Denis Cronin

11th November2016

Dear Mrs Mason, Senior Coroner

Dulwich BSAC 102 are keen to engage with and are fully committed to supporting the
process of improving the safety of our sport for the future. However we are finding it
challenging to see how many of the points raised can be effectively incorporated into
recreational diving withoutfurtherguidance.

As a branch of the British Sub Aqua Club we are reliant on the organisation for training,
advice, and guidance. We understand BSAC have responded to this report and we will
follow and comply with anyguidance produced by BSAC.

In the meantime Dulwich would like to respond to each element:

1) A training record is kept in every divers log-book that they should have with
them on every dive, this details dive time, depth and any training undertaken.
The instructor has to sign off exercises. Where partial training has been
completed the club will develop a means of recording this.

2) We will seek clarification from BSAC regarding sequencing of lessons.

3) The plan in the briefing was for DC to inflate the DSMB with an Assistant

Instructor on hand when ascending from the Stangarth within sight of the fixed
shot line (20 metres max or 15 metres from Deck). We had been assured Denis
had completed dry practice, used a DSMB in the pool and confirmed to the
instructor that he had done it "many times". We will remind all instructors to
follow BSAC guidance in the training programme.

4) DC was accompanied by a Dive leader/Assistant diving Instructor another
Assistant Diving Instructor and another Open Water diver, with a Full
Instructor/Training Officer on shore. When separated by visibility he was with
an Assistant diving instructor and no instruction was delivered from that point,
All Instructors within the club have been reminded about instruction and
supervision levels.

5) No written risk assessments are currently required when visiting a known site,
this is in line with the current guidelines. We always produce a dive plan, log the
dive and use a marshalling slate and follow BSAG safe diving practices with a full
briefing and buddy checks before the dive.

6) The BSAC safety manager said that he would not necessarily have carried the

dive out it in the same way, he subsequently confirmed that dives are carried out
in different ways, by different people and this does not make them wrong or
unsafe. We will seek further guidance form BSAC and advise all our members
accordingly.

 7) This is incorrect, he had dived to 18 metres over 3 hours before, the correct
calculations for Nitrogen uptake were carried out before the second dive to
ensure a sufficient and safe surface interval for a second dive at 2 metres deeper.
This meant the second dive to a maximum of 20 metres was safe in accordance
with the current guidelines. Denis was qualified to dive to 20 metres and Phil to
35 metres. It is our usual practice to dive the deeper dive first particularly when
the first dive is for instance - a boat dive at 35 metres and the second dive may
well be restricted to a 15 metre dive as the surface interval maybe restricted
due to tides etc. This was not considered an issue when the second dive was only
2 metres deeper than the first and the correct calculations to ensure a safe
surface interval were carried out.

8) The site is very large and 3 small signs were apparently displayed, one on the
back of a door one in the lavatory and one on a map of the lake, none of these
areas were visited by any of the divers, it is not a case of ignoring them, it is a
case of not having seen them at all. Even if they had seen them the divers were
briefed by their Instructor before the dive on what to do if they have a free flow,
we do not consider it a "special" risk until5 degrees C as it can happen at any
time. All divers on the day were using regulators designed for cold-water use.
There is no temperature ceiling in any BSAC safe diving guidelines. We currently
consider it unsafe not to use a DSMB, we are seeking clear guidance on what the
best practice is going forward.

9) The weight belt and kit configuration is personal choice there are no existing

guidelines governing this, the correct procedure-for removal of DC's weights was
discussed in the briefing before the divers entered the water and DC informed
Phil of the need to remove the harness crotch strap before the weights can be
removed. DC also participated in a weight removal exercise that morning were
he demonstrated the correct procedure for dumping weights to another diver,
stressing the importance of ensuring they are held at arms length away from the
body before being jettisoned. It had also been practiced dry and in the pool. We
will continue to encourage students and qualified divers to follow their training
and to practice regularly with their chosen configuration.

