Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0167, written 25 Mar 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 25 Mar 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0167 |
| Deceased | Christopher Sidle |
| Coroner | Jacqueline Lake |
| Coroner area | Norfolk |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust Hellesdon Hospital Drayton High Road Hellesdon Norwich NR6 5BE 1 CORONER I am JACQUELINE LAKE, HM Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Norfolk 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 12 July 2023, I commenced an investigation into the death of Christopher Edward SIDLE aged 51. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 22 March 2024. The medical cause of death was: 1a) 1b) 1c) 2) Traumatic Brain Injury Schizophrenia The conclusion of the inquest was: Mr Christopher Sidle threw himself out of a moving taxi and suffered fatal injuries. His state of mind at the time is not revealed by the evidence. There were missed opportunities to provide appropriate and timely care to Christopher and assessments carried out in respect of his mental health were inadequate. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Christopher Sidle had a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia in 2011. This was well controlled with medication for many years with short relapses in 2014 and 2021, being resolved following swift and effective intervention by mental health services. In March 2023, Christopher started to show signs of relapse and displayed symptoms following a pattern of those displayed in previous psychotic episodes, which increased over time. He was seen by primary services and referred to secondary services. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 Following triage on 21 April 2023, by the Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team (“CRHTT”) Christopher was returned to primary care. Christopher was referred again to secondary services and an assessment completed on 10 May 2023. Christopher said he had not been taking his medication for a month. Deterioration in Christopher’s mental health was recognised as the main risk and concordance with his medication needed to be achieved within three to four days. Christopher declined engagement with the CRHTT and said he would now take his medication. Christopher was allocated a Care Co Ordinator in the Community Mental Health Team on 17 May 2023 and was reviewed for several days to ensure medication concordance. These were exceptional steps taken by the Community Team due to concerns with regard to Christopher’s mental health. Christopher was again referred to the CRHTT on 19 May 2023 due to concerns regarding his mental ill health and displaying signs of psychosis and a pattern of previous psychotic symptoms. He was triaged and an assessment was undertaken on 20 May 2023. Christopher attended with his bag packed and was willing to be admitted for inpatient treatment. Evidence was heard this would not be possible in any event due to lack of available inpatient beds at that time. Christopher again said he was not taking his medication. Christopher was not taken on and again returned to the Community Team. The assessment was inadequate and psychotic markers were underestimated and/or missed. This was a missed opportunity to provide appropriate care and treatment to Christopher. Later that evening Christopher went missing from home and was later returned by police. From 22 May 2023, Christopher was monitored on a daily basis with regard to his medication for 7 to 10 days by the Community Team which they would not usually do, pending his being seen by a Consultant Psychiatrist. Christopher took his medication during this period. A recovery plan was completed and put in place by the Community Team by 1 June 2023, in which the crisis plan states: Deterioration in mental wellbeing - "It may be hard to notice, people should try to use their gut instincts, especially if they know me" and "Take over my responsibilities", "Check my medication adherence" and "I may not know when help is needed and would appreciate teams making decisions." Christopher agreed to see a Consultant Psychiatrist and to discuss a depot injection and was seen on 6 June 2023. A deterioration in his mental health was noted. Christopher declined depot injection and said he will take his oral medication. Christopher was seen by the Community Mental Health Team and arrangements were made for him to be seen in two to three weeks’ time to review his medication. On 28 June 2023, Christopher showed psychotic symptoms witnessed by his family and then the community team and a referral was made to the CRHTT for possible admission to hospital. Christopher was accepting of the referral and was present when this was triaged. That evening Christopher went missing again and was returned home by police. Requests were made by his family for Christopher’s history and ability to mask his symptoms be recorded in his notes prior to the Crisis assessment. The assessment was carried out on 29 June 2023 without discussion within the team, without reading Christopher’s records other than the triage document and the previous assessment note, due to insufficient time being allowed by the Team prior to the assessment. The assessment continued without knowledge of Christopher’s history and his ability to mask symptoms. There was no formal monitoring of the assessment which was allocated on the basis of availability of assessor rather than experience or suitability. This was the assessor’s first lone assessment. Christopher was not taken on by the CRHTT and returned for community care. The assessment was inadequate and was a further missed opportunity to provide appropriate inpatient care to Christopher, which more than minimally contributed to his death. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 Following a telephone conversation with Christopher’s family again providing relevant information with regard to Christopher’s history and mental health, no further action was taken and the decision not to take Christopher on by the team remained. This was a further missed opportunity to provide appropriate care and treatment to Christopher. Concern was raised in the Community Team on the morning of 30 June 2023 that Christopher had not been taken on by the Crisis Team. No immediate action was taken to ensure Christopher was re-assessed and this was a missed opportunity to provide immediate appropriate care to Christopher. A Mental Health Act assessment was requested by Christopher’s family. A discussion by the allocated assessor with the community team was requested and this was not responded to. On 1 July 2023, Christopher ordered a taxi to take him to an acute hospital. En-route while the taxi was travelling at approximately 30 mph Christopher jumped out of the taxi into the roadway. Christopher was taken to Addenbrookes hospital where he was found to have suffered life threatening head injuries. Life sustaining therapies ceased on 4 July 2023 and Christopher died. The evidence does not reveal whether Christopher had intention or if so, what that intention was, at the time of jumping out of the taxi. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. It is clear that the NSFT have treated the circumstances surrounding Christopher’s death seriously and have carried out an internal investigation, made recommendations and have put in place steps to prevent future deaths. However, there do remain outstanding matters of concern. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 1. Despite additional face to face training being made available to the CRHTT, witness evidence was heard which does not reflect the findings of the investigation and does not recognise the need for a full and proper assessment and the need not to accept a service user’s response to questions raised. 2. There remains a lack of understanding amongst the CRHTT with regard to the scope 3. and limitations of other services available within the community team. There remains a lack of understanding with regard to assessing a person’s mental capacity to make decisions and to fully and properly record the rationale for making decisions. 4. Support provided by FACT is usually carried out by telephone and will in some 5. circumstances not be sufficient to recognise ongoing concerns, for instance with regard to medication concordance. Important emails were not circulated to relevant personnel within the CRHTT. The evidence remains unclear what happened to the emails and why they did not reach the appropriate member of the team. 6. A person can be identified at triage risk assessment as being in need of an “immediate response, within 4 hours” but an assessment is then arranged for within a 24-hour period. 7. Evidence was heard of a nationwide shortage of inpatient mental health beds. Action has been taken by NSFT in an effort to minimise impact, but this does remain an ongoing concern. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by May 20, 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: (Sister) via Ashtons Legal I have also sent it to: Department of Health/Secretary of State CQC HSIB Healthwatch Norfolk NHS England & NHS Improvement who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 25 March 2024 Jacqueline Lake Senior Coroner for Norfolk County Hall Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2DH Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
From the Rt Hon Andrew Stephenson CBE MP Minister of State for Health and Secondary Care 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 24 May 2024 Jacqueline Lake Senior Coroner County Hall Norwich NR1 2UA Dear Ms Lake, Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 12 July 2023 about the death of Christopher Edward Sidle. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for mental health and patient safety. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Christopher’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. Please accept my sincere apologies for the significant delay in responding to this matter. Your report raises concerns about a shortage of inpatient mental health beds. We recognise how important it is that people with mental ill health get the level of care that is appropriate for their needs, and we want to ensure that people have access to the right mental health support, in the right place, and at the right time. Through the NHS Long Term Plan, we have invested almost £1 billion extra in community mental health care for adults by March 2024, compared to 2018/19, expanding and transforming community mental health services. The long-term aim set out within the NHS Long-Term Plan is to improve community support for those with serious mental illness to avoid the need for an inpatient admission where possible. As part of this, major expansion in funding for community mental health services commenced in all areas in 2021/22 which also aim to reduce