Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0300, written 3 Aug 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 3 Aug 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0300 |
| Deceased | Nigel Saunders |
| Coroner | Laurinda Bower |
| Coroner area | Nottingham and Nottinghamshire |
| Category | State Custody related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1
CORONER
I am Laurinda Bower, HM Area Coroner for Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28
and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 17 December 2018, I commenced an investigation into the death of NIGEL JOHN SAUNDERS.
The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest heard by the Coroner, sitting with a Jury, between 3
and 13 May 2022. The conclusion of the Jury was that Mr Saunders died an Accidental Death as a result
of:
4
5
1a. Global Hypoxic Brain Injury
1b. Asphyxia by hanging
1c
II
CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH
Nigel John Saunders was detained at HMP Lowdham Grange, Nottingham, where he was discovered
suspended by ligature and unresponsive at 16.00 hours on 17th November 2018
transported by ambulance to Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, arriving at 17.17 hours on 17
November 2018. He was treated in the Adult Intensive Care Unit where he was pronounced deceased at
03.59 hours on 18 November 2018 as a result of global hypoxic brain injury sustained during the period of
suspension by ligature.
The jury found that Mr Saunders’ death was accidental. The jury further returned a Narrative Conclusion,
captured by way of questionnaire, determining that there were failings by the Prison Service in relation to
Mr Saunders’ admittance to the Segregation Unit, his care pursuant to the Assessment, Care in Custody
and Teamwork plan (ACCT Plan), and in searching Mr Saunders before he entered the shower area.
CORONER’S CONCERNS
. He was
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion, there
is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
(1) The Prison failed to comply with its obligations pursuant to National Prison policy to retain and
preserve evidence likely to assist all agencies to learn from deaths in custody.
(2) The local system in place for the retention and preservation of material likely to be relevant to the
circumstances of death is not as robust as it ought to be.
##DW<<corAddress>>
Tel ##DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>>
This is not the first time serious disclosure irregularities have undermined the veracity of an Article 2
inquest involving this prison in my coroner Area. I consider this to be a local issue of significant
importance. If the investigations following a death are repeatedly hindered in their full and frank
examination of the facts due to missed opportunities by the prison to have retained and preserved
evidence, then lessons cannot be learned, and the risk of further deaths shall persist. The Chief Coroner
highlights this specific area of risk at paragraph 42 of the revised Guidance Note 5.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take
action in relation to the above matters.
(1) Governing Governor at HMP Lowdham Grange, c/o SERCO
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 28
September 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
In addition to the organisations identified in section 6 above, I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief
Coroner and to the following Interested Persons:
Family
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
I shall also share a copy of this report and your response with the Governing Governors at the other local
HMP establishments as the issues raised in this inquest have applicability across the local HMP estate.
I am under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of the responses received from the organisations listed
in section 6 above.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
DATE
Signature_________________________
Laurinda Bower, HM Area Coroner, Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire
##DW<<corAddress>>
Tel ##DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>>
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
serco
Serco Justice and Immigration
HMF' Lowdharn Grange
Old Epperstcne Road
L.owdham
Nottinghamshire
NG14 7DA
Ms L Bower
Area Coroner
The Council House
Old Market Square
Nottingham
NG12DT
Date 26th September 2022
Dear Ms Bower,
Inquest into the death of Nigel Saunders
Thank you for your Prevention of Future Deaths report received on 3 August 2022. You will
recall that Mr Saunders sadly passed away on 18 November 2018.
I am responding to matters of concern that you have raised relating to HMP Lowdham
Grange ('the Prison') which is operated by Serco Limited, where Mr Saunders was detained
at the time of his death.
I am aware that you will share a copy of this response with Mr Saunders' family, and I would
like to express my sincere condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy,
and the safety of those detained by the Prison is my absolute priority.
I am grateful to you for bringing the following matters of concern to my attention :
(1) The Prison failed to comply with its obligations pursuant to National Prison policy to retain and
preserve evidence likely to assist all agencies to learn from deaths in custody; and
(2) The local system in place for the retention and preservation of material likely ta be relevant to
the circumstances ofdeath is not as robust as it ought to be.
The Prison is aware of its obligation to retain and preserve evidence following a death in
custody ("DIC") as set out in National Prison Policy, PSI 6412011 Management of Offenders
at Risk of Harm to self and others (Safer Custody) ('the PSI) and takes its responsibilities in
this regard very seriously.
Policy at time of Mr Saunders' Death
Document retention provisions following DICs were in place at the Prison at the time of Mr
Saunders' death, pursuant to the National Prison Policy, specifically the PSI, and were
implemented at the Prison in the form of the Serco Divisional Operating Procedure -
Investigation and Management of Death in Custody Incidents ("DSOP'?. The DSOP was,
and still is, applicable nationally to all deaths that occurred in Serco's custody.
