Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Francis Beech

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0367, written 12 Dec 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report12 Dec 2017
Reference2017-0367
DeceasedFrancis Beech
CoronerLouise Hunt
Coroner areaBirmingham and Solihull
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
2. St Giles care home

CORONER

tam Louise Hunt Senior Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations
28 and 29 of the Coroners (investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 22/08/2017 | commenced an investigation into the death of Francis Robert Beech. The investigation
concluded at the end of an inquest on 12th December 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was Died from
bronchopneumonia contributed to by a severely infected fracture site which was not identified and
treated in a timely way before he was admitted to hospital on 06/07/17. Signs of infection were present
from 01/07/17 and care home and hospital staff did not investigate these in a timely way. Weekly x-rays
were not arranged following his discharge from hospital. His death was contributed to by neglect.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The deceased suffered from chronic obstructive airways disease, hypertension and ischaemic heart
disease. He fell at his home address on 21/05/17. He was admitted to Birmingham heartlands Hospital
where he was diagnosed with a fracture of the right distal tibia and fibular. Due to his underlying medical
problems he was not suitable for surgery so was treated in a plaster cast. Weekly x-rays and an
outpatient appointment 3 weeks after discharge were not arranged as required. He was discharged to St
Giles nursing home on 16/06/17 for care and rehabilitation. No care plan was put in place to monitor the
plaster of paris. He was immobile due to the fracture and existing knee and hip flexion so was bed bound
and hoisted from bed to chair. The physiotherapist was concerned about a possible problem with his hip
so arranged for an X ray to be undertaken. He was taken to Birmingham Heartlands hospital emergency
department on 01/07/17. The paramedic who attended noted pus from his cast and reported this to staff
at the hospital who did not record it on the notes. As a result the leg was not further examined and the
deceased was returned to the nursing home. On 05/07/17 staff noted a foul smell from the cast and
contacted the community nurse and GP. Advice was for the deceased to be readmitted to hospital. There
was a delay in the ambulance attending. He was admitted on 06/07/17 where the fracture was noted to
now be compound and there was a serious ulcer in relation to the fracture site with pressure sores on
the right lateral malleolus and right heel. He was treated with an air cast boot. He was not fit enough for
any surgery and sadly died on 09/08/17..

Following a post mortem/Based on information from the Deceased’s treating clinicians the medical cause
of death was determined to be:

BRONCHO-PNEUMONIA

CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE

COMPOUND FRACTURE RIGHT ANKLE(INFECTED AND NON UNITED)CHRONIC ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE.
OSTEOPOROSIS

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion

/

there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory
duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust:

1. Lack of clear guidelines regarding the management of high risk fractures treated conservatively.
| heard evidence that this was a high risk fracture as there were sharp edges and little skin over
the ankle area. The deceased required regular monitoring as a result.

2. Lack of continuity of care. Each week a different consultant took over his care. This led to a lack
of continuity and inadequate discharge planning.

3. Failing to arrange weekly x-rays after discharge to check for fracture alignment and to monitor
the fracture.

4. Failing to arrange an outpatient appointment within 3 weeks of discharge.

5. Failing to provide any information to the nursing home about the need to monitor the plaster
cast and that it was high risk.

6. Failing to document pus on the cast when he attended for a hip x-ray on 01/07/17.

7. Failing to undertake an internal investigation to ensure lessons were learnt from this case.

St Giles nursing Home:
1. Failing to have any care plan for the management and monitoring of his plaster cast.
2. Failing to adequately check the plaster cast for signs of infection
3. Failing to document any signs of infection
4. There has been no further training for staff on plaster casts. The nursing home should review
the training needs for staff on the care and management of plaster casts.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take
such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely
Wednesday 7" February 2018. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: the family. |
have also sent it to CQC and NHS England who may find it useful or of interest.

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the Chief Coroner.

12/12/2017

Signature
Louise Hunt
Senior Coroner Birmingham and Solihull

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from S (PDF)
Heart of England INHS

NHS Foundation Trust

Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Bordesley Green East

Birmingham

B9 58S

| Tel: 0121 424 2000
Web: www. heartofengland.nhs.uk

31% January 2018

Mrs Louise Hunt

Senior Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull ,
50 Newton Street

Birmingham

Dear Mrs Hunt

Inquest into the death of Mr Francis Beech — Report to Prevent Future Deaths

| write in response to the Regulation 28 report made by you following your investigation and
inquest into the death of Mr Francis Beech on 12" December 2017, My sincere condolences
and sympathies are extended to Mr Beech’s family and friends on the sad loss of Mr Beech.

The Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (the “Trust’) has carefully considered the
concerns raised within your Prevention of Future Deaths Report and has responded to each

of the seven points, as follows:
{

4. Lack of clear guidelines regarding the management of high risk fractures treated
conservatively

The Trust accepts that, at the time of Mr Beech’s death, there were no Trust guidelines in
existence regarding the management of potentially unstable fractures in frail patients that are
for conservative (non-operative) treatment.

Following the findings from this report, guidelines will be formulated for clinicians to follow for
these patients. These will include recommended timescales for follow-up and x-ray reviews
to be used in conjunction with clinical judgement. The new guidelines will be called
‘Conservative Management of Unstable Fractures’ and will be implemented by the Trust by
31 March 2018. Once the guideline has been implemented, the Directorate will audit

compliance. if you would like to see the guidelines, please let me know. |

The Clinical Director for Trauma and Orthopaedics has disseminated interim guidance to the
department whilst the guidelines are being developed.

Building healthier lives

Page 1 of 4
Interim Chair: Rt Hon Jacqui Smith — Interim Chief Executive: Dame Julie Moore

2. Lack of continuity of care. Each week a different consultant took over his care.
This led to a lack of continuity and inadequate discharge planning. ; ‘

Clear lines of accountability will be included within the guidelines mentioned above. The
admitting consultant will be responsible for formulating the initial management plan, which
can then be followed or modified, if clinically appropriate, by any Consultant or other clinician
who sees the patient as an inpatient or at a later outpatient appointment.

The consultant on-call rota is run on a weekly basis with changeover on Friday. Currently,
the exiting consultant completes a handover sheet for every patient, during his/her ward
round, which includes appropriate discharge planning. This is filed within the patient's notes.
It provides helpful information for the receiving consultant, such as original diagnosis,
management plan and any salient changes to the patients’ condition during his on call week.
Following this incident, a further point will be added on the handover asking for the date
when an X-Ray was performed and reviewed. This will emphasize the need for regular X-
Ray reviews as will be outlined in the new guidelines. Furthermore, there is a formal
handover which takes place every Friday between the exiting and incoming consultants.
The current process will be maintained but will be strengthened by the new guidelines. In
order to reinforce this, we propose to introduce a formal sign-off between incoming and
outgoing consultants to document that both parties are satisfied with the handover. '

It is appreciated by the Trust that the initial management pian to review Mr Beech within 6
weeks of discharge was inadequate. This was a matter of clinical judgment made at the time
and could have been changed by any subsequent consultant who had received handover for
the coming week. The new guideline will clarify the appropriate time for an outpatient
appointment following discharge for the management of a fracture such as Mr Beech’s.

3. Failing to arrange weekly x-rays after discharge to check for fracture alignment
and to monitor the fracture.

This matter has_been discussed with I Clinical Director for Trauma and
Orthopaedics. has confirmed that close follow up is required to identify
early displacement of fractures in patients undergoing conservative management. This
applies to potentially unstable fractures where surgical stabilisation has not been possible.
Once a patient is discharged, in the early stages of the fracture healing process, weekly
follow ups should be arranged to confirm that the position of the fracture remains adequate.
This would normally apply for a period of six weeks, at which point the position , of the
fracture is likely to have become more stable and is unlikely to displace any further.

Po has highlighted this case with all Trauma & Orthopaedic Consultants at the
Trust to highlight the importance of ensuring that a clear management plan and weekly x-
rays are arranged for patients not suitable for surgical stabilisation. It has been strongly
emphasised to all that this will be the responsibility of the consultant who made the initial
decision to treat the patient conservatively. The new guidelines will also be made available
for all clinicians to refer to.

Page 2 of 4

iy
4. Failing to arrange an outpatient appointment within 3 weeks of discharge

As per the above response to point 3 i :: reinforced the responsibilities to
all Trauma & Orthopaedic consultants employed at the Trust with regards to the correct
management for patients such as Mr Beech. In this case an outpatient appointment was not
arranged within 3 weeks as the management plan had specified that Mr Beech was to be
seen in 6 weeks. \

The Trust has taken steps to reduce the time that a patient will now experience when
awaiting an outpatient appointment for a consultant in Trauma & Orthopaedics. To support
patients being seen in outpatient appointments expeditiously the Trust has ordated 3 daily
“hot clinic” slots for post discharge follow-up. This will ensure that there is! capacity to
facilitate these reviews.

