. Towards the end of August there was some improvement in her condition but she deteriorated again on 02/09/14. She deteriorated further on 17/9/14 and remained unwell until her death on 30/9/14. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving risé to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action.is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: — (1) Despite a waterlow score on admission confirming she was at high risk of pressure sore formation no care plan was prepared. Staff at the inquest confirmed they had a lack of knowledge about pressure sore formation and how to prevent pressure sores occurring. Staff working on mental health wards dealing with elderly patients must have a clear understanding of basic medical care in particular how pressure sores occur and what steps are required to address those at high risk. Since these events staff confirmed at the inquest that they had still not had training on pressure sore formation and prevention. Rosemary suite had no leadership at the time. Staff were completing paperwork but not then actioning risks that were identified. The consultant and ward doctor were on leave at the same time and medical cover was only available from doctors off site who had to be requested to attend. The ward and trust need to ensure there is clear leadership on the ward with adequate medical cover. Registered Mental Health Nurses at the inquest confirmed their RMN training had not covered the subject of pressure sores in any detail and they felt they had inadequate awareness and knowledge. This is a subject that should be covered in the RMN curriculum. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN (2 YS (3 ~ (4 o In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your organisations have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 21 September 2015 . |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, the family, ED from West Midlands Police and the clinical commissioning group. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary ‘| form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
KD, (©) Birmingham and Solihull NHS) Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust Chair & Chief Executive’s Office Unit 1, B1 50 Summer Hill Road Ladywood Birmingham B1 3RB Tel: 0121 301 1319 Fax: 0121 301 1301 Our Ref: JS/DF/CEO Corres 18 September 2015 Mrs Louise Hunt HM Senior Coroner, Coroners Court Birmingham and Solihull Areas 50 Newton Street Birmingham B4 6NE Dear Mrs Hunt REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS | am writing further to your letter dated 23 July 2015 pursuant to Regulation 28 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. Thank you for informing me of your concerns relating to the care provided to Mrs Doreen England by Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust. | can assure you that these have been taken very seriously. In your letter of 23 July 2015, you raised the following matters of concern:- 1. Despite a waterlow score on admission confirming that Mrs England was at high risk of pressure sore formation, no care plan was prepared. Staff at the inquest confirmed that they had a lack of knowledge about pressure sore formation and how to prevent pressure sores occurring. Staff working on mental health wards dealing with elderly patients must have a clear understanding of basic medical care, in particular how pressure sores occur and what steps are required to address those at high risk. 2. Since these events staff confirmed at the inquest that they had still not had training on pressure sore formation and prevention. 3. Rosemary Suite had no leadership at the time. Staff were completing paperwork but not then actioning risks that were identified. The consultant and ward doctor were on leave at the same time and medical cover was only available from doctors off site who had to be requested to attend. The ward and Trust need to ensure that there is clear leadership on the ward with adequate medical cover. Chair: Sue Davis, CBE Chief Executive: John Short PALS Patient Advice and Liaison Service Customer Care Mon - Fri, 8am - 8pm Tel: 0800 953 0045 Text: 07985883 509 Email: pals@bsmbhft.nhs.uk Website: www.bsmbft.nhs.uk Ra POY As ‘ P VV Impreving mental health wellbeing Usp Co was to write to you again in March 2016 to confirm that all future actions have indeed been delivered. | will diarise this matter and ensure that you receive a letter to this effect. Yours sincerely Jer srork. John Short Chief Executive KJ RECEIVED 2 2 SEP 2015 From Ben Gummer MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Care Quality Department OSES of H ealt h Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SW1A 2NS Tel: 020 7210 4850 Mrs Louise Hunt HM Senior Coroner — Birmingham and Solihull 50 Newton Street Birmingham B4 6NE 21 SEP 2015 17" September 2016 Dear Mrs Hunt Thank you for your letter to Secretary of State about the death of Ms Doreen England. I am responding as the Minister with responsibility for care quality at the Department of Health. I was saddened to read of the circumstances surrounding Ms England’s death. The standard of care described in your report is disappointing and unacceptable. Please pass my condolences to Ms England’s family and loved ones. You detailed the treatment received by Ms England following her admission