Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0235, written 8 Jul 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 8 Jul 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0235 |
| Deceased | Maria Stancliffe-Cook |
| Coroner | Maria Voisin |
| Coroner area | Avon |
| Category | Mental Health related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
M. E. Voisin
Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner
Area of Avon
8th July 2021
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust and Minister
for Patient Safety, Suicide Prevention and Mental Health
CORONER
1
I am M E Voisin Senior Coroner for Area of Avon
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 21/08/2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Maria STANCLIFFE-COOK. The
investigation concluded at the end of the inquest.
Box 3 of the record of inquest recorded the following: “Maria Stancliffe-Cook died on 1st August 2019 at
Highbury Villas, Cotham, Bristol. She had intentionally taken her own life with the use of helium causing
asphyxiation. She had been assessed by the mental health team on 26th July 2019 and her risk had been
downgraded from high to medium. She had a telephone call on 28th July 2019 which did not meet the
standard; there was no assessment or plan to manage her risk undertaken at this time.”
The conclusion was: suicide contributed to by neglect.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Maria had a history of poor mental health over many years which resulted in a referral to the mental
health team in January 2018.
On 18th December 2018 Maria was admitted to A&E at Bristol Royal Infirmary having tried to end her life
by using helium, and was referred to crisis team who later discharged her back to the care of her GP.
On 23rd January 2019 her GP said that Maria told her that she’d ordered another helium kit, she denied
any thoughts and was referred to the mental health team.
From then until the events in July there are various appointments with the mental health team, her GP
and her therapist.
On 12th June 2019 there was a meeting with a number of those caring for Maria the notes say
The Coroner's Court, Old Weston Road, Flax Bourton, BS48 1UL
Website www.avon-coroner.com
“ we expressed our worry with Maria that with the method which she had considered in the past her
ongoing social isolation and the sense that it is unlikely she would ask for help from others she would be
a high risk of completed suicide if she attempted again. Her lack of protective factors beyond her
investment in her studies was also discussed “
Her care coordinator
, was present and she said in her evidence that was read, “We were
concerned about the ongoing risk of completed suicide given she continued to be in possession of a
helium bottle, the risk was not considered to have changed since my first meeting with her when the risk
to self was recorded as high”.
By 26th July 2019 things significantly changed. She reported to her therapist and GP both who knew her
well that she was having active suicidal thoughts. She had told them both that she’d tried to use the
helium cylinder but it failed so ordered another one; she also said that she’d been researching high
buildings. Her therapist was extremely concerned and said that that this felt like she had a high intention
to complete suicide. He reported this to the mental health team.
Her GP said that this was a big change; Maria told her that her suicidal thoughts had got worse and they
were difficult to dismiss. Her GP referred her to the mental health team explaining her concerns.
Maria was seen that evening by two members of the mental health team neither of whom had met her
before. They assessed her and decided to downgrade her risk from high to medium.
On 28th July 2019 as planned one of the them telephoned Maria, this was Maria’s last contact with
anyone from the mental health team the call and the note making lasted around 3 minutes, she said that
Maria told her she was ok.
Sadly on 1st August 2019 – Maria was found dead by police after flat mates became concerned for her.
That week she was also supposed to have an appointment with a care coordinator but that had not been
arranged.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory
duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
The trust have themselves admitted the failures reflected in an independent report they commissioned
after the death, that report said “we would not expect a patients level of risk to be downgraded from
high … to medium immediately following a suicide attempt”; In addition I heard evidence in relation to
the assessment on the 26th July 2019 when the risk was downgraded from high to medium.
I listened very carefully to the steps that the Trust has taken to make changes following this death and I
am pleased that a number of changes have taken place. I raised my concern about the downgrading of
risk from high to medium in this case by two members of the team that had no previous dealings with
Maria.
Maria was well known to the trust and her own care coordinator said “We were concerned about the
ongoing risk of completed suicide given she continued to be in possession of a helium bottle, the risk was
not considered to have changed since my first meeting with her when the risk to self was recorded as
high”. That was a reference to a multidisciplinary meeting which took place a matter of weeks before
her death.
