Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0009, written 4 Jan 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 4 Jan 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0009 |
| Deceased | Sylvia Price |
| Coroner | Nigel Parsley |
| Coroner area | Suffolk |
| Category | Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: RH Thomas Pursglove MP Minister of State for Disabled People, Health and Work. House of Commons London SW1A 0AA RH Nusrat Ghani MP Minister of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy House of Commons London SW1A 0AA 1 CORONER I am Nigel Parsley, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of Suffolk. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 9th December 2021 I commenced an investigation into the tragic death of- Sylvia Frances PRICE The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 8th December 2022. The conclusion of the inquest was that:- Sylvia Price, died as the result of an accidental death The medical cause of death was confirmed as: 1a Aspiration pneumonia 1b Intracerebral, subdural and extradural haemorrhages 2 Cervical and thoracic spine fractures 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Sylvia Frances Price died on the 4th December 2021 at 0915 am, at Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich. Sylvia attended Ufford Park Hotel and Spa on the 30th November 2021 for a meal. Prior to leaving the hotel, Sylvia went to use the toilet facilities. The closest toilet facilities were located down a flight of stairs. Sylvia fell down this flight of stairs. No signage was in place in the vicinity, that would have indicated the availability of an accessible toilet on the same level as an alternative option. The injuries she sustained as a result of the fall were extensive, and led to Sylvia being admitted to Ipswich Hospital. Whilst being treated for her injuries at Ipswich Hospital, Sylvia developed aspiration pneumonia which was the medical cause of her death. The injuries sustained in the fall, cerebral haemorrhages and spinal injuries, were contributing factors to her death. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters given rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you; the MATTERS OF CONCERN as follows. – Evidence was heard that Sylvia had underlying medical issues that required an easily accessible toilet facility. The jury concluded that the lack of appropriate signage, to readily identify an easily accessible toilet facility, was a directly contributory factor leading to Sylvia’s death. The Local Authority Food and Safety Officer who investigated this case identified no other contributing factors, with the stairs themselves meeting building and safety regulations. The officers report contained only one recommendation for the premises owner, which was the provision of more adequate signage. However, the officer stated in evidence that there was no statutory power to enforce the provision of such signage, and should a premises owner wish to ignore such a recommendation, they could (it is acknowledged that the premise owner in this case has put new signage in place). In addition, current building regulations do not require any such signage to be fitted into new buildings. The court was informed that the provision of adequate accessible toilet facilities is now a legal requirement for the majority of buildings designed for public use, but as detailed above there is no requirement for these facilities to be clearly identified with appropriate signage. As a failure to provide adequate signage was found to be a contributing factor in this case, and there is no enforceable requirement that such signage should be provided, I am concerned further deaths may occur in other public access buildings, should similar circumstances arise in the future. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken in order to prevent future deaths, and I believe you or your organisation have the power to take any such action you identify. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 2nd March 2023 I, the Senior Coroner, may extend the period if I consider it reasonable to do so. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons;- 1. Sylvia’s next of kin. I am under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Senior Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 4th January 2022 Nigel Parsley
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
•
Department for Levelling Up,
Housing & Communities
Rt Hon Michael Gove MP
Secretary of State for Levelling up, Housing
and Communities
Minister for Intergovernmental Relations
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
Nigel Parsley
HM Senior Coroner for Suffolk
Beacon House
Whitehouse Road
Ipswich, Suffolk
IP1 5PB
l°Jft., June 2023
Inquest into the death of Sylvia Frances Price: Regulation 28 report
Thank you for your investigative report of 4 January into the death of Sylvia Frances Price,
which was made in accordance with Paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. Your
report was submitted to the Minister of State for Disabled People Health & Work; and the
Minister of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. I am responding to you as the
finding of the inquest concerned signage and Building Regulations. Building Regulations and
the statutory guidance supporting them, Approved Documents, sit within my area of
responsibility. I would like to offer my sincere condolences to Ms Price's family and friends
and also acknowledge the professionalism of health workers who cared for her at Ipswich
Hospital.
You set out matters of concern and recommended that I, in my capacity as the Secretary of
State, should take action to prevent future deaths. In this letter, I set out the work currently
underway by officials in my department and at the Building Safety Regulator to update
Building Regulations regarding toilet provision and to prepare statutory guidance in a new
Approved Document. There will be a period of public consultation to supplement evidence
already held by the department. I can assure you that I will consider findings that arise and
what changes are necessary to reduce the risk of similar incidents in the future.
At the inquest, evidence was heard that Ms Price had underlying medical issues that required
an easily accessible toilet facility. The jury concluded that the lack of appropriate signage to
readily identify an easily accessible toilet facility was a contributory factor leading to Ms
Price's death. The local authority officer who investigated this case identified no other
contributing factors and noted that the stairs themselves met building and safety regulations.
