Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Sylvia White

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0044, written 30 Jan 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report30 Jan 2024
Reference2024-0044
DeceasedSylvia White
CoronerLorraine Harris
Coroner areaEast Riding and Hull
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 

1 

CORONER 

Miss Lorraine Harris, Area Coroner, 
East Riding of Yorkshire and City of Kingston Upon Hull. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 3rd November 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Sylvia 
Linda WHITE, aged 92 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the 
inquest on 26th January 2024. 

The conclusion of the inquest was: 
Accident 

The following findings of fact were made: 

•

Sylvia Linda WHITE was 92 years of age, she was partially sighted but
maintained a level of independence at home with the assistance of
carers.

• Mrs White had been discharged from hospital recently (day before her
birthday, which would have been 04/10/2023), but evidence heard that
the discharge papers did not report the increase in her frailty and the
decrease in her mobility.  At the beginning of the inquest it was
unknown that the issue of discharge summaries may be relevant.
Manager of the care company raised concerns that it was not
uncommon for discharge summaries to be inadequate in assessing the
ongoing care changes.  The carer felt that the risk assessments should
have changed after hospital but they were not.

• Carer attended on the evening of Thursday 12th October 2023, Mrs

White was in bed.  She was given medication but did not wish to use the
commode.

• Mrs White was capable of getting out of bed and using the commode

1 

 herself. 

•  The commode should have been placed next to the bed.  Notes said it 
should have been placed within reach but were not specific about 
locations. 

•  The following morning Friday 13th October 2023 a carer attended and 
discovered Sylvia pinned to the floor by an upturned wardrobe. 
•  The commode looked to have been placed in the corner of the room, 

but was upturned. 

•  The wardrobe had never shown signs of instability. 
•  Mrs White had never moved the commode herself in the past.  There 
was no reason to think that she had moved it herself on this occasion. 
•  A coroner is unable to deal with what is possible, and it would be unsafe 
to say what definitely happened as Mrs White had no recollection, but it 
is likely that Mrs WHITE has slipped, possibly while using the commode, 
and as she fell inadvertently pulled the wardrobe down on top of her.  
Her dressing gown was hung on the door handle and she may have 
pulled on this. 

•  Mrs White wore a lifeline device but the position of the wardrobe meant 

• 

she was unable to activate it. 
I note that, on discovery, the carer lifted the wardrobe, called 
emergency services and the family, while reassuring Mrs White and 
keeping her warm and stable. 

•  Mrs White had sustained a significant head injury but was unsuitable for 

surgical intervention. 

Box 3 of the record of inquest read: 
Sylvia Linda WHITE was 92 years of age and partially sighted.  She maintained a 
level of independence at home with the assistance of carers.  On 13th October 
2023 at 0758 a carer discovered Mrs White pinned to the bedroom floor by an 
overturned wardrobe which she appeared to have accidently pulled down on 
top of herself during some form of fall or slip.  Mrs White was conveyed to Hull 
Royal Infirmary and found to have a traumatic subdural haemorrhage.  The 
bleed progressed and Mrs White was placed on palliative care.  She died on 28th 
October 2023. 

Her medical cause of death was recorded as: 
1a Traumatic Subdural Haemorrhage 
1b Unwitnessed fall 
2 Frailty of great old age, cognitive impairment, chronic kidney disease, 
congestive cardiac failure 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Sylvia Linda WHITE was 92 years of age.  She maintained her independence at 
home but had carers visit 4 times a day.  She was mobile but used aides.  She 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 was partially sighted, having problems in both eyes.  As outlined above Mrs 
White was found by a carer on the morning of Friday 13th October 2023 pinned 
to the floor by a wardrobe.  She sustained a head injury and died on 28th 
October 2023 in hospital.  There was no issue with her care in hospital leading 
to her death. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless 
action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

1.  The main issue of this inquest was to try to ascertain exactly how the 

wardrobe came to be on top of Mrs White and evidence was heard on 
the subject.  As the evidence neared its conclusion a comment was 
made regarding discharge summaries and the role they play in updating 
risk assessments for carers. 

2.  I am fully aware that the hospital did not have the opportunity to put 

forward any information on this point, however it is my statutory duty to 
make a report to prevent future death, and the evidence in this case was 
that this was an issue that occurred regularly. 