I was told that risk is dynamic and that professionals assess risk at the time and that it can go up and
down. I was also told that there are lots of assessments by staff that do not know patients. That said
there is a concern that there is a risk of future death - is it right that the risk of a patient, who is well
known to the trust, with a care coordinator who knew her well, is downgraded without any check put in
place.
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
6
The Coroner's Court, Old Weston Road, Flax Bourton, BS48 1UL
Website www.avon-coroner.com
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take
such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 3rd
September 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the chief coroner and to the following interested persons – the family.
I am also under a duty to send the chief coroner a copy of your response.
The chief coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the chief coroner.
9
08/07/2021
Signature
M E Voisin Senior Coroner Area of Avon
The Coroner's Court, Old Weston Road, Flax Bourton, BS48 1UL
Website www.avon-coroner.com
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Avon and Wiltshire
Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust
Bath NHS House
Combe Park
Bath
BA1 3QE
1 September, 2021
M E Voisin
HM Senior Coroner (Avon)
The Coroner's Court
Old Weston Road
Flax Bourton
BS48 1UL
Inquest into the death of Maria Stancliffe-Cook
Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
Dear Ms Voisin,
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 8 July 2021, issued following the Inquest into the tragic
death of Maria Stancliffe-Cook who died on 1 August 2019. We are very sorry that Maria lost her life
and we have accepted the findings of the independent report that we commissioned from Niche. We
know that you will share a copy of this response with Maria’s family and would like to express again our
sincere condolences for their loss.
At the conclusion of the inquest held on 5 July 2021 you shared your concerns with regard to the
downgrading of risk status by practitioners who had ‘no previous dealings with Maria’. We acknowledge
your concerns alongside the recommendations made within the Niche report. Please be assured, we
have completed a full multi-professional review to consider how we can ensure that our staff can
continue to work in an autonomous manner whilst maintaining the safe care of patients as indicated
within your Regulation 28 report. The implementation of learning from this is our absolute priority.
We have approximately 3000 service users within our Bristol services across three local geographic
areas and a number of speciality work-streams. We have carefully considered the proportionality of risk
in changing policy, balanced with the quality improvement process directly related to risk assessment
and management. Whilst our staff work within teams, individual practitioners undertake the majority of
patient engagement, assessment, formulation and review. All registered practitioners are held to
account by their professional body as well as the Trust policy, procedures, values and expectations. We
have supervision, appraisal and audit systems in place to ensure the competence and capability of our
staff. However, we are continuously using experiences and feedback as a means to learn and improve
our standards of care and practice.
We have updated and continue to work with the action plan shared during the inquest. We will continue
to support staff, patients and carers to ensure that all systems, policy, procedures and guidelines are
consistently and robustly implemented in practice.
Trust Headquarters
Bath NHS House, Newbridge Hill, Bath BA1 3QE
_______________________________________________________________________________
'We are a teaching, learning and research trust; we aim to inform you about relevant opportunities,
unless you tell us otherwise.'
We will achieve this through; audit, governance and assurance across all levels of the Trust. We do not
believe that a change of policy would support the quality improvement work that has commenced and
is already being introduced into practice. Instead, the Trust is continuing to support the delivery of these
commitments with the actions detailed below, to improve the understanding and application of risk
assessment and ensure that practitioners are able to demonstrate a clear and informed decision making
process whenever risk is assessed.
Risk Assessments
The Trust has in place a regular monthly audit of sample records for risk and care management of
patients in the community and in-patient services. The most recent audit data has shown 90%
compliance with Trust standards and performance indicators.
A ‘care planning steering group’ is in place, which is working with (and is co-produced alongside) those
with lived experience to ensure quality improvements and compliance indicators are developed to
support staff in practice.
A new care plan and risk supervision tool has been introduced as a means to support staff to audit their
patient records through management supervision each month. The tool is more comprehensive than the
Trust sample audit and is specific to risk assessment, management, crisis and contingency, formulation
of care and how individual practitioners are meeting the standards as indicated within the tool.
The tool was developed as a quality improvement measure. It is completed through the supervision
structure, which allows any areas of concern with record management or care delivery to be addressed
with immediacy and plans introduced for performance support if this is indicated.