The officer's report contained only one recommendation for the premises owner, relating to
provision of more adequate signage, which has since been installed. Your report noted the
officer stated in evidence that there was no statutory power to enforce the provision of such
signage, and should a premises owner wish to ignore such a recommendation , they could.
The point was also made that there was no requirement for signage of this nature in the
building regulations for new buildings, so it was not clear what form such signage should take
even if an enforcement officer decided that it was necessary. I therefore consider it important
to highlight what legislation applies to new buildings being constructed and what applies to
existing buildings.
New Buildings
Building Regulations and Approved Documents for new build and construction
You noted in your report that provision of adequate accessible toilet facilities is now a legal
requirement for the majority of buildings designed for public use. For new build, or where re
design or major refurbishment of existing buildings is anticipated, work must comply with the
Building Regulations. The Approved Documents provide statutory guidance on how to
achieve compliance. The Building Regulations and Approved Documents ensure that
minimum standards for size, space and materials are incorporated into new buildings.
Approved Document M ('Access to and use of buildings - Volume 2: Buildings other than
dwellings') is the relevant statutory guidance in such a case. It sets out design considerations
for toilet accommodation (including wheelchair accessible toilets) at paragraphs 5.5 to 5.10
and includes guidance on other provisions, e.g. support rails and a wash basin. Additionally,
building design professionals are directed to BS8300 which covers provision of signs and
information. The Building Regulations apply to new design and construction; they are not
retrospective. A Building Control Body (including local authority Building Control Officers and
Approved Inspectors) will make sure that building regulations are followed in new buildings or
when building works (as defined in the Building Regulations 2010) are carried out. They
cannot require an existing building where no building works are completed to be modified or
change its layout.
Technical changes to Building Regulations and Approved Documents
The Government's call for evidence on toilet provision for men and women ended in
February 2021. Following that, in July last year, the Government set out its intention to
launch a technical consultation on formal changes to the Building Regulations and Approved
Documents. We are preparing the consultation document now with a view to publication later
this summer. We will seek views on the design and range of toilet provision, so that we can
prepare new statutory guidance. We will draw on evidence from commissioned research to
inform possible design suggestions for a variety of non-residential toilet facilities including
wheelchair-accessible toilets, toilet signage and labelling. I will ensure that a review of
Approved Document M is coherent with the new statutory guidance we will prepare on toilet
provision . We will also take steps to ensure that signage provision is given appropriate
prominence in statutory guidance so that it may be readily understood by Building Control
Officers.
Existing Buildings
Whilst our work on updating the relevant building regulations will address the fundamental
issue of what signage should be provided in new buildings, there are other areas of existing
legislation which support appropriate toilet provision for disabled persons which are therefore
relevant in this case.
Health and safety legislation and enforcement
In workplaces (including hotels) , a need for signage to mitigate risks (based on principles of
prevention) would normally be identified as part of routine management risk assessment
procedures; the relevant legislation is the Health and Safety at Work Act 197 4, the Health
and Safety (Enforcing Authority) Regulations 1998, and the Management of Health and
Safety at Work Regulations 1999. Health and safety legislation requires every employer to
make a suitable and sufficient assessment of the risks to the health and safety of employees
and persons who are not in the employer's employment but where risks might arise out of or
in connection with their business. Local authorities are responsible for enforcement relating
to premises in their area.
Equality Act 2010: reasonable adjustments to existing premises
The Equality Act 2010 provides protections for people with disabilities who may encounter
difficulties in accessing existing premises. Service providers are under an anticipatory duty to
make reasonable adjustments to enable customers with disabilities to use their premises and
facilities. An obligation to make reasonable adjustments is continuous. The Equality and
Human Rights Commission notes that if a disabled person wants to use an organisation's
services but encounters barriers, then the organisation needs to think about reasonable
adjustments whether or not any adjustments have already been made. In premises open to
the public, this may involve making changes where barriers have been created by the
physical features of those premises, or providing auxiliary aids or auxiliary services. In this
and similar cases, providing appropriate signage to readily identify an easily accessible toilet
facility could be considered an auxiliary aid.
Building Safety Regulator
Finally, we have introduced a more stringent regulatory regime led by the Building Safety
Regulator. The Building Safety Regulator has responsibilities for overseeing the safety of all
buildings, including identifying patterns of regulatory failure and making recommendations for
improving standards. This will drive continuous improvement in buildings technology and
who has taken up the role of
construction techniques. I have sent your report to
Director of Building Safety at the Building Safety Regulator.
The Government is committed to ensuring a safe built environment for all. Thank you , once
again, for your report.
Rt Hon Michael Gove MP
Secretary of State for Levelling up, Housing and Communities
Minister for Intergovernmental Relations
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Nigel Parsley, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.