Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Andrew Horgan

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0163, written 8 Apr 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report8 Apr 2014
Reference2014-0163
DeceasedAndrew Horgan
CoronerDavid Ridley
Coroner areaWiltshire & Swindon
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Ms Nerissa Vaughan, Chief Executive, The Great Western Hospital,
Marlborough Road, Swindon SN1 6BB

CORONER

| am David Ridley, Senior Coroner for the Coroner area of Wiltshire and Swindon

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 17 September 2013 | commenced an investigation into the death of Andrew Michael
Horgan aged 46. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 08 April
2014. The conclusion of the Inquest was that Andrew had died from:-

1a) Acute cardiac failure
1b) Colchicine overdose

2) Coronary artery atherosclerosis, myocardial fibrosis, focal incomplete hepatic
cirrhosis.

| concluded that Andrew Horgan’s death was as a result of an accident — an unintended
consequence of a deliberate act.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Andrew had recently split up with his girlfriend and was admitted to the Great Western
Hospital in Swindon at 0018 on 14 September 2013 having over the previous 12 hour
period consumed a variety of drugs including Colchicine with alcohol (other drugs
included Clomethiazole and Dihydrocodeine). | found as a matter of fact that more likely
than not Andrew himself called the ambulance from his flat at Flat 1 Daniel Gooch
House, Rodbourne Road, Swindon.

Following admission his condition was monitored, he was given intravenous fluids and
whilst his Glasgow Coma Scale fluctuated the following day shortly after 1500 hours he

that he self-discharge from hospital (GCS normal at this stage). [i

spoke to him having appraised himself as regards the background to the
case and was satisfied that Andrew had full mental capacity and understood the
ramifications of his decision to leave hospital. He did not form the view that Andrew
posed a risk of further self-harm, Andrew having indicated the reason for him wanting to
leave was in respect of a meeting with his landlord.

Following self-discharge Andrew was dropped off at his mother’s home and she walked
him round to Andrew's flat and spent about an hour with him. They had further contact
on Sunday 15 September 2013 and Andrew was last known to be alive at 1715 that
evening.

Andrew's body was discovered at approximately 1600 hours on Monday 16 September

2013 lying on the floor of his bedroom fully clothed at his flat. His death was confirmed
by an attending paramedic at 1655 the same day. The examination after death revealed
that Andrew had a compromised cardiovascular system reducing cardiac reserve as well
as reduced hepatic reserve both of which contributed to his death as a result of acute
cardiac failure which was attributable to the Colchicine overdose. The evidence that |
had before me was that Colchicine remains in the body for some time and it can take a
number of weeks to fully recover from an overdose. There is also no antidote as such to
the drug.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the Inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my duty to report these concerns to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

1, Training for Doctors and other medical staff in relation to referring patients for
assessment both within the hospital and externally following discharge. — During
the course of the Inquest —_ fae evidence and it was quite clear
that he did not have a clear understanding of the referral procedure to involve
professionals from the Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership. He
believed his telephone conversation with the Swindon Intensive Services with
CPN «oc result in the outreach team assessing Andrew in
the community. He thought that a telephone call alone would be sufficient in
that respect to engage the Mental Healthcare professionals.

The importance of a clear and effective communication pathway following
recognised and agreed practices and procedures cannot be ignored and | am
concerned following the evidence | heard there were knowledge gaps as regards
practice and procedures to be followed when engaging Mental Health
Partnership personnel.

| would be grateful if you could please review the appropriateness and the
effectiveness of training in this respect not only for current GWH personnel but
also how effective training in this area can be given to personnel in the future.
Whilst | was satisfied that this did not contribute to Andrew’s death in this
instance my concern is that an issue could arise in the future whereby that may
not be the case.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your
organisation have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 03 June 2014. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:-

Mr Simon Stevens, Chief Executive, NHS England,

Mr lain Tulley, Chief Executive Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust.
| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both ina complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

StS

08 April 2014 HM Senior Coroner

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Great Western Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
Great Western Hospitals INHS|

NHS Foundation Trust

The Great Western Hospital
Marlborough Road
Swindon

SN3 6BB

= Tel: 01793 60 40 20

8" May 2014

Private and confidential

Mr David W G Ridley

Senior Coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon
Wiltshire and Swindon Coroner's Court
26 Endless Street

Salisbury

Wiltshire

SP11DP

Dear Mr Ridley

Re: Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths
Andrew Michael Horgan (deceased)

Thank you for your letter of 10" April 2014 summarising the circumstances that led to the
sad and untimely death of Mr Horgan. This letter sets out the Trust’s response to your
report.

