Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0507, written 17 Sep 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 17 Sep 2019 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2019-0507 |
| Deceased | Jonathan Ball |
| Coroner | Kevin McLoughlin |
| Coroner area | West Yorkshire (East) |
| Category | Road (Highways Safety) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 4 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Road Haulage Association, Roadway House, Bretton Way, Bretton, Peterborough, PE3 8DD 2. Office of the Traffic Commissioner & DVSA, 386 Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS9 6NF 3. DAF Trucks Ltd, Haddenham Business Park, Pegasus Way, Haddenham, HP17 8LI 4. Whitelock Plant Limited, Carleton Road, Skipton, BD23 3BT 1 | CORONER tam Kevin McLoughlin, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner area of West Yorkshire (East) 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 29" November 2018 | commenced an investigation into the death of Dr Jonathan Edward Ball, aged 46. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 11% September 2019. The conclusion of the Inquest was death was attributable to a Road Traffic Collision in which Dr Ball sustained 1(a) Multiple skull fractures and 1(b) Traumatic head injury following a motor vehicle collision. 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the evening of Saturday 24 November 2018 a DAF HGV lost power and came to a halt around 18:15 hours on the A647 Stanningley bypass near Pudsey, Leeds. This is a two lane dual carriageway subject to a 70mph speed limit. It was stationary in lane 1 for 41 minutes displaying hazard warning lights and amber cab beacons alongside the nearside crash barriers awaiting mechanical assistance. Dr Ball was driving a Skoda Motorcar and collided with the rear of the 32 ton stationary DAF HGV at a speed estimated to be between 50-60mph. Despite wearing a seat belt and the deployment of the air bag he sustained fatal injuries and was declared dead at the scene at 19:18 hours. 5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the Inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. tn my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) The HGV was not equipped with a device (such as a warning triangle) which the driver could have positioned some way before his stranded vehicle to warn oncoming motorists of the hazard presented by a stranded 32 ton HGV blocking one lane of a dual carriageway in darkness. (2) The HGV driver had not been trained or instructed to contact the emergency services to report the foreseeable hazard created by his stranded HGV ona dual carriageway at night. The HGV was there for some 41 minutes before the fatal collision occurred (although the Inquest heard evidence there were several near misses before then). It was likely that when a mechanic did arrive at the scene the HGV would have been there for a further period before it was repaired or could have been towed to a safe location. In consequence, the police had no opportunity to guard the scene, position safety barrier or warning signs to alert approaching motorists of the hazard. The evidence of the other motorists on the A647 at the material time indicated that the rear offside hazard warning light was hard to see (or thought not to be working) thus giving the impression that the HGV was indicating to turn left (and thereby potentially confusing approaching motorists). In such circumstances there was no added resilience to the lights displayed, such as would have been provided by having duplicate indicator/hazard lights on the rear corners of the HGV. Given the arduous work of such vehicles and the propensity for the light to become dirty at the end of a working day, concern was expressed at the Inquest as to the danger which might be created in the event (a) the HGV broke down in a hazardous location and (b) the rear lights were not working or insufficiently conspicuous. 3 pod ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 12" November 2019. |, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: (1) RR (deceased's partner) (2) RK deceasec's wite) | have also sent it to: (1) RR West Yorkshire Police Collision Investigation Unit (2) The Editor, Yorkshire Post Newspapers who may find it useful or of interest. tam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Date: Signed by Coroner: me . 17 September 2019 Kear M wile
4 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
