Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0363, written 13 Oct 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 13 Oct 2016 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2016-0363 |
| Deceased | Robert Davidson |
| Coroner | Louise Hunt |
| Coroner area | Birmingham and Solihull |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 5 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Care Quality Commission Department of health NHS England Jubillee Gardens care home S. Aran Court Care Centre PeENnp CORONER | am Louise Hunt Senior Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 10/02/2016 | commenced an investigation into the death of Robert Arthur Davidson aged 79. The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest on 12th October 2016. The conclusion of the Jury at the inquest was We do not deem Roberts death to be an accident. Our narrative conclusions are: 1. Roberts PICA condition was inadequately identified during the pre-admission process. 2. Insufficient attention was paid to the 28/03/15 risk assessment during handover between care providers. 3. Lack of escalation of the 13/11/15 incident when Robert was seen eating a glove, did not result in the correct procedure being followed and Roberts needs being sufficiently met in respect of 1:1 care. 4. The level of training for staff dealing with vulnerable people was insufficient. 5. There was a failure to ensure staff were suitably trained for emergency situations. In particular: summonsing help, calling emergency services or when to initiate CPR. His death was contributed to by neglect.. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The deceased suffered from dementia and Altzeimers disease. Due to his complex care needs he was admitted to Jubilee Gardens care home on 20/03/15. Due to concerns from the family and the home being an unsuitable placements he was transferred to Aran Court Care Centre on 03/04/15. At Jubilee gardens a risk assessments had been undertaken identifying the deceased as suffered from PICA. This is when someone puts objects other than food into their mouth and they then try to eat these objects. During the transfer this fact was not recognised or highlighted. On 13/11/15 the deceased was found “eating” a plastic glove. The staff member on duty failed to report this to the Home Manager, who confirmed she would have put 1:1 nursing in place to avoid a similar occurrence. On the evening of 27 January 2016 at approximately 22.10, the deceased was found choking sitting in a chair in the corridor. Staff were initially unable to remove the obstruction. A 999 call was made at 22.15 indicating that the deceased was unresponsive and blue. No CPR was instigated despite being instructed by ambulance call staff to do so. A paramedic arrived at 22.23 and immediately started CPR as the deceased was in cardiac arrest. He was taken to Heartlands Hospital where he was pronounced dead. Following a post mortem/Based on information from the Deceased’s treating clinicians the medical cause of death was determined to be: OBSTRUCTION OF AIRWAY BY PLASTIC GLOVE CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — 1. During the inquest | heard evidence that Health care staff had not been trained on basic process as follows: ¢ Making 999 calls — to obtain an outside line caller’s needed to first dial “9”. The HCA instructed to make the 999 call did not know this so the call was unsuccessful. The registered nurse looking after the patient whilst he was choking had to make the 999 call resulting in her leaving the patient. « When to Start CPR. The RGN and HCA (Health Care Assistants) staff had received no training on the CPR and choking policy The concern is that staff are not trained in basic processes and therefore not able to deal with emergency situations. 2. The two HCA’s had no experience or basic training before starting work as HCA’s. They had limited understanding of conditions and processes. Consideration needs to be given as to whether there should be mandatory training or minimum standards, which are objectively assessed, to ensure HCA’s have the necessary knowledge and understanding to undertake their role. 3. The deceased PICA behaviour was not highlighted or identified on his transfer between care homes. Some process or direction from the governing body needs to be provided to care homes to ensure essential information is provided and highlighted when patients are transferred. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 12 December 2016, I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following family of the deceased. tam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 13 October2016 Signature Louise Hunt Senior Coroner Birmingham and Solihull
5 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
