Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Christopher Sidle

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0167, written 25 Mar 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report25 Mar 2024
Reference2024-0167
DeceasedChristopher Sidle
CoronerJacqueline Lake
Coroner areaNorfolk
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust 
Hellesdon Hospital 
Drayton High Road 
Hellesdon  
Norwich 
NR6 5BE 

1 

CORONER 
I am JACQUELINE LAKE, HM Senior Coroner  for the coroner area of Norfolk 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 12 July 2023, I commenced an investigation into the death of Christopher Edward SIDLE 
aged 51.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 22 March 2024.   

The medical cause of death was: 

1a) 
1b) 
1c) 
2) 

Traumatic Brain Injury  

Schizophrenia 

The conclusion of the inquest was: 
Mr Christopher Sidle threw himself out of a moving taxi and suffered fatal injuries.  His state of 
mind at the time is not revealed by the evidence. There were missed opportunities to provide 
appropriate and timely care to Christopher and assessments carried out in respect of his 
mental health were inadequate. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 
Christopher Sidle had a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia in 2011. This was well controlled 
with medication for many years with short relapses in 2014 and 2021, being resolved following 
swift and effective intervention by mental health services.  
In March 2023, Christopher started to show signs of relapse and displayed symptoms following 
a pattern of those displayed in previous psychotic episodes, which increased over time. He was 
seen by primary services and referred to secondary services.  

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Following triage on 21 April 2023, by the Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team (“CRHTT”) 
Christopher was returned to primary care. Christopher was referred again to secondary 
services and an assessment completed on 10 May 2023. Christopher said he had not been 
taking his medication for a month. Deterioration in Christopher’s mental health was recognised 
as the main risk and concordance with his medication needed to be achieved within three to 
four days. Christopher declined engagement with the CRHTT and said he would now take his 
medication.  
Christopher was allocated a Care Co Ordinator in the Community Mental Health Team on 17 
May 2023 and was reviewed for several days to ensure medication concordance. These were 
exceptional steps taken by the Community Team due to concerns with regard to Christopher’s 
mental health.  
Christopher was again referred to the CRHTT on 19 May 2023 due to concerns regarding his 
mental ill health and displaying signs of psychosis and a pattern of previous psychotic 
symptoms. He was triaged and an assessment was undertaken on 20 May 2023. Christopher 
attended with his bag packed and was willing to be admitted for inpatient treatment. Evidence 
was heard this would not be possible in any event due to lack of available inpatient beds at that 
time. Christopher again said he was not taking his medication. Christopher was not taken on 
and again returned to the Community Team. The assessment was inadequate and psychotic 
markers were underestimated and/or missed. This was a missed opportunity to provide 
appropriate care and treatment to Christopher.  
Later that evening Christopher went missing from home and was later returned by police. From 
22 May 2023, Christopher was monitored on a daily basis with regard to his medication for 7 to 
10 days by the Community Team which they would not usually do, pending his being seen by a 
Consultant Psychiatrist. Christopher took his medication during this period.  
A recovery plan was completed and put in place by the Community Team by 1 June 2023, in 
which the crisis plan states: Deterioration in mental wellbeing - "It may be hard to notice, 
people should try to use their gut instincts, especially if they know me" and "Take over my 
responsibilities", "Check my medication adherence" and "I may not know when help is needed 
and would appreciate teams making decisions."  
Christopher agreed to see a Consultant Psychiatrist and to discuss a depot injection and was 
seen on 6 June 2023. A deterioration in his mental health was noted. Christopher declined 
depot injection and said he will take his oral medication. Christopher was seen by the 
Community Mental Health Team and arrangements were made for him to be seen in two to 
three weeks’ time to review his medication.  
On 28 June 2023, Christopher showed psychotic symptoms witnessed by his family and then 
the community team and a referral was made to the CRHTT for possible admission to hospital. 
Christopher was accepting of the referral and was present when this was triaged. That evening 
Christopher went missing again and was returned home by police. Requests were made by his 
family for Christopher’s history and ability to mask his symptoms be recorded in his notes prior 
to the Crisis assessment.  
The assessment was carried out on 29 June 2023 without discussion within the team, without 
reading Christopher’s records other than the triage document and the previous assessment 
note, due to insufficient time being allowed by the Team prior to the assessment. The 
assessment continued without knowledge of Christopher’s history and his ability to mask 
symptoms. There was no formal monitoring of the assessment which was allocated on the 
basis of availability of assessor rather than experience or suitability. This was the assessor’s first 
lone assessment. Christopher was not taken on by the CRHTT and returned for community 
care. The assessment was inadequate and was a further missed opportunity to provide 
appropriate inpatient care to Christopher, which more than minimally contributed to his death.  