The tool also identifies; patient, carer and family involvement to ensure that collaborative care is being
provided or clearly identified if it is not indicated.
The new tool has received positive feedback from staff using it, as it provides a framework of protected
time to consider the safe aspects of patient care.
A ‘task and finish group’ has also been formed to specifically develop a new face-to-face training
package to address risk assessment and management including suicidality, self-injurious and complex
behaviours. Again, this is a co-produced delivery group and to the training is expected to commence in
the next couple of months.
A report published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists in July 2020 on Self-Harm and Suicide in Adults,
provides a comprehensive overview of the evidence base for suicide prevention measures and the role
of mental health services within the wider system. This report highlights the increasing awareness of the
limitations of risk assessment with regard to suicide risk and notes that ‘use of terms such as ‘low risk
or ‘high risk’ are unreliable, open to misinterpretation and potentially unsafe (Cole-King and Platt, 2016)’.
The report also highlights some best practice, including the importance of Safety Plans that are co-
produced with the patient. One of the report authors is Dr
, who is a Consultant
Psychiatrist, Suicide Prevention expert and Director of ‘4Mental Health’, a reputable training provider.
2
Dr
is a strong advocate of using Safety Plans for all service users and not just those seen as
‘High Risk’.
Earlier this year, the Trust procured the services of ‘4Mental Health’ to provide AWP staff with a training
package to be delivered in September and October 2021. The training package is 3.5 days and will
initially be delivered to 60 members of staff. This is anticipated to promote consistency and benchmark
standards of competency, linking the research of Dr
. It specifically includes the co-
production of Safety Plans. This training was identified to provide support to address the quality of risk
assessments and care plans. These are areas of practice which have been recognised as thematic
learning from investigations.
Update on Niche Recommendations
You have kindly acknowledged that we have taken some positive steps to make changes. The
independent investigation conducted by Niche made five recommendations and also noted areas of
good practice where trust staff made efforts to obtain information from partner agencies and to share
information to develop a greater understanding of risk. We have provided further updates on the five
recommendations from the independent report below, but also attach a copy of the current action plan:
Recommendation 1 (staff access and consistency of care plans, risk assessments)
We have detailed the changes being implemented in respect of care plans and risk assessments above
and therefore will not repeat this information here.
Recommendation 2 (capacity assessments)
We have started detailed work to review and audit the quality of capacity assessments. There has been
wide communication (including, but not limited to the Trust’s intranet) giving staff advice on how to
complete capacity assessments. We intend to review how effective this is and continue to make further
improvements.
Recommendation 3 (research into suicide prevention)
Suicide prevention remains a key area of development and concern. We are particularly focussing on
developing guidance for staff regarding autism, risk assessment and suicide prevention. These will form
part of a Clinical Toolkit and RiO Clinical Support. Our Library Services have started sending out
literature on suicide prevention so that staff are up to date with the latest research and thinking on suicide
prevention.
There is a quarterly Suicide Prevention Workshop held for Bristol services that hosts guest speakers,
reviews identified literature and explores challenges in practice through break-out groups. The next
workshop is in November 2021 and is hosting the Specialist Autism Team who are providing a
presentation for staff on how to support individuals experiencing complex and/or suicide risk.
Recommendation 4 (applying Triangle of Care principles)
Since Maria’s death, we have ensured that there is a named carer lead in each team. We are currently
undertaking an audit of the Triangle of Care to ensure that identification of carers has been correctly
3
recorded. This will help us to ensure that carers’ views and knowledge are sought throughout the
assessment and treatment process and that the carer is regularly updated and involved in care plans,
medication management and strategies. The information from these audits will inform improvement
plans which will be managed through local quality improvement. We are assessed externally for the
Triangle of Care accreditation and will make our submission in autumn 2021.
In addition to this, an e-learning package emphasising good practice when dealing with families and
carers, is due to be released at the end of October 2021, with the aim to reach all staff. A team level,
carer lead, training package is being developed with our expert by experience carer group which we
hope to pilot in the autumn. Specific training sessions are delivered by the Carer Involvement Co-
ordinator and Lead Psychologist for In-patients for Bristol services and has been received well by teams
and carer involvees.