5) Aver Optimum Care Providers Advocates of Person Centred Care 1 December 2016 Louise Hunt Senior Coroner Birmingham and Solihull j 2ECEIVED Coroner’s Court, 50 Newton Street, -2 DEC 2016 Birmingham, B4 6NE BY: Dear Ms Hunt, Following your Coroner’s investigation and inquest into the death of Robert Arthur Davidson, the jury concluded that Robert’s death was not an accident and was contributed to by neglect. During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed a number of matters of concern. | have listed these numerically below to correspond to each point you have raised, for clarity. 1. Health care staff had not been trained on basic process; the Health Care Assistant (HCA) that was instructed to make the 999 call failed to demonstrate an awareness that to obtain an outside line the caller must first dial ‘9’. Subsequently her attempt to call emergency services was unsuccessful resulting in the nurse having to leave the patient, whom was choking, to make the 999 call. 2. The RGN and HCA staff involved in the incident had not received training on the CPR and the Choking Policy. They were unclear when to start CPR. 3. The two HCA’s involved had no experience or basic training before starting work as HCA’s. They had limited understanding of conditions and processes and therefore consideration needs to be given as to whether there should be a mandatory training or minimum standards, which are objectively assessed, to ensure HCA’s have the necessary skills and knowledge to undertake their role. 4. The deceased PICA behaviour was not highlighted or identified on his transfer between care homes, therefore some direction from the governing body needs to be provided to care homes to ensure essential information is provided and highlighted when a patient transfers. As a provider Avery Healthcare does have appropriate systems and documentation in situ to address each of the above points. For example, with reference to point 1. Avery’s orientation checklist would sufficiently provide evidence of staff awareness regarding how to use the phone systems, how to utilise the nurse call system, inclusive of emergency call bells and actions to take in an emergency. Avery Healthcare Group 3 Cygnet Drive, Swan Valley Northampton NN4 9BS t: 01604 675566 f: 01604 674410 e: enquiries@averyhealthcare.co.uk HealthInvestor " Awards 2016 Residential care provider www.averyhealthcare.co.uk of the year With reference to point 2, Emergency first aid at work and basic life support training would provide an appropriate level of training for staff. With reference to point 3, Avery have a robust recruitment and induction process, inclusive of the care certificate. This is to ensure that staff have the correct qualities and aptitude to fulfil the role of an HCA within Avery Healthcare. With reference to point 4, Avery's documentation pertaining to pre-admission assessment and transfer of care is comprehensive and if completed correctly would indicate relevant clinical risk. Unfortunately, whilst under the Restful Homes Group tenure, Aran Court had very few of these processes in place and where systems or processes were in situ they were often substandard. It remains an ongoing process to fully embed all of Avery’s policies and procedures and in light of the inquests findings an additional action plan and timetable for action has been implemented. Kind Regards Regional Manager oO)
Care Quality ; oe Commission See nformation Gallowgate Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4PA Telephone: 03000 616161 HM Coroner Louise Hunt Fax: 03000 616171 HM Coroner's Court, Coroner's Court 50 Newton Street Birmingham B4 6NE 21 December 2016 By Email to: coroner@birmingham.gov.uk Our Reference Ai Dear HM Coroner Louise Hunt Ref: Robert Davidson Re: Regulation 28 Report - Inquest touching on the death of Robert Arthur Davidson Thank you for sending the Care Quality Commission (CQC) a copy of the Regulation 28 Report issued following the Inquest touching on the death of Mr Robert Davidson. We are writing to you with our response to the matters of concern raised in relation to Aran Court Care Centre and Jubilee Gardens. CQC received a notification from the registered manager of Aran Court Care Centre on 29 January 2016 notifying CQC of the death of Mr Robert Davidson on 27 January 2016, after he swallowed and choked on a viny! disposable glove. As a consequence of receiving this information the CQC made further enquiries and gathered information about the incident including Mr. Davidson’s care records. CQC carried out a focussed inspection on 09 March 2016. At this inspection we focused on how the people known to be at risk of choking were being supported. We carried out a further comprehensive inspection at Aran Court Care Centre on 44 November 2016 in line with our inspection scheduling frequency. At this inspection we looked to see if the provider had acted appropriately to address the concerns raised during your inquest and were meeting the The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (“The Regulations’). Aran Court Care Centre is a care home with nursing operated by Avery Homes RH Limited. The home has been registered to carry on the regulated activities of: accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, diagnostic and screening and treatment of disease, disorder or injury at the location of Aran Court Care Centre from 02 March 2015. Prior to this Aran Court Care Centre was operated by another provider. CQC’s response to the specific concerns you have raised in the Regulation 28 Report are taken in turn and set out below: 1. Health care staff had not been trained on basic process as follows: « Making 999 calls — to obtain an outside line caller’s needed to first dial “9”. The health care assistant (HCA) instructed to make the 999 call, did not know this so the call was unsuccessful. The registered nurse looking after the patient whilst he was choking had to make | the 999 call resulting in her leaving the patient. : e When to start CPR. The RGN and HCA staff had received no training on the CPR and choking policy. The concern is that staff was not trained in basic processes and therefore not able to deal with emergency situations. The registered provider is responsible for ensuring there are sufficient numbers of suitably, qualified, competent, skilled and experienced persons deployed and appropriately trained as is necessary to enable them to carry out their duties. (Regulation 18, the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014). The provider should have procedures to follow in an emergency and staff should be trained in these procedures. The CQC inspects a provider’s compliance with the requirements of the Regulations during the course of an Inspection. During the course of the CQC focused inspection of Aran Court Care Centre on 09 March 2016, we found systems in place to ensure that nurses had training in emergency first aid. Emergency First Aid at work training provides delegates with an extensive first aid skill set so that they can identify incidents and manage them appropriately, whether the patient is conscious or unconscious. The course is designed to include first aid priorities, managing incidents, basic life support (CPR), unconsciousness, control of bleeding, burns and scolds, recording and reporting First Aid Priorities. A system had been put in place so that all staff received the training they needed and this ensured that there was always staff trained in first aid on each shift. Staff were able to give us a satisfactory explanation and told us about the actions they needed to take, and would take, in the event of a similar incident of choking. At our inspection of the 14 November 2016 to Aran Court Care Centre, we observed that at the shift handover staff were reminded of the need to dial ‘9’ for an outside line. Staff spoken with confirmed their understanding of how to make 999 calls and what action to take in the event of a medical emergency. The CQC provider guidance requires that when members of staff are registered with a professional body, for example the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), and this is a requirement of their role, providers must ensure that nurses are able to meet the requirements of the relevant professional regulator throughout their employment, such as _ requirements for continuing professional development. Where providers follow this guidance, registered nurses employed will have the up to date skills and knowledge required to meet service users’ needs safely, including basic life support. During the 09 March 2016 inspection we looked at the system that had been put in place to ensure that nurses had the required training. At the inspection of 14 November 2016, we saw records that showed what training people had received and were scheduled to receive. On the 10 November 2016 we inspected Jubilee Gardens. All staff had received first aid training commensurate with their role and all of the staff spoken with knew how to respond to medical emergency, including how to make emergency 999 calls. The two HCA’s had no experience or basic training before starting work as HCA’s. They had limited understanding of conditions and processes. Consideration needs to be given as to whether there should be mandatory training or minimum standards, which are objectively assessed, to ensure HCAs have the necessary knowledge and understanding to undertake the role. The Care Certificate was developed jointly by Skills for Care, Health Education England and Skills for Health, and introduced on 01 April 2015. These Care Certificate standards apply across both social care and health, and link to the national occupational standards. The Care Certificate is designed for new HCA staff, it also offers opportunities for existing staff to refresh or improve their knowledge. The new standards encapsulated in the Care Certificate should ensure that the health and social care workers have the required values, behaviours, competences and skills to provide high quality, compassionate care. The Care Certificate clearly sets out the learning outcomes that should be achieved whether this is through training or alternative learning and development activities, There is a clear requirement for