Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Jeff Antwis

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0392, written 13 Nov 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report13 Nov 2017
Reference2017-0392
DeceasedJeff Antwis
CoronerJohn Ellery
Coroner areaShropshire, Telford & Wrekin
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Railway related deaths
Organisation namedShropshire Community Health NHS Trust · South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

1 

2 

3 

4 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Mr Neil Carr OBE 

The Chief Executive of South Staffordshire and Shropshire NHS Trust 
Trust Headquarters 
St George's Hospital 
Corporation Street 
Stafford ST16 3SR 

CORONER 

I  am  John  Penhale  Ellery,  Senior  Coroner  for  the  coroner  area  of  Shropshire, 
Telford & Wrekin 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 31st January 2017 1 commenced an investigation into the death of Jeff David 
ANTWIS, 14 years of age. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 
on 9th November 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was suicide. 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On Monday  30th January 2017 at approximately 05:30 hours a train travelling 
south along the railway line at Harlescott level crossing Shrewsbury struck the 
deceased  causing  serious  head  injuries.  He  was  transferred  by  ambulance  to 
the  Royal  Stoke  University  Hospital  where  at  17:18  hours  he  was  confirmed 
dead.  The  deceased  was  a  vulnerable  teenager  with a  diagnosis  of  asperger’s 
syndrome with a history of self-harm escalating to suicide attempts. In answers 
to  a  miracle  question  he  indicated  that  he  wished  to  die.  An  urgent  medical 
review was appropriate but not carried out however it cannot be said to have 
caused or contributed to the death. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During  the  course  of  the  inquest  the  evidence  revealed  matters  giving  rise  to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 

(1)  Following an urgent referral by Jeff’s GP to (the then) Shropshire CAMHS on 
the  10th  January  2017  a  timely  response  was  made  with  an  initial 
appointment with a mental health practitioner  taking place  on the  12th. A 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 further  appointment  was  arranged  for  the  25th  January  (an  earlier  date 
clashed  with  an  existing  medical  appointment)  and  in  the  meantime  Jeff 
was given a miracle question to complete.  

(2)  Jeff  answered  the  miracle  question  indicating  that  he  wished  to  die.  He 
passed  it  to  his  mother  who  immediately  contacted  the  mental  health 
practitioner  who  in  turn  referred  it  and  the  initial  assessment  to  a 
consultant  physiatrist  for  review.  The  consultant  physiatrist  did  not 
consider  the  matter urgent and arranged for a routine  medical review for 
the 17th March 2017.  

(3)  At the second meeting on the  25th January 2017 Jeff and his mother were 
informed  of  the  appointment  for  the  17th  March  2017.  Jeff’s  mother 
immediately  raised  concerns  and  asked  for  it  to  be  brought  forward.  She 
was told she would have to write in and make a complaint. This was a time 
sensitive situation adding to the problem without resolving it.  

(4)  On the 30th January 2017 Jeff killed himself on the railway line.  

(5)  Independent  expert  evidence  from  a  child  and  adolescent  consultant 
physiatrist indicated that Jeff should have been offered an urgent medical 
review  appointment  for  the  27th  January  2017  (i.e.  within  7  days  of  the 
internal  referral  to  the  consultant  physiatrist)  and  not,  as  a  routine 
appointment,  the  17th  March  2017.  It  cannot  be  said  that  such  earlier 
appointment would have addressed Jeff’s problems and altered his wish to 
die  but  it is it  possible  that  earlier intervention may  have  lifted  his  spirits 
and  not,  according  to  his  mother,  ‘wilted’.  It  undoubtedly  would  have 
helped and at least been an earlier step in seeking to help Jeff.  

(6)  Other  matters  of  concern  arose  from  the  evidence.  The  mental  health 

practitioner: 

a)  Was aware of the deliberate self-harm protocol but not its content. 

b)  Carried  out  a  risk  assessment  on  a  subjective  basis  without 

reference to any known definition e.g. serious or significant.  

c)  Had no mechanism for referring back  to the  consultant  physiatrist 

appointment, whether she agreed with the request or not.  

