Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0218, written 24 Apr 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 24 Apr 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0218 |
| Deceased | Olayemi Kehinde |
| Coroner | Graeme Irvine |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Road (Highways Safety) related deaths |
| Organisation named | North East London NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MR G IRVINE SENIOR CORONER EAST LONDON Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. , North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT), CEME Centre, March Way, Rainham, Essex, RM13 8GQ Email: 1 CORONER I am Graeme Irvine, senior coroner, for the coroner area of East London 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 27th October 2023, this court commenced an investigation into the death of Olayemi Oluwarotimi Kodjo Kehinde aged 34 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 23rd April 2024. The court returned a short form conclusion of “Road Traffic Collision”; Mr Kehinde’s medical cause of death was determined as; 1.a. Haemothorax 1.b. Blunt Force Trauma (Road Traffic Collision) 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 1 Olayemi Oluwarotimi Kodjo Kehinde was a 34-year-old man with a history of schizophrenic illness. Mr Kehinde walked into fast-moving traffic on a busy dual carriageway on 26th October 2023. Mr Kehinde was struck by a van and later that day died from his injuries. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. In July 2011, Mr Kehinde was an inpatient subject to an order under S.3 Mental Health Act 1983. On 2nd July 2011, Mr Kehinde was granted escorted S.17 leave to return home to collect belongings. Mr Kehinde left the ward in the company of a mental health nurse and they both travelled to a tattoo parlour. Mr Kehinde’s face was tattooed with a large permanent tattoo. No action was taken by the nurse to prevent this act occurring. The incident was not investigated as a serious incident by the Trust. Whereas the court does not suggest that a facial tattoo constitutes a factor that would likely cause a future death, concerns arise regarding; • The ability of staff authorised to supervise S.17 leave at identifying serious incidents that require meaningful intervention. • The ability of the Trust to identify matters that require a full governance investigation. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 19th June 2024 I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following; the family of Mr Kehinde. I have also sent it to local Director of Public Health who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 2 9 [DATE] 24 April 2024 [SIGNED BY CORONER] 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Paul Calaminus
Chief Executive Officer
Trust Head Office
West Wing
CEME Centre
Rainham
Essex
RM13 8GQ
14th June 2024
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Mr G Irvine
HM Coroner
East London Coroners Service
124 Queens Road
Walthamstow
London
E17 8QP
By email only to:
Your ref: 20364757
Trust ref: 1425
Dear Sir,
Re: Inquest touching upon the death of Olayemi Oluwarotimi Kodjo Kehinde
I refer to your Regulation 28 report, dated 24 April 2024, detailing your concerns about the risk
of future deaths in light of the findings of this Inquest.
I should like to extend my sincere condolences to the family of Mr Olayemi Kehinde. This must
have been an extremely difficult time and I hope that my response provides them, and you, with
assurances that the North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT) is taking action to
address the issues set out in your report.
I note that your concerns relate to:
1.
2.
The ability of staff authorised to supervise S.17 leave at identifying serious
incidents that require meaningful intervention.
The ability of the Trust to identify matters that require a full governance
investigation.
NELFT acknowledges your concerns and wishes to advise that prior to, and post, the sad
passing of Mr Olayemi Kehinde, has implemented a number of changes, which are set out
below:
Chair:
Chief Executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
The ability of staff authorised to supervise S.17 leave at identifying serious incidents
that require meaningful intervention.
