Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Nigel Saunders

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0300, written 3 Aug 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report3 Aug 2022
Reference2022-0300
DeceasedNigel Saunders
CoronerLaurinda Bower
Coroner areaNottingham and Nottinghamshire
CategoryState Custody related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:   

1 

CORONER 

I am Laurinda Bower, HM Area Coroner for Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 
and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 17 December 2018, I commenced an investigation into the death of NIGEL JOHN SAUNDERS.  

The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest heard by the Coroner, sitting with a Jury, between 3 
and 13 May 2022. The conclusion of the Jury was that Mr Saunders died an Accidental Death as a result 
of:   

4 

5 

1a. Global Hypoxic Brain Injury 
1b. Asphyxia by hanging 
1c 
II 
CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH 

Nigel John Saunders was detained at HMP Lowdham Grange, Nottingham, where he was discovered 
suspended by ligature and unresponsive at 16.00 hours on 17th November 2018 
transported by ambulance to Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, arriving at 17.17 hours on 17 
November 2018. He was treated in the Adult Intensive Care Unit where he was pronounced deceased at 
03.59 hours on 18 November 2018 as a result of global hypoxic brain injury sustained during the period of 
suspension by ligature. 
The jury found that Mr Saunders’ death was accidental. The jury further returned a Narrative Conclusion, 
captured by way of questionnaire, determining that there were failings by the Prison Service in relation to 
Mr Saunders’ admittance to the Segregation Unit, his care pursuant to the Assessment, Care in Custody 
and Teamwork plan (ACCT Plan), and in searching Mr Saunders before he entered the shower area. 
CORONER’S CONCERNS 

. He was 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion, there 
is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1)  The Prison failed to comply with its obligations pursuant to National Prison policy to retain and 

preserve evidence likely to assist all agencies to learn from deaths in custody.  

(2)  The local system in place for the retention and preservation of material likely to be relevant to the 

circumstances of death is not as robust as it ought to be. 

##DW<<corAddress>> 
Tel ##DW<<corTel>>    |    Fax ##DW<<corFax>> 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                        
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This is not the first time serious disclosure irregularities have undermined the veracity of an Article 2 
inquest involving this prison in my coroner Area. I consider this to be a local issue of significant 
importance. If the investigations following a death are repeatedly hindered in their full and frank 
examination of the facts due to missed opportunities by the prison to have retained and preserved 
evidence, then lessons cannot be learned, and the risk of further deaths shall persist. The Chief Coroner 
highlights this specific area of risk at paragraph 42 of the revised Guidance Note 5. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take 
action in relation to the above matters. 

(1)  Governing Governor at HMP Lowdham Grange, c/o SERCO 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 28 
September 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for 
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

In addition to the organisations identified in section 6 above, I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief 
Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 

Family 
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust 

I shall also share a copy of this report and your response with the Governing Governors at the other local 
HMP establishments as the issues raised in this inquest have applicability across the local HMP estate. 

I am under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of the responses received from the organisations listed 
in section 6 above.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a 
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of 
your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

DATE 

Signature_________________________ 
Laurinda Bower, HM Area Coroner, Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire 

##DW<<corAddress>> 
Tel ##DW<<corTel>>    |    Fax ##DW<<corFax>>

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from HMP Lowdham Grange (PDF)
serco 

Serco Justice and Immigration 

HMF' Lowdharn Grange 
Old Epperstcne Road 
L.owdham 
Nottinghamshire 
NG14 7DA 

Ms L Bower 
Area Coroner 
The Council House 
Old Market Square 
Nottingham 
NG12DT 