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 Following a telephone conversation with Christopher’s family again providing relevant 
information with regard to Christopher’s history and mental health, no further action was 
taken and the decision not to take Christopher on by the team remained. This was a further 
missed opportunity to provide appropriate care and treatment to Christopher.  
Concern was raised in the Community Team on the morning of 30 June 2023 that Christopher 
had not been taken on by the Crisis Team. No immediate action was taken to ensure 
Christopher was re-assessed and this was a missed opportunity to provide immediate 
appropriate care to Christopher.  
A Mental Health Act assessment was requested by Christopher’s family. A discussion by the 
allocated assessor with the community team was requested and this was not responded to. On 
1 July 2023, Christopher ordered a taxi to take him to an acute hospital. En-route while the taxi 
was travelling at approximately 30 mph Christopher jumped out of the taxi into the roadway. 
Christopher was taken to Addenbrookes hospital where he was found to have suffered life 
threatening head injuries. Life sustaining therapies ceased on 4 July 2023 and Christopher died. 
The evidence does not reveal whether Christopher had intention or if so, what that intention 
was, at the time of jumping out of the taxi. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.  
It is clear that the NSFT have treated the circumstances surrounding Christopher’s death 
seriously and have carried out an internal investigation, made recommendations and have put 
in place steps to prevent future deaths. However, there do remain outstanding matters of 
concern. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:  

1.  Despite additional face to face training being made available to the CRHTT, witness 

evidence was heard which does not reflect the findings of the investigation and does 
not recognise the need for a full and proper assessment and the need not to accept a 
service user’s response to questions raised. 

2.  There remains a lack of understanding amongst the CRHTT with regard to the scope 

3. 

and limitations of other services available within the community team. 
 There remains a lack of understanding with regard to assessing a person’s mental 
capacity to make decisions and to fully and properly record the rationale for making 
decisions. 

4.  Support provided by FACT is usually carried out by telephone and will in some 

5. 

circumstances not be sufficient to recognise ongoing concerns, for instance with regard 
to medication concordance. 
Important emails were not circulated to relevant personnel within the CRHTT. The 
evidence remains unclear what happened to the emails and why they did not reach the 
appropriate member of the team. 

6.  A person can be identified at triage risk assessment as being in need of an “immediate 
response, within 4 hours” but an assessment is then arranged for within a 24-hour 
period. 

7.  Evidence was heard of a nationwide shortage of inpatient mental health beds. Action 
has been taken by NSFT in an effort to minimise impact, but this does remain an 
ongoing concern. 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
 
 6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation 
has the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,  
namely by May 20, 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 
COPIES and PUBLICATION 

8 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons:  

 (Sister) via Ashtons Legal     

I have also sent it to:    
Department of Health/Secretary of State 
CQC 
HSIB 
Healthwatch Norfolk 
NHS England & NHS Improvement who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested 
persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of 
interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.  He 
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.   

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

 Dated: 25 March 2024 

Jacqueline Lake 
Senior Coroner for Norfolk 
County Hall 
Martineau Lane 
Norwich 
NR1 2DH 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
From the Rt Hon Andrew Stephenson CBE MP 
Minister of State for Health and Secondary Care 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

24 May 2024 

Jacqueline Lake 
Senior Coroner 
County Hall 
Norwich 
NR1 2UA 

Dear Ms Lake, 

Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 12 July 2023 about 
the death of Christopher Edward Sidle.  I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for 
mental health and patient safety.     

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Christopher’s 
death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The circumstances 
your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to 
my attention. Please accept my sincere apologies for the significant delay in responding to 
this matter. 

Your report raises concerns about a shortage of inpatient mental health beds. 

We recognise how important it is that people with mental ill health get the level of care that 
is appropriate for their needs, and we want to ensure that people have access to the right 
mental health support, in the right place, and at the right time.  

Through the NHS Long Term Plan, we have invested almost £1 billion extra in community 
mental  health  care  for  adults  by  March  2024,  compared  to  2018/19,  expanding  and 
transforming community mental health services. The long-term aim set out within the NHS 
Long-Term Plan is to improve community support for those with serious mental illness to 
avoid the need for an inpatient admission where possible. As part of this, major expansion 
in funding for community mental health services commenced in all areas in 2021/22 which 
also  aim  to  reduce  pressure  on  beds. However,  we  recognise  that  there  are  occasions 
where  a  mental  health  bed  is  not  available  locally.  The  2024/25  NHS  priorities  and 
operations  planning  guidance  has  a  commitment  to  improving  patient  flow  and  working 
towards eliminating inappropriate out of area placements. 

