Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Ralph Goslin

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0282, written 25 Jun 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report25 Jun 2014
Reference2014-0282
DeceasedRalph Goslin
CoronerMary Hassell
Coroner areaInner North London
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Ralph Stephen GOSLIN (died 21.06.14) 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

Corporate Medical Director 
University College London Hospitals NHS Trust 
University College Hospital 
2nd Floor Central 
250 Euston Road 
London  NW1 2PG 

1 

CORONER 

I am:   Coroner ME Hassell 
           Senior Coroner  
           Inner North London 
           St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
           Camley Street 
           London  N1C 4PP 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,  
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and  
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
regulations 28 and 29. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  27  January  2014  I  commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of 
Ralph  Stephen  Goslin,  aged  40.  The  investigation  concluded  at  the  end 
of the inquest on 18 June 2014.  The jury’s determination made at inquest 
was by way of a narrative, which I attach. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mr  Goslin  was  an  inpatient  at  St  Pancras  Hospital  on  Montagu  Ward, 
detained  under  Section  3  of  the  Mental  Health  Act.    He  suffered  with 
schizophrenia and also epilepsy. 

He was found unresponsive in the bath on 21 June 2014, and died later 
that day in University College Hospital. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The jury recorded his medical cause of death as: 

1a 
1b 

seizure related death (seizure alone or with drowning) in epilepsy 
grade IV glioblastoma 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During  the  course  of  the  inquest,  the  evidence  revealed  matters  giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances,  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTER OF CONCERN for UCLH is as follows.  

1.  The  junior  doctor  at  St  Pancras  Hospital  who  first  reviewed  the 
UCH blood test result giving Mr Goslin’s sodium valproate level as 
less than 3, did not realise that this was sub therapeutic, because 
the  reference  range  was  given  as  less  than  100,  rather  than  50-
100 as  it  is in  some  other hospitals.   This  meant that  Mr Goslin’s 
failure to take his anti epilepsy medication was not recognised as 
quickly as it could have been. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion,  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe  that  you  and  your  organisation  have  the  power  to  take  such 
action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 22 August 2014.  I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be 
taken,  setting  out  the  timetable  for  action.  Otherwise  you  must  explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

  HHJ Peter Thornton QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales 
 

 father of Ralph Goslin 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  the  Chief  Coroner  a  copy  of  your 
response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he  believes  may 
interest.  You  may  make 
representations to me, the Senior Coroner, at the time of your response, 
about  the  release  or  the  publication  of  your  response  by  the  Chief 
Coroner. 

it  useful  or  of 

find 

9 

DATE                                                   SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER 

25.06.14 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Respondent Not Named (PDF)
Camden and Islington INHS|

NHS Foundation Trust

Chief Executive Office

Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust
St Pancras Hospital

4 St Pancras Way

London NW1 OPE

Tel: 020 3317 3224

chief.executive@candi.nhs.uk

www.candi.nhs.uk

Coroner ME Hassell

Senior Coroner

Inner North London

St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street

London N1C 4PP

19" August 2104

Dear Coroner Hassell,
Re: Mr Ralph Goslin (died 21.01.14)

| write further to your report on the above dated 25" June 2014.

In this report you state that “during the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters
giving rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.” You outlined your
concerns in three areas:

e Trust and ward epilepsy management
e Risks associated with bathing
e Trust action in the light of coroner’s PFD report

| will address each area individually.
1. Trust and ward epilepsy management

Understanding the holistic care of patients and integrating their psychological and physical
care needs, is fundamental to good nursing practice and provision of effective personal care
and treatment. It is accepted that insufficient consideration was given to Mr Goslin’s physical
care needs, in particular educating and supporting Mr Goslin in the implications of living with
Epilepsy and the impact this would have on his life.

Chair: Leisha Fullick Your partner in CRI
Chief Executive: Wendy Wallace care & improvement

23 C&l is an NHS trust providing treatment and social care for mental ill-health and
S2¢ Camden # ISLINGTON Substance in adune inisa i pariesihip ‘ait Canidenvand Islington councils.

