Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Michael Warren

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0330, written 17 Jul 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report17 Jul 2014
Reference2014-0330
DeceasedMichael Warren
CoronerPeter Bedford
Coroner areaBerkshire
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Bracknell Forest Borough Council 
2.  Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation 
3. 
CORONER 

1 

I am Peter J. Bedford, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of Berkshire. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 9th October 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Michael Arthur 
Warren. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 10th July 2014. The 
conclusion of the inquest was a narrative as attached. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Michael Arthur Warren died from serious head injuries suffered when the car he was 
driving was struck on its roof by the large branch of a mature oak tree that unexpectedly 
fell without warning as he drove beneath it on 5th October 2012. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1) The evidence at the Inquest revealed that Bracknell Forest Borough Council employ 
Highways Inspectors to carry out driven and walked inspections in order to attempt to 
identify any potential hazards that might impact adversely on road users. 
(2) The Highway Inspectors were expected to identify a range of potential problems 
including potholes in the road, damaged or obscured signage and potential hazards 
from trees abutting the highway which were often of considerable height.  There was 
little by way of guidance given to Highways Inspectors who had developed their own 
system of drive-by investigations conducted at a speed rarely less than thirty miles per 
hour. 
(3) The evidence highlighted the limited nature of training provided to Highway 
Inspectors in identifying potential hazards from trees.  The two Inspectors who 
conducted a drive-by survey two days before the branch fell and killed Mr Warren and 
who had noted nothing of concern, had not completed any form of tree training since a 
two day course some seven years earlier.  Another Highway Inspector who gave 
evidence at the Inquest, had never attended a formal training course with regard to tree 
hazards. 
(4) There is therefore a need for appropriate guidelines to be provided by Bracknell 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Forest Council to Highway Inspectors to ensure that they are properly trained in tree 
issues; that they have an appropriate system of work that ensures that they drive at a 
speed appropriate to maximise the chances of identifying tree hazards and that there 
should be a series of inspections which are limited to only the inspection of trees. 
(5) The evidence also revealed that there was very little by way of clear, detailed 
guidance available to Local Authorities as regards the appropriate systems of highway 
inspection of trees abutting the highway.  There is a potential need for clear direction 
from a suitably qualified source to assist Local Authorities in this crucial role. 
(6) The owner of the land on which the relevant oak tree stood lived abroad and had no 
arrangements for professional review of the trees on his property, in particular those that 
were close to the highway and therefore a potential hazard to road users. It was of 
concern that the lack of active management of the owner’s land continued some two and 
a half years after Mr Warren’s death. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or 
your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by Friday 12th September 2014. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons - Bracknell Forest Borough Council, The Chartered Institution of Highways and 
Transportation and Mr 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

17th July 2014                                                         

Senior Coroner for Berkshire 

2

Related reports

Other reports by Peter Bedford

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.