Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016

Beverley Upton

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0318, written 7 Sep 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report7 Sep 2016
Reference2016-0318
DeceasedBeverley Upton
CoronerRobert Chapman
Coroner areaRutland and North Leicestershire
CategoryAccident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  

1. 

 Managing Director, MAC Skip Hire Limited, Ventura 

House, Ventura Park Road, Tamworth B78 3HL 

CORONER 

I am Robert Chapman, Assistant Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Rutland and North 
Leicestershire 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 9th November 2015 I commenced an investigation into the death of Beverley Dorothy 
Upton. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest with a jury on 1 September 
2016. The conclusion of the inquest was: 

The Cause of death was:  

1.a. Chest Injuries 

The Conclusion of the jury was: 

Accidental death 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mrs Upton was a heavy goods vehicle driver employed by MAC Skip Hire Limited 
(MAC). On the 4th November 2015 she was at work at the MAC premises in Hinckley. 
Her lorry was in the process of being loaded by a CAT Loading Shovel. During the 
course of the loading a carpet became lodged over the near side of the lorry. The driver 
of the shovel attempted to cut the carpet using the bucket of the shovel, moving it from 
side to side on the top edge of the nearside of the lorry. That was unsuccessful. Mrs 
Upton got out of the cab of her lorry and tried to help to drag the carpet down, again 
unsuccessfully. She was not wearing any high visibility clothing.  

On three occasions the driver of the shovel put the bottom edge of the bucket on the 
carpet, putting the bucket into a vertical position, attempting to drag the carpet towards 
him. On the last occasion his evidence was that he saw Mrs Upton move towards her 
lorry cab and gave him the “thumbs up”. During the last manoeuvre Mrs Upton was 
trapped between the bucket and the side of the truck, and died as a result of injuries 
sustained. 

It was apparent from the evidence given at the Inquest that: 

1.  The driver of the CAT Shovel had not seen Mrs Upton as he approached the 

side of her lorry on the last occasion; 

2.  His view of her and the lorry was restricted by the height of the bucket in front of 

him; 

3.  That his ability to have seen her may have been reduced because she was not 

wearing high visibility clothing; 

4.  There was a rule, apparent in the industry, stipulating that a driver should not 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 get out of their lorry whilst it was being loaded; 

5.  There was no written rule at MAC requiring drivers to stay in their cabs whilst 

loading; 

6.  There was no enforcement of the rule as to the use of high visibility clothing; 

7.  There was no enforcement of the rule that drivers should not get out of their cab; 

8.  Mrs Upton did get out of her cab, appears to have moved down the nearside of 

the lorry, and was trapped as indicated; 

9.  There was a lack of attention given to the drafting of health and safety 

documentation, with people preparing documentation who did not have 
appropriate training and experience in doing so; 

10.  There was insufficient training given to the staff of MAC in the nature of risk and 

the ways to reduce risk, as well as health and safety matters. 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

(1)  The method of work employed at the time, in operating the CAT Loading Shovel 

to load lorries, put anyone in the vicinity at risk of injury or death 

(2)  There was no clear written guidance requiring drivers to stay in their cabs during 

loading, with sanctions if the rule was disobeyed 

(3)  There was no enforcement of the industry rule that drivers should not get out of 

their cab 

(4)  There was no enforcement of the rule that workers should wear high visibility 

clothing 

(5)   There was need for proper training to be given to those people whose task it 
was to assess risk, draft health and safety documentation, and who provided 
training to staff on risk and health and safety matters 

(6)  There was an urgent need for appropriate training to be given to staff of MAC 

into awareness of risk and health and safety matters  

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN:  
A detailed investigation should be undertaken into those matters that are set out in this 
letter, and urgent attention given to the assessment of risk. Appropriate steps then need 
to be taken to deal with and correct the deficiencies in the approach to health and safety 
and the methods of working.  

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 3rd November 2016. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons:  
Mr Steven Newham and Melanie Upton and their solicitors Bray and Bray 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 DWF solicitors 
The Health & Safety Executive 

 Leicestershire Police 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

7th September 2016                              Robert Chapman              [SIGNED BY 
CORONER]

Related reports

Other reports by Robert Chapman

See all →

More reports categorised “Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths”

See all →

Track Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Accident at Work and Health and Safety related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.