providers to demonstrate that staff has 3 been assessed in the workplace with regard to their competence and safety to practice. For example: e Standard 11 of the Care certificate covers basic life support. The expectation is that the learner will be able to carry out basic life support and complete practical basic life support training that meets the UK Resuscitation council guidelines. e Standard 13 of the Care Certificate requires the learner to understand procedures for responding to accidents and sudden illness, including the procedures to be followed if an accident or sudden illness should occur. CQC refers to the Care Certificate in the ‘Guidance for providers on meeting the regulations. The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014’. The guidance states, “That providers must have an induction programme that prepares staff for their role. It is expected that providers that - »employ healthcare assistants and social care staff support workers, should follow the. Care Certificate standards to make sure new staff are supported, skilled and assessed as competent to carry out their roles’. CQC therefore on inspection looks to see if the provider's induction incorporates the Care Certificate standards. If as an organisation the provider chooses on staff inductions to ask staff to complete something other than the Care Certificate or not complete all of the outcomes in the Care Certificate, they will need to demonstrate to CQC how the induction meets the needs of the staff they employ and the needs of the people they support. At the Inspection of Aran Court Care Centre on 14 November 2016 we checked to see that the induction training provided to new staff followed the Care Certificate standards and we were able to see that it did. In addition information provided by the. provider in the provider information return (PIR) showed that to date nine: new staff had completed the Care Certificate induction standards training. At the inspection of Jubilee Gardens on 10 November 2016, we saw that new staff complete induction training that incorporated the Care Certificate standards. The provider's PIR also reflected that some new staff has completed the Care Certificate induction standards. The deceased PICA behaviour was not highlighted or identified on his transfer between care homes. Some process or direction from the governing body needs to be provided to care homes to ensure essential information is provided and highlighted when patients are transferred. CQC expects that providers should actively work with others, both internal and external, to make sure the care and treatment remains safe for people using the service. When people move between services or providers, Regulation 12(2) (The Regulations) requires providers to undertake appropriate risk assessments to make sure service users’ safety is not compromised. This includes when they move between or to other bodies who may not be registered with CQC. At the inspection on 14 November 2016 at Aran Court Care Centre, we looked at Avery Homes RH Limited admission assessment document. This is the provider's transfer document. Whilst we did not look specifically at Mr Davidson's transfer document, we saw that if this admission document was completed appropriately and with sufficient detail, the information needed to ensure that where people were known to be at risk would be captured. This would enable the provider to take appropriate steps to minimise this risk. At the inspection of Jubilee Gardens on 10 November 2016, we reviewed the provider's revised handover document, which is called a passport and if this document was completed appropriately then the known risk to a person would be recorded so that plans could be put in place to minimise these risk. Should any further information please do not hesitate to contact me on * iailieaeaaaasas ca Yours Sincerely, Cm Head of Inspection Adult Social Care Directorate
From David Mowat MP % Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Community Health and Care AER Department eeg Whitehall of Health SWANS Our ref: 1055494 Mrs Louise Hunt Senior Coroner HM Coroner for Birmingham & Solihull Coroner’s Court 50 Newton Street Birmingham RECEIVED] B4 6NE 12 JAN 27 AN 2017 11" January 2017 Dear Mrs Hunt, Thank you for your letter of 13" October 2016, following the inquest into the death of Mr Robert Davidson. I was sorry to hear of his death and wish to extend my condolences to his family. The Department of Health acknowledges that improving the capability of the care workforce through continued skills development is a vital investment in the future, and helps other people to recognise social care as a skilled career option. The characteristics of the workforce, including opportunities for learning and development, have a direct relationship with the quality of the care that services users receive. In April 2015, the Government introduced the Care Certificate (as recommended by Camilla Cavendish in her July 2013 review), which is helping to ensure