pressure on beds. However, we recognise that there are occasions where a mental health bed is not available locally. The 2024/25 NHS priorities and operations planning guidance has a commitment to improving patient flow and working towards eliminating inappropriate out of area placements. Timely discharge of patients who are ready to be discharged is important to free up beds for those who need them. To support adult social care and discharges across the NHS, including from mental health inpatient settings, up to £2.8 billion was made available in 2023/24 and £4.7 billion in 2024/25, reducing bed occupancy. The Department has also worked with NHS England and other system partners to develop statutory guidance for discharge from all mental health inpatient settings, which was published in January 2024. This sets out how NHS bodies and local authorities can work together to support the discharge process, improving flow and ensuring the right support in the community. The guidance is available at: Hospital discharge and community support guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) For those in crisis, we are providing £150 million of capital investment for mental health urgent and emergency care infrastructure over 2023/24 and 2024/25. This includes investment into a range of wider local mental health infrastructure schemes, including new and improved crisis cafes, crisis houses, health-based places of safety and improvements to emergency departments and crisis lines. Over 160 schemes have been allocated funding by NHS England so far and 99 have been completed. The funding will also provide for specialised mental health ambulances which will be rolled out across the country – and be supported by practitioners trained to provide advice and treatments in cases of co- occurring physical and mental health issues. The care Quality Commission (CQC) continue to monitor the mental health sector and Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation trust (NSFT) through their regulatory monitoring powers. The CQC will also continue to work with and monitor the trust on an ongoing basis and, if there are concerns about risk to patients, will not hesitate to take action. Access to mental health care and the quality of the care remain a key area of concern. The Department is also committed to ensuring that significant progress is being made in Norfolk and Suffolk to ensure that mental health services are of the high standard that patients and their families should rightly expect. This is why I met and will continue to meet with a range of campaigners, local stakeholders, the Trust and delivery partners to discuss progress on the Trust’s improvement plan, improvements in mortality recording, and how we can better understand the number of deaths, as set out in the 2023 Grant Thornton report into the reporting of deaths at the Trust. Whilst some improvements have been made, as set out in the most recent Care Quality Commission inspection report, it is clear that vital improvements are needed to be made and embedded to address the very significant challenges that remain. The Trust must be transparent and engage closely with families and local stakeholders as it aims to continue to make progress with its partners in improving mental health support in the area. The Trust is in the national Recovery Support Programme, which means it is subject to the highest degree of national oversight in segment 4 of the NHS Oversight Framework. NHS England is providing the Trust with focused and integrated support, with a full-time improvement director in place, and representation in the trust’s governance meetings so it has full visibility of the latest data on the improvements needed. It will work closely with the trust and stakeholders to ensure that the recent progress made continues and is built on. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely, MARIA CAULFIELD MP
Ms Jacqueline Lake
Norfolk Coroner’s Service
County Hall
Martineau Lane
Norwich
Dear Ms Lake
NSFT Trust Management
Norfolk & Suffolk Foundation Trust
County Hall
Martineau Lane
Norwich
NR1 2DBH
Date: 17 May 2024
Regulations 28 and 29 (coroners investigations regulations 2013) notification made in response to
the death of Christopher Sidle
I write to you in respect of Christopher Sidle who died on 4th July 2023. His inquest concluded on 22 March
2024; at the end of the inquest, you raised concerns outlined in this response within a prevention of future
deaths notification.
I would like to reiterate to you and importantly to Christopher’s family our sincere regret and apologies for
the death of Christopher whilst under our care.
1. Despite additional face to face training being made available to the CRHTT, witness evidence
was heard which does not reflect the findings of the investigation and does not recognise
the need for a full and proper assessment and the need not to accept a service user’s
response to questions raised.
As a result of this concern the lead nurse from the care group has sought details from other mental
health Trusts of any additional training that they require their own CRHT assessors to undertake,
this was requested from the Mental Health Forum. This is a professional network of mental health
leaders from other organisations. Only one Trust responded stating that they did not provide any
additional training but recruited experienced Mental Health Clinicians. Therefore, we were unable to
benchmark against other organisations.