3.  Prior to this incident occurring Mrs White had been in hospital and 

discharged on 4th October 2023.  A manager for the care home outlined 
that the paperwork provided to carers known as the “Discharge 
Summary” is often inadequate in providing suitable information.  In this 
instance I was informed it did not provide any information on Mrs 
White’s increased frailty and decreased mobility.  This means that 
information provided is inappropriate for ongoing risk assessments. 
4.  The manager did outline a particular form that they prefer, I make no 

comment regarding the format of the information required, merely the 
need for appropriate information to allow risk assessments to take 
place. 

5.  The manager stated that a social worker should be completing a risk 

assessment prior to discharge but this often does not happen.  In many 
cases a doctor or another member of staff will complete a discharge 
summary.  The information in these is often lacking to safeguard the 
welfare of the person concern with regard to their care needs.  The 
manager stated they often have to alert safeguarding at the local 
authority of the deficit. 

6.  Bearing in mind the importance of a discharge summary in providing the 
foundation information for the ongoing safe care of patients as they 
leave the hospital environment, this is an issue where either a structured 
approach is required or training to those who are failing to complete 
them correctly is required. 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe 
your department/organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by Tuesday 26th March 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to: 

•  The family of Sylvia Linda WHITE 
•  The Chief Coroner 
•  Hale Care 
•  The Safeguarding Department of the Local Authority 
•  The CQC 
•  The ICB for Humber 
•  NHS National England Director 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and 
all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.   

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may 
find it useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest.  

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

[DATE]                                              [SIGNED BY CORONER] 

30th January 2024                                  Lorraine Harris 

4

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Hull University Teaching Hospitals (PDF)
Date 25 March 2024 

Miss Lorraine Harris 
HM Area Coroner for Hull & the East Riding of 
Yorkshire 
The Coroner’s Court & Offices 
The Guildhall 
Hull 
HU1 2AA 

Dear Miss Harris, 

Hull Royal Infirmary 
Anlaby Road 
Hull 
HU3 2JZ 

Re: Death of Sylvia Linda White – Response to Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths 

I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths (the Report), dated and 

received on 30 January 2024, issued as a result of the concluded inquest into the death of Ms Sylvia 

Linda White. 

I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincerest condolences to the family of Ms White for 

their loss. 

As confirmed within the Report, the Trust was not an interested party in this matter, nor was evidence 

requested from the Trust prior to the inquest hearing, and therefore we first became aware of the inquest 

and circumstances on 30 January 2024. 

The Report states that upon receipt of evidence from the Care Manager of Hale Care, your statutory 

duties under regulation 28 were triggered.  It is stated that the Care Manager provided oral testimony 

suggesting that information contained within a patient’s discharge summary does not provide appropriate 

information to risk assess a patient, and that this was not only the case for Ms White but that this 

happens regularly; thus leading to the concerns detailed within the report.   

Unfortunately, as the Trust was not present at the inquest, we are only able to comment on the 

information contained within the Report.  It does not seem that the discharge process has been fully 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 explained in the course of the inquest.  Information regarding a patient’s frailty and mobility is detailed in 

a form known as a Trusted Assessor Referral Form (TARF) not the patient’s discharge summary, as 

suggested by the Care Manager.  This form is sent from the hospital to the Local Authority, who risk 

assess the patient’s needs within the community.  Trusted Assessor schemes are a national initiative 

designed to reduce delays when patients are ready for discharge from hospital.  This approach allows 

adult social care providers to adopt and use assessments carried out while patients are still in hospital, 

promoting safe and timely discharges. 

On review of Ms White’s records, I can confirm that a TARF was appropriately completed and submitted 

to Social Services on 04 October 2023, and our system show that this was acknowledged by them on 

the same day.  This details that during her admission she was able to walk to the toilet and back with 

minimal supervision, and with the use of a Zimmer frame.  I would also like to confirm that on review of 

Ms White’s discharge summary, there is a request to her GP to follow up her lying and standing blood 

pressure in a week due to risk of falls within the community.   

I am sorry that this information was not made available to you by those who were party to the inquest.  I 

hope that this letter provides both you and Ms White’s family with further clarity and assurance regarding 

the discharge process and risk assessment of a patient from the hospital into social care. 

Yours sincerely 

Interim Group Director of Quality Governance

Related reports

Other reports by Lorraine Harris

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Lorraine Harris

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Lorraine Harris, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.