Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Edith Alden

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0196, written 16 Apr 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report16 Apr 2024
Reference2024-0196
DeceasedEdith Alden
CoronerJacqueline Lake
Coroner areaNorfolk
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 
The Limes Care Home 
16A Drayton Wood Road 
Hellesdon 
Norwich 
Norfolk 
NR6  5BY 

1  CORONER 

I am Jacqueline LAKE, HM Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Norfolk 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 29 September 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Edith Jane ALDEN 
aged 89.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 10 April 2024. 

The medical cause of death was: 

1a) 

Traumatic Subdural and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage with intraventricular 

extension 

1b) 
1c) 
2) 

Fall 

Frailty, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 

The conclusion of the inquest was: 
Mrs Alden was assessed at very high risk of falls and required supervision when mobilising 
outside. On 13 September 2021 Mrs Alden, unnoticed and unsupervised, got up from her 
chair, walked through the communal area, opened an unlocked door and stepped outside. 
There she fell. Mrs Alden suffered severe head injuries and died as a result. Mrs Alden’s 
death is contributed to by neglect. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Edith Alden had a history of falls and was admitted to The Limes Residential Home on 11 
June 2021. Care Plan and Risk Assessments deemed Mrs Alden as being at a very high risk 
of falling and measures in place to control this risk included reference to staff monitoring 
her, supervision and mobilising with her frame plus the support of one carer. The evidence 
does not clearly reveal what the practical interpretation of these individual measures was. 
On 26 August 2021 Mrs Alden had an unwitnessed fall in her room. 
On 13 September 2021 Mrs Alden was sitting in a communal lounge. Four carers were 
present in the communal area carrying out handover. The door from the lounge area to the 
outside garden area was closed and unlocked. 
During handover, unnoticed and unsupervised and without the support of one carer, Mrs 
Alden got up from her chair, made her way out of the small lounge area, through the large 
lounge area, opened the patio doors and stepped out into the garden area. 
Mrs Alden was then heard to scream. 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 Mrs Alden was found unresponsive lying on her back on the patio. Emergency services were 
called at 20.20 hours. Mrs Alden regained consciousness and was moved inside to keep her 
warm.  On Mrs Alden’s condition deteriorating emergency services were called again at 
22.04 and 22.25. Emergency services arrived at 22.45 and Mrs Alden was taken to Norfolk 
and Norwich University Hospital where CT scan showed a subdural and subarachnoid 
haemorrhage.  Mrs Alden’s condition continued to deteriorate and she died on 25 
September 2021. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

1.  Care Plans and Risk Assessments were not consistent and clear as to what steps 

were required to mitigate the risks of Mrs Alden falling. 

2.  Staff were unclear in evidence as to what was required in respect of Mrs Alden to 

mitigate the risks of her falling. 

3.  Residents deemed as at very high risk of falls were, and still are, allowed in 

communal areas with no carer present. 

4.  Staffing levels may be insufficient for the number of residents. Evidence was heard 

that “staff can’t be everywhere at once”. 

5.  The Inspection Report dated 6 October 2022, carried out following Mrs Alden’s 

death, found “There were enough staff on duty to meet people’s needs and people 
told us they never had to wait long for assistance. The registered manager had 
reviewed how staff were working and deployed staff in a way that meant that the 
right staff were in the right places when needed. This meant people in communal 
areas were never left alone ...”. This sentence is not supported by the evidence 
heard at inquest. 

6.  Residents deemed as at very high risk of falls were, and still are, in their bedrooms 
with a call bell and no other means to alert staff if they get out of bed and mobilise, 
this includes leaving their room and entering corridor areas. I am concerned this 
will lead to carers responding to a fallen resident, rather than preventing the fall. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by June 09, 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons: 

, Next of Kin 
, Next of Kin 

, Next of Kin 

, Fosters Solicitors, Norwich (family legal) 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 I have also sent it to: 

Care Quality Commission 
Healthwatch Norfolk 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 16/04/2024 

Jacqueline LAKE 
Senior Coroner for Norfolk 
County Hall 
Martineau Lane 
Norwich 
NR1 2DH 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from The Limes Care Home (PDF)
Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Regulation 28): 
The Limes Residential Care Home’s Response 

JUNE 2024 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Coroner’s concerns in relation to The Limes Residential Care 
Home 

CORONER’S CONCERNS  

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is 
taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.  