DAF Trucks Limited Haddenham Business Park Pegasus Way Kevin Mcloughlin Haddenham HP17 8LJ Senior Coroner West Yorkshire, East Tel: 01844 261111 County Hall Fax: 01844 217111 Wakefield www.daftrucks.com WF1 2QW Date: 04/11/2019 Your Reference: KM/ST/16216 DAF Trucks Ltd. Reference: 0G034509/CF370FAD/Fatal/ Vehicle: XLRADM4100G034509 CF 370 FAD, LN64FYO Copy: (After Sales Director, DAF Trucks Ltd.) (DAF Aid Manager, DAF Trucks Ltd.) (DAF Liability Engineering, DAF N.V.) (Senior Coroner West Yorkshire) coronersoffice.east@westyorkshire.pnn.police.uk Dear Sir I am writing to you in response to the report (KM/ST/16216) issued to DAF Trucks Ltd on 17/09/19, regarding the prevention of future deaths, with respect to the fatal incident involving vehicle 0G034509 CF 370 FAD operated by Whitelock Plant Ltd of Skipton. Please be advised that DAF Trucks only has records regarding this vehicle, from its original owner MV Commercials. I have investigated the concerns raised and offer the enclosed responses to the specific concerns raised in the document KM/ST/16216 Should you require any further assistance from DAF Trucks Ltd. regarding the issues raised and the subsequent investigation, please do not hesitate to contact me and I will assign more resource to ensuing we provide further assistance. Yours Sincerely Technical Manager DAF Trucks Ltd. Registered Office: 9400 Garsington Road, Oxford Business Park, Oxford, OX4 2HN. Registered in England No. 2815777 Below noted responses and Actions regarding the Section 5 Coroner’s Concerns. DAF Trucks Ltd. answers are set against numbered order of concerns from the copy Regulation 28 Report, of the coroner to prevent future deaths Matters of Concern: 1) Vehicle was not equipped with warning Triangles a. DAF Trucks Ltd issues to all new vehicles sold via the sales network a PDI safety kit. This Bagged kit (DAF part number 9507301) includes x2 Hazard Warning Triangles x3 Tachograph paper roll, x1 Hi‐ Viz vest and a pair of safety working gloves. A photo of this kit is shown in Appendix 1. Action: A safety kit with x2 warning triangles was issued in this vehicle at point of delivery to the original owner. It is understood that the publication “The Highway Code” and rule 274 implies that the driver and or operator will make available in their vehicle a warning triangle in case of emergency breakdown. Original DAF replacement safety kits are available to purchase under DAF part number 9507301 if required. No further action deemed necessary from DAF Trucks Ltd. 2) The HGV Driver has not been trained / the authorities were not notified. a. DAF Trucks Ltd. provides to the DAF Sales Network, a driver training service which is offered to the original sales customer during the sales process. Since the introduction of Euro 4 in 2006 driver training has become a feature of sales transactions due to the complexity of modern vehicles. All DAF dealers, now have dedicated driver trainers available to teach the functions and features of the new vehicle. For retail customers, our DAF UK Sales Dealers offer discounted driver training incentives with a redeemable voucher scheme, this is to encourage all new vehicle owners and drivers to take advantage of the driver training at favourable costs to ensure all current vehicle features and OE vehicle operation are understood. Actions: Whilst DAF Trucks provides driver training at all DAF sales dealerships, this covers only the safe operation and function of the DAF vehicle. It is industry practice that the driver is obligated by Driver Certificate of Professional Competence (CPC), to be fully trained on safe operation of a LGV used on the UK highway and that his/her employer would ensure that safe systems of work are employed per industry and vehicle body type utilised, for vehicles in that specific industry sector. We deem no action for DAF on this point. b. DAF Trucks offers a free to call break down service called DAF Aid. This is an emergency break down service, whereby a DAF customer, only needs to have a trading account, with any DAF UK dealer in‐order to use the service. DAF Aid is administered by the RAC Control Centre, Bescot, West Midlands, Walsall. Had this vehicle been attended by the DAF Aid service, then the attending technician would have been a trained individual, whereby safety is a paramount feature of the road side assistance service provided. Having checked the DAF Aid records there was no call to the DAF Aid service from this operator for this vehicle on the day of the incident. The operator therefore utilised an alternative provider for the break down service regarding this incident. Actions: Whilst DAF Trucks break down service “DAF Aid” was not used in this incident, we have deemed that our policy on notifying the Highways Agency from our DAF Aid Control Page 1 of 2 G034509/04/11/19 centre in Bescot, for vehicles stranded in “live lanes”, should