Nevertheless, in response to this incident and as presented at inquest, the Trust has developed a
core competency framework for CRHTT assessors which reflects fidelities outlined within the Core
CRISIS Fidelity Scale. This was developed by 31.08.23 in response to an action arising from the
Safety Incident Review (SIR) that was undertaken by the NSFT Patient Safety Team. Our action
was to ensure that new assessing staff complete an induction and all assessors within the team
complete core competency.
This commenced immediately following development of the core competency framework. All training
around competencies was completed for all senior nurses (band 7 and 8) by 24.01.24. Competency
assessment for all other assessors is scheduled and on track for completion by the end May 2024.
We have an additional and ongoing programme of work, delivering knowledge and understanding of
the standards set out in NSFT core competency framework, applying this framework to assess each
clinician within their individual line management supervision, offering additional support where this is
identified. This will be completed by the end of June 2024.
Trust HQ: County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich, NR1 2DH
Tel: 01603 421421 Web: www.nsft.nhs.uk
- 2 -
It is acknowledged that clinicians within CRHTT require a wide breadth of knowledge and
understanding and as such in April 2024 a recruitment and retention project was launched for
CRHTT. This project will attempt to recruit qualified and experienced clinicians, these will be
qualified band 5 with post registration experience. They will undertake a 12-week preceptorship
within CRHTT. New staff will be allocated to a named preceptor. Their preceptor will be an
experienced member of staff who will act as their professional support during their induction to the
CRHT Team. New team members will be expected to complete 80% of clinical time with their
preceptor within that first 12 weeks. They will attend weekly supervision and monthly reflective
practise, as well as complete a portfolio that will record evidence of their training and professional
development.
Recruitment began 06.05.24 and four nurses are in the process of being recruited with expected
start date 01.07.2024. Recruitment will continue until all posts have been filled.
Norfolk CRHTT is well established in utilising the 5P Formulation model in all interventions. This
model refers to 5 factors (Presenting problem; Precipitating; Perpetuating; Predisposing; and
Protective Factors) to support comprehensive understanding and formulation for care planning
purposes.
The next phase in line with NICE Guidance around Clinical Risk, is to routinely evidence all risk
using this same psychological approach. To support this approach the person in charge (a senior
mental health professional, minimum band 6) is now co located with the clinical team, immediately
available to support clinical discussion regarding patient care.
We will monitor the impact of these measures on patient care and assessment by undertaking a
monthly audit. This will inform an evaluation report that will be presented to the Care Group Quality
Assurance Group for monitoring purposes and to support improvement. For assurance purposes
the report findings will be presented to the Trust Safety group and onward to the Trust Board Quality
Committee.
The oversight of the CRHTT is further supported by an analysis of all Trust wide CRHTT’s which is
being undertaken to support the Chief Transformation Officer in CRHTT transformation.
2. There remains a lack of understanding with regard to assessing a person’s mental capacity
to make decisions and to fully and properly record the rationale for making decisions.
Bespoke training was designed in response to the difficulties identified in Mr Sidle’s care. This was
delivered by the Mental Capacity Act Lead (MCA) to the CRHTT involved in his care. This was an
interactive session delivered through “Teams” on 01.05.24 & 02.05.24. Staff awareness will be
further supported through discussion of case studies as part of table discussion, at the forthcoming
CRHTT training day on 21 August 2024.
To provide assurance that CRHTT apply their MCA knowledge consistently and appropriately, an
audit programme has been developed. A monthly audit will go live in Norfolk CRHTT on 20.05.24.
We will use our audit findings and other means (for example feedback from patient safety
investigations), to identify ongoing training needs. We will provide bespoke training where this is
identified as needed. This bespoke training offer is in addition to the Trust’s existing requirement for
all clinical assessors to receive mandatory e learning training in mental capacity every three years.
From July 2024 the MCA audit will be implemented Trust wide to secure similar assurance
regarding application of MCA across community and inpatient mental health teams.
Audit results will be reported to the Care Group Quality Assurance Group for monitoring and to
support further improvement. For broader assurance purposes the report findings will be presented
to the Trust Safety group and onward to the Trust Board Quality Committee.
- 3 -
3. There remains a lack of understanding amongst the CRHTT with regard to the scope and
limitations of other services available within the community team.