 
 
 Timely discharge of patients who are ready to be discharged is important to free up beds for 
those  who  need  them.  To  support  adult  social  care  and  discharges  across  the  NHS, 
including  from  mental  health  inpatient  settings, up  to  £2.8  billion was  made  available 
in 2023/24 and £4.7 billion in 2024/25, reducing bed occupancy. The Department has also  
worked  with  NHS  England  and  other  system  partners  to  develop  statutory  guidance  for 
discharge from all mental health inpatient settings, which was published in January 2024. 
This  sets  out  how  NHS  bodies  and  local  authorities  can  work  together  to  support  the 
discharge process, improving flow and ensuring the right support in the community.  
The guidance  is available  at:  Hospital discharge  and  community  support  guidance  - 
GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) 

For those in crisis, we are providing £150 million of capital investment for mental health 
urgent and emergency care infrastructure over 2023/24 and 2024/25. This includes 
investment into a range of wider local mental health infrastructure schemes, including new 
and improved crisis cafes, crisis houses, health-based places of safety and improvements 
to emergency departments and crisis lines. Over 160 schemes have been allocated 
funding by NHS England so far and 99 have been completed. The funding will also provide 
for specialised mental health ambulances which will be rolled out across the country – and 
be supported by practitioners trained to provide advice and treatments in cases of co-
occurring physical and mental health issues.  

The care Quality Commission (CQC) continue to monitor the mental health sector and 
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation trust (NSFT) through their regulatory monitoring 
powers. The CQC will also continue to work with and monitor the trust on an ongoing basis 
and, if there are concerns about risk to patients, will not hesitate to take action. Access to 
mental health care and the quality of the care remain a key area of concern.  

The Department is also committed to ensuring that significant progress is being made in 
Norfolk and Suffolk to ensure that mental health services are of the high standard that 
patients and their families should rightly expect.  This is why I met and will continue to 
meet with a range of campaigners, local stakeholders, the Trust and delivery partners to 
discuss progress on the Trust’s improvement plan, improvements in mortality recording, 
and how we can better understand the number of deaths, as set out in the 2023 Grant 
Thornton report into the reporting of deaths at the Trust. 

Whilst some improvements have been made, as set out in the most recent Care Quality 
Commission inspection report, it is clear that vital improvements are needed to be made 
and embedded to address the very significant challenges that remain.  The Trust must be 
transparent and engage closely with families and local stakeholders as it aims to continue 
to make progress with its partners in improving mental health support in the area.  

The Trust is in the national Recovery Support Programme, which means it is subject to the 
highest degree of national oversight in segment 4 of the NHS Oversight Framework. NHS 
England is providing the Trust with focused and integrated support, with a full-time 
improvement director in place, and representation in the trust’s governance meetings so it 
has full visibility of the latest data on the improvements needed. It will work closely with the 
trust and stakeholders to ensure that the recent progress made continues and is built on. 

 I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. 

Yours sincerely, 

 MARIA CAULFIELD MP
Response from Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
Ms Jacqueline Lake 
Norfolk Coroner’s Service 
County Hall 
Martineau Lane 
Norwich 

Dear Ms Lake 

NSFT Trust Management 
Norfolk & Suffolk Foundation Trust 
County Hall 
Martineau Lane 
Norwich 
NR1 2DBH 

Date: 17 May 2024 

Regulations 28 and 29 (coroners investigations regulations 2013) notification made in response to 
the death of Christopher Sidle  

I write to you in respect of Christopher Sidle who died on 4th July 2023. His inquest concluded on 22 March 
2024; at the end of the inquest, you raised concerns outlined in this response within a prevention of future 
deaths notification. 

I would like to reiterate to you and importantly to Christopher’s family our sincere regret and apologies for 
the death of Christopher whilst under our care. 

1.  Despite additional face to face training being made available to the CRHTT, witness evidence 
was heard which does not reflect the findings of the investigation and does not recognise 
the need for a full and proper assessment and the need not to accept a service user’s 
response to questions raised. 