Recommendation 5 (communication with families)
The Trust will be recruiting 1.5 WTE Family Liaison Officers, in line with best practice, to ensure that
family engagement is ongoing and delivered with the right resource. We attach the updated action plan
for your information and would be happy to send you an updated version six months from today, after
completion and quality control if you would like.
Please be assured that learning from the circumstances of this tragic death will also be shared more
widely with colleagues.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive
4
From Gillian Keegan MP Minister of State for Care and Mental Health 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 27 October 2021 F.A.O Senior Coroner M. E. Voisin M E Voisin HM Senior Coroner, Avon The Coroner's Court Old Weston Road Flax Bourton BS48 1UL Via email Dear Ms Voisin, Thank you for your letter of 8 July 2021 about the death of Maria Stancliffe-Cook. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for mental health, and I am grateful for the additional time allowed in order for me to do so. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Ms Stancliffe-Cook’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are very concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. In relation to the matters of concern raised within your report, as you are aware the Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust commissioned an independent investigation into Ms Stancliffe-Cook's death, the findings of which have been shared with you. I am advised that the Trust has also completed a multi- professional review to consider how staff can continue to work in an autonomous manner whilst maintaining the safe care of patients, and that the Trust has implemented several changes, as a result of these investigatory activities, to improve the understanding and application of risk assessment across the Trust. I am further advised that the Care Quality Commission, the independent regulator for quality, will seek assurance that these actions are undertaken by the Trust. It is of course vital that the Trust takes forward the learnings from Ms Stancliffe-Cook's death. With regards to the assessment of mental health patients, evidence from the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH)1, as well as National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance2, suggests that risk assessments must not be seen as a form of risk prediction. It is emphasised that whilst standardised tools may provide the impression of precision, they are poor 1 https://sites.manchester.ac.uk/ncish/reports/the-assessment-of-clinical-risk-in-mental-health- services/ 2 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance in terms of prediction of suicide or a particular behaviour. Instead evidence suggests that assessments should be personalised according to individual circumstances. At a national level, the Government remains committed to ensuring that fewer people die by suicide each year. Indeed, every suicide is a tragedy that can have a deep impact on families, friends, and communities, and even a single suicide is a suicide too many. The Department continues to work across Government and with health services and suicide prevention stakeholders, including people with lived experience and those bereaved by suicide, to put in place a scheme of work to prevent future suicides. In March 2021, the Department published Preventing suicide in England: Fifth progress report of the cross-government outcomes strategy to save lives3, which details work across Government and with health service and suicide prevention stakeholders, to reduce suicide rates. It includes action to reduce access to the means to complete suicide. As a result, a process has been established with partners, and across Government, to rapidly signpost emerging methods and take actions through a multi-agency approach. This includes, but is not limited to, limiting access to the method, and reducing or removing material that promotes suicide methods. Evidence from NCISH has shown that people in contact with mental health services are at highest risk of suicide in the immediate days and months following discharge (200-fold increased risk in the three months post discharge). In view of this, NHS England and NHS Improvement have amended the national post-discharge 7-day follow up standard in the NHS standard contract, to instead require all patients to be followed up within 72 hours following discharge from inpatient mental health care. Through the NHS Long Term Plan, the Government is investing an additional £57million in suicide prevention by 2023/24. This will see investment in all areas of the country to support local suicide prevention plans and the development of suicide bereavement services. More broadly, we are increasing investment in mental health services and expanding support for people in crisis. The Government remains committed to the aims of the NHS Long Term Plan to invest at least an additional £2.3billion a year into mental health services by 2023/24. In response to the pandemic, all NHS mental health providers acted quickly to establish 24/7 urgent mental health helplines for people experiencing a mental health crisis. This is an ambition of the NHS Long Term Plan brought forward from 2023/24 to now. I hope this response is helpful. GILLIAN KEEGAN 3https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97 3935/fifth-suicide-prevention-strategy-progress-report.pdf
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.