Yours sincerely

Tony Chapman

(Ex Chair) on behalf of Dulwich BSAC 102

~1✓~~'

j ~ 

1 .'

J ~~'~

~Yi~~, 

fL. 

f /`~

H.M Coroner
Leicester City &South Leicestershire
Mrs. Catherine E Mason
The Town Hall
Town Hall Square
Leicester
LE19BG

09 November 2016

Inquest Regulation 28 recommendation report -Denis William Patrick Cronin

Dear HM Coroner,

On behalf of BSAC I  note your letter of the 16 September 2016 and your report made in accordance with
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners
(Investigations) Regulations 2013.

We note particularly your finding that although the regulator freeflow occurred the situation was retrieved by Mr
Cronin and his buddy and they were able to complete their ascent to the surface. However, at the surface Mr
Cronin struggled and was unable to release his weightbelt and after swimming away from his buddy and sank.
Had he been able to re~~~e F~'rs weigi~~k~~1t, remained with his buddy and use the alternate supply available to
him, on the balance of probabilities he would have survived.

BSAC in common with all concerned would wish to take any steps that might help prevent any similar or indeed
any deaths and would assure the court that we continually strive to improve training and diving safety.

Coroner's concerns

The concerns raised by the Coroner follow the same numbering below and each is followed by BSAC's response
together with an indication of the proposed timetable for action.

1.  No Training record is kept to evidence when training/practice took place.

Currently other than recording 'completed' training it is correct that there is no formal method or rolling
programme of recording training. BSAC is currently rewriting its core Diver Training Programme. As part
of the new programme a skills sheet for instructors to sign off individual skills rather than full lessons is to
be provided for each grade to facilitate keeping an accurate training record in the branch. Additionally
the proposed modularisation of aspects of training will further improve recording of any partial training
completion. This skills record will be implemented upon release of the new Diver Training Programme.
An initial release of the revised Ocean Diver syllabus is planned for early 2017 with other grades to follow
over a period of 2017-2019.

BSAC is also working to develop a new digital platform with which the organisation plans to make training
records an integral part of the process so instructors can confirm diver's skill completion online in order

Telford`s Quay, Sough Pfer Road, Ellesrnsre "~ ; t, Cl ~esi7irc; CHG~-~ =~~L

1. "~"4'i ~~ tt~1 .7 ~11 ~~li e.t 

F. '~"-W't  ~f

'111 '~k  "3Fr'} 

f-~'~~. ~_: 

G~ ~  ~F1~~~, `.i `t ~`. (', ~',, 

~I`(e  ~~'~I~~'~...V~`  ~`. r^  %. f'\(YL

...., 
r I

l

~  ~ 

i 
-~~~-- 

~ 
-_. 

I  ~ ~~  ,~~ . j 

~  5~;~~  1 

l-.~.~---~ -, 

i ~i r 
~.- 

~ ~'  ..] 

,` 

~ ? I

~

~

~~, i 

~

'! ~ f , 

t ;  -t i i 

~

Y . 

:1 ~ !'I

.`  _  ~ ,~:._  _  _--  -_. 

.~..-ate  -N-r.Y_~

,'  n 

i 

sFrr  ' !r5 , i}~;iai 

~•  . :_  ' 7? i  . :: id !  itec ' , ,~, iarantee. Pr:•  icient. NRN T..e L7uk~ of Ce 

_  ' ; KT. VAT €~f  -  ;tratian Nn. E~23 (' a ~i 17

 .. 

, ~

~ 

~✓

✓~~'

~

~  ~  _

L1i~r~ ~rit~ ~r~~~c~~

that the student, their instructor, branch and the BSAC will have a record of training. This work is
underway but there is no completion date or finalised solution as yet for the digital version.

2,  Training was not in accordance with BSAC Sports Diver training.