As a result of this concern the lead nurse from the care group has sought details from other mental 
health Trusts of any additional training that they require their own CRHT assessors to undertake, 
this was requested from the Mental Health Forum. This is a professional network of mental health 
leaders from other organisations. Only one Trust responded stating that they did not provide any 
additional training but recruited experienced Mental Health Clinicians. Therefore, we were unable to 
benchmark against other organisations.   

Nevertheless, in response to this incident and as presented at inquest, the Trust has developed a 
core competency framework for CRHTT assessors which reflects fidelities outlined within the Core 
CRISIS Fidelity Scale. This was developed by 31.08.23 in response to an action arising from the 
Safety Incident Review (SIR) that was undertaken by the NSFT Patient Safety Team. Our action 
was to ensure that new assessing staff complete an induction and all assessors within the team 
complete core competency.   

This commenced immediately following development of the core competency framework. All training 
around competencies was completed for all senior nurses (band 7 and 8) by 24.01.24. Competency 
assessment for all other assessors is scheduled and on track for completion by the end May 2024.  

We have an additional and ongoing programme of work, delivering knowledge and understanding of 
the standards set out in NSFT core competency framework, applying this framework to assess each 
clinician within their individual line management supervision, offering additional support where this is 
identified. This will be completed by the end of June 2024. 

Trust HQ: County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich, NR1 2DH 
Tel: 01603 421421   Web: www.nsft.nhs.uk 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - 2 - 

It is acknowledged that clinicians within CRHTT require a wide breadth of knowledge and 
understanding and as such in April 2024 a recruitment and retention project was launched for 
CRHTT. This project will attempt to recruit qualified and experienced clinicians, these will be 
qualified band 5 with post registration experience. They will undertake a 12-week preceptorship 
within CRHTT. New staff will be allocated to a named preceptor. Their preceptor will be an 
experienced member of staff who will act as their professional support during their induction to the 
CRHT Team. New team members will be expected to complete 80% of clinical time with their 
preceptor within that first 12 weeks. They will attend weekly supervision and monthly reflective 
practise, as well as complete a portfolio that will record evidence of their training and professional 
development.  

Recruitment began 06.05.24 and four nurses are in the process of being recruited with expected 
start date 01.07.2024. Recruitment will continue until all posts have been filled.  

Norfolk CRHTT is well established in utilising the 5P Formulation model in all interventions. This 
model refers to 5 factors (Presenting problem; Precipitating; Perpetuating; Predisposing; and 
Protective Factors) to support comprehensive understanding and formulation for care planning 
purposes.  

The next phase in line with NICE Guidance around Clinical Risk, is to routinely evidence all risk 
using this same psychological approach. To support this approach the person in charge (a senior 
mental health professional, minimum band 6) is now co located with the clinical team, immediately 
available to support clinical discussion regarding patient care. 

We will monitor the impact of these measures on patient care and assessment by undertaking a 
monthly audit.  This will inform an evaluation report that will be presented to the Care Group Quality 
Assurance Group for monitoring purposes and to support improvement.  For assurance purposes 
the report findings will be presented to the Trust Safety group and onward to the Trust Board Quality 
Committee.  

The oversight of the CRHTT is further supported by an analysis of all Trust wide CRHTT’s which is 
being undertaken to support the Chief Transformation Officer in CRHTT transformation.  

2.  There remains a lack of understanding with regard to assessing a person’s mental capacity 
to make decisions and to fully and properly record the rationale for making decisions. 

Bespoke training was designed in response to the difficulties identified in Mr Sidle’s care. This was 
delivered by the Mental Capacity Act Lead (MCA) to the CRHTT involved in his care. This was an 
interactive session delivered through “Teams” on 01.05.24 & 02.05.24.   Staff awareness will be  
further supported through discussion of case studies as part of table discussion, at the forthcoming 
CRHTT training day on 21 August 2024. 

To provide assurance that CRHTT apply their MCA knowledge consistently and appropriately, an 
audit programme has been developed. A monthly audit will go live in Norfolk CRHTT on 20.05.24. 
We will use our audit findings and other means (for example feedback from patient safety 
investigations), to identify ongoing training needs. We will provide bespoke training where this is 
identified as needed. This bespoke training offer is in addition to the Trust’s existing requirement for 
all clinical assessors to receive mandatory e learning training in mental capacity every three years.  

From July 2024 the MCA audit will be implemented Trust wide to secure similar assurance 
regarding application of MCA across community and inpatient mental health teams.  
Audit results will be reported to the Care Group Quality Assurance Group for monitoring and to 
support further improvement. For broader assurance purposes the report findings will be presented 
to the Trust Safety group and onward to the Trust Board Quality Committee.  