Date 26th September 2022 

Dear Ms Bower, 

Inquest into the death of Nigel Saunders 
Thank you  for your Prevention of Future Deaths  report received on 3 August 2022.  You will 
recall that Mr Saunders sadly passed away on  18 November 2018. 
I  am  responding  to  matters  of concern  that  you  have  raised  relating  to  HMP  Lowdham 
Grange ('the Prison') which is operated by  Serco Limited,  where Mr Saunders was detained 
at the time of his death. 
I am aware that you will  share a copy of this response with Mr Saunders' family, and  I would 
like  to express  my  sincere  condolences  for  their loss.  Every death  in  custody  is  a  tragedy, 
and  the safety of those detained by  the Prison is my absolute priority. 
I am grateful to you for bringing the following matters of concern to my attention : 
(1)  The Prison failed to  comply with its obligations pursuant to National Prison policy to retain and 

preserve evidence likely to assist all agencies to learn from deaths in custody; and 

(2)  The  local system  in  place for the retention and preservation of material likely ta be relevant to 

the circumstances ofdeath is not as robust as it ought to be. 

The  Prison  is  aware  of  its  obligation  to  retain  and  preserve  evidence  following  a  death  in 
custody  ("DIC") as  set out in  National  Prison  Policy,  PSI 6412011  Management of Offenders 
at Risk of Harm to self and others (Safer Custody)  ('the  PSI) and takes its responsibilities  in 
this regard very seriously. 

Policy at time of Mr Saunders' Death 
Document retention  provisions following  DICs were in  place  at the  Prison  at the  time  of Mr 
Saunders'  death,  pursuant  to  the  National  Prison  Policy,  specifically  the  PSI,  and  were 
implemented  at  the  Prison  in  the  form  of  the  Serco  Divisional  Operating  Procedure  -
Investigation  and  Management  of Death  in  Custody  Incidents  ("DSOP'?.  The  DSOP  was, 
and still is,  applicable nationally to all deaths that occurred in Serco's custody. 
The DSOP included: -

• 

• 

A DIC checklist  which  set  out all  of the  documents that were required to be retained and 
available to the Police, the PPO and  HM Coroner when required. 
a Death in Custody Response Plan 

However,  it  is  acknowledged  that  there  were  some  short  comings  in  the  retention  and 
production of some documentation in relation to Mr Saunders' death. 

Justice and lmmlgrallon, a division ofSe.-co Limited.  Acompeny reglslsnld In England and WalesNO. 242248. 
Reglstellld Office: Seroo Holl98, Ill Barlloy Ytbod Business PaJ1<, Bal1tey Way, Hook, ~ re RG27 gu-,: Unitad Kingdom. 

 
 
 
 
 Policy Updates Prior to Inquest 

In  January  2021  the  DSOP was  updated.  The  DSOP  is  reviewed  and  updated  regularly  as 
appropriate and in  any event every two years. 

Policy Changes Post Inquest 

Following this inquest,  the DSOP,  including tne DIC checKllst nas been  reviewed further and 
an  updated  version  is  to  be  rolled  out  to  the  Eng:ish  Serco  prison  estate  by  the  end  of 
October  2022.  The  updated  version  of the  DSOP  will  include  a  statement  that  the  DIC 
Checklist  is  not an  exhaustive  list,  and  the  Prison  should  retain  any  other document that  it 
considers could  be of relevance. 
The updated  DSOP will  be  rolled  out across the  prison  estate and guidance will  be given to 
all staff responsible for collating relevant documentation following a death in  custody. 
I  understand  that a  copy  of the  DIC  checklist that was  in  place  at the time of Mr Saunders 
death and  a  copy  of the  DIC  checklist,  as amended  in  January  2021  were  provided  to you 
during the course of the  Inquest.  The  most recent version  of the checklist is  currently  being 
finalised prior to its roll  out at the end of October 2022. 

