Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Kenneth King

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0653, written 27 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Nov 2024
Reference2024-0653
DeceasedKenneth King
CoronerJacqueline Lake
Coroner areaNorfolk
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

Norfolk Community Health & Care NHS Trust (NCHC)
Woodlands House
Norwich Community Hospital
Bowthorpe Road
Norwich
NR2 3TU

1

CORONER

I am Jacqueline LAKE, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Norfolk

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 20 November 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kenneth George
Willard KING aged 76. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 26
November 2024.

The medical cause of death was:

1a)
1b)
1c)
2)

Septic Shock
Bilateral Leg Cellulitis

Type Two Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension

The conclusion of the inquest was:
Mr King died from septic shock due to bilateral leg cellulitis. His wounds were not always
dressed in accordance with the recommended time scales.

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Mr King had a significant medical history. He was referred to the Community Nursing Team
in June 2023 due to a wound on his right ankle. Mr King was rereferred in July 2023 when
he had three wound sites. He was seen and continued to receive assessment and dressings
to his wounds in the community. At various times there were delays in Mr King being seen
in accordance with recommendations sometimes by five or six days. Mr King was at times
prescribed antibiotics.
On 10 October 2023 blood tests were taken and Mr King’s inflammatory markers were
significantly elevated. He attended hospital but then self-discharged. He returned to
hospital the next day and was admitted. Following intravenous antibiotics he was
discharged to Ambulatory care on 14 October 2023 and returned to hospital on a daily basis
for intravenous antibiotics until 21 October 2023, (not attending on 20 October 2023) when
he was discharged to community care with oral antibiotics for five days. Mr King was not
referred to the community nursing team.
An urgent visit by community nursing was requested on 27 October 2023 when Mr King had
signs of infection.
On 28 October 2023 Mr King was triaged and seen that day and his dressings were

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 changed.
Mr King was seen on 31 October and on 5 November 2023 when his dressings were
changed.
Swabs were taken on 8 November 2023 when a huge amount of strike through was noted
on the left leg and a moderate amount of exude green in colour present on the right leg.
Evidence was heard there was a mild malodor.
Mr King’s dressings were changed on the morning of 10 November 2023. Evidence was
heard there was no malodor and no sign of infection on this occasion neither of which is
referred to in the written records. A referral was made for increased visits. Later that day
Mr King was admitted to Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital with cellulitis of both legs,
being generally unwell and confused. Mr King’s condition continued to deteriorate and he
died on 12 November 2023 from septic shock due to bilateral leg cellulitis.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
(brief summary of matters of concern)

NCHC have taken action and put in place many steps to prevent future deaths. However, I
do have two ongoing concerns as follows:

1. Evidence was heard that there is no formal structure in place as to when or with regard

to the frequency of carrying out physiological observations on patients in the
community. Observations are required to be taken if the attending clinician has any
concerns about the patient's wellbeing or a deterioration in their condition, or at the
request of a senior clinician or GP.
No specific questions are asked of the patient, such as if they are feeling unwell, have
pain or localised heat, the attending practitioner relies on general conversation carried
out at their attendance to help form a view as to whether observations are required to
be taken.
It was accepted in evidence that the decision to perform observations relies on the
clinical judgment of the relevant clinician, which is a subjective decision which may be
exercised incorrectly and at variance with other clinicians.
Different clinicians carry out visits in the community and so have no overall view of a
patient's presentation and any deterioration. Written records are available but evidence
was heard that in this case, on the last visit, the record of the previous attendance was
looked at and no history prior to that.
Evidence was heard that Health Care Practitioners may have limited clinical training and
rely on instructions and advice from trained nurses.
In this case, evidence was heard that Mr King presented as feeling well but had high
inflammatory markers, which may mask when observations are required to be carried
out. Some patients may not be forthcoming about any symptoms unless specifically
asked.

2. Mr King died a year ago and although there is a training programme which is being

devised and rolled out it is not expected to be in place for a further eighteen months.
The policy to prevent bank staff applying for roles when they have not undergone the
required training is not yet in place.

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or
your organisation) have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 namely by January 22, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons




The Family of the Deceased
Fosters Solicitors, Legal Representative for the Family
Legal Services, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital

I have also sent it to







Department of Health and Social Care
Care Quality Commission (CQC)
HSSIB (Health Services Safety Investigations Body)
Healthwatch Norfolk
NHS ENGLAND & NHS IMPROVEMENT

who may find it useful or of interest.