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:  

1.  Care Plans and Risk Assessments were not consistent and clear as to what steps 

were required to mitigate the risks of Mrs Alden falling.  

2.  Staff were unclear in evidence as to what was required in respect of Mrs Alden to 

mitigate the risks of her falling.  

3.  Residents deemed as at very high risk of falls were, and still are, allowed in 

communal areas with no carer present.  

4.  Staffing levels may be insufficient for the number of residents. Evidence was heard 

that “staff can’t be everywhere at once”.  

5.  The Inspection Report dated 6 October 2022, carried out following Mrs Alden’s 
death, found “There were enough staff on duty to meet people’s needs and 
people told us they never had to wait long for assistance. The registered manager 
had reviewed how staff were working and deployed staff in a way that meant that 
the right staff were in the right places when needed. This meant people in 
communal areas were never left alone ...”. This sentence is not supported by the 
evidence heard at inquest.  

6.  Residents deemed as at very high risk of falls were, and still are, in their bedrooms 

with a call bell and no other means to alert staff if they get out of bed and 
mobilise, this includes leaving their room and entering corridor areas. I am 
concerned this will lead to carers responding to a fallen resident, rather than 
preventing the fall. 

The above concerns were shared via email following the conclusion of the inquest with NCC 
and CQC Dated-11/04/2024 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Summary  
Keeping our resident’s safe is of high importance to us as a social care service. We strive to 
mitigate and prevent risks wherever possible. 

The following are key areas of improvement already implemented or scheduled for 
implementation. 

Training 
We have reviewed the training we have in place to support staff. We have introduced a 
‘Falls Champion’ role to provide continuous drive and improvements to our working 
practices. This is an active member of the staff team providing support, guidance and 
coaching around falls prevention. Knowledge and understanding checks through 
competency assessment and sign off following completion of this for each staff member.  
Our in house trainer has completed a falls, train the trainer programme, date 21st May 2024 
this will also support ongoing improvements for both the training package being provided 
and the Falls Champion role. We will continue to develop and adapt our training with 
further awareness sessions being offered to friends, families and advocates etc. 

‘Falls Prevention is Everyone’s Business’ 
‘Falls Prevention is Everyone’s Business’ is an awareness raising publicity campaign we 
introduced in May 2024. To build and develop all staff awareness and understanding. This 
initiative is further going to be rolled out across the home to involve all stakeholders and 
will include residents, their families and friends. We are also hoping to include health and 
social care professionals further with its continued development. This will then become a 
whole home approach. We envisage this will just be the start of a new way of working 
where we promote and talk about risk management and falls prevention on a daily basis.  
‘Falls Prevention is Everyone’s Business’ is displayed on the staff knowledge board within 
the home and has also been used as topic of the week for a six week rolling period. Making 
it a discussion point of reference as part of the daily handover process, so all staff are 
supported and aware of the importance of falls prevention and management. Promotional 
posters, leaflets and other resources are actively being used and made available. 

‘Getting Active’ 
An initiative we will be introducing during June 2024 to build and develop resident’s physical 
abilities, to improve muscle strength, bone density and to support health and wellbeing.  

Policies and procedure reviews 
Policies and procedures are continuously reviewed as part of our development as a 
company. Special emphasis has been given to any of our policies linked to falls, including 
environmental factors, individual risks, actions to be taken to improve staff guidance around 
understanding and interventions required to mitigate risks where possible. 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Coroner’s concern number one 

Care Plans and Risk Assessments were not consistent and clear as to what 
steps were required to mitigate the risks of Mrs Alden falling 

Actions taken prior to the inquest: 

Care plans and risk assessments were fully reviewed and revised. Working with an external 
consultancy for guidance and advice we changed the structure and wording of our care 
plans to better reflect a person focused approach with a higher emphasise of risk 
management embedded within these documents. 