In May 2024 an updated Trust wide CRHTT Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) was ratified and
implemented across the Trust.
The SOP addresses liaison between CMHT and CRHTT:
• 7.4 states ‘Assessments ideally are carried out with CRHTT staff and joint assessments with
other community staff are actively encouraged. Response time for face-to-face assessments are
key so if paired staff are not available for assessment, assessments may be carried out (taking
into account risk and safety issues),..’
Through this the SOP highlights the importance of teams having clear discussions about the scope
of services available from each team at the time of transferring care.
In addition, within the Norfolk CRHTT, experienced practitioners attend weekly interface meetings
with community teams to increase their knowledge of each other's service.
4. Support provided by Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) is usually carried out
by telephone and will in some circumstances not be sufficient to recognise ongoing
concerns, for instance with regard to medication concordance.
An initial scoping exercise is being undertaken as part of Quality Improvement initiative led by the
Deputy service director, to understand the existing arrangements and opportunities for
improvement. in FACT delivery. This will report to the newly established (April 2024) Trust wide
Safety Group to ensure there is consistency regarding the application of FACT. A review of existing
FACT arrangements across the 5 Adult CMHTs in North Norfolk and Norwich inclusive of
recommendations and a clear action plan, will be received by the Chief Nurse by 31st July 2024.
5. Important emails were not circulated to relevant personnel within the CRHTT. The evidence
remains unclear what happened to the emails and why they did not reach the appropriate
member of the team.
During the period under review at Inquest there were two separate (north and south) e mail boxes.
These have now been merged into one generic team email address. The process for receipt and
management of emails to the CRHTT generic team e mail address has been reviewed.
A new process is in place that ensures that all emails are regularly checked and actioned by the
qualified practitioner, as person in charge (PIC).
The PIC is the front door for all referrals and triages, responsible for the allocation and ‘flow’ of work
through-out the shift.
To increase resilience, administrative support has now been allocated to assist the PIC with
weekday administrative tasks which includes monitoring the inbox.
Outside normal office hours (on weekdays 17:00 - 20:00) oversight of the PIC email is now provided
by a senior support worker (band 4) who refers to the PIC throughout the shift.
Support to the PIC from a designated senior support worker has also been introduced for weekend
days.
- 4 -
Night shift is covered by 2 clinicians and 2 senior support workers with shared responsibility. All
contacts are recorded on to the Night Handover Log. The embedding of this new process will be
monitored through a six-month audit which will commence 20.05.24.
The audit findings will report to the Care Group Quality Assurance Group for monitoring purposes
and to support further improvement. For assurance purposes the report will be presented to the
Trust Safety group and onward to the Quality Committee.
6. A person can be identified at triage risk assessment as being in need of an “immediate
response, within 4 hours” but an assessment is then arranged for within a 24-hour period.
This case highlighted the importance of professionals having the required skill and competency in
risk assessment to inform their decision to re grade a referral, furthermore that the decision is made
within a clear process.
The development and assurance of core staff competency (described under section 1 above)
will support appropriate risk assessment decisions.
The requirement to discuss referral regrade with another clinician is clearly described within the
Trust Clinical Harms SOP (updated February 2024) and included within the updated Trust wide
CRHTT SOP (17.05.24). These documents prompt staff to follow the required approach.
We will evaluate compliance against this standard through local management monitoring with
additional second level assurance provided through an audit that will be completed by the Patient
Safety and Quality Team by mid-July 2024. This will enable us to provide assurance that all
decisions to regrade a referral are being made by two clinicians in line with Trust standard.
This will be reported to the Care Group Quality Assurance Group for monitoring purposes and to
support improvement. For further assurance purposes the report will be presented to the Trust
Safety group and onward to the Quality Committee.
The tragic death of Mr Sidle has been a key learning point for the Trust. As described above, a
number of actions have been undertaken that address the concerns set out within the Regulation 28
and 29 notice. Further to this, quality improvement in our CHRTT will remain a key focus.
Yours sincerely,
Chief Executive Officer
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.