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or
of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of
interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

Dated: 27/11/2024

Jacqueline LAKE
Senior Coroner for Norfolk
County Hall
Martineau Lane
Norwich
NR1 2DH

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Norfolk Community Health Care NHS Trust (PDF)
Clinical Governance and Quality Team 
Woodlands House 
Norwich Community Hospital 
Bowthorpe Road 
Norwich 
NR2 3TU 

Tel: 

Email: 

Website: www.nchc.nhs.uk 

Ref: 
Kenneth George Willard KING - Regulation 28 
Report 

23 January 2025 

Dear Senior Coroner, 

I am writing to you in response to the Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths, relating to the 
death of Mr Kenneth George Willard King, dated 27th November 2024. Please find set out below the 
summary of actions taken, and those planned to be taken, in relation to your concerns. I have also 
enclosed a copy of the full Trust action plan including timelines for implementation.  We would like to 
apologise if information previously provided and presented during the inquest has not provided 
yourself or Mr King’s family with the necessary assurances that Norfolk Community Health and Care 
(NCH&C) are committed to the delivery of safe, effective and evidence-based care. We would also like 
to apologise for any additional distress this may have caused Mr King’s family and offer our sincere 
condolences for their loss once again.  

Following receipt of the report, a working group consisting of senior quality leaders, senior operational 
leaders and subject matter experts was commenced on 11th December 2024. The concerns raised 
within the report were reviewed and further areas for learning, improvement and development have 
been identified. These have been detailed in the attached action plan which is being regularly 
monitored by trust governance processes including risk group and quality committee. The action 
themes and focus areas include: 

•  Monitoring and Recognising the Deteriorating Patient in the Community  
•  Quality Assurance in Community Services  
•  Clinical Skills and Competencies  
•  Community Demand and Capacity Issues Impacting on Quality of Care and Patient Safety  
•  Temporary Worker Service 

In relation to your specific concerns (in bold), please find responses below. Full details and timelines 
can be found on the enclosed action plan. 

Concern 1: Evidence was heard that there is no formal structure in place as to when or with 
regard to the frequency of carrying out physiological observations on patients in the 
community. Observations are required to be taken if the attending clinician has any concerns 
about the patient's wellbeing or a deterioration in their condition, or at the request of a senior 
clinician or GP. 

  Norfolk Community Health & Care NHS Trust  
  Norwich Community Hospital, Bowthorpe Rd, Norwich, NR2 3TU 

LOOKING AFTER YOU LOCALLY 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No specific questions are asked of the patient, such as if they are feeling unwell, have pain or 
localised heat, the attending practitioner relies on general conversation carried out at their 
attendance to help form a view as to whether observations are required to be taken. 
It was accepted in evidence that the decision to perform observations relies on the clinical 
judgment of the relevant clinician, which is a subjective decision which may be exercised 
incorrectly and at variance with other clinicians. 

In this case, evidence was heard that Mr King presented as feeling well but had high 
inflammatory markers, which may mask when observations are required to be carried out. 
Some patients may not be forthcoming about any symptoms unless specifically asked. 
Trust guidance was updated and disseminated to all clinical staff to mandate the completion of 
physiological observations on every initial patient visit with immediate effect. A community patient 
escalation plan has been published and cascaded to support staff in identifying patients at risk of 
deterioration and the escalation actions that are required which includes the completion of 
physiological observations.  

A community patient assessment guide is being created which will provide exploratory questions that 
community staff can use to ascertain any changes in the patient’s condition and identify if any further 
action is required. Both of these documents and how to use them will be included in the Deteriorating 
Patient training. 

Different clinicians carry out visits in the community and so have no overall view of a patient's 
presentation and any deterioration. Written records are available but evidence was heard that 
in this case, on the last visit, the record of the previous attendance was looked at and no 
history prior to that. 
Due to operational pressures and the need to work flexibly with staff allocation to ensure patients with 
priority and complex needs are seen in a timely manner, it continues to be very difficult to provide 
consistent staff allocation to individual patients. Whilst this would be best practice for continuity of 
care, escalation actions such as the movement of staff are sometimes required to minimise risk to our 
patients. Whenever possible continuity of care is maintained and patients most at risk or at end of life 
would be prioritised. Handovers are completed to share learning and patient updates and clinical 
leads are available to support with complex patient discussions and escalation of conditions. As a trust 
we recognise the importance of continuity of care and are currently piloting a named clinician and 
geographical area caseload approach which is being analysed and will inform the development of our 
future community nursing model. 