The DSOP included: -
•
•
A DIC checklist which set out all of the documents that were required to be retained and
available to the Police, the PPO and HM Coroner when required.
a Death in Custody Response Plan
However, it is acknowledged that there were some short comings in the retention and
production of some documentation in relation to Mr Saunders' death.
Justice and lmmlgrallon, a division ofSe.-co Limited. Acompeny reglslsnld In England and WalesNO. 242248.
Reglstellld Office: Seroo Holl98, Ill Barlloy Ytbod Business PaJ1<, Bal1tey Way, Hook, ~ re RG27 gu-,: Unitad Kingdom.
Policy Updates Prior to Inquest
In January 2021 the DSOP was updated. The DSOP is reviewed and updated regularly as
appropriate and in any event every two years.
Policy Changes Post Inquest
Following this inquest, the DSOP, including tne DIC checKllst nas been reviewed further and
an updated version is to be rolled out to the Eng:ish Serco prison estate by the end of
October 2022. The updated version of the DSOP will include a statement that the DIC
Checklist is not an exhaustive list, and the Prison should retain any other document that it
considers could be of relevance.
The updated DSOP will be rolled out across the prison estate and guidance will be given to
all staff responsible for collating relevant documentation following a death in custody.
I understand that a copy of the DIC checklist that was in place at the time of Mr Saunders
death and a copy of the DIC checklist, as amended in January 2021 were provided to you
during the course of the Inquest. The most recent version of the checklist is currently being
finalised prior to its roll out at the end of October 2022.
Documents of Specific Concern
During the Inquest I became aware of specific concerns you had in respect of disclosure,
and I would like to offer the following reassurances, by way of example:
ACCT Tick Sheets
At the time of Mr Saunders' death, it was standard practice for observation 'tick sheets' to be
completed for those prisoners subject to an ACCT. Despite the requirement to retain the tick
sheets in accordance with the DIC Checklist in place at the time, it was accepted during
evidence that the tick sheets in relation to Mr Saunders could not be located.
Following the introduction of Version 6 of 'ACCT - Policy Guidance - Annex', which was
rolled out nationally in 2021 the use of these 'tick sheets' has been discontinued across all
prisons in the UK. All records relating to the ACCT process are now contained within the
ACCT book itself.
Oscar Journal
You may recall that the Oscar is the senior member of prison staff, who has overall
operational responsibility for the Prison e.g., incident management etc. The Oscar Journal
('the Journal'), is a large leather-bound folder where relevant material from each shift was
recorded by the Oscar, for example details of anyone who is self-harming and incidents of
violence to aid information sharing.
Over the years the Journal has been replaced by incident reports, which are completed and
then reported to and discussed by the Director and the Senior Management Team on a daily
basis.
It is accepted that Journal entries may have contained relevant information following a DIC
and consequently should have been included on the DIC checklist to ensure their
preservation following a death. The Journal is now listed in the checklist, to ensure it is
produced in Serco prisons that use an Oscars journal.
Yours sincerely
Contract Director
HMP Lowdham Grange
MISS MAIRIN CASEY SENIOR CORONER Nottingham and Nottinghamshire 28th September 2022 Dear Prevention of Future Deaths Report The Council House Old Market Square Nottingham, NG1 2DT Thank you for your response to the Prevention of Future Deaths report that I issued following the inquest touching the death of Nigel John Saunders. I am so pleased to read of the broad range of measures you have put in place to address my concerns. I understand the improvements you have made to the Prison’s investigation of deaths in custody processes are now being rolled out across the SERCO English prison estate. This will assist with learning from deaths in custody, with the overarching objective of seeking to reduce the number of preventable deaths that occur in prisons every year. Two further matters occur to me on considering your helpful response. Firstly, the Chief Coroner has, very recently, issued Coroners across England and Wales with new guidance in relation to Disclosure. At paragraph 4, the Chief Coroner suggests an undertaking be lodged by Interested Persons declaring that due diligence has been exercised in relation to the retention and disclosure of all relevant material. Consideration might be given to aligning your processes to include an undertaking similar to that suggested by the Chief Coroner. My practise in Nottingham has been to ask that the Prison Governor and the legal representative sign and lodge with the Coroner a copy of the undertaking at the end of the disclosure process. This additional step promotes a culture of openness, transparency and accountability, values which are so important to these very sensitive investigations. I include a link to the guidance, which is accessible to the public, here: GUIDANCE No 44 DISCLOSURE final (judiciary.uk) Secondly, it does occur to me that the improvements you have overseen on behalf of SERCO, might actually assist the non-SERCO managed prisons estate in seeking to comply with their duties, and for that reason, I am going to copy my report and your response, along with this letter, to the Minister of State for Justice, Mr Rob Butler MP, purely for information purposes. A copy shall also be shared with the family, other Interested Persons and the Chief Coroner. There has to be a commitment across all agencies to place bereaved families at the heart of the investigation process, and to seek to extract every opportunity for learning from these tragic deaths. I am grateful for the work you have undertaken in this regard. Yours sincerely Miss Laurinda Bower HM Area Coroner Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.