Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0378, written 17 Jul 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 17 Jul 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0378 |
| Deceased | Lorraine Procter |
| Coroner | Alison Mutch |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Other related deaths |
| Organisation named | Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1) The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 1 CORONER I am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 27th December 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lorraine Julia PROCTER. The investigation concluded on the 25th June 2024 and the conclusion was one of natural causes. The medical cause of death was 1a) Acute myocardial ischaemia 1b) Coronary artery atheroma 1c) Ischaemic cardiomyopathy II, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sleep apnoea. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Lorraine Julia Proctor had a history of cardiac health issues. She was discharged from hospital on 2nd March 2023 with an indication she should have a cardiology follow up appointment 3 months later. The appointment should have been in June 2023.It did not take place as the waiting list for routine cardiology appointments was 48 weeks. The inquest was told it was unlikely the appointment had it taken place would have changed the treatment she was on. On 22nd December 2023, Lorraine Julia Proctor as found unresponsive in bed at her home address . A post-mortem established that the direct cause of her death was 1a) Acute myocardial ischaemia 1b) Coronary artery atheroma 1c) Ischaemic cardiomyopathy. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 1 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – The inquest was told that there are significant backlogs for cardiology appointments not just in Greater Manchester but nationally. The reasons the inquest was told were multi factorial and included demand, resources available, covid backlogs and the impact of strike action. As a consequence patients referred for first cardiology appointments from primary care are often waiting in excess of 40 weeks for a first specialist appointment and existing cardiology patients are also waiting similar periods of time for follow up appointments. In Ms Proctor’s case the inquest was told that it was unlikely that there would have been a change to the treatment she was on even if she had been seen. However it was clear that this would not always be the case and patients requiring specialist input were not receiving it within the timescales that reduced the risk of complications and death. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 11th September 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely Stepping Hill Hospital, who may find it useful or of interest. on behalf of the family, I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 2 9 Alison Mutch HM Senior Coroner 17/07/2024 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Our ref: HM Coroner Alison Mutch Coroner’s Court 1 Mount Tabor Street Stockport SK1 3AG Dear Alison, From Minister Karin Smyth MP Minister of State for Health 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 11 September 2024 Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 17 July sent to the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of Ms Lorraine Julia Procter. I am replying as the Minister of State for Health with responsibility for elective care. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Ms Procter’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises concerns around the significant backlogs for elective cardiology appointments – both at the area in question (Greater Manchester) and nationally. The inquest was told reasons for this backlog included demand, resources available, covid backlogs and the impact of strike action. I want to assure you that tackling waiting lists is a top priority for this government, as we work to get the NHS back on its feet. We have committed to achieving the NHS Constitutional standard that 92% of patients should wait no longer than 18 weeks from Referral to Treatment (RTT), by the end of this parliament. This government will also change the NHS so that it becomes not just a sickness service, but able to prevent ill health in the first place. A focus will be on ensuring fewer lives are lost to the biggest killers and reducing deaths from heart disease and stroke by a quarter within ten years. The report raised the specific concern that patients referred for first cardiology appointments from primary care were often waiting in excess of 40 weeks for a first specialist appointment, and in particular, as in this case, that existing cardiology patients are also experiencing unacceptably long waits for follow up appointments. We recognise that it is unacceptable that some patients are waiting over 40 weeks for cardiology first appointments and too long for post treatment follow ups. NHS England (NHSE) is taking forward a programme of work to transform outpatient services, to ensure that patients can be seen more quickly and give patients more choice and flexibility about their treatment. The NHS and Department are also providing additional regional and national support and scrutiny to the most challenged trusts with the largest backlogs, including Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, and continue to work towards the target in NHSE’s 24/25 planning guidance to eliminate waits of over 65 weeks by September 2024. In preparing this response, Departmental officials made enquiries with NHSE in order to attain a more detailed response at local level, and both NHSE and Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (ICB) provided the below responses: NHSE’s Cardiac Transformation Programme aims to improve heart health and healthcare outcomes by utilising a whole pathway approach to transformation, working jointly across directorates to drive improvement in an integrated way. To support the work at a local level, 15 cardiac networks were established across England in 2021 with the following aims in relation to heart health/cardiac care: - Overall, reduced CVD mortality - Improved focus on preventative and proactive care, particularly through better management of blood pressure in general practice - Better quality and safety of care across the pathway - Restored services and reduced waits, particularly for cardiology and cardiac surgery in trusts - Better experiences of care across the pathway - More equitable access, particularly for specialised care - More sustainable costs Cardiovascular disease or CVD is a general term for conditions affecting the heart or blood vessels and includes angina, heart attacks, strokes, and heart failure. CVD has been identified as the single biggest area where our NHS can save lives over the next 10 years. Not only does it contribute to the gap in life expectancy between the rich and poor, it is also the leading cause of premature death and health inequalities across Greater Manchester (GM) where heart and circulatory diseases will kill more than 1 in 4 people. NHS Greater Manchester (GM) ICB has a CVD prevention plan which can be found at Greater-Manchester-Recovery-and-Prevention-Plan_final.pdf (england.nhs.uk) and is based on the National CVD Prevention Recovery Plan 2022 with a view to empowering clinicians, non-clinical partners, patients, and communities to work together to prevent CVD by providing alignment and co-ordination across different parts of the system. Positive progress is being made on waiting times to access cardiac services and related diagnostic tests. However positive progress in relation to early detection and timely referral of patients at risk of CVD has increased demand on tertiary specialist referrals and related diagnostic tests. Progression of the NHS GM CVD Prevention Plan remains a key priority for NHS GM. Greater Manchester holds the largest proportion of cardiac waits across England and have significant challenge with Priority 2 (high priority but not emergency – can safely wait up to 4 weeks) categorised patients. Manchester Foundation Trust cardiology serves approximately 3.3 million people across GM over 5 sites providing level 1-4 cardiology care. There has been some success in transferring Elective cardiology procedures from Manchester Royal to Wythenshawe to reduce wait times, but there has been limited wider success in agreeing transfers (known as mutual aid) elsewhere. Learning from incidents has identified the need to improve process for intake of referrals to ensure patients are not lost to follow-up and ensure that communication after clinic appointments is robust so all clinical teams are aware of management plans. Patients should be better informed of the symptoms of heart valve disease and know their options should they experience these symptoms, including informing the cardiac nurse specialist, a hospital ED admission, or use of a helpline. Local plans to prevent such incidents are in place, including reviews of waiting lists, reprioritisation of long waits, and ongoing escalation of deterioration for clinical review and/or incident reporting. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely, KARIN SMYTH MP
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.