INHS

Specialist training and advice has been commissioned from the National Neurological
Commissioning Support Unit, working in conjunction with the National Epilepsy Society to
undertake a programme of training across all our inpatient and residential services. This will
draw on national best practice and address matters including:

e General epilepsy awareness

e Assessment of risk

e Emergency care and treatment

e Living with epilepsy

The programme will be led by a Specialist Consultant Nurse in Epilepsy and will roll out
across the Trust during September and October. 2014. In support of the programme the
Trust has taken a range of immediate steps to ensure management of people at risk of
epilepsy are effectively managed in the interim. These actions include:

e Issuing of a Trust wide Patient Safety Alert, ensuring all people with epilepsy
or at risk of seizures have their care plans immediately reviewed to identify
specific risks and ensure action plans are put in place to mitigate these risks
(appendix 1).

e Review of all care plans on Montague Ward to ensure these are reviewed on
a weekly basis and are reflective of individual need.

e Programmes of audits on Montague Ward to ensure the above arrangements
are in place.

e Changes to the staffing arrangements on Montague to increase the
leadership capacity in the services.

2. Risks associated with bathing

The Trust has issued a second Patient Safety Alert (appendix 2) ensuring all in-patient
services and community houses have protocols in place for the use of bathroom and shower
rooms. These protocols ensure:

e Access to communal bathroom and shower rooms are managed
e Levels of supervision for patients are considered
e Patients at risk of seizure have these needs considered.

In addition to the training programme, a well-being resource pack to support people living with
epilepsy is being developed. This will be implemented across all in-patient areas and enable
staff to engage with patients, families and carer's to raise their awareness and knowledge of
the risks people with epilepsy face, and provide practical steps to take on a day to day basis.
This will also ensure staff have the particular issues of risks associated with bathing for
people with epilepsy in their minds.

Currently the Trust provides services over a number of sites, from a range of different
building, of which a small number are purpose built but many have been adapted from a
previous use or inherited following organisational change. The Trust has therefore
commissioned an independent review of all bathrooms and shower rooms to determine their

N

GQ, ee

NHS}

suitability for the current patient group and how they meet the needs of patients and disability
requirements. This review alongside a review of environmental ligature risks (already
completed) will inform decisions about the type of bathroom / shower rooms required for each
particular service. This review is due to complete at the end of August 2014. As indicated in
court, the Trust has already made the decision to convert communal bathroom/shower rooms
in the Huntley Centre at St Pancras Hospital to wet rooms and the programme of work has
already commenced. This programme will conclude in September 2014.

3. Trust action in the light of coroner’s PFD report

Following the PFD report received on 23 October 2013 the Trust has initiated a range of
actions as indicated in the response of December 18" 2013. These include:

e A programme of works within the acute inpatient service at the Huntley Centre
St Pancras Hospital to introduce wet rooms where there were previously
bathrooms or shower rooms. These works are due to be completed by
September 2014.

e A review of the observation policy, issuing new observation sheets on 19th
December 2013, which provide greater detail about patient’s location on the
ward and a clear rational for enhanced observations, leading to greater
interaction with the patient and more frequent reviews.

The Trust also shared with staff the findings of the inquest touching the death of Mr JL.
However following the inquest touching the death of Mr RG and the evidence of the Ward
Manager on Montague ward that he had not been aware of the inquest findings, the Trust has
reviewed the case and how the learning was disseminated.

All ward managers have a professional supervision group with the Deputy Director of Nursing.
It was at this meeting that the inquest findings were shared with staff. Unfortunately we now
know that the Ward Manager on Montague ward was not able to attend the meeting on that
occasion and as a consequence was unaware of the JL inquest findings.

This was a shortfall in our governance arrangements. The process has now been changed so
that when recommendations and findings from investigations, complaints or Coroner’s PFD
are to be shared with a group; they are always followed up with all members of the group after
the meeting and communicated in writing.

As with all serious untoward incidents in the Trust, our policy requires an_ internal
investigation. One of the findings from the Internal Investigation, shared prior to the inquest
was that the identified ligature risks in the bathroom on Montague Ward were of a level that
meant the room should not be used until these issues had been addressed. It was upon this
basis that the bathroom was temporarily closed. The timing of the closure was governed by
the completion of the internal investigation report and was not done in preparation for the
inquest. These ligature risks are programmed to be addressed in September 2014.

| hope that this response addresses the concerns set out in your Prevention of Future Death
Report. As acknowledged the Trust services did not identify the enhanced risks associated

KN

le  —

NHS)

with Mr Goslin’s epilepsy and bathing and put in place additional observations. This was a
shortfall in the care provided to Mr Goslin. | can give assurance that we take the learning from
this case and your concerns very seriously. As set out above in our response, the Trust has
taken and is taking significant actions to address these concerns and is committed to improve
the care and safety of all our service users.

Yours sincerely,

luab=

Wendy Wallace
Chief Executive

Related reports

Other reports by Mary Hassell

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track University College London Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.