Training was completed for senior staff to support with completion of care plans. Bite size 
care plan training was cascaded to regional deputy and team leader and then introduced 
across the senior staff team to develop their knowledge, understanding and reasoning for 
the changes. Training completed in relation to falls linked to Safeguarding. Face to Face 
training was brought in to support staff knowledge and confidence with regards to falls 
linked to Safeguarding to continue to promote an open and transparent workplace. 

Management changes were implemented. Manager in situ at the time of the incident left 
the role, initially regional manager stepped into this role whilst a new manager was 
recruited. New manager in post from May 2022. Further management changes in March 
2024, where we introduced an interim manager, she is currently in post to continue to drive 
improvements. 

Review of equipment in place to support the individual and what additional measures we 
can put in place to further support making sure details are within care plans and risk 
assessments.  

Auditing processes reviewed and updated to actively identify inconsistencies within care 
plans and risk assessments.  

Garden access risk assessments completed for each individual and periodically reviewed. 

Actions taken immediately following the inquest: 

Meeting with the management teams across the company to discuss actions to take place 
with immediate effect.  

4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 These included:  
Falls Champion role see above ‘Training’ for details. 

Risk management risk overview sheets within the home shared at Handover meetings to 
highlight the risks associated with residents to all staff, to build on knowledge and 
understanding. Risks to be aware of on Person Centred Software (electronic care plan 
system used) checked and updated if required, again to support staff knowledge and 
understanding. Pre-admission assessments of falls risk has been introduced to identify and 
mitigate risks prior to admission. Falls risk analysis completed with the management team 
for the whole home, to drive further improvements and identify and mitigate risks where 
possible. Falls analysis is completed monthly for the whole home, this is managed as and 
when falls occur with weekly clinical meetings and weekly accident/incident sign offs by 
management. 

Falls assessments fully reviewed and corroboration of information checked against mobility 
and function assessments and care plan need to make sure information staff are accessing is 
current and accurate. Time line and actions taken listed for each individual.  

Assistive technology review of all equipment currently in use, additional equipment 
considered and introduced where appropriate. Equipment is reviewed following any 
changes to an individual’s physical, mental or emotional health. This is evidenced within 
assessments linked to the relevant change and within weekly clinical meetings. 
Management, senior staff are responsible for making these changes. 

Auditing care plans and risk assessments continue to be reviewed on a monthly basis as a 
minimum or when there is a significant change. Care plan audits have been completed with 
regional management support, and is now set as 10% of the home each month, being 
completed by the management team. This includes all aspects of the care plan including risk 
assessments, Mental Capacity assessments, front page, planned care, photo etc. 

Continuation of referrals to the relevant health professionals, to support with individuals 
plans and needs.  

Continuation of reporting to Safeguarding and CQC volume of falls (in accordance with 
statutory and NCC guidance). This links to referrals back to Social Services for reviews where 
required for additional funding or notice being issued as we are unable to meet an 
individuals specific needs. 

Further actions we plan to take: 

Multifactorial Falls Risk Screening Tool introduced May 2024 to support and pull together 
the work for each individual, this includes an action log that shows how we measure the 
outcomes and changes for each person. 

5 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Our approach developing the whole home approach to be proactive with managing and 
mitigating falls wherever possible. 

Progress continue to review, develop and improve auditing processes and policies to 
support continued improvements. 

6 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Coroner’s concern number two 

Staff were unclear in evidence as to what was required in respect of Mrs 
Alden to mitigate the risks of her falling 

In addition to the remarks under 1 above the follow actions relate to Concern 2 

Actions taken prior to inquest: 

Health professional referrals completed so involvement and guidance is accessed to 
mitigate falls for individuals who have experienced falls. 

Actions taken immediately following the inquest: 

Falls prevention to be an agenda item for meetings to promote the further awareness.  

Further actions we plan to take: 

Falls awareness training is being developed further, our trainer has completed a falls train 
the trainer session on 21st May 2024. Following this a full review of our current training 
linked to falls will be completed and additional details added to both the Moving and 
Handling training and Safeguarding training. 

Staff knowledge and understanding checks – this will be completed through the format of a 
questionnaire linked to the ‘React to Falls’ guidance used as part of the Champion role being 
introduced.  