(7)  As  stated  Jeff  had  a  diagnosis  of  asperger’s  syndrome  with  autistic 
spectrum  disorder.  Concerns  were  raised  to  what  extent  these  conditions 
have may have masked Jeff’s suicidal ideation on presentation and to what 
extent, if it is the case, they were recognized.  

(8)  From evidence given at the inquest it is clear that the provision of child and 
adolescent  mental  health  service  is  in  transition,  having  moved  from 
Shropshire CAMHS to part of South Staffordshire and Shropshire NHS Trust. 
Certain  actions  are  already  being  taken  and  these  concerns  are  raised  so 
that  a  holistic  approach  can  be  taken  and  fed  in  to  what  is  already  an 
ongoing wider review.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 6 

7 

8 

9 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I  believe 
your organisation have the power to take such action. 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 8th January 2018. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be  taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons 

, Solicitors for the family  
, father of deceased 

Mills & Reeve, Solicitors for South Staffordshire and Shropshire NHS Trust 

, Consultant Child and Adolescent Physiatrist  
, Director of Shropshire Public Health  

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The  Chief  Coroner  may  publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or 
summary  form.  He  may  send  a  copy  of  this  report  to  any  person  who  he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication 
of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

                                                      13th November 2017 

J.P. Ellery 
Senior Coroner 
Shropshire, Telford & Wrekin Area

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Respondent Not Named (PDF)
INHS

South Staffordshire and

Shropshire Healthcare
NHS Foundation Trust

Trust Headquarters
St George’s Hospital
Corporation Street
Stafford

ST16 3SR

Tel: 0300 790 7000 Ext 8578
Fax: 01785 783217

J.P. Ellery

Senior Coroner

HM Coroner's Services

Shirehall ~ 5 JAN 2018
Abbey Foregate

Shrewsbury

Shropshire;

SY2 6ND

3" December 2017

Dear Mr Ellery

RE: Jeff David ANTWIS
Report to Prevent Future Deaths

Thank you for your letter dated 13" November 2017, reporting a matter to us, in
accordance with Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroner’s (investigations) Regulations 2013.

As identified in your letter South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation
Trust were not providing CAMHS services within Shropshire at the time of Jeff's death
therefore South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust were not
in a position to have carried out an investigation into the care of Jeff prior to his death.
The Serious Incident Investigation presented at the inquest was carried out by Shropshire
Community Health NHS Trust who were providing CAMHS services in Shropshire in
January 2017.

May | take this opportunity to reassure you that South Staffordshire and Shropshire

Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Emotional Wellbeing Service have received a copy of the
Serious Incident Investigation Report from Shropshire Community Health NHS Trust and in
addition are taking action in response to the concerns you raised at the inquest as follows:

ae
Positively * = 4%
Different @

|
|
|
|

Following an urgent referral by Jeff's GP to (the then) Shropshire CAMHS on the 10th
January 2017 a timely response was made with an initial appointment with a mental
health practitioner taking place on the 12". A further appointment was arranged for
the 25" January (an earlier date clashed with an existing medical appointment) and in
the meantime Jeff was given a miracle question to complete.

Jeff answered the miracle question indicating that he wished to die. He passed it to his
mother who immediately contacted the mental health practitioner who in turn
referred it and the initial assessment to a consultant physiatrist for review. The
consultant physiatrist did not consider the matter urgent and arranged for a routine
medical review for the 17th March 2017.

At the second meeting on the 25th January 2017 Jeff and his mother were informed of
the appointment for the 17th March 2017. Jeff's mother immediately raised concerns
and asked for it to be brought forward. She was told she would have to write in and
make a complaint. This was a time sensitive situation adding to the problem without
resolving it.

On the 30" January 2017 Jeff killed himself on the railway line.

Independent expert evidence from a child and adolescent consultant physiatrist
indicated that Jeff should have been offered an urgent medical review appointment
for the 27th January 2017 (i.e. within 7 days of the internal referral to the consultant
physiatrist) and not, as a routine appointment, the 17th March 2017. It cannot be said
that such earlier appointment would have addressed Jeff's problems and altered his
wish to die but it is it possible that earlier intervention may have lifted his spirits and
not, according to his mother, ‘wilted’. It undoubtedly would have helped and at least
been an earlier step in seeking to help Jeff. ‘

Other matters of concern arose from the evidence. The mental health practitioner:
a) Was aware of the deliberate self-harm protocol but not its content.
b) Carried out a risk assessment on a subjective basis without
reference to any known definition e.g. serious or significant.
c) Had no mechanism for referring back to the consultant physiatrist
appointment, whether she agreed with the request or not.

