Prevention of Future Deaths reports

Jamie Bennett

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0136. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Reference2022-0136
DeceasedJamie Bennett
CoronerTanyka Rawden
Coroner areaSouth Yorkshire (West)
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · State Custody related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Practice Plus Group, Hawker House, Napier Court, 5-6 Napier Road, Reading, 
Berkshire RG1 8BW 

1  CORONER 

Tanyka Rawden, Assistant Coroner for South Yorkshire (West) 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 
2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.  

3 

INVESTIGATION 

On 3 May 2020 an investigation commenced into the death of Jamie Lee Bennett, 
aged 33 years. The investigation concluded with an  inquest heard between 25 
April 2022 and 29 April 2022. The Coroner returned a narrative conclusion  

 4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Jamie Lee Bennett (“Jamie”) was born on 10 July 1986 in Sheffield 

Jamie had a history of heroin and cocaine use dating back to approximately 2016. 
He  had  successfully completed  a  detoxification programme  while  serving  a 
custodial sentence between 2017 to 2019, but had relapsed on release  

On 3 September 2019 he was remanded to HMP Doncaster, testing positive for 
various substances. On 20 September 2019 he was transferred to HMP Moorlands 
where he remained until he was executively released on 1 May 2020. During his 
time  at  HMP Moorlands he  refrained from using illicit  substances and  was  not 
prescribed methadone 

On 1 May 2020 he was  released from HMP Moorlands to be accommodated at 
Norfolk Park Bail Hostel in Sheffield 

On 2 May 2020 at 1.35pm Jamie was found unresponsive in his room at Norfolk 
Park Bail Hostel. He was pronounced deceased by paramedics  

The medical  cause of death at  post mortem  examination  was:  1a.  Heroin and 
cocaine use 

The narrative conclusion given was as follows: 

On 1 May 2020 Jamie Lee Bennett was executively released from HMP Moorland. 
He  had  been  abstinent  from  drugs  and  methadone  therapy  for a  period  of 
approximately eight months. As such he was at an increased risk of overdose due 
to a reduced tolerance 

There was a failure to formally consider re-toxification with Methadone during his 
release planning. It cannot be said that this caused or contributed to his death  

There was a failure to follow the Local Operating Policy for Take Home Naloxone. 
Jamie Lee Bennett declined Naloxone and signed confirmation of this refusal was 
not obtained in line with the policy. It cannot be said that this caused or contributed 
to his death 

Jamie Lee Bennett was released to Norfolk Park Bail  Hostel on Norfolk Road in 
Sheffield where he was inducted 

Due to the Exceptional Delivery Model in place in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, 
Jamie Lee Bennett was not offered a face-to-face appointment with his probation 
officer on the day of his release, room searches and drug testing were not being 
conducted at Norfolk Park Bail  Hostel and there was no access to a  substance 
misuse team on site 

This reduced support along with the failure to provide Norfolk Park Bail Hostel with 
information on release about Jamie Lee Bennett’s previous substance misuse, his 
detoxication history, and that he had refused Naloxone, in addition to the failure to 
provide the community substance misuse team with his release date resulted in 
Norfolk Park Bail Hostel not having the opportunity to provide additional support  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Had  that additional support been put in place in the days immediately  after his 
release it may have reduced the risk of him using substances and dying as a result 

Jamie Lee Bennett was last seen on CCTV returning to his room at 1.01am on 2 
May 2020 

There was a failure to conduct the 7am welfare and curfew check in accordance 
with procedure in that Jamie  was  not roused, and it  was not confirmed he was 
breathing. This failure was caused by a lack of training and understanding by staff 
as to what was expected of them during this check 

There was  a  failure  to  conduct the  12pm  welfare  check  in  accordance  with 
procedure in that the check was not carried out until 1.35pm after concerns were 
raised for his welfare by his family and another resident. That failure was caused 
by a lack of training and understanding by staff as to what was expected of them 
with regard to the timing of this check 

At 1.35pm Jamie Lee Bennett was found unresponsive in bed. There was a delay 
in calling the emergency services which was caused by the lack of first aid training 
and staff not being in possession of radio equipment  

It cannot be said what time Jamie Lee Bennett died as such, it cannot be said the 
failings in those checks and the delay in calling the emergency services caused or 
contributed to his death 

Jamie Lee Bennett was pronounced deceased by paramedics on 2 May 2020 after 
ingesting cocaine, and  an  amount of heroin lower than  usually encountered in 
deaths attributed to heroin overdose  

5  CORONER’S CONCERN 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is 
taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTER OF CONCERN is as follows.  –  