be updated. We will therefore proactively act upon the findings of the coroner’s report and pre‐empt any expectation for future changes in industry practice. The DAF Aid service will endeavour to ensure all possible means of marking out a vehicle by the authorities, is actioned during the first calls of a breakdown reported to DAF Aid. We expect to complete our review and implementation of this policy by the end of 2019 3) Condition of the rear lights a. DAF Trucks supplies vehicles such as 0G034509 FAD CF 370, from factory as a “Chassis Cab” only vehicle. The vehicle therefore is incomplete (No Body) at point of delivery, to the customers chosen Body Builder, in this case a company called “Thompsons of Blackburn”, at which point the “tipper” or “skip body” and its associated equipment, including the rear light arrangement, would have been permanently mounted to the new body and commissioned by Thompsons of Blackburn. The end choice of lamp arrangement and the conspicuousness of the rear lamps in the final phases of build for this vehicle, would have therefore been controlled by the completion of the build in accordance with Thompsons of Blackburn’s chosen Legislative Approval methods, before the vehicle was moved to the PDI dealer (Lancashire DAF in this case) prior to delivery to the original customer MV Commercials, Brownsburn Ind. Est, Airdrie. All DAF vehicles are supplied with rear light assemblies secured to transport bars and with regards to the case of 0G034509 the vehicle was supplied with standard incandescent rear lamp cluster part number 1875581 (Right) and 1875580 (Left). These OE rear lamp clusters comply with Regulation 48 of UNECE‐R48 light signalling devices. These OE rear lamps work in conjunction with an electronic safety system of “bulb monitoring”. This bulb monitoring feature, advises the driver by an in cab display if any bulb of the vehicle lighting system fails during operation. It is known that this vehicle was subsequently fitted with alternative LED rear lamps on the 14‐06‐2017. As such these alternative rear lamps, do not have incandescent bulbs and therefore the OE feature of “Bulb Monitoring” is not compatible or operational for such lamps. Action: Because this vehicle was completed for approval by another organisation and the choice and conspicuity of the rear lamps was not controlled by DAF, we deem no action for DAF on this point. DAF Trucks provided an OE vehicle lighting system that included an in‐cab driver warning Bulb Monitoring function. The vehicle lighting was subsequently altered and the original OE lamps were replaced for an alternative LED lamp. The feature therefore of notifying the driver of defective lights was removed as a vehicle feature. We therefore deem no action for DAF. Page 2 of 2 G034509/04/11/19 Appendix 1 DAF Trucks Ltd issues to all new vehicles including XLRADM4100G034509 a PDI safety kit. This Bagged kit (DAF part number 9507301) includes x2 Hazard Warning Triangles x3 Tachograph paper roll, x1 Hi‐ Viz vest and a pair of safety working gloves. A photo of this kit is shown below G034509/04/11/19 Appendix
OCT 29 A 19 Inquest touching the death of Jonathan Edward Ball Further to your letter of the 17 September enclosing the regulation 28 report in the above case, | have been asked to reply on behalf of the Road Haulage Association (RHA). We, at the RHA, are a trade association who have strong links with the industry and do represent a significant proportion of goods vehicle operators (we have some 7,000 members). However, as a trade association, we do not have a specific mandate or authority by which we can force operators to take action in an attempt to prevent similar shortcomings such as those that led to the tragic death of Dr Ball. Within the haulage industry, the organisations and individuals that may have such power include the industry regulator (the traffic commissioners), the primary enforcement authority (the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency — DVSA) as well as those responsible for legislation (the Department for Transport). We would respectfully suggest that each of the above organisations are also sent copies of the report and asked to respond. It may well be that legislation can, at some point, be introduced to make it mandatory to carry and deploy a warning triangle and additional warning lights or, following the Uk’s exit from the EU, making ‘breakdown management’ a compulsory element of driver training via the Driver Certificate of Professional Competence (DCPC). At the present time such mandatory training is not possible given that EU regulations cover DCPC training and do not prescribe mandatory course content. Furthermore, the