As stated Jeff had a diagnosis of Asperger’s Syndrome with autistic spectrum disorder.
Concerns were raised to what extent these conditions have may have masked Jeff’s
suicidal ideation on presentation and to what extent, if it is the case, they were
recognised.

From evidence given at the inquest it is clear that the provision of child and adolescent
mental health service is in transition, having moved from Shropshire CAMHS to part of
South Staffordshire and Shropshire NHS Trust. Certain actions are already being taken
and these concerns are raised so that a holistic approach can be taken and fed in to
what is already an ongoing wider review. Following discussions and feedback from the
clinical leads and operational management team in the Specialist & Family Directorate,

BBs
Positively vn Ae
Different @

Since the service transferred to our organisation in May 2017 we have been working
with the staff to improve the access and effectiveness of services provided. In
response to the concerns that you identified the following actions have already
occurred:

ACTION ALREADY TAKEN

e single point of access to the service was implemented on 4" Dec 2017 to
ensure that young people’s needs can be appropriately identified at the point
of referral and an appropriate, timely response provided (point 1 and 7).
Introduction of standardised validated clinical risk assessment tool with
associated pathway to enable timely robust response to changes in risk level
(Also points 2, 3, 5, 6 & 7)

e One assessment appointment each week is ring fenced for urgent assessments
in each Consultant Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist job plan to ensure that
young people presenting in crisis are provided with urgent psychiatric review
(points 2,4, 5 & 7)

e We have commenced reviewing the caseloads of all practitioners within the
service to ensure that all young people within the service have appropriate
care plans and risk assessments in place (points 2, 3, 5, 6 & 7) this will be
completed by 31 March 2018.

e When a young person is accepted within the service, a clear pathway for their
care is identified, this enables the case holding clinician to access additional
support for example, psychology, family therapy consultant psychiatry (Also
points 2, 3, 6 & 7) Healios are delivering online therapeutic interventions as
part of core MH service (point 8).

e Escalation processes have been agreed within clinical pathways so that urgent
psychiatric reviews can be obtained when concerns are raised (points 2, 4,5 &
7)

e Reflective learning/OD sessions for the clinical teams are taking place to
improve communication between members and improved team based working
(points 2, 5, 6 & 7) The Home Treatment / crisis team now respond to young
people who present in crisis and offer additional support within the home
during episodes of crisis (Also points 3, 4 & 7)

e implementation of electronic patient records, to ensure that young people’s
current and historical risk history is available to all practitioners working with
the young person, including “out of hours”. (points 3, 4 & 7)

e Bespoke training on all assessment documentation used within the electronic
patient record system is being provided to all clinical staff to ensure consistent
use (points 3, 5, 6 & 7)

e New services are available from Kooth (open access online service for young
people 11-25) and The Childrens Society (open access drop-in service for CYP,

Positively “ae
Different ®

families and professionals) in order to provide a wider range of service for

young people. (point 8)
FURTHER ACTIONS TO BE COMPLETED

e By end of March 2018 — Completion of the review of ail cases currently open to
Mental Health services to ensure recording appropriately reflects levels of
need to improve capacity planning based on need/priority (points1, 2, 3, 5 & 7)

e By end of June 2018 — Completion of appointment to vacant posts within the
Mental Health service to ensure skill mix and capacity in place to better meet
needs of children and young people. (Posts are currently out to advert)
(points1, 2, 3,5 & 7)

e By end of June 2018 - Development of a joint crisis pathway between adult and

children’s mental health services to improve the response further for children
and young people in crisis (also points 2, 3, 5 & 7).

| hope this response helps to address your concerns. However if you require any further
information please do not hesitate to contact me

Yours sincerely

Neil Carr
Chief Executive

ex as
Positively “= 4°
Different ®

Related reports

Other reports by John Ellery

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Shropshire Community Health NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Shropshire Community Health NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.