1. To ensure that staff who escort a patient on supervised leave under section 17 of the
Mental Health Act 1983 (‘s. 17 leave’), are able to do so safely and are able to identify
serious incidents that require meaningful intervention, and to provide appropriate and
timely intervention, new guidance for leave from inpatient wards for mental health
patients has been prepared. This guidance (attached) sets out in detail the process to
be undertaken before, during, and after escorting a patient on s. 17 leave, and also
covers actions to be taken if the patient intends what may be an ill-advised or reckless
decision, and/or absconds or attempts to do so. The first page of this guidance contains
on a single page an ‘At a glance guidance for escorted leave for mental health patients’
as a flowchart, to enable effective learning for staff involved in s. 17 leave, and as an
aide memoire for the nurse-in-charge to print and hand to the escort to take with them
whilst on escorting duty. Please also find attached the relevant policies referred to in
the guidance, namely the Mental Health Act Overarching Policy, Clinical Risk
Assessment and Management Policy, and Absent Without Leave (AWOL) including
Missing Patients Policy, as well as the electronic pre section17 leave of absence risk
assessment form for patients who are on section 17 leave.
2. This guidance will go live across the Trust in June 2024 and will be communicated to all
staff via the Trust electronic weekly newsletter and a copy of this guidance will be
placed on the Trust’s intranet. It will also feature in regular Mental Health Act (MHA)
introductory and refresher training, and through wider learning at Trust-wide Learning &
Development events. This guidance will also be circulated to the Integrated Care
Directors, Directors of Nursing, Associate Directors of Nursing, the Directors, the
Associate Medical Directors, and the matrons, some of whom were involved in the
preparation of the guidance and disseminated through managers’ and matrons huddles,
as well as in staff supervision. Electronic dip-sample audits will be performed on a two-
monthly basis, against the guidance, and the outcome of the audit will be reviewed by
the relevant directorates to support any required improvements in this area.
The ability of the Trust to identify matters that require a full governance investigation.
The Trust takes the identification of incidents and the importance of learning very
seriously, and has a number of processes in place to support this. A number of these
are new, and I have set these out below:
1. The Trust holds a weekly Incident Review Group (IRG) to review incidents that have
occurred across the organisation. The Associate Directors of Nursing (ADoNs) for each
directorate attend that meeting to provide oversight on their own incidents. This
ensures that incidents are seen centrally before being disseminated across their
relevant directorates for local management processes.
2. Each directorate holds a regular incident review meeting, at which incidents requiring
further oversight (such as unexpected harms) are reviewed.
3. In 2023 the reporting and management of investigations changed with the
implementation of the nationally mandated Patient Safety Incident Response
Framework (PSIRF). PSIRF supports the development of an effective patient safety
incident response system, that prioritises compassionate engagement and involvement
of those affected by patient safety incidents (including patients, families and staff), and
Chair:
Chief Executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
enables the organisation to respond to incidents and safety issues in a way that
maximises learning and improvement.
4. With the implementation of PSIRF, the Trust initiated a weekly Patient Safety Incident
Group (PSIG) forum chaired by the Executive Chief Nursing Officer to oversee incidents
that have met the threshold for a PSIRF learning response. There are several learning
responses to incidents. Decisions about the type of investigation to undertake are
decided at the weekly PSIG forum, and a learning response is decided, based on the
local PSIRF plan, national PSIRF recommendations via NHS England (NHSE), and
following presentations from clinical staff who share immediate learning outcomes.
5. In 2024, the Trust transitioned from one incident reporting and management system
(Datix), to another (InPhase). This is, in part, to satisfy the NHSE requirement for
LFPSE (Learning From Patient Safety Events).
6. Once the Trust is made aware of an incident that is historic, it reviews the historic
incident utilising the current process in place, which consists of reporting it as an
incident on InPhase, discussion of the incident at the IRG meeting, and following further
directorate oversight, and where deemed necessary, preparation of a 72-hour report for
presentation at the PSIG forum. This provides a robust decision-making mechanism,
ensuring that the investigation of an historic incident is treated with the same care and
attention as all incidents.
If I can be of any further assistance or if you would like a further update on the progress made
to address your concerns, I would be happy to provide a further update.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive Officer
Chair: Eileen Taylor
Chief Executive: Paul Calaminus
www.nelft.nhs.uk
Chair: Eileen Taylor
Chief Executive: Paul Calaminus
www.nelft.nhs.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching North East London NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.