Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014

Thomas Taylor

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0388, written 1 Sep 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report1 Sep 2014
Reference2014-0388
DeceasedThomas Taylor
CoronerMary Hassell
Coroner areaInner North London
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Thomas Charles TAYLOR (died 13.03.14) 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

Medical Director 
Royal Free London NHS Trust 
Royal Free Hospital 
Pond Street 
London  NW3 2QG 

1 

CORONER 

I am:   Coroner ME Hassell 
           Senior Coroner  
           Inner North London 
           St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
           Camley Street 
           London  N1C 4PP 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,  
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and  
The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, 
regulations 28 and 29. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  27  March  2014  I  commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of 
Thomas  Charles  Taylor,  aged  54  years.  The  investigation  concluded  at 
the  end  of  the  inquest  earlier  today.    I  made  a  narrative  determination, 
which I attach to this letter.   

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mr  Taylor  was  a  diabetic  who  died  in  the  Royal  Free  Hospital  after  a 
delay  in  the  administration of  insulin, following  the  loss  of medical  notes 
and drug chart. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During  the  course  of  the  inquest,  the  evidence  revealed  matters  giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances,  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The  MATTERS  OF  CONCERN  are  contained  within  the  narrative 
attached, but in brief -  

1.  The ward where Mr Taylor was being nursed  seemed rudderless, 

operating without clarity of leadership or support.   

On  21  February,  a  bank  nurse  worked  alone  in  the  morning, 
though  was  joined  by  another  agency  nurse  at  lunch  time,  with 
only a senior nurse in the office.   

On 22 February, the nurse in charge appeared unclear that he had 
any additional responsibility by virtue of being the nurse in charge, 
other than to allocate nurses to patients.   

Despite only three nurses being on duty on 22 February, the nurse 
in charge took a break at the same time as another nurse.   

There  was  a  conflict  of  views  among  the  nurses  that  day  about 
who had primary care of Mr Taylor.   

2.  There  was  no  protocol  for  the  loss  of  notes  and  drug  chart.  
Attempts  by  the  ward  staff  to  locate  these  were  not  prompt, 
focused or sustained.  The notes and chart were later found simply 
in a drawer on the ward. 

3.  When  Mr  Taylor  refused  to  have  his  blood  sugar  checked,  there 
seemed no well understood protocol for re-checking or escalation.  
Immediate provision was not made for the administration of insulin, 
and a doctor was even told that he was not diabetic.   

When Mr Taylor became significantly hyperglycaemic on the 22nd, 
after  the  administration  of  the  delayed  dose  of  insulin  his  nurses 
did not immediately re-check his blood sugar, perform neurological 
observations or alert medical staff. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion,  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe  that  you  and  your  organisation  have  the  power  to  take  such 
action.  

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of  this report, namely  by  3  November 2014.    I,  the  coroner, may  extend 
the period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be 
taken,  setting  out  the  timetable  for  action.  Otherwise  you  must  explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

  HHJ Peter Thornton QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales 
 
  Professor Dame Sally Davies, Chief Medical Officer for England 

, daughters of Thomas Taylor 

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  the  Chief  Coroner  a  copy  of  your 
response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he  believes  may 
interest.  You  may  make 
representations to me, the Senior Coroner, at the time of your response, 
about  the  release  or  the  publication  of  your  response  by  the  Chief 
Coroner. 

it  useful  or  of 

find 

9 

DATE                                                   SIGNED BY SENIOR CORONER 

01.09.14 

3

Related reports

Other reports by Mary Hassell

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.