that support workers and their employers can deliver a consistently high quality standard of safe, effective and compassionate care. It includes 15 standards and outcomes that health and social care workers — in hospitals, care homes and people’s own homes — should know and be able to deliver in their daily work. Regarded as ‘best practice’ for the induction of new health and care assistants, it is also offering existing staff an opportunity to refresh or improve their knowledge. The Care Certificate standards include: Awareness of mental health, dementia and learning disability; Basic life support; and Health and safety. While not mandatory, all new healthcare assistants and social care support workers are expected to attain the Care Certificate. It is a benchmark by which service providers can demonstrate they meet Care Quality Commission ‘staffing’ and ‘fit and proper persons employed’ requirements, and evidence of its use may be actively sought by inspectors. The Department is providing significant levels of funding to support training and development for the care workforce. In 2016/17, DH will invest £12m through the Workforce Development Fund which provides support to employers on modules and qualifications for their workers in adult services in the private and voluntary sectors. The Department is also continuing to work closely with our delivery partner, Skills for Care, a partner in the sector skills council for social care, to improve the level of skills of the adult social care workforce. Skills for Care has developed a comprehensive suite of standards and qualifications to help workers develop the skills and knowledge they need to support people who use - services, including specialist pathways in dementia, diabetes, managing challenging behaviour and learning disabilities. As a government we take the safety of patients and quality of care very seriously. Many measures have already been introduced to ensure providers improve standards - including how the Care Quality Commission (CQC) assesses providers against the new fundamental standards of safety and quality which care should never fail. CQC has made unannounced inspections in November 2016 of both Aran Court Care Centre and Jubilee Gardens Care Home. Lam informed by CQC that its initial findings indicate that staff now have a better understanding of what action to take in an emergency. However its assessment of the findings following both inspections is still underway and, once completed, full inspection reports will be published. I hope this response is helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the circumstances of Mr Davidson’s death to my attention. oo DAVID MOWAT Yours sincerely,
INHS England Room 6B7 Skipton House London Road London SE1 6LH 0113 825 1120 Ms Louise Hunt Senior Coroner Her Majesty's Coroner for the City of Birmingham and the Borough of Solihull Coroner's Court 50 Newton Street Birmingham B4 6NE 8" December 2016 Dear Ms Hunt, Mr Robert Arthur Davidson (deceased) Thank you for your letter 13" October 2016 enclosing your Regulation 28 Report which follows investigation and inquest into the death of Mr Robert Davidson. On behalf of NHS England | would like to express our sympathy to Mr Davidson's family. It may be helpful, in replying to the Coroner's concerns, if | explain that Section 1H of the National Health Service Act 2006 (as amended) (‘the 2006 Act”) created the National Health Service Commissioning Board. The Board is more commonly known as NHS England. The Board's functions and duties are set out in that both the 2006 Act as well as the Health & Social Care Act 2012. The legal responsibility of NHS England is to commission healthcare provision from third party healthcare providers. NHS England does not provide healthcare itself. NHS England’s regulatory role is limited to that of primary care practitioners. | have reviewed and considered the concerns set out in your report and your report and address each as follows:- During the inquest | heard evidence that Health care staff had not been trained on basic process as follows: e Making 999 calls — to obtain an outside line caller’s needed to first dial “9”. The HCA instructed to make the 999 call did not know this so the call was unsuccessful. The registered nurse looking after the patient whilst he was choking had to make the 999 call resulting in her leaving the patient. e When to start CPR. The RGN & HCA (Health Care Assistants) staff had received no training on the CPR and choking policy. The concern is that staff are not trained in basic processes and_ therefore not able to deal with emergency situations. Care organisations, including homes such as Aran Court Care Centre, are responsible for the induction and training of their staff. This should include the use of the telephone in emergency situations. Basic CPR training is a minimal expectation of those working in care settings. It is the responsibility of the care home to provide this training and ensuring that staff maintains their competence through regular updates. It may be necessary for the care home to access training in the NHS to meet these requirements. 