There were gaps in the information provided by HMP Moorlands to Norfolk Park 
Bail  Hostel, in  particular  his  history of substance misuse  and  that  Jamie  had 
refused Naloxone. The Court heard evidence that information sharing with third 
parties is in  line with national guidelines, but also  that there should have  been 
another report by the offender management services that would have been more 
detailed and would have  given this information to Norfolk Park. I do feel that if 
Norfolk Park Bail  Hostel had that information, they would have been in a  better 
position to support Jamie  during those first crucial 48 hours and that may  have 
reduced the risk of him using substances and dying 

It is my view there should be a process by which crucial information about a patient 
is communicated to the Approved Premise, specifically substance misuse history, 
any substance misuse work, any  detox or re-toxification processes undertaken, 
and whether the patient has  accepted or refused Naloxone and any community 
drugs services referral. It  is  my  view  this  will  assist  the Approved Premise  to 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 determine the level of support to be offered to a resident, especially those that are 
released on a Friday and will have limited support from anywhere other than an 
Approved Premise during the first 48 hours 

It is my opinion there is a risk that future deaths may occur unless such a process 
is developed  

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe 
you have the power to take such action.    

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 24 June 2020. I may  extend this period upon your application 
and I may vary the recipient of this report on your application that another agency 
is better placed to address the changes  

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting 
out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed 

 
 COPIES and PUBLICATION 

8 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons:  

• 

 (father of deceased) via his representative at Simpson 

Millar, Yorkshire House, Greek St, Leeds, LS1 5SH 

•  Care Quality Commission at Citygate, Gallowgate, Newcastle upon Tyne, 

NE1 4PA 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response 

The  Chief Coroner may  publish  either or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes 
may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, 
at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response 
by the Chief Coroner 

Mrs Tanyka Rawden       
HM Assistant Coroner   
29 April 2022 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

The Ministry of Justice, Justice and Development Division, Litigation Group, 
Government Legal Department , 102 Petty France, Westminster, London SW1H 
9GL  

1  CORONER 

Tanyka Rawden, Assistant Coroner for South Yorkshire (West) 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 
2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.  

3 

INVESTIGATION 

On 3 May 2020 an investigation commenced into the death of Jamie Lee Bennett, 
aged 33 years. The investigation concluded with an  inquest heard between 25 
April 2022 and 29 April 2022. The Coroner returned a narrative conclusion  

 
 
 
 
 4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Jamie Lee Bennett (“Jamie”) was born on 10 July 1986 in Sheffield 

Jamie had a history of heroin and cocaine use dating back to approximately 2016. 
He  had  successfully completed  a  detoxification programme  while  serving  a 
custodial sentence between 2017 to 2019, but had relapsed on release 

On 3 September 2019 he was remanded to HMP Doncaster, testing positive for 
various substances. On 20 September 2019 he was transferred to HMP Moorlands 
where he remained until he was executively released on 1 May 2020. Du ring his 
time  at  HMP Moorlands he  refrained from using illicit  substances and  was  not 
prescribed methadone 

On 1 May 2020 he was  released from HMP Moorlands to be accommodated at 
Norfolk Park Bail Hostel in Sheffield 

On 2 May 2020 at 1.35pm Jamie was found unresponsive in his room at Norfolk 
Park Bail Hostel. He was pronounced deceased by paramedics  

The medical  cause of death at  post mortem  examination  was:  1a.  Heroin and 
cocaine use 

The narrative conclusion given was as follows: 

On 1 May 2020 Jamie Lee Bennett was executively released from HMP Moorland. 
He  had  been  abstinent  from  drugs  and  methadone  therapy  for a  period  of 
approximately eight months. As such he was at an increased risk of overdose due 
to a reduced tolerance 

There was a failure to formally consider re-toxification with Methadone during his 
release planning. It cannot be said that this caused or contributed to his death  

There was a failure to follow the Local Operating Policy for Take Home Naloxone.  
Jamie Lee Bennett declined Naloxone and signed confirmation of this refusal was 
not obtained in line with the policy. It cannot be said that this caused or contributed 
to his death 

Jamie Lee Bennett was released to Norfolk Park Bail  Hostel on Norfolk Road in 
Sheffield where he was inducted 

Due to the Exceptional Delivery Model in place in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, 
Jamie Lee Bennett was not offered a face-to-face appointment with his probation 
officer on the day of his release, room searches and drug testing were not being 
conducted at Norfolk Park Bail  Hostel and there was no access to a  substance 
misuse team on site 

This reduced support along with the failure to provide Norfolk Park Bail Hostel with 
information on release about Jamie Lee Bennett’s previous substance misuse, his 
detoxication history, and that he had refused Naloxone, in addition to the failure to 
provide the community substance misuse team with his release date resulted in 
Norfolk Park Bail Hostel not having the opportunity to provide additional support  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Had  that additional support been put in place in the days immediately  after his 
release it may have reduced the risk of him using substances and dying as a result 