All community clinicians are given thirty minutes protected time each day for visit preparation, which 
includes reviewing of patient records prior to visits. We acknowledge that the record review can be 
variable across clinicians practice and that is an area of focus to understand why. It is also recognised 
that clinicians responding to urgent care visits may not have the ability to review the record at all prior 
to the visit. We are looking at ways to ensure more consistency with the senior operational and quality 
leadership team. 

Evidence was heard that Health Care Practitioners may have limited clinical training and rely 
on instructions and advice from trained nurses.  
The trust holds a clinical training programme that is open to registered and non-registered clinicians 
as per the competency matrix. Additional sessions are held, such as the Deteriorating Patient 
Training, which is open to all staff. From review of the attendance logs, it is acknowledged that there is 
lower uptake of this training by community staff, particularly podiatrists and non-registered clinicians 
including phlebotomists. The training sessions will have a targeted focus on those staff groups, and 
we are currently gathering information to understand the barriers and challenges to good attendance 
levels. It is also recognised that different staff groups will need different levels of training.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The current competency matrix has been under review and a newly developed community 
competency matrix has been out to consultation and is in the final stages of ratification. To support the 
competency management and sign off process, we have also developed competency passports 
aligned to each role. Each Place area will be completing a gap analysis of competency and training 
needs to ensure that our current clinical training programme is accessible and offers appropriate 
availability. 

Our non-registered clinicians do work under the delegation of registered staff who provide ongoing 
advice, support and review. Shadow and observational review shifts are completed to ensure 
competency of individuals in both practical skill and theoretical knowledge. This is an ongoing review 
process and will be supported with the competency passports. In addition to this monitoring and 
overview, there is an expectation that staff work within their limitations and escalate where further 
support and development is required. 

Concern 2: Mr King died a year ago and although there is a training programme which is being 
devised and rolled out it is not expected to be in place for a further eighteen months. 
We would like to apologise if information previously presented has not been clear or has caused 
yourself or Mr King’s family any confusion. NCH&C has a full clinical training programme and currently 
is and will continue to be delivered on a rolling basis across various locations. Whilst most of the 
clinical training is provided by our clinical education team, additional or enhanced sessions are 
provided by subject matter experts. One example of this is the wound care and tissue viability training 
package that is provided by the Tissue Viability Specialist Nurse. I have included the 2025 wound care 
and tissue viability training plan for information. As part of the action plan, we are currently scoping all 
clinical training to understand previous attendance levels and accessibility of sessions, so we can 
understand barriers or challenges to accessing the training. The tissue viability and wound care 
pathway has been a priority workstream within our community transformation programme, ‘Better for 
All’. The workstream has a number of quality improvement initiatives and focus areas such as the 
implementation of the National Wound Care Strategy guidance and the use of digital technology in 
wound care, which have different timeframes for completion. For clarity, the eighteen-month timeframe 
stated at the inquest was relating to the Better for all transformation programme duration and some of 
the individual initiatives, rather than the training programme which is on a rolling agenda.  

The policy to prevent bank staff applying for roles when they have not undergone the required 
training is not yet in place. 
We acknowledge that there is inconsistent and variable levels of clinical supervision and monitoring/ 
management of clinical competencies for this staff group. The majority of our bank staff are well 
known to the substantive teams and are supported with training and clinical supervision. The 
competency passports and matrix will provide a robust process for competency management moving 
forward. As part of the interim plan, restrictions are in place so that only temporary worker staff known 
to the local team and where competencies are signed off will be able to book community shifts. 

We hope that the information provided offers you full assurance that immediate learning and actions 
have been taken and further actions are planned to prevent recurrence. If you wish to discuss 
anything further following receipt of this letter and action plan, I would be very happy to meet you.    
Please do not hesitate to contact the Clinical Governance and Quality Team on the details at the top 
of this letter. 

Yours Sincerely 

Executive Director of Nursing and Quality 

Encs

Related reports

Other reports by Jacqueline Lake

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.