2, The 2 HCA’s had no experience or basic training before starting work as HCA’s. They had limited understanding of conditions and processes. Consideration needs to be given as to whether there should be mandatory training or minimum standards, which are objectively assessed, to ensure HCA’s have the necessary knowledge and understanding to undertake their role. Health Care Assistants (often referred to as nursing assistants or support workers) have traditionally received training from their employer. This has caused a variation in standards of practice across the country. The recent introduction of the National Care Certificate, developed jointly between Health Education England and Skills for Health, is a set of standards that social care and health workers stick to in their daily working life. The new minimum standards should be covered as part of induction training of new care workers. The Care Certificate was developed jointly by Skills for Care, Health Education England and Skills for Health. 3. The deceased PICA behaviour was not highlighted or identified on his transfer between care homes. Some process or direction from the governing body needs to be provided to care homes to ensure essential information is provided and highlighted when patients are transferred. It is essential that information is communicated between organisations when a patient is transferred. In this case between Jubilee Gardens and Aran Court Care Centre. Had Aran Court Care Centre been aware of Mr Davidson’s condition they would have been aware of the need for additional, possibly 1:1, care. The commissioning organisation should be satisfied that the organisation to which Mr Davidson was being admitted were able to meet his care needs. The care home will be registered with and regulated by the Care Quality Commission, to whom this Regulation 28 report has also been sent, and they may wish to comment in respect of this issue. 1 am grateful to you for highlighting this matter to NHS England and trust that, in so far as remedies are within our powers, NHS England has endeavoured to address the issues raised by you. Yours sincerely Chief Nursing Officer England
[->>--- PRIORY Pe Director of Risk and Safety Priory Group Fifth floor 80 Hammersmith Road London, W14 8UD Tel. 020 7605 0923 Email: Your reference: 112694 — Robert Arthur Davidson (LH/AS) Friday 21 October 2016 Mrs Louise Hunt Senior Coroner: Birmingham & Solihull Areas 50 Newton Street Birmingham, B4 6NE Private and confidential Dear Mrs Hunt Re. Robert Arthur Davidson Deceased I write to thank you for your report dated Thursday 13 October 2016. You have made your report under Paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. Your report is in response to the matters of concern identified during the inquest concerning the death of Mr Davidson who had been a resident at Jubilee Gardens Care Home from 20 March 2015 until his discharge to another care home Aran Court Care Centre on 3 April 2015. Our understanding is that Mr Davidson died on 27 January 2016. We have considered your report at length and understand that you have raised three matters of concern. The particular matter of concern which is relevant to the actions of Jubilee Gardens Care Home is the third: e The deceased PICA behaviour was not highlighted or identified on his transfer between care homes. Some process or direction from the governing body needs to be provided to care homes to ensure essential information is provided and highlighted when patients are transferred. Whilst we understand that you have directed this matter of concern to be dealt with by the governing body (which we take to understand either the regulator the Care Quality Commission or the Department of Health or NHS England) we hope that you will be reassured by the actions that we intend to take in respect of this matter. These actions are as follows: «This incident and the lessons learnt from it i.e. to ensure effective communication at the point of a resident’s transfer or discharge to another provider will be raised in a forthcoming issue of our quarterly Safety 1* bulletin which is shared across all of our Amore Care Homes. « We will also highlight the requirement for our home staff to complete Form AM32 Transfer Discharge record. This form is completed in accordance with Policy AM27 Admission, Transfer and Discharge (July 2016). The form contains prompts for staff to record key information such as PICA behaviour. The completed form is then provided to staff at the receiving organisation at the point of the resident's transfer or discharge. We do hope that you will feel reassured by these actions. Please note that we are happy to provide you with copies of the documents outlined above if this would be of benefit to you and other parties involved in this matter. Yours sincerely Director 5 ack and Safety
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.