Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0637, written 18 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 18 Nov 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0637 |
| Deceased | John Riley |
| Coroner | Jacqueline Lake |
| Coroner area | Norfolk |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Manor House Care Home The Manor House Skeyton Road North Walsham Norfolk NR28 0LU 1 CORONER I am Jacqueline LAKE, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Norfolk 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 22 February 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of John Edward RILEY aged 73. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 15 November 2024. The medical cause of death was: Neck Fracture Fall 1a) 1b) 1c) 2) The conclusion of the inquest was: Accident 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Riley suffered life changing injuries in a road traffic collision in 1976 and was dependent on others for his care. Mr Riley entered Manor House Residential Home in 2017 and was provided with personal care. His mobility was severely limited. Risk Assessments found that Mr Riley was deemed at low risk of falling out of bed. His bed was to be placed at the lowest setting when unattended and he was subject to two hourly checks at night time. On 8 February 2024, Mr Riley was checked at 01.10 hours and 03.00 hours. When checked at about 05.25 hours Mr Riley was lying on the floor with the bed frame under his neck. Emergency services were called and Mr Riley was declared dead at the scene. The evidence does not reveal the means by which Mr Riley came out of bed and onto the floor. Mr Riley died from a fracture to his neck. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: Evidence was heard that observations were sometimes not carried out every two hours as required. In January 2024 observations were late on ten occasions and on one prior occasion to 8 February 2024 in February 2024. Evidence were heard that some action has been taken by Manor House Residential Home to reduce late observations. Evidence was also heard that some observations are still being carried out outside of the two hour period. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by January 10, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons (sister) I have also sent it to CQC Healthwatch Norfolk Department of Transport who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 18/11/2024 Jacqueline LAKE Senior Coroner for Norfolk County Hall Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2DH Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Response to the Coroner's Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths 1. THIS RESPONSE IS MADE ON BEHALF OF The Manor House Care Home 2. REGULATION 28 REPORT This response follows a report by Jacqueline Lake, Senior Coroner for Norfolk. 3. INVESTIGATION AND INQUEST On 22 February 2024, the Senior Coroner commenced an investigation into the death of John Riley, aged 73, who died on 8 February 2024 at The Manor House Care Home. The investigation concluded at the end of an Inquest on 15 November 2024, conducted by the Senior Coroner. The Senior Coroner gave a conclusion of Accident. The medical cause of death was: 1a) Neck fracture 1b) Fall 4. CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH Mr Riley suffered life changing injuries in a road traffic collision in 1976 and was dependent on others for his care. Mr Riley entered The Manor House Care Home in 2017 and was provided with personal care. His mobility was severely limited. Risk Assessments found that Mr Riley was deemed at low risk of falling out of bed. His bed was to be placed at the lowest setting when unattended and he was subject to two hourly checks at night time. On 8 February 2024, Mr Riley was checked at 01.10 hours and 03.00 hours. When checked at about 05.25 hours, Mr Riley was lying on the floor with the bed frame under his neck. Emergency services were called and Mr Riley was declared dead at the scene. The evidence does not reveal the means by which Mr Riley came out of bed and onto the floor. Mr Riley died from a fracture to his neck. 5. CORONER’S CONCERNS The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows (as stated on the Coroner's Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths): I. Evidence was heard that observations were sometimes not carried out every two hours as required. In January 2024 observations were late on ten occasions and on one prior occasion to 8 February 2024 in February 2024. II. Evidence was heard that some action has been taken by Manor House Residential Home to reduce late observations. Evidence was also heard that some observations are still being carried out outside of the two hour period. 6. ACTION TAKEN The management at The Manor House Care Home has taken this matter very seriously. An internal investigation and Root Cause Analysis were undertaken following the incident, and the management at the home have continued to review their processes throughout, and following, the Senior Coroner's investigation into the death. The Manor House Care Home is a residential care home for 48 residents. Care is provided twenty four hours a day in shifts. Between 7pm and 7am, there is a senior carer supported by three night carers on duty. The care team undertakes welfare observations of every resident throughout the night shift. The NICE guidelines do not provide a standard for the frequency of welfare checks, but determine that every care home should ensure regular monitoring of residents' wellbeing based on the individual needs of its residents. The Manor House Care Home operates a system of two hourly welfare observations. The Manor House Care Home notes the concerns of the Senior Coroner. The Home wants to reassure all reading this report that they have reviewed their policy as to the frequency and timeliness of welfare observations, and that steps have been taken to address the concern that observations were sometimes not carried out every two hours as the Home requires of itself. In order to provide clarity, night staff previously undertook welfare observations in pairs. Care staff operated in pairs since should personal care also be required most, if not all, residents require two members of staff for the safe provision of their personal care. Each pair previously undertook the welfare observations for half of the residents within the home. Each pair of care staff moved from one resident to the next, administering personal care as required as they progressed round the home. The delays identified by the Senior Coroner occurred when residents required extensive personal care or attention during the welfare observation, which would then delayed the carers as they progressed to the next resident. Following the Inquest, The Manor House Care Home has made the following changes: 1. Following the handover to the night staff at 7pm, each pair of care staff goes to their assigned areas. They undertake a walk around together whereby they check each resident. 2. Between 7pm and 9pm, those residents not already in their room are given the choice to be assisted to their rooms. 3. The two hourly welfare observations commence at 9pm and are undertaken thereafter at 11pm, 1am, 3am and 5am before the day staff commence their shift at 7am. 4. For the purpose of the two hourly welfare observations, the home is divided into four sections. Each staff member on duty is assigned a section for the duration of their shift. The home has a maximum capacity of 48 residents and so each staff member is assigned the duty of undertaking the welfare observations for a maximum of 12 residents. 5. Each staff member on duty is required to undertake a visual observation of each of their 12 residents at least every two hours. The individual members of care staff then re-join their partner upon completion of their respective observations to attend those residents requiring personal care in a priority order. 6. This approach ensures that welfare checks are undertaken at least every two hours without the prospect of the observations being delayed by the provision of personal care. 7. Welfare checks are recorded electronically via a handheld device onto the resident's social care record. The timeliness of the welfare observations undertaken the previous night is reviewed for five different residents daily by the Home Manager. This random, daily auditing process ensures that the timeliness of the welfare observations is monitored daily, which further ensures compliance. In conclusion, The Manor House Care Home wants to reassure all reading this report that the above actions are confirmed as embedded into practice as of the date of this response. 7. THIS RESPONSE HAS BEEN PREPARED BY , Solicitor, DWF Law LLP on behalf of The Manor Care Home. 8. DATE OF RESPONSE 10 January 2025
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.