 
 
                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - 3 - 

3.  There remains a lack of understanding amongst the CRHTT with regard to the scope and 

limitations of other services available within the community team. 

In May 2024 an updated Trust wide CRHTT Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) was ratified and 
implemented across the Trust. 

The SOP addresses liaison between CMHT and CRHTT:  

•  7.4 states ‘Assessments ideally are carried out with CRHTT staff and joint assessments with 

other community staff are actively encouraged. Response time for face-to-face assessments are 
key so if paired staff are not available for assessment, assessments may be carried out (taking 
into account risk and safety issues),..’ 

Through this the SOP highlights the importance of teams having clear discussions about the scope 
of services available from each team at the time of transferring care. 

In addition, within the Norfolk CRHTT, experienced practitioners attend weekly interface meetings 
with community teams to increase their knowledge of each other's service. 

4.  Support provided by Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) is usually carried out 

by telephone and will in some circumstances not be sufficient to recognise ongoing 
concerns, for instance with regard to medication concordance. 

An initial scoping exercise is being undertaken as part of Quality Improvement initiative led by the 
Deputy service director, to understand the existing arrangements and opportunities for 
improvement. in FACT delivery. This will report to the newly established (April 2024) Trust wide 
Safety Group to ensure there is consistency regarding the application of FACT. A review of existing 
FACT arrangements across the 5 Adult CMHTs in North Norfolk and Norwich inclusive of 
recommendations and a clear action plan, will be received by the Chief Nurse by 31st July 2024.  

 5.  Important emails were not circulated to relevant personnel within the CRHTT. The evidence 
remains unclear what happened to the emails and why they did not reach the appropriate 
member of the team. 

During the period under review at Inquest there were two separate (north and south) e mail boxes.  

These have now been merged into one generic team email address. The process for receipt and 
management of emails to the CRHTT generic team e mail address has been reviewed. 

A new process is in place that ensures that all emails are regularly checked and actioned by the 
qualified practitioner, as person in charge (PIC).  

The PIC is the front door for all referrals and triages, responsible for the allocation and ‘flow’ of work 
through-out the shift.  

To increase resilience, administrative support has now been allocated to assist the PIC with 
weekday administrative tasks which includes monitoring the inbox.   

Outside normal office hours (on weekdays 17:00 - 20:00) oversight of the PIC email is now provided 
by a senior support worker (band 4) who refers to the PIC throughout the shift.    

Support to the PIC from a designated senior support worker has also been introduced for weekend 
days.   

 
 
                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - 4 - 

Night shift is covered by 2 clinicians and 2 senior support workers with shared responsibility. All 
contacts are recorded on to the Night Handover Log. The embedding of this new process will be 
monitored through a six-month audit which will commence 20.05.24.  

The audit findings will report to the Care Group Quality Assurance Group for monitoring purposes 
and to support further improvement. For assurance purposes the report will be presented to the 
Trust Safety group and onward to the Quality Committee.  

6.  A person can be identified at triage risk assessment as being in need of an “immediate 

response, within 4 hours” but an assessment is then arranged for within a 24-hour period. 

This case highlighted the importance of professionals having the required skill and competency in 
risk assessment to inform their decision to re grade a referral, furthermore that the decision is made 
within a clear process.  

The development and assurance of core staff competency (described under section 1 above)  
will support appropriate risk assessment decisions.  

The requirement to discuss referral regrade with another clinician is clearly described within the 
Trust Clinical Harms SOP (updated February 2024) and included within the updated Trust wide 
CRHTT SOP (17.05.24). These documents prompt staff to follow the required approach.  

We will evaluate compliance against this standard through local management monitoring with 
additional second level assurance provided through an audit that will be completed by the Patient 
Safety and Quality Team by mid-July 2024.  This will enable us to provide assurance that all 
decisions to regrade a referral are being made by two clinicians in line with Trust standard.  

This will be reported to the Care Group Quality Assurance Group for monitoring purposes and to 
support improvement. For further assurance purposes the report will be presented to the Trust 
Safety group and onward to the Quality Committee.  

The tragic death of Mr Sidle has been a key learning point for the Trust. As described above, a 
number of actions have been undertaken that address the concerns set out within the Regulation 28 
and 29 notice. Further to this, quality improvement in our CHRTT will remain a key focus.   

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Executive Officer

Related reports

Other reports by Jacqueline Lake

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.