Manager’s meeting standard agenda item for each meeting, discussing falls at every 
possible opportunity. Making sure it isn’t dropped from any priority list and making sure it 
continues to be developed further within the staff teams and whole homes approach. 

Activity and Wellbeing provision reviews – ‘Getting Active’ being introduced for our 
residents. Adding more physical activities into the weekly planners – consideration of 
timings/involvement/resources and impact. 

7 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Coroner’s concern number three 

Residents deemed as at very high risk of falls were, and still are, 
allowed in communal areas with no carer present  

In addition to the remarks in 1 and 2 above, the following actions relate to Concern 3. 

Actions taken prior to inquest: 

Dependency tool in place and used to calculate staffing hours – occupancy has fluctuated 
over time, staffing hours has mainly been maintained at our highest dependency score to 
support continuity across the staff team. 

Actions taken immediately following the inquest: 

Care staff are allocated to communal areas of the home to provide relevant help and 
support for any residents within these areas. 

Assistive technology in place within communal areas of the home for those residents 
identified as needing to alert staff if they are attempting to mobilise independently. 

Dependency tool completed to review staffing April 2024 (overstaffed by 18hrs a day). 

Garden use with staff allocated to this area now in place. Staff within the garden areas are 
equipped with a radio (walkie talkie) to alert colleagues within the home. i.e in an 
emergency or if someone requires support with something. Staff knowledge and 
understanding was confirmed through staff memo and handover process. 

Further actions we plan to take: 

Level of needs continue to review for each resident and refer back to NCC if additional 
funding needs are required to be met. 

Involving other stakeholders as much as possible, including health professionals, Norfolk 
County Council, friends, families and advocates. 

8 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Coroner’s concern number four 

Staffing levels may be insufficient for the number of residents. 
Evidence was heard that “staff can’t be everywhere at once” 

In addition to the remarks under 1, 2 and 3 above the following actions relate to Concern 4. 

Actions taken prior to inquest: 

Key coded access was fitted to the door to the garden, access with staff support is required. 

Actions taken immediately following the inquest: 

Dependency tool completed to review staffing April 2024 (overstaffed by 18hrs a day). 

Further actions we plan to take: 

Continue to use the dependency tool to calculate staffing hours, as and when changes occur 
in the service. Working with above the level of staffing required where possible. 

9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Coroner’s concern number five 

The Inspection Report dated 6 October 2022, carried out following  
Mrs Alden’s death, found “There were enough staff on duty to meet 
people’s needs and people told us they never had to wait long for 
assistance. The registered manager had reviewed how staff were 
working and deployed staff in a way that meant that the right staff 
were in the right places when needed. This meant people in  
communal areas were never left alone ...”. This sentence is not 
supported by the evidence heard at inquest 

Actions taken prior to, follow and plan to take, are all listed above under Concern 1, 2, 3 and 
4. 

I’d respectfully draw Coroner’s attention to the fact that this is a report of the regulator and 
as such only the regulator can defend their report. We do happen to agree with CQC’s 
independent assessment dated 5th October 2022. The inspection is a ‘snapshot’ of our 
service. Our internal auditing processes provide evidence of our staff being allocated to 
areas throughout the service to effectively meet individual’s needs, which gives us the 
assurance that the remarks in the CQC report were accurate. 

10 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Coroner’s concern number six 

Residents deemed as at very high risk of falls were, and still are, in 
their bedrooms with a call bell and no other means to alert staff if  
they get out of bed and mobilise, this includes leaving their room  
and entering corridor areas. I am concerned this will lead to carers 
responding to a fallen resident, rather than preventing the fall 

In addition to the remarks listed under 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, the following actions relate top 
Concern 6. 

Actions taken prior to inquest: 

Assistive technology was also used in bedroom areas of the service, this included sensor 
mats, door alarms etc. 

Staffing allocations within the home are split into different corridors to support residents 
remaining in their bedrooms. 

Actions taken immediately following the inquest: 

Further actions we plan to take: 

Developing additional resources for friends and families, guidance to support, introducing a 
whole service approach. 

11

Related reports

Other reports by Jacqueline Lake

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.