to the Juniper Centre, culminating in her death 30 September 2014. The report noted a number of concerns including the following; e Staff working on mental health wards not being trained in pressure sore formation and prevention; and e Registered Mental Health Nurses (RMNS) training curriculum not covering the subject of pressure sores in any detail. I note that you have also asked NHS England to respond to your findings and I understand that Sir Bruce Keogh — National Medical Director at NHSE has responded to your report. Mrs England’s case has been tabled for discussion at the Quality Surveillance Group in order to address the deficiencies in care and to look at what needs to happen to prevent any recurrence. With regard to your concerns about staff training, I have consulted Health Education England (HEE), which is the body established to help improve the quality of care delivered to patients by ensuring that our future workforce is available in the right numbers with the right skills, values and competencies to meet their needs. While HEE have a responsibility for promoting high quality education and training, they are not responsible for setting curricula or the standards of training; in this instance this would be the responsibility of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). Nevertheless, HEE have confirmed that they will work with the NMC to influence training and curricula as appropriate. HEE do take account of the impact of actions on the whole health and social care workforce, especially where the performance of the whole system is so inherently interlinked. Health Education England Strategic Framework 2014 -29 — Framework 15 builds upon a Strategic Intent Document published in February 2013 and the feedback to that and the refresh published in July 2013 and can be found at https://hee.nhs.uk/2014/06/03/framework-15-health-education-england-strategic- framework-2014-29/ Framework 15 identified the five characteristics required of the future workforce to meet the needs of future patients. One of which is the need for a workforce with adaptable skills, responsive to evidence and innovation to enable ‘whole person’ care, with specialisation driven by patient rather than professional needs. HEE plans to undertake a long term piece of work to review the curricula of all NHS commissioned training programmes to include areas of health, including learning disability, mental illness, physical illness and physical ill health and social support needs. Working with regulatory bodies, HEE will agree the standards and content for education and training; this is anticipated to be completed by April 2017. I hope that this infoyfnation is useful. Thank you for bringing the circumstances of Ms England’s déath to our attention. BEN GUMMER RECEIVED 09 SEP 2015 H.M. Senior Coroner England Bruce Keogh Medical Directorate 6" Floor, Skipton House 80 London Road SE1 6LH bruce.keogh@nhs.net 4" September 2015 Mrs Louise Hunt Birmingham & Solihull Areas Coroner’s Court 50 Newton Street Birimingham B4 6NE Your ref: 003059/2014 - DOREEN ENGLAND (LH/AS) Dear Mrs Hunt, Re: Doreen England, Deceased NHS England has received your regulation report dated 23 July 2015 relating to the unfortunate death of Doreen England. It was upsetting to read of the significant failures of care that contributed to her death and we are saddened to hear of this deficiency in care delivery and extend sincere apologies to the family of Mrs England. There are aspects of care in that have been highlighted in the report which demonstrate an urgent need for rectification. In particular there is a lack of an appropriate response to assessing Mrs England at high risk of developing pressure sores. Her risk had clearly been identified and documented on at least ‘two occasions but had not resulted in appropriate delivery of care. In situations like this whilst staff may not have the necessary skills to respond themselves to the risk identified, there should have had ready access to specialists, specialist equipment and easily accessible advice. High quality care for all, now and for future generations It is also a significant concern that at the time of the inquest the organisation involved does not appear to have responded in correcting these issues. We are in communication with Birmingham Cross City CCG which has undertaken a significant amount of work in relation to this case already and who commission the service and will also ensure CQC are aware of the case. NHS England has oversight of such issues as the convenor of local quality surveillance groups (QSGs) which bring together the commissioners and regulators in local areas. In this case, the matter has been tabled for discussion in our Quality Surveillance Group, where we will oversee the need for a specific action plan and seek assurance that the deficiencies in care have been addressed in order to prevent a recurrence. We will ensure you are made aware of the outcome and actions resulting from these efforts. | hope that this response containing details of the action proposed provides assurance. Yours sincerely, ul \ mae Bruce Keogh KBE) MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP National Medical Director NHS England High quality care for all, now and for future generations
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.