BSAC has a flexible approach to Diver Training. At Sports Diver level it would be acceptable to conduct
lessons out of sequence as the pre-requisite skills are in Ocean Diver (the previous grade). The proposed
new Diver Training Programme actually looks at a more self-contained modular approach from Sports
Diver upwards that reflects these skills as separate dives rather than sequenced sl<ilis. We do not believe
doing the lesson out of sequence was unreasonable,

The plan for the second dive was for Mr Cronin to inflate the DSMB from a depth of around 17 metres. It
took place at 20 metres. The BSAC instructions for Sports Diver are for the exercise to be conducted at 10
metres.

We will send a reminder to all BSAC Instructors to follow the guidance for skills in the BSAC Diver Training
Programme in the next issue of BSAC Instructor News to go out in February/March 2017.

4.  A diver without the necessary qualifications and experience was permitted to teach Mr Cronin with no

instruction otherwise.

We will send a table to all BSAC Instructors in the next issue of BSAC Instructor News to go out in
February/March 2017 reminding them of the instructor requirements for teaching each of the BSAC Diver
Training grades.

5.  No written risk assessments/templates were completed to ensure those responsible for the dive have

focussed their minds to relevant circumstances.

Currently we provide members with guidance and resources on our website
i~tt~://w~rrw,bsac.c~rn(pa~~.asp?section..=15.86&sectionTitfe=Risk+Assessment . Included within this
current section there are outline examples of Risk Assessment information for a selection of inland
managed dive sites including for Stoney Cove
http•//www bsac comf ~a~e asp~sectian=1596~sectiarsTitle=Risk+Assessment+--~inlaa~d+sites .We will
review this information and look at how we could provide more interactive materials via a new digital
platform. This review will be completed by the end of 2017.

6.  The dive was not properly planned. A Safety and Development Manager employed by BSAC said he

would not have done the final dive in the way that it was planned and conducted.

Telford's Quay, Sot~tf7 Pier Road, Ellesmere '~  ~  t, Che:-"lire CH65 ~tFL
"C: ~-4~ 0)251 U 0 62001  F: ~44~ {E7)~ ~~'' '_  ;~ ~''1 ~  E: ir~foC~~~s~c.cn~ :  is"~":  www.t~sac.~^~r~,, 

-

A imp:  r 

i~ 

r 

i  in ~r-'~.~;~d No. 7  1. ~ tf~ and i9n~it€  ~ 

': ,~ ~  ~.,rantEe. Pr~ .rent:  'i.. The ~7uk~ of C~ml~3r' ' 

f~,f  VA7 i 

°;!i  'ton Nn. X29 0(~C}~t 17

 } ~►

er~,~~,

r '; 
~..

y

r 

~~~ t,~°I~~ fr~l~. r ~  ~s

We are conscious that any individual dive can be conducted in many different ways taking account of
both prevailing and changing conditions. Instructors and divers each need to use their own respective
skills and experience in planning and conducting a dive and be prepared to cope with factors that occur
during the dive. Consequently we believe there is no single and/or simple means of highlighting a specific
message in this instance but we will maintain and continue our efforts to educate divers and instructors
appropriately. We will continue to utilise BSAC Talk (our member email), Instructor Bulletin and SCUBA
Magazine to feature articles reminding all divers of the importance of dive planning and how to conduct
it.

Mr Cronin had previously dived to a maximum depth of 16.5 yet he was permitted to dive to 20 metres
after an 8 month gap since his last open water dive.

The depth limit for our entry diver grade is 20m and it would not be unreasonable for someone who had
dived to 16.5m to progress to 20m after a gap. BSAC Diver Training programme incorporates depth
progression for example within Ocean Diver training with for example 001 having  a maximum depth of
6m and 002 is 10m. Should both dives be conducted on a single day the second deeper dive would be
2nd The primary reason for advising the deeper dive first derives from a common sense approach to
decompression management. There is currently no documentary evidence to support nor contradict this
advice. BSAC has ensured that progressive increases in depth between subsequent dives within the
training programme do not exceed a  6m increment. At present we have no evidence that this
recommendation presents a risk to divers. Indeed an international symposium on the subject in 1999
arrived at a similar conclusion with subsequent agreement that for dives shallower than 40m reverse
profile dives were reasonably safe providing the difference between repetitive dives is 12m or less.

8.  Signs containing important information and clearly displayed at several sites at the Dive Centre were not
read. Evidence was heard that it was believed that there was not a need because it was not the first visit
to the Dive Centre and a map of the site had been printed off the Internet in advance of the visit. One
witness said that if he had seen the signs then it would possibly have made him think twice about doing
the DSMB inflation exercise on another day.

Diving and training takes place throughout the year in the UK in cold water and  DSMB deployment in
particular is a safety skill and should not be limited to training and/or practice only when water
temperatures were convenient. The signs raise awareness to divers but in the admission of the operators
of Stoney Cove are "overly cautious".

In order to appropriately quantify the risks and if necessary revise any guidance BSAC would propose to
interrogate its incident data, take industry advice and speak to experts in this field before if necessary
issuing any revised guidance to ensure that all information gathering can be completed and carefully
considered.

Tel~orcl's Quay, Scrr,~h ('ier Road, Ed6esrtter~ Port, Cheshire Ck~~5  4FL
~~~~  ~.nr~ 