traffic commissioners could potentially look to raise an expectation of training and issuing equipment as part of what they consider ‘best practice’ for operators. Having set out the above, | can say that we, at the RHA, are keen to assist in any way we can and to this end we are proposing taking the following steps to raise awareness of the issues surrounding a lack of equipment (including warning triangles and additional emergency lighting) as well as driver training: 1. Raising the issues within our weekly members email and in our members ‘app’; 2. Producing an article in our members magazine looking at the shortcomings the coroner has identified and; 3. Raising the subject at our forthcoming member events including at member briefings and future compliance conferences. It may also be of assistance if the report is also sent to the other main trade association representing commercial goods vehicle operators, namely the Freight Transport Association (the FTA). No doubt they too will be able to take similar steps, in relation to their members, to those that we are proposing. The traffic commissioners and the DVSA also produce regular email newsletters and bulletins that go to all operators and they too may be able to include similar content to help raise awareness. Should the coroner require any further assistance or more details on the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely, RHA Managing = Road Haulage Association Ltd www.rha.uk.net 22 Greencoat Place, Westminster, London, SW1P 1PR : Tel 0207 630 1111 Chief Executive Richard Burnett Registered in England No 391886 «VAT No GB 232 4793 64
www. whitelocks.co.uk Whitelocks Ref: KM/ST16216 23" September 23, 2019 Coroners Service West Yorkshire (Eastern) Area 71 Northgate ’ Wakefield /? a West Yorkshire 7 Ny WF1 3BS Dears Sirs BAe \ve ( St lam responding in response to the Coroners concerns raised in his report of 11° September 2019 following the conclusion of the; Inquest touching the death of Mr. Jonathon Edward Ball (deceased) | would like to report our actions, as follows, in respect of the concerns raised: (1) The concern over a lack of any advance warning aids (such as a warning triangle) has been addressed with the purchase of foldable reflective roadside warning triangles, to be placed within each of our HGVs. Instruction to our drivers in the requirement of use (if/when safe to do so) in the event of a breakdown upon the highway where it has not been possible to pull up clear of the highway, has been communicated via a Toolbox Talk and added to the company induction to capture all/any new drivers. This action has been instigated and will be complete by end November 2019 or sooner. (2 The lack of training/instruction in the requirement of contacting the emergency services should the breakdown of a vehicle occur where it has not been possible to pull up clear of the highway, has been addressed and communicated to current drivers via a Toolbox talk briefing and included with the company driver induction to capture all/any new drivers. This action has been instigated and will be complete by end November 2019 or sooner. (3) The concerns raised by the evidence, indicating warning lights were not as conspicuous as they might, may have resulted from the adverse weather conditions in the winter season. Drivers have now, via a Toolbox Talk, been instructed to check rear light lenses periodically through their shift and wipe clean when required. This again is included within the driver’s induction to capture new staff. All lights are also checked as working, as part of the existing daily pre-use driver checks. This action has been instigated and will be complete by end November 2019 or sooner. In line with the suggestion of additional/duplicate warning lights, each vehicle is under consideration for fitting of rear auxiliary warning lights either linked to the hazard lights or the amber cab beacon. Yours faithfull Director/Transport Manager Whitelock Developments Ltd Whitelocks Development Ltd. Carlton Road. Skipton. North Yorkshire. BD23 3BT Tel: 01756748 624 Email: info@whitelocks.co.uk
