Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Andrew Carr

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0038, written 31 Jan 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report31 Jan 2019
Reference2019-0038
DeceasedAndrew Carr
CoronerLouise Hunt
Coroner areaBirmingham and Solihull
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · State Custody related deaths
Organisation namedMidlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust · Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:   

  G4S 
  HM Prison and Probation Service 
 
The Rt Hon David Gauke MP 
CORONER 

1 

I am Louise Hunt, Senior Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 06/04/2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Andrew Stephen Carr. The investigation 
concluded at the end of an inquest on 30th January 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was:- 

Drug Related 

At this time Birmingham prison was facing a serious problem with the ingress of drugs.  It is clear to us 
that this problem was not being adequately controlled.  We do not feel that any intelligence was 
recorded appropriately in order to understand the full extent of the serious drug problem within the 
prison at that time. Through the evidence we have gathered, it is apparent that there had been no action 
taken to reduce the risks of prisoners using the plumbing system to send and receive drugs. To conclude, 
we can confirm that on balance of probabilities, Andrew’s death was solely caused by the use of illicit 
drug use. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Andrew Carr was transferred from a Category C to a Category B prison, on the 19th February 2018. 
There is strong evidence to suggest there was a history of illicit drug use, which we believe he continued 
during his stay in the Birmingham prison.  

On 27th February 2018, Andrew was taken to the segregation unit due to a serious assault on an officer. 
On the night of the 29th March 2018, an officer delivered hot water to Andrew with no cause for 
concern.  
At 22:05 the officer checked on Andrew and found him lying in the foetal position on the floor. He 
completed his rounds returned to Andrews’s cell and tried to rouse him which proved unsuccessful.  
The officer went to find Oscar 1 on foot, unable to find him he proceeded to call the comms office via the 
telephone on the segregation unit to find his location. 
Oscar 1 was attending an ongoing medical situation with the staff nurse on duty. As the officer reached 
their location he waited for them to complete their duties, and proceeded to make their way to Andrew’s 
cell retrieving the blue bag on the way.  

Oscar 1 attempted to gain a response from Andrew by kicking the door. When no response was gained 
they proceeded to enter the cell. It was immediately apparent that Andrew was in cardiac arrest and a 
code blue was called straight away. 
All attempts to revive Andrew where made and were unsuccessful and he was pronounced dead by the 
Doctor at 22:53 hrs. 
It was clear there was a delay on entering Andrews’s cell, although this did not change the outcome. 
From supporting photographic evidence we believe Andrew had received his illegal substances through 
the plumbing system of the prison. 

Following a post mortem, the medical cause of death was determined to be: 

EFFECTS OF A SYNTHETIC CANNABINOID 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion 
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory 
duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

1.  The inquest heard evidence that before his transfer to Birmingham prison on 19/02/18 Andrew 
had been involved in 4 incidents of taking psychoactive substances resulting in a code blue being 
called. In addition there was intelligence that he may be giving out drugs. This information was 
available and passed onto Birmingham Prison - however they were not aware of it and did not 
record the information. The inquest heard that there was no time to review information of 
prisoners coming into the prison. This is a major concern as key information may not be 
identified and this poses a risk to the individual and other prisoners.  
It had been known for approximately 5 years that drugs and other items could be passed 
through the plumbing system of the prison. No action was taken before Andrew’s death and the 
inquest heard that no solution had been found to the problem. This raises an ongoing concern 
for the wellbeing of prisoners and the risk of future deaths. 

2. 

3.  Many problems within the prison related to substances misuse are contributed to by the use of 
contraband mobile phones. The inquest heard evidence that blocking the use of mobile phones 
in prison would be very useful in mitigating this risk. 

NB a recent Regulation 28 report (Ricardo Holgate) raised the issue of the need for CCTV cameras at 
Birmingham prison and airport style scanners. This inquest raised the same issue and should be linked 
with that report. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take 
such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 29th 
March 2019. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for 
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons [ 

The Family 

 
  Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust 
  Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust 
  Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a 
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of 
your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

31/01/2019 

Signature 

Louise Hunt Senior Coroner Birmingham and Solihull

Related reports

Other reports by Louise Hunt

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.