Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Sonia Stante

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0428, written 28 Nov 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report28 Nov 2017
Reference2017-0428
DeceasedSonia Stante
CoronerJacqueline Devonish
Coroner areaInner North London
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

Transport for London
Transport for London

1

| CORONER

fam Jacqueline Devonish, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of Inner North London

2

T CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 31 July 2017] | commenced an investigation into the death of Sonia Elvira Stante,
aged 69. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28 November 2017.
The conclusion of the inquest was Road Traffic Collision and a cause of death of multi
organ failure due to ischaemic bowel (operated) as a direct result of multiple injuries.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

On 10 July 2017 Sonia Stante arrived in London for a three day trip as a part of multi
country European trip which she had commenced on 30 May 2017. Ms Stante was
evidenced on CCTV footage stepping off the pavement just east of the junction along
Pentonville Road from Kings Cross Road into the path of a double decker bus without
looking in the direction of the bus, but appearing to look across the road, not left, but
diagonally.

The bus had a green light signal and was travelling in the bus lane at a speed of
between 18 and 22mph, in a 30moh zone. Upon seeing Ms Stante step into the road
the bus driver applied the brakes reducing his speed to 16-9mph. She made contact with
the front nearside of the bus and was thrown back onto the pavement along the kerb.

She was transferred to hospital in a conscious state and had been able to tell the
London Ambulance Service paramedic that she had checked the road in the wrong
direction.

She deteriorated and died from her injuries on 21 July 2017 at the Royal London
hospital.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my Statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

Following the incident i! Traffic Management Officer undertook a review

of the road traffic layout at the scene. He met with TfL on site on 16 August 2017 anda
number of findings were made:

(1) No road markings indicating the direction pedestrians should look when crossing

(2) Two separate junctions at that location make that crossing confusing for pedestrians
(3) The phasing of the green man operates for each carriageway independently so
causing confusion for pedestrians who may look at the wrong phasing

(4) Missing louvre on the green man on the north side of the crossing making the green
man more visible to pedestrians crossing from the south

(5) With the location being close to the Eurostar Terminal there are several hotels
nearby and foreign visitors may not have a full understanding if the junction.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your
organisation have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 4 January 2018. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the
Interested Person. | have also sent it to ho may find it useful or of
interest.

! am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

28 November 2017 (pegretie howons U

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Transport for London (PDF)
Dear Ms Jacqueline Devonish,

My colleagues and | were very sorry to hear of the death of Ms Sonia Stante and we
pass on our sincere condolences to her family.

We acknowledge receipt of your Prevention of Future Deaths report on the 30
November 2017 and respond as follows.

Junction design and layout (‘matters of concern’ points 2 and 3)

The junction of Pentonville Road and King’s Cross Road operates as a single
junction with two separately signalled pedestrian crossings. The crossing of King’s
Cross Road is known as a ‘straight across’ crossing and the crossing on Pentonville
Road as a ‘staggered’ crossing. This is a common arrangement and used throughout
London. At a staggered crossing, a pedestrian must cross the road in two stages as
each green figure light aspect will display independently of the other. Each green
figure light aspect is sufficiently far apart to discourage pedestrians from looking at
the other. This arrangement allows the junction to operate in the most efficient
manner overall, reducing the time that pedestrians must wait before they are able to
cross the road as well as delays to other road users.

J OFFICES &
b EISURE ig
L | é
B\ pancras's KING|:
Ot. CROs
| |
endurys

4

Figure 1: Location of junction within wider area

Green figure ‘louvres’ on pedestrian signals (‘matters of concern’ point 4)

At the time of the collision, pedestrian signals at both crossings were functioning
normally. This included louvres (a slatted cover designed to prevent confusion
between the green figure light aspects of the separate crossings) on two of the green
figure light aspects at the pedestrian crossings. These louvres were in place at the
time of the site visit with the Metropolitan Police on 16 August 2017.

We inspected the crossings again on 11 September 2017 to review the layout and
consider whether any changes could be made to assist pedestrians further.
Subsequent to this visit, additional louvres were fitted on 13 October 2017 to two
further green figure light aspects on the Pentonville Road crossing, including on the
north side of the crossing (see Figure 2), to reduce the likelihood of pedestrians
crossing when they were not invited to do so.

Road markings (‘matters of concern’ point 1)

The provision of ‘Look left, Look right’ markings is assessed by TfL on a site-by-site
basis, in line with the national guidance. Following your report, these have been
installed at each of the pedestrian crossings at this junction.

Understanding of the junction by foreign visitors (‘matters of concern’ point 5)
We take the safety of our highway extremely seriously and adopt an approach of
continual improvement to reducing road danger. The measures we have undertaken
at this junction will further enhance pedestrian safety at this location. There are
hotels and tourists in the area, including those from outside the UK. This type of
location, however, is not atypical in London and we design and operate the highway
so that it is clear and understandable for all users, regardless of their origins and
familiarity of the area.

Yours sincerely,

TfL - Head of Network Sponsorship

Figure 2: Location of louvres on green figure light aspects and additional ‘look left,
look right’ markings

=

Pentonville Road / King’s Cross Road junction

Vs
W
ost

Related reports

Other reports by Jacqueline Devonish

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.