Jamie Lee Bennett was last seen on CCTV returning to his room at 1.01am on 2 
May 2020 

There was a failure to conduct the 7am welfare and curfew check in accordance 
with procedure in that Jamie  was  not roused, and it  was not confirmed he was 
breathing. This failure was caused by a lack of training and understanding by staff 
as to what was expected of them during this check 

There was  a  failure  to  conduct the  12pm  welfare  check  in  accordance  with 
procedure in that the check was not carried out until 1.35pm after concerns were 
raised for his welfare by his family and another resident. That failure was caused 
by a lack of training and understanding by staff as to what was expected of them 
with regard to the timing of this check 

At 1.35pm Jamie Lee Bennett was found unresponsive in bed. Ther e was a delay 
in calling the emergency services which was caused by the lack of first aid training 
and staff not being in possession of radio equipment  

It cannot be said what time Jamie Lee Bennett died as such, it cannot be said the 
failings in those checks and the delay in calling the emergency services caused or 
contributed to his death 

Jamie Lee Bennett was pronounced deceased by paramedics on 2 May 2020 after 
ingesting cocaine, and  an  amount of heroin lower than  usually encountered in 
deaths attributed to heroin overdose  

5  CORONER’S CONCERN 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is 
taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTER OF CONCERN is as follows.  –  

The evidence was unclear as to who will carry out actions on the task lists on a 
night shift when a Sodexo worker was replaced by agency staff . There is no audit 
process in place to ensure staff are carrying out tasks in accordance with the lists 
issued 

There are no written instructions on how to conduct welfare checks. There is no 
audit process in place to ensure staff are conducting welfare checks appropriately  

It is my opinion there is a risk that future deaths may occur unless there ar e: 

•  Clear, written instructions on how to conduct welfare checks 

•  Clarity around which member of staff will be responsible for which task list, 
particularly on a night shift when a Sodexo worker is replaced by agency 
staff 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •  An  audit  process put  in  place  to ensure staff are  carrying out tasks  in 
accordance with the lists issued and in particular are conducting welfare 
checks appropriately  

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe 
you have the power to take such action.    

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report by 31 December 2022. The period 
of response has been extended given the evidence that Norfolk Park Bail Hostel 
is closed for refurbishment and will not re-open until the Autumn of 2022. I may 
extend this period upon your application  

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting 
out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed 

 
 
 
 COPIES and PUBLICATION 

8 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons:  

• 

 (father of deceased) via his representative at Simpson 

Millar, Yorkshire House, Greek St, Leeds, LS1 5SH 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response 

The  Chief Coroner may  publish  either or  both  in  a  complete  or  redacted  or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes 
may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, 
at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response 
by the Chief Coroner 

Mrs Tanyka Rawden       
HM Assistant Coroner   
29 April 2022

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Practice Plus Group (PDF)
Practice Plus Group 
Hawker House 
5-6 Napier Court 
Napier Road 
Reading 
Berkshire 
RG1 8BW 

practiceplusgroup.com 

HM Assistant Coroner for South Yorkshire (West) 
Tanyka Rawden 
Office of HM Coroner 
The Medico-Legal Centre 
Watery Street 
Sheffield 
S3 7ES 

22 June 2022 

Dear Madam 

The Inquest touching upon the death of Mr Jamie Lee Bennett 

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths issued pursuant to Regulation 28 Coroners 
(Investigations) Regulations 2013 dated 11th May 2022 and following the inquest touching upon 
the death of Mr Jamie Lee Bennett, who sadly passed away on 2nd May 2020 whilst residing at 
Norfolk Park Bail Hostel in Sheffield following his release from HMP Moorlands on 1st May 2020.   

I  would  like  to  take  the  opportunity  on  behalf  of  Practice  Plus  Group  to  offer  my  sincere 
condolences to Mr Bennett’s family and friends for their loss.  

This letter addresses the matters of concern insofar as they relate to Practice Plus Group.  

Matter of Concern  

Below are the concerns quoted in the PFD report: 

“There were gaps in the information provided by HMP Moorlands to Norfolk Park Bail Hostel, 
in particular his history of substance misuse and that Jamie had refused Naloxone. The Court 
heard evidence that information sharing with third parties is in line with national guidelines, but 
also  that  there  should  have  been  another  report  by  the  offender  management  services  that 
would have been more detailed and would have given this information to Norfolk Park. I do feel 
that if Norfolk Park Bail Hostel had that information, they would have been in a better position 
to support Jamie during those first crucial 48 hours and that may have reduced the risk of him 
using substances and dying. 

