Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Frazer Golden

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0197, written 5 Oct 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report5 Oct 2020
Reference2020-0197
DeceasedFrazer Golden
CoronerJames Thompson
Coroner areaCounty Durham and Darlington
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. Mr 

, Chief Executive, Durham County Council, County Hall, Durham 

1  CORONER 

I am James E THOMPSON, Assistant Coroner for the area of County Durham and Darlington 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On Eighteenth April 2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Frazer GOLDEN aged 30. 
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 2nd October 2020. The conclusion of the 
inquest was: Road Traffic Collision and the medical cause of death was: 

I a Head,Neck and Chest Injuries 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 
Frazer Golden died on 9th April 2017 on the A689 road near Whit's Hill, St John's Chapel, County 
Durham after his motorcycle & another motorcycle collided, the resultant injuries sustained by him 
caused his death. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

The MATTERS OF CONCERNS are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) 

I heard evidence from 2 police collision experts who could not explain in their examination of the 
A689 road between Ireshopeburn & St Johns Chapel why SLOW road markings were displayed on 
the carriageway when immediately leaving these 2 villages and the 30mph limit and entering a 
60mph limit. 

The evidence heard was that it would appear to be confusing that a warning to SLOW was 
displayed when the immediately adjacent signs were confirming a change in speed limit from 30 to 
60 mph. 

Evidence was also heard that at the collision location near Whit’s Hill on the A689 road between 
the 2 villages there is a bend where forward visibility is reduced. This is accepted in a Durham 
County Council Highways report read as evidence at the inquest. There are no warning signs or 
double white hazard warning lines approaching the bend or at the bend in either direction. 

The police experts further opined that a speed travelled by one of the motorcyclists into the bend of 
51mph was not supported when considering the reduced view created by the bend. The speed limit 
in this area of the A689 is 60 mph. 

 6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation have 
the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 30 November 2020.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 

Chief Constable, Durham Constabulary, Akley Heads, Durham 

Mr 

Miss 

Mr 

, c/o Mr 

, Solicitor, Alderson Law 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.  He may 
send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.  You may 
make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the 
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

James E THOMPSON 
Assistant Coroner for 
County Durham and Darlington
Dated: 05 October 2020

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Durham County Council (PDF)
Contact: 

Direct Tel:  03000 

email: 

@durham.gov.uk 

Your ref:  01009-2017 
Our ref:  OC 1587 

By email 
hmcoroner@durham.gov.uk  

Mr James E Thompson 
H M Assistant Coroner for  
County Durham and Darlington 
H M Coroners Office 
P O Box 282 
Bishop Auckland 
County Durham 
DL14 4FY 

24th November 2020 

Dear Mr Thompson 

Regulation 28 – Frazer Golden  (Inquest 18th April 2017) 

Thank you for your correspondence dated 5th October 2020 which 
Executive, has asked me to respond to.  

 Chief 

Site Investigation Following Fatal Accident Report 
The Council has an Accident Investigation and Prevention Team and one of its roles is to 
investigate every fatal road traffic accident, on the council’s highway network, in conjunction 
with Durham Constabulary’s Traffic Management Unit. Please find attached a copy of the 
Accident  Report  (M/TS05/17).    These  reports  are  undertaken  to  identify  any  defects  or 
improvements to the highway street furniture and infrastructure. 

The report made the following observation / recommendation 
Although not considered contributory factors of this accident, it is suggested that Durham 
County Council Technical Services highway maintenance personnel address the following 
observations through the recommendations provided: 

Neighbourhoods and Climate Change 

Durham County Council, County Hall, Durham  DH1 5UF 
Main Telephone 03000 26 0000 

Text Messaging Service 07860 093 073 

www.durham.gov.uk 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Page 2 of 3 

A missing gully cover was identified within the north westbound channel, at a point 
approximately 70 metres  northwest  of  the  access  road  to  Whit’s Hill  dwelling. The 
relevant  highway  maintenance  personnel  should  assess  the  issue  and  take 
appropriate action. 

The above item has been actioned and remedial measures implemented. 

Regulation 28 Report 
In your report of the 5th October 2020 you refer to three specific items for the council, as 
the highway authority for the A689, to address namely; 

1.  Why SLOW road markings were displayed on the carriageway when immediately 

leaving these 2 villages and the 30mph limit and entering a 60mph limit;  

2.  There are no warning signs;  
3.  Double white hazard warning lines approaching the bend in either direction. 

 . 
After receiving your letter a road safety and traffic management engineer from the council 
visited the site on the morning of Thursday 22nd October 2020 and has carried out a review 
of the personal injury accident record for the A689 between Ireshopeburn and St. John’s 
Chapel.  There has been one other accident in the past 10years, occurring 260metres 
northwest of Whit’s Hill, which involved a bird colliding with a motorcyclist who impacted 
against a lamp column and suffered fatal injuries. 

The Council’s Response and Proposed Course of Action. 
The council’s response and proposed course of action are: 

•  The two SLOW road markings: there is no valid road safety / traffic management 
reason for these road markings. .  As such, I will arrange to have the two road 
markings removed; 

•  Bend warning signs: a bend warning sign will be erected on both approaches to 

the bend; 

•  Double White Lines: the installation of a system of double white lines at this 

location is not considered appropriate as the road’s layout does not meet the criteria 
for this type of intervention as set out in the Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 5 Road 
Markings 2018.  As stated in the Manual “It is important to note that the marking is 
not to be used where appropriate criteria are not satisfied otherwise it will be 
brought into disrepute”.  It is also noted that the accident did not involve an 
overtaking manoeuvre 

It is the intention of the council to implement the above-mentioned measures by 31st 
March 2021.  This timescale reflects the backlog in the council’s highway works caused by 
the Covid 19 Lockdown measures. 

Once again I wish to offer my condolences to Frazer Golden’s family and friends on their 
loss.  I trust the above provides a considered response to your correspondence. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Page 3 of 3 

Should you wish to discuss further, please do not hesitate to contact 
Works Permit Scheme Project Manager, on telephone number 03000 
at 

@durham.gov.uk  

, Street 
 or by email 

Yours sincerely 

Corporate Director – Neighbourhoods and Climate Change 

Enc  
Fatal Accident Report (M/T/S05/17) 

Copies to 

, PA to 

, Chief Executive 

, Head of Transport & Contract Services (Interim) 

, Strategic Highways Manager 
, Traffic Asset and Streetworks Manager 
 Street Works Permit Scheme Project Manager 

 Legal Manager Litigation  
, Service Support Officer

Related reports

Other reports by James Thompson

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.