Your letter raised concerns about this case, around the lack of understanding by medical
staff about the procedure to engage our mental health provider, the Avon and Wiltshire
Mental Health Partnership (AWP). Regulation 28 was issued because during the Inquest

id not provide a clear understanding of the referral procedure needed to
initiate an assessment by the community outreach team following Mr Horgan’s self-
discharge from hospital. You requested that the Trust should review the appropriateness
and effectiveness of training currently provided to all staff.

The Deputy Chief Nurse who leads on compliance with the Mental Health Act for the Trust,
has reviewed Mr Horgan's case with regards to the referral process and current training

Our Values
Service Teamwork Ambition

provision. The review of the referral process and actions arising from this was carried out
in collaboration with AWP. The findings, recommendations and actions are listed as
follows:

Referral to mental health services

The review of the Trust’s referral process to mental health services showed that there is a
clear referral process in place for patients in the Emergency Department or those admitted
into Great Western Hospital (GWH). During 2013/14 staff referred 911 patients to the
Adults of Working Age Psychiatry Liaison Service; 321 patients to the Adults of Later
Years Psychiatry Service and 94 patients to the out of hours intensive team.

In Mr Horgan’s case, there was a miscommunication as to whether the contact with the out
of hours intensive team was for advice or referral to mental health community services
upon Mr Horgan’s self discharge. The Trust and AWP both agreed that this area of
practice should be made clearer to all staff. The AWP documentation record has now
been updated to include a question making it clear that the telephone call from GWH staff
is either for referral, advice or both. In addition, the Trust is advised that community crisis
intervention as, in the case of Mr Horgan, is only accessible by the patient contacting the
out of hours General Practitioners’ service. The patients’ General Practitioner will normally
be informed about their admission or attendance to hospital through the Trust Patient
Electronic Discharge Summary system.

The Trust acknowledges that both staff and patients should be made aware of this and as
a result, the information will be included in the patients’ information leaflet that will be
available at the end of May 2014. In addition, this will be included in the Trust's Mental
Health Act training programme and the Trust's intranet site will be updated to reflect this
information.

Review of Mental Health Act Training

The Trust provides mandatory training to all clinical staff to support understanding of and
application of the Mental Health Act (MHA), the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and the
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

In September 2013, the Trust implemented face to face mandatory training as opposed to
training via our E-Learning programme. The change was implemented because the Trust
strongly acknowledges the value of face-to-face interactive learning, enabling staff to
explore issues and learn from case presentation.

A total of 82% of clinical staff had untaken Mental Health Act training and 94% MCA and
DoLS during 2013/14. In addition to mandatory training, four one day sessions were held
in the autumn of 2013 looking specifically at MCA and DoLS. A total of 91 clinical leaders
from across the organisation attended the training that was delivered in collaboration with
specialist leads for Wiltshire and Swindon local authorities, as well as the Trust's legal
advisors, Bevan Brittan.

Over the last two years the Trust has worked closely with AWP and commissioners to
improve the delivery of an effective psychiatric service at GWH. The number of Mental
Health Liaison nurses has increased from 2.6 wte nurses to 6.8 nurses, enabling bespoke

Our Values
Service Teamwork Ambition

training to take place on wards and departments. In addition, the Trust now has a
dedicated Consultant Physiatrist who was appointed by AWP and who commenced work
with GWH on 4" May 2014. This new position will enable staff, in particular our medical
teams, to have greater access to advice, support and training. The Trust is satisfied with
the provision and impact of MHA training and also that this is monitored on a regular basis
via the Trust’s internal governance arrangements.

In conclusion, | hope that this response provides you with assurance that the MHA referral
process to AWP and training provision at GWH are working effectively. However, the
case has presented gaps in the recording of information by clinical staff and advice given
to patients that may require support in the community following their discharge from
hospital. Actions have already taken place to address the two issues. If you require any
further information please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

Nerissa Vaughan
Chief Executive

Our Values
Service Teamwork Ambition

Related reports

Other reports by David Ridley

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.