It  is  my  view  there  should  be  a  process  by  which  crucial  information  about  a  patient  is 
communicated to the Approved Premise, specifically substance misuse history, any substance 
misuse work, any detox or re-toxification processes undertaken, and whether the patient has 
accepted or refused Naloxone and any community drugs  services  referral.  It  is  my  view  this 
will assist the Approved Premise to determine the level of support to be offered to a resident, 
especially those that are released on a Friday and will have limited support from anywhere 

Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Limited. Registered in England No 10498997 
Registered Office: Hawker House, 5-6 Napier Court, Napier Road, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8BW 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 other than an Approved Premise during the first 48 hours. 

It is my opinion there is a risk that future deaths may occur unless such a process is 
developed.”  

Response 

The following actions have now been taken to address the concerns raised. 

•  A  reflective  practice  session  has  been  held  with  the  Healthcare  team  following  the 

inquest to review our processes around Naloxone.   

• 

Information  regarding  a  patient  being  released  is  requested  from  Healthcare.  Such 
requests  can  come  directly  from  the  Approved  Premises,  as  was  the  case  for  Mr 
Bennett. Requests for information from the Approved Premises/Probation Service are 
often sent as a letter to healthcare with a very brief form attached for completion, and 
submission back to the requesting Approved Premises. The information requested on 
the form for the Approved Premises (AP) is limited information. In this case the form in 
question  provided  a  section  to  list  any  current  medications  only.  However,  it  is 
acknowledged that the covering letter sought additional information. 

Following  the  Inquest,  PPG  Healthcare  reflected  on  the  type  of  information  being 
requested  and  determined  that  more  information  should  be  shared.  Therefore, 
Healthcare  have  drafted  a  more  detailed  template  (attached  for  reference),  which 
provides  more  specific  information  including,  medical  conditions,  medication,  COVID 
vaccinations,  social  services  input,  mental  health  concerns  including  history  of  self-
harm,  and  specific  equipment  the  patient  may  require,  substance  misuse involvement 
including SMS history,  any  current  substance  misuse  work,  any  detox  or  re-toxification 
processes undertaken, whether the patient has been offered and trained for Naloxone 
and details of any community drugs  service referrals that may have been made.  

The  template  drafted  by  PPG  (Appendix  A)  if  used  in  future  would  by  provide  the 
Approved Premises with the type of information which the Coroner highlighted.  

It should be noted that the template provided in the case of Jamie Lee Bennett was not 
created by PPG; we are not responsible for the requests and templates provided by the 
Approved Premises/Probation service. 

•  A  process  has  been  immediately  implemented  for  managing  all  Approved  Premises 

information requests: 
−  Requests for patient information received are logged onto a spreadsheet for tracking 

the process. 

−  All information/medical report requests received are scanned onto the patient record 

on SystmOne. 

−  Consent to share information is signed by the patient and scanned onto the patient 

record (SystmOne). 

−  The  Medical  Record  template  is  completed  by  a  manager,  quality  assured  and 

shared with the requesting provider. 

−  The completed report is scanned onto the patient record (SystmOne) providing an 

audit trail. 

•  Patients are provided with advice on discharge, where appropriate, about Naloxone. I 
understand this occurred in the case of Jamie Lee Bennett.  However, in order for greater 
clarity  and  clinical  safety, the  disclaimer  form for  Naloxone  has  now  been  updated to 
make  the  risks  of  not  accepting  Naloxone  clearer,  please  see  Appendix  B.  When  a 

Page 2 of 6 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 patient refuses to accept Naloxone, as in this case, they should be asked to sign the 
disclaimer  which  would  be  scanned  onto  SystmOne.  Such  a  refusal  would  also  be 
recorded on the Medical Record template to a third party as noted above. 

As  well  as  the  information  above I  understand  that  an  additional  witness  statement from the 
Head of Healthcare, Nicola Wraith, was provided following the conclusion of the Inquest. This 
also provides information on the changes made. 

I hope that the above information provides you with reassurance that action has been taken, to 
improve  the  processes  for  sharing  of  information  for  patients  being  released  from  HMP 
Moorlands  and  the  level  of  information  shared  is  appropriate  to  the  patient’s  needs  when 
released into the community. 

Practice Plus Group is committed to ensuring the high quality provision of healthcare services 
to all prisoners at HMP Moorlands and that this extends through the gate when being released. 
We will also ensure that the lessons learnt as a result of this inquest are shared across all of 
Practice Plus Group’s services.  

I  do  hope  that  this  letter  provided  the  necessary  reassurance  sought  and  if  I  can  be  of  any 
further assistance you should not hesitate to contact me directly. 

Yours sincerely 

National Medical Director, Health in Justice, Practice Plus Group 

Enc. 

Page 3 of 6

Related reports

Other reports by Tanyka Rawden

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.