Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Daniel-John Varndell

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0388, written 29 Nov 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report29 Nov 2022
Reference2022-0388
DeceasedDaniel-John Varndell
CoronerRosamund Rhodes-Kemp
Coroner areaHampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1 

1  CORONER 

I am Rosamund RHODES-KEMP, Area Coroner for the coroner area of Hampshire, 
Portsmouth and Southampton 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 14 May 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Daniel-John VARNDELL 
aged 30.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 24 November 2022.  The 
conclusion of the inquest was that: 

On 4th January 2019 Daniel Varndell, aged 30, was sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment 
for various offences. He was sentenced to a further 36 weeks on 29th August 2019 to run 
consecutively and another 6 weeks on 16th April 2020 to run concurrently. 
He was considered to be a high risk of serious harm to the public and Prison and hospital 
staff, adults and children by the National Probation Service and  by others to himself largely 
due to his drug use and mental health which had historically included a diagnosis of 
Schizophrenia more recently Personality Disorder therefore his release was the subject of 
detailed  multi-agency planning including a Trigger plan, Mental Health Support and the 
creation of a list of those known to be at risk upon Daniel’s release. 
His release took place on 7th May 2020 and was to be on licence with conditions until 27th 
May then on post Licence supervision until 2021. 
He was to be taken to Dickson House, an Approved Premise, at least for his initial licence 
period. 
Although a Licence Condition was removed concerning regular appointments with Mental 
Health Practitioners shortly before Daniel’s release once at Dickson House, he was 
contacted by a clinical psychologist on 7th May to discuss his needs, but she was unable to 
reach him and arranged to call him again on 11th May. Staff engaged with him, he 
struggled to abide by the Dickson House and Covid 19 rules but initially he seemed to be 
reasonably settled in the Approved Premises where staff instituted regular welfare checks to 
monitor his wellbeing. 
On evening of the 10th of May 2020  there was an altercation with another resident. Staff 
raised the alarm and he absconded. There is a discrepancy in timings and a gap of about 10 
minutes from when the AP staff say the incident began and they activated their personal 
alarm and when the Alarm company received an Alarm Notification which cannot be 
accounted for and remains unresolved.  Police were alerted, responded swiftly but by the 
time they arrived he had already left. An initial search proved fruitless ass did the Recall 
process as he had gone to an address not on the Trigger list and with which he had no 
previous connection. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

The MAPPA meeting (consisting of over 20 professionals due to the complexity of the 
release planning) decided that various Conditions should apply to Daniel-John Varndell's 
Licence as he posed such a high risk to himself and others. 
One of these was: 
" Attend all appointments arranged for him with a psychiatrist/psychologist/medical 
practitioner and co-operate fully with any care or treatment they recommend" 
This was for use with a specific named practitioner, who must have agreed to treat him and 
he should have consented to this prior to the condition being added so unless something 
had been set up prior to release this condition may not have been suitable. 
The condition was unilaterally removed by a probation officer possibly because consent was 
not in place or for another reason. The point is there was no discussion with MAPPA 
professionals nor any mental health practitioner prior to removal notwithstanding that the 
Chair of MAPPA indicated that the conditions were appropriate and necessary. 
Whilst this may not have affected the outcome in the present sad case such unilateral 
removal of a Licence Condition could result in a future death. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by January 24, 2023.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

I have also sent it to 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 29/11/2022 

Rosamund RHODES-KEMP 
Area Coroner for 
Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Related reports

Other reports by Rosamund Rhodes-Kemp

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Rosamund Rhodes-Kemp

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Rosamund Rhodes-Kemp, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.