ae Traffic Commissioners’ | . c te Offi Office of the Office of the Trafic www.gov.uk/traffic- Traffic Commissioner SErelcroisecs =_—=— Stone Cross Lane North Golbome Warrington WA3 2SH Mr Kevin McLoughlin The Senior Coroner West Yorkshire (Eastern) Area Your reference: KM/ST/16216 71 Northgate Wakefield WF1 3BS 29 October 2019 Dear Mr McLoughlin Regulation 28: Report to prevent future deaths Inquest touching the death of Jonathan Edward Ball (deceased) | refer to the Regulation 28 report dated 17 September 2019 following the inquest held into the death of Dr Jonathan Ball following a road traffic collision on 24 November 2018. Your report was circulated to four parties with various connections to the road haulage industry, which included the Traffic Commissioner for the North East of England. You requested a response on the action taken or proposed to be taken or an explanation as to why no action is proposed. The Senior Traffic Commissioner for Great Britain has asked that | respond on his behalf. lt may assist if | start by summarising the jurisdiction of the Traffic Commissioners. There are eight individual Traffic Commissioners for Great Britain. They are appointed by the Secretary of State for Transport but act independently of Government. One traffic commissioner is appointed as the Senior Traffic Commissioner and he has statutory powers to deploy traffic commissioners and to provide guidance and directions. Each traffic commissioner is deployed to one of eight traffic areas within Great Britain. The North East traffic area includes the county of West Yorkshire. Traffic commissioners are responsible for the licensing and regulation of those who operate large goods vehicles and public service vehicles through the operator licensing system, the registration of local bus services, granting vocational driving entitlements where there may be a conduct issue and taking regulatory action against vocational driving entitlements when issues related to conduct are referred for consideration on behalf of the Secretary of State. Before being granted an operator’s licence an applicant must satisfy a traffic commissioner that they meet the requirements to hold a licence. The framework of the requirements are set out in European and domestic legislation and include that the applicant is of sufficient financial standing or resources to run a transport business safely and that they will make proper arrangements to ensure that the vehicles are maintained to the correct standards. Further 41 OCT 2019 standing or resources to run a transport business safely and that they will make proper arrangements to ensure that the vehicles are maintained to the correct standards. Further guidance on the expectations of traffic commissioners are set out in the Senior Traffic Commissioners Statutory Documents. These can be accessed at: www.gov.uk/government/collections/senior-traffic-commissioners-statutory-quidance- and-statutory-directions An operator must continue to meet these requirements and standards once an operator's licence is granted. The traffic commissioners are not an investigatory body and rely upon evidence of non-compliance being submitted by enforcement agencies, most commonly the police or the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA). When evidence is received a traffic commissioner will consider whether to take regulatory action against the operator’s licence in accordance with the relevant legislation and guidance. This action may include the revocation or suspension of the licence and the disqualification of the licence holders or directors. The Senior Traffic Commissioner was concerned to learn of the events leading to Dr Ball's death and of course shares your desire to prevent similar circumstances arising in the future. You will appreciate that it is the role of Government, through the Department for Transport, to consider the need to legislate on the matters relating to vehicle design or to impose a mandatory requirement for warning triangles to be deployed at a time of a breakdown. To assist you we have identified the relevant section of the Department for Transport, namely the Freight, Operator Licensing and Roadworthiness Division at: Department for Transport, Freight, Operator Licensing and Roadworthiness, Zone 2/21, Great Minister House, 33 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 4DR You may be aware that, in addition to the general health and safety duties and those relating to the assessment of risk on operators, that there is a requirement under European legislation for holders of vocational entitlements to undertake periodic training under the umbrella of the Drivers’ Certificate of Professional Competence. The DVSA administer this scheme and may be able to work with and provide advice to training providers on the inclusion of safety training into the modules available to drivers. The DVSA can be contacted at: Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency, Berkeley House, Croydon Street, Bristol BS5 ODA | hope this information is of use to you and please contact me should you have any further questions. Yours sincerely Traffic Commissioners’ Corporate Office Office of the Traffic Commissioner
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.