€a  X44.  s  ~1~~  ~i~~ 621 

;~  ~?~~  ~~~ ~7(t0 

~. i~  ~.7r'=.~sa~  e~ 

~~ ; 

~~v:  w~~;.~h- ,~,^.com

_ ~ 

~ 

J~ 

~ 

~ ~ 

E,~ ~,Y 

f~, i. i- ~ 

~  1~~'  ~ 

a 

~ f E' 

~ 

t ' I r~ 

~ 1 l ~

~.:~ 

'.t .  t 

R

~

~ ~ 

~ 

tPi  ~

I~ ~ 

:~~~~ }

f ~

A cvit~~ 

~ re  dsb~,  -d a7  En;~i~r 

, ,  ;, 

',. t 

~  ~-  -~r~J 

~  t~itea~l  `,~,  " ~,=-oniee  F 

r  of  ~  ~t:  HRH ~i I  c~  k7ul  ~ 

~  ~F ~ 

rbri~. ~ h~  ~-  Kt.  V 

tr 

ern Cl~,.  ~: 3  t 

r.'E 1i

 '  x  ~  ~. 

ii

,~
` _ ~~ ~.

''

9.  The belt configuration meant that there was a foreseeable risk that it could not easily be released.

The weightbelt and BCD configuration is not uncommon. BSAC training already requires practice of
removal (own and buddy's) at every stage of the Diver Training Programme (DTP) and encourages regular
practice (especially with new equipment). BSAC will feature weightbelt removal and its importance by
producing a guidance document by February 2017 and subsequently remind instructors in the next issue
of BSAC Instructor news about the importance of teaching this skill as outlined in the DTP.

If the Coroner so desires we will forward copies of any of the above proposed communications and comments as
they are completed.

Once again BSAC is committed to promoting and encouraging the safe enjoyment of our sport by all divers and
will continue to develop advice and training as appropriate and to take account of the lessons learned from any
situation.

Yours sincerely

/ ~I

Alex Warzynski
Chairman British Sub Aqua Club

Date  09 November 2016

Telford"s Quay, South Pier Rc~<<', E(iesr~~ere Port, Cheshire CH~5 4FL
7': X44 (0). ';  ".~~t1 F'~('(} 

~'t ; 44 ;Ck)151 ~5~ x:215  E' ~  ~~:fn~ ;~~~sac rn, ~ 

~'~~' w~t~~~r 1  ~z: ;..rnm 

~ 

~`

~~np~~~ , ~r . ~  er  ~ 

Er;~~:~~~c3 i :~,. 1~ ;_73 `; an ~ 

li  niie~~ '~ ~yguar~nter ~  Pr~sic' rat, rRH 11 e  .u4;a r~: C 

r~ ~,~ {fG?'. ~:  VAi Red-  r~'lon Ncr. 523 t  J(}4 ~7