Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Liliwen Thomas

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0352, written 8 Jul 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report8 Jul 2025
Reference2025-0352
DeceasedLiliwen Thomas
CoronerRachel Knight
Coroner areaSouth Wales Central
CategoryChild Death (from 2015) · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Wales prevention of future deaths reports (2019 onwards)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

GRAEME HUGHES 

HIS MAJESTY’S 
SENIOR CORONER 

SOUTH WALES CENTRAL  
CORONER AREA  

CORONER’S OFFICE 

THE OLD COURTHOUSE 

COURTHOUSE STREET 

PONTYPRIDD 
CF37 1JW 

Telephone: 01443 281100 

Email: 

ANNEX A  

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

, Chief Executive of NICE  

1 

2 

3 

CORONER 

I am Rachel Knight H M Coroner, for the coroner area of South Wales Central. 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 20 October 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Liliwen Iris THOMAS . 
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 7th July 2025. The conclusion of 
the inquest was a narrative as follows: 

Box 3: 

Liliwen Thomas’s mother was admitted to the University Hospital of Wales for induction of labour on 8th 
October 2022 at 40+1 weeks. On 9th October she was given analgesia, Entonox and pethidine. Into the early 
hours of 10th October, Liliwen’s mother was not attended to, or subjected to physical checks/examinations, 
regularly enough for her progress to active labour to be recognised. At 02:14 staff attended and found that 
Liliwen had been delivered unattended. Liliwen was in a very poor condition. She died at 22:40 the same 
day. A postmortem examination concluded that she died due to asphyxia around the time of her birth 
exacerbated by the presence of congenital infection and abnormal perfusion of the placenta of which there 
were no clinical indications identified before birth. 

Box 4: 

Coroner’s Office, The Old Courthouse, Courthouse Street, Pontypridd, CF37 1JW 

Phone/Ffôn  (01443) 281100       Fax/Ffacs  (01443) 485862 

 
  
 Liliwen died from a hypoxic brain injury following an unattended delivery in hospital. This was contributed 
to by: 

a. Her mother not being attended to as frequently, or subject to as regular physical checks/examinations, as 
she should have been and her progress to active labour not being recognised; 

b. The effects of maternal pethidine administered during labour; 

c. Liliwen’s mother suffering an exaggerated pharmacological response to therapeutic doses of the drugs 
codeine and pethidine in combination with Entonox; 

d. The absence of resuscitation at birth; 

e. bacterial infection and malperfusion of the placenta. 

Liliwen’s cause of death was found to be: 

1a   Perinatal asphyxia 

1b   congenital bacterial infection and maternal vascular malperfusion of the placenta 

1c    

 II     

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

The Inquest focused upon:- 

4 

5 

a. The learning from Liliwen’s death, surrounding maternal analgesia during induction 

and labour; and 

b. Supervision of mothers being induced and/or labouring under analgesia 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  

(1)   Liliwen’s mother was given unlimited Entonox, as well as routine doses of pethidine 
and codeine. The result was that she effectively became comatose for a period of time, 
during which she delivered Liliwen; 

(2) Cardiff & Vale Health Board have taken significant steps to significantly restrict the use 
of analgesia during induction and labour, including reductions of prescribed doses, 
allowing only limited access to analgesia on the wards and increased levels of supervision 
of mothers under analgesia;  

Coroner’s Office, The Old Courthouse, Courthouse Street, Pontypridd, CF37 1JW 

Phone/Ffôn  (01443) 281100       Fax/Ffacs  (01443) 485862 

 (3) They have seen an escalation in the numbers of women being transferred from the 
induction ward to the delivery suite as a consequence of reduced analgesia, which would 
otherwise have masked the transition to active labour; and 

(4) The current NICE guidelines on Induction of Labour and Intrapartum Care do not deal 
explicitly with analgesia levels and supervision.  

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

6 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your 
organisation have the power to take such action. 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 3rd September 2025.  I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

7 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to family as well as 
Wales, who may find it useful or of interest, especially in terms of the learning and 
implications around analgesia use and supervision in induction and labour, and who may 
wish to consider wider dissemination across other Health Boards within Wales.  

, Chief Executive of NHS 

8 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, 
about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

 8 July 2025  

9 

SIGNED: 

Rachel Knight H M Coroner for South Wales Central Coroner Area  

Coroner’s Office, The Old Courthouse, Courthouse Street, Pontypridd, CF37 1JW 

Phone/Ffôn  (01443) 281100       Fax/Ffacs  (01443) 485862

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Nice (PDF)
NIC E National Institute for 3rd floor
Health and Care Excellence 3 Piccadilly Place
Manchester

M1 3BN

United Kingdom

+44 (0)300 323 0140
01 September 2025

Ms Rachel Knight
HM Area Coroner
Coroner's Office

The Old Court House
Courthouse Street
Pontypridd

CF37 1JW

Sent via email: southwalescentralcoroners@rctcbc.gov.uk
Our reference: EH-343005-J6D1RO

Dear Ms Knight
Re: Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Liliwen Iris Thomas)

| write in response to your regulation 28 report dated 8 July 2025 regarding the very sad death of Liliwen
Iris Thomas. | would like to express my sincere condolences to Liliwen’s family.

| have asked the patient safety leads at NICE to carefully consider the content of your report with respect
to the areas for which NICE is responsible, and with specific regard to the NICE guidelines on induction
of labour and intrapartum care.

| can confirm that we will consider updating the recommendations in our guidelines on inducing labour
(NG207) and intrapartum care (NG235) as a result of the issues raised in your report. This will include
the following specific considerations:

1. NG207 recommendation 1.5.4. What is the optimum frequency of clinical assessments (including
vaginal assessments) in women before active labour, and where women require increasing levels
of pain relief during labour?

2. NG235 recommendation 1.6. We will consider updating the pain relief section to discuss the use
of combination therapies and at what point further monitoring is required.

3. NG207 recommendation 1.5.6-8 in We will also consider if these recommendations need
updating.

Given that some of the matters of concern relate to policies and practices within Cardiff and Vale
University Health Board, these are not areas that we can comment on, but | understand that you have
also shared your report with the Health Board.

Once we have concluded our review and decided on any updates needed to our guidance, we will write
to you once more with the outcome.

| hope that the information above is helpful and would like to reiterate my sincere condolences to
Liliwen’s family.

Yours sincerely,

NICE nice.org.uk | nice@nice.org.uk

lef Executive

[Insert footer here] 2 of 2

Related reports

Other reports by Rachel Knight

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Child Death (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.