Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Prevention of Future Deaths report 2022-0143

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0143, written 13 May 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report13 May 2022
Reference2022-0143
CoronerAlan Walsh
Coroner areaManchester (West)
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

ANNEX A 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  The Highways Department, Salford City Council, Civic Centre, 

Chorley Road, Swinton, Salford, M27 5FJ 

1  CORONER 

I am Professor Dr Alan Peter Walsh,  HM Area Coroner for the Coroner 
Area of Manchester West 

2  CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5,  of the Coroners and 
Justice Act 2009 and  Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners 
(Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 12th of July 2021  I commenced an investigation into the deaths of 
Michael John Draper, 62 years, born the 23rd  of May 1959 and  Rafal 
Wojdyl, 43 years, born the 23rd  of March 1978. The investigation 
concluded at the end of the inquest on the 9t h of February 2022. 

The medical cause of death of Michael John Draper was: 

1 a) Multiple Injuries 

The medical cause of death of Rafal Wojdyl was : 

1 a) Severe Head and Chest Traumatic Injuries 

The conclusion of the investigation in  relation to both deceased was Road 
Traffic Collision. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEA TH 

1)  Michael John Draper and Rafal Wojdyl died in a road traffic 

collision which occurred on the 23rd  of June 2021  on Cadishead 

 2)  Way, lrlam at its junction of Fairhills Road,  lrlam. Mr Draper was 
driving a Dacia Logan vehicle and Mr Wojdyl was sat in the rear 
seat of the vehicle directly behind Mr Draper. The vehicle was 
being driven along Fairhills Road towards the junction with 
Cadishead Way, lrlam. 

2) At the same time, a Heavy Goods Vehicle was being driven 
northbound along Cadishead Way towards Manchester and a Citroen 
Berlingo was travelling in the opposite direction along Cadishead Way 
intending to turn right into Fairhills Road,  lrlam. 

3) At the junction Mr Draper, without reason,  pulled out of Fairhills Road 
into Cadishead Way directly into the path of the Heavy Goods Vehicle 
and there was a collision and as the collision developed Mr Draper's 
vehicle was pushed back by the Heavy Goods vehicle causing a further 
collision between Mr Draper's vehicle and the Citroen Berlingo. 

4) Both deceased sustained injuries in the collision and they were taken 
to the Salford Royal Hospital, where they later died from their injuries. 

5) The junction of Cadishead Way with Fairhills Road, lrlam is not 
controlled by traffic signals and the speed limit on Cadishead Way,  lrlam 
in the area of the junction is 50mph. 

5 

CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise 
to concern.  In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur 
unless action is taken.  In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. 

1) During the Inquest evidence was heard that:-

a)  The junction is very busy allowing access to industrial and retail 
units, including Tesco, Lidl and Screwfix off Fairhills Road,  lrlam. 

b)  Cadishead Way, lrlam is a very busy designated 'A' road,  namely 
the A57 road, which is an access road towards Manchester in one 
direction and the M6 motorway in the other direction. 

c)  At the junction there is no footpath on one side of Cadishead Way 
and approaching the junction with Fairhills Road from the direction 
of the M6 motorway there is a bend, a bridge, trees and bushes, all 
of which obscure and affect the line of vision of vehicles exiting 
Fairhills Road into Cadishead Way,  lrlam. 

I 

 d)  The junction of Fairhills Road with Cadishead Way,  lrlam is very 

busy with vehicles turning into both Fairhills Road and Cadishead 
Way from both directions, which could cause distractions to 
drivers, particularly a driver exiting Fairhills Road into Cadishead 
Way with vehicles travelling at 50mph along Cadishead Way and 
the restricted view. 

2) I request that you conduct a review of the following issues in relation to 
the junction of Fairhills Road with Cadishead Way, lrlam: 

a)  The layout of the junction of Fairhills Road with Cadishead Way, 

lrlam. 

b)  The speed limit of 50mph on Cadishead Way in the area of the 

junction with Fairhills Road, lrlam. 

c)  The restricted views of vehicles pulling out of Fairhills Road into 
Cadishead Way,  lrlam, particularly caused by trees, bushes and 
undergrowth. 

d)  The provision of traffic signals at the junction of Fairhills Road with 

Cadishead Way,  lrlam. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe you have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report,  namely by 8th July 2022 I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons 

I 

, brother of Michael John Draper 

, brother of Radal Wojdyl 

3 

 I have also sent it to Greater Manchester Police who may find it useful or 
of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief 
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I 
believe may find it useful or of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form.  He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he believes may find  it useful or of interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

Dated 13th May 2022 

Signed 

~ 

!Aft-

Professor Dr Alan Peter Walsh, 
HM Area Corner, 
Manchester West 

4

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Salford City Council (PDF)
Salford City Council 
Traffic & Transportation  
Salford Civic Centre 
Chorley Road, Swinton 
Salford 
M27 5AS 

Email 

Your Ref: 

APW/HK/1536-2021 & 1612-2021 

H M Coroner’s Court 
Paderborn House, 
Howell Croft North, 
Bolton,  
BL1 1QY 

8th July 2022 

Subject:   RESPONSE TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REPORT  

A57 CADISHEADWAY & B5311 FAIRHILLS ROAD, SALFORD 

Dear Professor Dr A. P. Walsh 

I am writing to you on behalf of Salford City Council in response to the Regulation 28 Report 
to  prevent  future  deaths  at  the  junction  of  A57  Cadishead  Way  and  B5311  Fairhills  Road 
following the fatal road traffic collision involving Mr. Draper and Mr. Wojdyl on the 23rd June 
2021. 

Within the report you have made a request for the Council to conduct a review of four issues 
relating to the layout, speed limit, restricted view and provision of traffic signals at the junction 
of Fairhills Road with Cadishead Way. 

I would like to inform you that Salford City Council’s Collision Investigation Team have carried 
out a detailed investigation into the junction following the collision. This involved a site visit on 
the 30th of June 2021 with Greater Manchester Police’s Specialist Operations Roads Policing 
Unit  to  understand  the  circumstances  of  the  collision  and  to  review  the  operation  of  the 
junction.  A  desktop  exercise  was  also  undertaken  to review  the  collision  history  and  traffic 
survey data in the immediate vicinity of the junction.  

A technical note has been appended to this letter containing the findings from the Council’s 
investigation covering the four issues you have identified along with the actions the Council 
have already undertaken, as well as those actions still to be implemented.    

I  would  be  grateful  for  your  acknowledgement  upon  receipt  of  this  letter  and  appended 
documents. I would also be open to receiving any further feedback you have in response to 
the Council’s proposals to prevent a future death occurring at this junction.  

If you have any questions or require any clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Kind regards,  

Head of Highways and Network Management 
Salford City Council

Related reports

Other reports by Alan Walsh

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.