Documents of Specific Concern 

During  the  Inquest  I  became  aware  of specific concerns  you  had  in  respect of disclosure, 
and  I would like to offer the following  reassurances,  by way of example: 
ACCT Tick Sheets 
At the time of Mr Saunders' death,  it was standard practice for observation 'tick sheets' to be 
completed  for those prisoners subject to an ACCT.  Despite the requirement to retain the tick 
sheets  in  accordance  with  the  DIC  Checklist  in  place  at  the  time,  it was  accepted  during 
evidence that the tick sheets in  relation to Mr Saunders could not be located. 
Following  the  introduction  of Version  6  of 'ACCT - Policy  Guidance  - Annex',  which  was 
rolled  out  nationally  in  2021  the  use of these  'tick  sheets'  has  been  discontinued  across  all 
prisons  in  the  UK.  All  records  relating  to  the  ACCT  process  are  now contained  within  the 
ACCT book itself. 
Oscar Journal 
You  may  recall  that  the  Oscar  is  the  senior  member  of  prison  staff,  who  has  overall 
operational  responsibility  for  the  Prison  e.g.,  incident  management  etc.  The  Oscar Journal 
('the  Journal'),  is  a  large  leather-bound  folder where  relevant  material  from  each  shift was 
recorded  by  the  Oscar,  for example details  of anyone  who  is  self-harming  and  incidents  of 
violence to aid information sharing. 

Over the years the Journal has been  replaced  by  incident reports,  which  are completed and 
then  reported to and discussed by the Director and the Senior Management Team on a daily 
basis. 
It is accepted that Journal  entries  may  have contained  relevant  information  following  a  DIC 
and  consequently  should  have  been  included  on  the  DIC  checklist  to  ensure  their 
preservation  following  a  death.  The  Journal  is  now  listed  in  the  checklist,  to  ensure  it  is 
produced in Serco prisons that use an Oscars journal. 

Yours sincerely 

Contract Director 
HMP Lowdham Grange
Response from To HMP Lowdham Grange (PDF)
MISS MAIRIN CASEY 
SENIOR CORONER 
Nottingham and Nottinghamshire 

28th September 2022 

Dear 

Prevention of Future Deaths Report  

The Council House 
Old Market Square 
Nottingham, NG1 2DT 

Thank you for your response to the Prevention of Future Deaths report that I issued following the 
inquest touching the death of Nigel John Saunders. 

I am so pleased to read of the broad range of measures you have put in place to address my 
concerns. 

I understand the improvements you have made to the Prison’s investigation of deaths in custody 
processes are now being rolled out across the SERCO English prison estate. This will assist with 
learning from deaths in custody, with the overarching objective of seeking to reduce the number of 
preventable deaths that occur in prisons every year. 

Two further matters occur to me on considering your helpful response. 

Firstly, the Chief Coroner has, very recently, issued Coroners across England and Wales with new 
guidance in relation to Disclosure. At paragraph 4, the Chief Coroner suggests an undertaking be 
lodged by Interested Persons declaring that due diligence has been exercised in relation to the 
retention and disclosure of all relevant material. Consideration might be given to aligning your 
processes to include an undertaking similar to that suggested by the Chief Coroner. My practise in 
Nottingham has been to ask that the Prison Governor and the legal representative sign and lodge 
with the Coroner a copy of the undertaking at the end of the disclosure process. This additional step 
promotes a culture of openness, transparency and accountability, values which are so important to 
these very sensitive investigations. I include a link to the guidance, which is accessible to the public, 
here: GUIDANCE No 44 DISCLOSURE final (judiciary.uk) 

Secondly, it does occur to me that the improvements you have overseen on behalf of SERCO, might 
actually assist the non-SERCO managed prisons estate in seeking to comply with their duties, and for 
that reason, I am going to copy my report and your response, along with this letter, to the Minister 
of State for Justice, Mr Rob Butler MP, purely for information purposes. A copy shall also be shared 
with the family, other Interested Persons and the Chief Coroner. 

There has to be a commitment across all agencies to place bereaved families at the heart of the 
investigation process, and to seek to extract every opportunity for learning from these tragic deaths. 
I am grateful for the work you have undertaken in this regard. 

Yours sincerely 

Miss Laurinda Bower 
HM Area Coroner  
Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire

Related reports

Other reports by Laurinda Bower

See all →

More reports categorised “State Custody related deaths”

See all →

Track State Custody related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.