5. Failing to provide any information to the nursing home about the need to monitor
the plaster cast and that it was high risk : \

Mr Beech was discharged to St Giles Nursing Home as a “non-weight bearing patient”. On
review of the documentation that was handed over to St Giles, while the history and nature
of Mr Beech’s injury is clearly recorded, it is agreed that there was no patient-specific

(

handover that advised staff at St Giles to closely monitor the cast. {

Mr Beech was assessed by the Trust's Supported Integrated Discharge Team (SID) on 42%
June 2017. The purpose. of the assessment was to conduct a review of the patient's medical
needs (with access to the medical records) on discharge and to determine the suitability of
the home in question. St Giles will have received a copy of the SID assessment along with a
discharge checklist, Discharge to External Agency form, verbal handover and the electronic
discharge summary. Whilst the patient will receive a leaflet with advice on plaster casts at
the point when the cast is applied, the Trust accepts that it is inappropriate to expect that
patients, especially those in a confused state like Mr Beech, will pass the leaflet on to the
care home staff. In future, nursing staff will ensure that the literature on all plaster cast
management is included within the checklist of documents that are to be sent to the home
and not simply provided to the patient.

6. Failing to document pus on the cast when he attended on for a hip x-ray on :
01/07/17

The Trust does not challenge the findings that were reached at the inquest. The nursing and
medical staff who examined Mr Beech did not identify evidence of pus; however the Trust
acknowledges the WMAS handover document details this finding. The nurse cannot recall
whether WMAS staff verbally handed over their finding of pus on the cast.

Going forward, all of the staff involved in the care of Mr Beech have been reminded of the

importance of reviewing the full ambulance handover document which would have alerted
them to the ambulance crew’s full history and may have led to a more thorough assessment.

Page 3 of 4 ’ 1

in addition the ED and Trauma & Orthopaedic teams will be reminded of the potential risk of
breakdown of skin integrity and infection under plaster casts.

7. Failing to undertake an internal investigation to ensure lessons were learnt from
this case.

An independent review of the management of this case by the governance team is currently

being undertaken. . i

There are concerns regarding the. lack of reporting of this case by the ward staff, the way the
initial complaint from the family was responded to, and also the lack of appropriate
escalation to the Clinical and Professional Review of Incidents Group. This is a weekly
meeting chaired by the Executive Medical Director. The purpose of this group is to determine
the appropriate level of response to new incidents, either relating to potential lapses In care
or accusations of individual failings, and to provide oversight of the progress of any
processes initiated as a result.

The review will clarify these issues further and allow them to be appropriately addressed.
The review and subsequent action plan will be shared with you at a later date.

The Trust has taken the concerns raised within the Prevention of Future Deaths Report
seriously and confirms the details of this case have been raised at the highest levels within
the organisation. i

Yours sinc

emo

Dr David Rosser
Interim Executive Medical Director

Page 4 of 4

Avery

Care With A Difference

16" January 2018

Louise Hunt, Senior Coroner

The Coroner’s Court

50 Newton Street |
Birmingham

B4 6NE

Dear Ms Hunt,

Reference 120656: Regulation 28 from Birmingham and Solihull Coroner to Prevent Future Deaths
relating to the death of Francis Robert Beech.

| write in response to your Regulation 28 report regarding the death of Mr Francis Robert Beech who
was resident at St Giles Care Home in Solihull, Birmingham.

In response to your concerns | can confirm that we have implemented the following:

e Care of plaster cast policy and procedure
© Care of plaster cast care plan
e Supervision and training with staff on the safe management of residents with a plaster cast |
e Implementation of the National Early Warning score and process training in the nursing
homes

If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

4 Deyu ld)
a

Director of Operations
Avery Healthcare Group

Avery Healthcare Group

3 Cygnet Drive
Swan Valley
Northampton
NN4 9BS

RECEIVED
19 JAN 2018

HealthInvestor
Awards 2016

t: 01604 675566
e: enquiries@averyhealthcare.co.uk
www.averyhealthcare.co.uk

Residential 5
10 care provider o , be
WINNER ofthe vear 9 Bh aneods aliCare

Company Registration Number: 08599361

Related reports

Other reports by Louise Hunt

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.